Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

531 citation(s) found for "Qu, Vera".

Polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: 2021 update on diagnosis, risk‐stratification and management
Tefferi, Ayalew , Barbui, Tiziano

American Journal of Hematology | September 25, 2020 | Volume: 95 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1599-1613

10.1002/ajh.26008 | PMID 32974939 Get It

Abstract Disease overview Polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) are myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) respectively characterized by clonal erythrocytosis and thrombocytosis; other disease features include leukocytosis, splenomegaly, thrombosis, bleeding, microcirculatory symptoms, pruritus and risk of leukemic or fibrotic transformation. Diagnosis Bone marrow morphology remains the cornerstone of diagnosis. In addition, the presence of JAK2 mutation is expected in PV while approximately 90% of patients with ET express mutually exclusive JAK2 , CALR or MPL mutations (so called driver mutations). In ET, it is most important to exclude the possibility of prefibrotic myelofibrosis. Survival Median survivals are approximately 15 years for PV and 18 years for ET; the corresponding values for patients age 40 or younger were 37 and 35 years. Certain mutations (mostly spliceosome) and abnormal karyotype might compromise survival in PV and ET. Life‐expectancy in ET is inferior to the control population. Driver mutations have not been shown to affect survival in ET but risk of thrombosis is higher in JAK2 mutated cases. Leukemic transformation rates at 10 years are estimated at <1% for ET and 3% for PV. Thrombosis risk In PV, two risk categories are considered: high (age > 60 years or thrombosis history present) and low (absence of both risk factors). In ET, four risk categories are considered: very low (age ≤ 60 years, no thrombosis history, JAK2 wild‐type), low (same as very low but JAK2 mutation present), intermediate (age > 60 years, no thrombosis history, JAK2 wild‐type) and high (thrombosis history present or age > 60 years with JAK2 mutation). Risk‐adapted therapy The main goal of therapy in both PV and ET is to prevent thrombohemorrhagic complications. All patients with PV require phlebotomy to keep hematocrit below 45% and once‐daily or twice‐daily aspirin (81 mg), in the absence of contraindications. Very low risk ET might not require therapy while aspirin therapy is advised for low risk disease. Cytoreductive therapy is recommended for high‐risk ET and PV, but it is not mandatory for intermediate‐risk ET. First‐line drug of choice for cytoreductive therapy, in both ET and PV, is hydroxyurea and second‐line drugs of choice are interferon‐α and busulfan. We do not recommend treatment with ruxolutinib in PV, unless in the presence of severe and protracted pruritus or marked splenomegaly that is not responding to the aforementioned drugs. New treatment directions Controlled studies are needed to confirm the clinical outcome value of twice‐daily vs once‐daily aspirin dosing and the therapeutic role of pegylated interferons and direct oral anticoagulants.
Abstract 1928: Study of copy number amplification and chemo-response in triple negative breast cancer
Grainger, Jordan, Yu, Jia , Vedell, Peter T. , Wang, Liewei , Kalari, Krishna R. , Thompson, Kevin J. , Goetz, Matthew P. , Suman, Vera J. , Boughey, Judy C.

Cancer Research | September 4, 2020 | Volume: 80 | Issue: 16_Supplement | Pages: 1928-1928

10.1158/1538-7445.am2020-1928 Get It

Abstract Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 15-20% of breast cancer cases in the United States. With currently no targeted therapies for TNBC, identification of novel biomarkers to improve chemo-response is vital. Recently, copy number amplifications (CNAs) have been implicated in treatment response in several diseases including breast cancer. Our clinical studies have associated a 5 Mb CNA in TNBC patients with chemo-response, which may elucidate novel biomarkers and treatment strategies for TNBC. Analysis of RNAseq and Whole Exome Sequencing data from 42 TNBC patient tumors enrolled in the BEAUTY Study, identified a 5 Mb CNA on chromosome 8q which associated with pathological complete response following taxane and anthracycline chemotherapy. By performing siRNA knockdown cytotoxicity studies in TNBC cell lines for genes within this amplified region, we identified RDH10 as a potential novel biomarker for increasing chemo-sensitivity. RDH10 is the rate limiting step in the synthesis of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA). Previous studies have demonstrated ATRA to be a potent inhibitor of PIN1, a key regulator of several oncogenic signaling pathways, amplified in TNBC. We discovered overexpression of RDH10 to increase endogenous levels of ATRA, contributing to the degradation of PIN1 and taxane sensitivity. A rescue experiment with PIN1 was able to restore the chemo-resistance phenotype. Similarly, we found treating TNBC cells with ATRA phenocopied RDH10's effect on PIN1 and improved chemo-sensitivity. Furthermore, analyses of chemo-responsive PDX tumors containing the 5 Mb CNA, overexpressed RDH10 and exhibited lower levels of PIN1 when compared to non-responders. In conclusion, RDH10 amplification increases endogenous levels of ATRA and degrades PIN1 in TNBC. ATRA-mediated degradation of PIN1 sensitizes TNBC to chemotherapy, suggesting RDH10 as a novel biomarker for chemo-response and ATRA as a novel treatment to improve chemo-sensitivity. Citation Format: Jordan Mark Grainger, Jia Yu, Krishna R. Kalari, Peter Vedell, Kevin Thompson, Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Judy C. Boughey, Liewei Wang. Study of copy number amplification and chemo-response in triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 1928.
The Smith-Robinson Approach to the Subaxial Cervical Spine: A Stepwise Microsurgical Technique Using Volumetric Models From Anatomic Dissections
Vigo, Vera, Pastor-Escartín, Félix , Doniz-Gonzalez, Ayoze, Quilis-Quesada, Vicent , Capilla-Guasch, Pau , González-Darder, José M., Fernandez‐Miranda, Juan C. , Quilis-Quesada, Vicent , BONIS, Pasquale DE

Operative Neurosurgery | August 31, 2020 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 83-90

10.1093/ons/opaa265 | PMID 32864701 Get It

Abstract BACKGROUND The Smith-Robinson 1 approach (SRA) is the most widely used route to access the anterior cervical spine. Although several authors have described this approach, there is a lack of the stepwise anatomic description of this operative technique. With the advent of new technologies in neuroanatomy education, such as volumetric models (VMs), the understanding of the spatial relation of the different neurovascular structures can be simplified. OBJECTIVE To describe the anatomy of the SRA through the creation of VMs of anatomic dissections. METHODS A total of 4 postmortem heads and a cervical replica were used to perform and record the SRA approach to the C4-C5 level. The most relevant steps and anatomy of the SRA were recorded using photogrammetry to construct VM. RESULTS The SRA was divided into 6 major steps: positioning, incision of the skin, platysma, and muscle dissection with and without submandibular gland eversion and after microdiscectomy with cage positioning. Anatomic model of the cervical spine and anterior neck multilayer dissection was also integrated to improve the spatial relation of the different structures. CONCLUSION In this study, we review the different steps of the classic SRA and its variations to different cervical levels. The VMs presented allow clear visualization of the 360-degree anatomy of this approach. This new way of representing surgical anatomy can be valuable resources for education and surgical planning.
Progression-free and overall survival analysis in patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing first- versus second-line therapy
Allred, Jacob B., Suman, Vera J.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | August 25, 2020 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 9078-9078

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.9078 Get It

9078 Background: A frequently discussed topic at meetings of oncologists is the question of expected clinical outcomes for patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing 1st vs 2nd line systemic therapy. Differing outcomes in these two patient populations could affect interpretation of non-randomized clinical trials involving both patient populations. Some have suggested superior clinical outcome in patients undergoing 2nd line therapy. As there is little data addressing this issue, we sought to answer the question by comparing the clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma treated on 1st vs 2nd line therapy across clinical trials conducted at our institution. Methods: Data were collected from 10 phase II clinical trials for patients with stage IV melanoma for which Mayo Clinic was the data center. The 10 trials included three categories of treatments: cytotoxic chemotherapy (4), cancer vaccines (4), and biologic agents (2). In all studies, eligibility criteria required: stage IV melanoma, life expectancy >3 months, reasonable hematology and serum chemistry laboratory results, and an ECOG performance status of ≤2. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to assess the relationship between patients' “therapy” status (1st vs 2nd line) and time to events, both overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS), for each treatment category. Results: We identified 318 unique eligible patients across 10 trials. Removed from the analysis were 55 patients (ocular melanoma and/or metastases involving the central nervous system) leaving 263. Cox proportional hazards results demonstrated no differences in PFS or OS for 1st vs 2nd line patients for either “chemotherapy” or “vaccine” treatment regimens. However, patient treated on “biologic” trials as 1st line therapy appeared to demonstrate a PFS advantage over 2nd line treatments (HR=1.98, p-value=0.02). There was a suggestion of an OS benefit for 1st line patients in this category, however, the relationship was not significant (HR=1.77, p=0.07). Conclusions: The presented data suggest that there is no PFS/OS difference in stage IV melanoma patients receiving 1st vs 2nd line therapy (no PFS/OS advantage to patients treated in 2nd line vs. 1st line). No significant financial relationships to disclose.
A phase II trial of carboplatin (C) and nab-paclitaxel (ABI-007-nab-P) in patients with unresectable stage IV melanoma: Final data from N057E
Markovic, S. N. , Kottschade, Lisa A. , Amatruda, Thomas, Dakhil, Shaker R. , Nikcevich, Daniel A., Morton, Roscoe F., Fitch, Tom R., Jaslowski, Anthony J., Suman, Vera J. , McWilliams, Robert R.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | August 25, 2020 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 9055-9055

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.9055 Get It

9055 Background: There is increasing evidence that paclitaxel and carboplatin are clinically active in the treatment of metastatic melanoma (MM). Nab-P is an albumin-bound paclitaxel with ability to bind SPARC (secreted protein acid rich in cysteine), that is overexpressed in MM and associated with poor prognosis. This study explores the clinical activity of the combination of nab-P and C in patients (pts) with stage IV melanoma and SPARC correlatives. Methods: A parallel phase II trial was conducted in pts with unresectable stage IV melanoma, who were either chemotherapy naïve (CN) or were previously treated (PT). A treatment regimen consisting of nab-P (100 mg/m2) and C (AUC 2) was administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28 day cycle. The primary aim of this study was to assess whether tumor response rate (CR + PR by RECIST) was ≤15% vs ≥35% in the CN group and ≤5% vs ≥ 20% in the PT cohort. Major eligibility criteria: ≥18 years of age, ECOG PS ≤2, adequate organ function, platinum or taxane naive, peripheral neuropathy < grade 2, and no untreated brain metastasis; no pregnant and/or nursing women. Tumor tissue was tested for SPARC and level 3 immunohistochemical staining was considered positive. Results: 76 pts (41-CN and 35 PT) enrolled from 11/2006 - 7/2007, 3 pts (2-CN, 1-PT) cancelled prior to starting treatment. The median number of cycles administered was 4 (range 1–18-CN and 1–10-PT). There were 11 (28.2%) confirmed responses (1 CR and 10 PRs) in the CN cohort (90% CI: 16.7–42.3%) and 3 (8.8%) confirmed responses (3 PRs) in the PT cohort (90% CI: 2.5–21.3%). Median PFS was 4.5 months (CN) and 4.1 months (PT). Median OS was 11.1 months (CN) and 10.9 months (PT).The most common severe toxicities in both groups (CTCAE ≥ grade 3) included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, neuro-sensory, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting. PFS was not affected by SPARC positivity; however, based on limited data there is some evidence that OS may be longer with tumoral SPARC positivity (10.0 vs 12.8 mo; SPARC negative vs SPARC positive). Conclusions: The weekly combination of nab-P and C appears to be well tolerated with promising clinical activity as front line or salvage therapy in pts with MM. SPARC positivity may be associated with improved OS. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Possible therapeutic reversal of immune suppression in patients with metastatic melanoma by timed delivery of temozolomide chemotherapy: A pilot study
Ashdown, Martin, Robinson, Andrew , Kottschade, Lisa A. , Kaur, Judith S. , Creagan, Edward T. , Quevedo, Fernando , Suman, Vera J. , McWilliams, Robert R. , Markovic, Svetomir N.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | August 25, 2020 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: e20013-e20013

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.e20013 Get It

e20013 Background: Recent evidence suggests that patients with advanced cancer exhibit an underlying anti-tumor immune response that is continuously attenuated by regulatory T cells (Treg). Depletion of Treg using conventional chemotherapy may be feasible and clinically beneficial. C-reactive protein (CRP) is reported to rise/fall with initiation/termination of the immune response, and may be a surrogate for the periodicity of Treg proliferation that could be utilized for timing of anti-proliferative therapy. Timed delivery of chemotherapy therapy based on CRP cycling may deplete Treg and yield clinical benefit. Methods: We conducted a pilot clinical for 12 patients with metastatic melanoma who underwent serial CRP measurements (every 2–3 days) for 2 weeks. The CRP oscillation cycle was identified and chemotherapy with temozolomide (200mg/m2 for 5 days, every 28 days) was initiated at the estimated peak of plasma CRP. Patients were evaluated for clinical and immune response endpoints every 8 weeks until progression. Results: All 12 patients (median age 61; 4 female; 7 with M1c disease) exhibited oscillating CRP levels with an average periodicity of 7.8 days. Only 11 patients were treated (1 patient had rapid tumor progression). The two patients who remain progression-free for >2 years (1 PR, 1 CR), were treated in the pre-peak section of the CRP cycle, distinctly separate from the other patients treated post CRP-peak (all progressed <5 months). Presented are peripheral blood immunological laboratory correlates (cellular and cytokine) to CRP oscillation. Conclusions: These data suggest that patient clinical outcome may be dependent on the timing of therapy relative to an individual patient's immune response cycle and outline the dynamic equilibrium of systemic immune homeostasis in patients with advanced melanoma. Further investigations of these observations are under way. [Table: see text]
Phase II trial of pazopanib in progressive, metastatic, iodine-insensitive differentiated thyroid cancers
Bible, Keith C. , Smallridge, Robert C., Maples, William J., Molina, Julian R. , Menefee, Michael E., Burton, Jill K., Bieber, Carolyn, Erlichman, Charles , Suman, Vera J. , Ivy, S. Percy

Journal of Clinical Oncology | August 25, 2020 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 3521-3521

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.3521 Get It

3521 Background: Systemic therapies have had little impact on the outcomes of patients with advanced differentiated thyroid cancers. Methods: A three-outcome one-stage Phase II trial was conducted to assess the anti-tumor activity and toxicities of the orally bioavailable VEGF/tyrosine kinase inhibitor pazopanib (800 mg daily) in patients with advanced and progressive radioiodine-insensitive differentiated thyroid cancers. Up to 2 prior therapies were allowed, with measurable disease required. Design: at the 0.10 significance level, there would be a 90% chance of detecting a RECIST response rate of >20% given a true response rate of >5%; with the regimen considered promising if >4 confirmed responses observed. Results: From February to November 2008, 32 patients (53% male) aged 23–79 years (median: 63 years) were enrolled. Common sites of metastases were: lung (100%), nodes (52%), and bone (39%). Measurement data are available for 26 patients, with the median number of cycles administered thus far 4 (range: 1–8, total: 101). Overall, therapy has been well tolerated. Six patients (23%) required dose reduction due to: grade 2+ ALT (3 pts), grade 3 mucositis (1 pt); grade 3 diarrhea and dehydration (1 pt), and grade 3 abdominal pain (1 pt.). Other serious toxicities included grade 3 colon perforation and grade 3 chest pain (1 pt). No thyroglobulin antibody (TGA) negative patient has become TGA positive, and 11 of 16 patients (69%) with initially elevated thyroglobulin levels experienced a decline in thyroglobulin of >50%. Five RECIST partial responses have been confirmed to date (19%). Two patients are alive with disease progression and another has died from disease progression. Conclusions: Pazopanib appears to have both a favorable toxicity profile and promising clinical activity in patients with advanced and progressive differentiated thyroid cancers. Supported in part by NCI CA15083 and CM62205. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and gene expression markers for prediction of invasive recurrence
McKean, Heidi, Grant, Clive S., Erlander, MG, Ma, Xiao , Reynolds, C., Hoskin, Tanya L. , Suman, Vera J. , Ma, X., Ingle, James N. , Goetz, Matthew P.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | August 25, 2020 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 550-550

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.550 Get It

550 Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a heterogeneous group of non-invasive cancers with varying propensity for recurrence. There are no validated markers that identify patients at risk for invasive recurrence following lumpectomy. HOXB13/IL17BR (H/I) is expressed in both DCIS and invasive cancer (Ma Cancer Cell. 2004) and associated with recurrence in stage I cancer. A 5-gene molecular grade index (MGI) distinguishes outcome in grade II disease (Ma Clin Cancer Res. 2008). We sought to determine whether H/I or MGI was associated with invasive recurrence in resected DCIS. Methods: We identified patients at Mayo Rochester who underwent lumpectomy ± radiation for DCIS between 1988 and 2001 and performed a nested case/control study. Cases were patients with ipsilateral invasive recurrence, matched to controls based on age, surgery date, length of follow-up, and adjuvant radiation. DCIS was macrodissected from paraffin sections and RNA extracted to obtain H/I and MGI RT-PCR profiles. The association of H/I and MGI with case-control status was assessed with conditional logistic regression; results reported are odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The association of H/I and MGI as continuous variables with nuclear grade (low, intermediate, high) was estimated with Spearman's rank correlation. Results: 427 patients underwent lumpectomy for DCIS, and 33 were identified as possible cases. Histologic review excluded 8 (non-sufficient tissue or DCIS recurrence without invasion). 25 cases were matched to 48 controls (2 controls for 23 cases, 1 control for 2 cases). Both H/I (r = 0.43, p = 0.0001) and MGI (r = 0.41, p = 0.0004) were significantly correlated with nuclear grade. Positive H/I was associated with trend towards higher recurrence (OR 1.9; p = 0.22) that was most pronounced in cases/controls (15/28) treated with lumpectomy alone (OR 3.3; CI: 0.8–13.2, p = 0.09). Similarly, positive MGI was associated with a trend towards higher recurrence risk in patients treated with surgery alone (OR 2.0; CI: 0.6–6.4, p = 0.27). Conclusions: These data suggest that both HOXB13/IL17BR and MGI can identify a subset of patients with surgically resected DCIS who are at risk for invasive recurrence. Further studies in larger cohorts are needed to confirm these findings. [Table: see text]
Estimating global injuries morbidity and mortality: methods and data used in the Global Burden of Disease 2017 study
James, Spencer L , Castle, Chris D, Dingels, Zachary V, Fox, Jack T, Hamilton, Erin B, Sylte, Dillon O , Bertolacci, Gregory J, Cunningham, Matthew , LeGrand, Kate E , Abdelalim, Ahmed , Abdulkader, Rizwan Suliankatchi , Abedi, Aidin , Abegaz, Kedir Hussein , Eshete, Akine , Abushouk, Abdelrahman Ibrahim , Adebayo, Oladimeji , Advani, Shailesh M, Agudelo‐Botero, Marcela , Ahmad, Tauseef , Aichour, Miloud Taki Eddine, Alahdab, Fares , Alanezi, Fahad , Alema, Niguse Meles , Wassihun, Biresaw , Ali, Beriwan Abdulqadir, Alipour, Vahid, Almasri, Nihad A. , Altirkawi, Khalid A , Amer, Yasser Sami , Andrei, Cătălina Liliana , Ansari-Moghaddam, Alireza, Antonio, Carl Abelardo T, Anvari, Davood , Appiah, Seth Christopher Yaw , Arabloo, Jalal , Arefi, Zohreh , Aremu, Olatunde , Ariani, Filippo , Arora, Amit , Quintanilla, Beatriz Paulina Ayala , Ayano, Getinet , Ayanore, Martin Amogre , Azarian, Ghasem , Badawi, Alaa, Badiye, Ashish , Baig, Atif Amin , Bairwa, Mohan , Bakhtiari, Ahad , Banerjee, Srikanta , Banik, Palash Chandra , Banstola, Amrit , Barker‐Collo, Suzanne , Bärnighausen, Till , Barzegar, Akbar , Belete, Habte , Bennett, Derrick , Berhe, Kidanemaryam , Bhagavathula, Akshaya Srikanth , Bhardwaj, Pankaj , Bhat, Anusha Ganapati , Bhattacharyya, Krittika , Bhutta, Zulfiqar A , Bibi, Sadia , Bijani, Ali , Borschmann, Rohan , Borzì, Antonio Maria , Braithwaite, Dejana , Брико, Н. И. , Brugha, Traolach , Budhathoki, Shyam Sundar , Car, Josip , Cárdenas, Rosario , Carvalho, Félix , Castaldelli-Maia, João Maurício , Castañeda-Orjuela, Carlos A , Castelpietra, Giulio , Catalá-López, Ferrán , Cerin, Ester , Chandan, Joht Singh , Chapman, Jens R. , Chattu, Vijay Kumar , Chattu, Soosanna Kumary , Chaudhary, Neha , Cho, Daniel , Choi, Jee-Young J, Chowdhury, Mohiuddin Ahsanul Kabir , Christopher, Devasahayam Jesudas , Chu, Dinh‐Toi , Costa, Vera Marisa , Dávila-Cervantes, Claudio Alberto , Leo, Diego De, Demoz, Gebre Teklemariam , Demsie, Desalegn Getnet , Deribe, Kebede , Desai, Rupak , Nasab, Mostafa Dianati, Silva, Diana Dias da , Forooshani, Zahra Sadat Dibaji, Doyle, Kerrie , Driscoll, Tim , Dubljanin, Eleonora , Adema, Bereket Duko , Eagan, Arielle Wilder , Elemineh, Demelash Abewa , El‐Khatib, Ziad , Ellingsen, Christian Lycke , Eyawo, Oghenowede , Faris, Pawan , Faro, André , Farzadfar, Farshad , Fereshtehnejad, Seyed-Mohammad , Fernandes, Eduarda , Ferrara, Pietro , Fischer, Florian , Foláyan, Morẹ́nikẹ́ Oluwátóyìn , Fomenkov, Artem Alekseevich , Francis, Joel M , Fukumoto, Takeshi , Geberemariyam, Biniyam Sahiledengle, Gebremariam, Hadush, Gebremedhin, Ketema Bizuwork , Gebremeskel, Leake , Gebremeskel, Gebreamlak Gebremedhn , Gebremichael, Berhe , Geta, Birhanu, Ghafourifard, Mansour , Ghamari, Farhad , Gheshlagh, Reza Ghanei , Gholamian, Asadollah , Gilani, Syed Amir , Gill, Tiffany K, Goulart, Alessandra C. , Grada, Ayman , Guo, Yuming , Haagsma, Juanita A. , Hall, Brian J. , Hamadeh, Randah R , Hassan, Shoaib, Hassen, Hamid Yimam , Havmoeller, Rasmus, Heydarpour, Fatemeh , Hı́jar, Martha , Ho, Hung Chak , Hoang, Chi Linh , Hole, Michael K., Hossain, Naznin , Hosseinzadeh, Mehdi , Hostiuc, Sorin , Ibitoye, Segun Emmanuel , Inbaraj, Leeberk Raja , Irvani, Seyed Sina Naghibi , Islam, M. Mofizul , Islam, Sheikh Mohammed Shariful , Ivers, Rebecca , Jahani, Mohammad Ali, Jakovljević, Mihajlo , Jayaraman, Sudha , Jha, Ravi Prakash , John-Akinola, Yetunde O. , Joseph, Nitin , Joukar, Farahnaz, Jürisson, Mikk , Kahsay, Amaha , Kalankesh, Leila R , Kalhor, Rohollah , Kamil, Teshome Abegaz, Kapoor, Neeti , Karami, Manoochehr , Kasaeian, Amir , Kassaye, Hagazi Gebremedhin, Kavetskyy, Taras , Kayode, Gbenga A , Keiyoro, Peter Njenga, Kelbore, Abraham Getachew , Khader, Yousef , Khafaie, Morteza Abdullatif , Khalid, Nauman , Khalil, Ibrahim A, Khalilov, Rovshan , Khan, Maseer , Khan, Ejaz Ahmad , Khan, Junaid , Khanna, Tripti, Khundkar, Roba , Kiirithio, Daniel N, Kim, Yun Jin , Kısa, Sezer , Kısa, Adnan , Komaki, Hamidreza , Kondlahalli, Shivakumar K M, Koolivand, Ali , Korshunov, Vladimir Andreevich , Kraemer, Moritz U. G. , Krishan, Kewal , Defo, Barthélémy Kuate , Biçer, Burcu Küçük , Kugbey, Nuworza , Kumar, Manasi , Kumar, Vivek , Kumar, Narinder , Kumaresh, Girikumar, Lami, Faris , Lasrado, Savita , Leasher, Janet L , Li, Shanshan , Liu, Xuefeng , Lyons, Ronan A , Machado, Daiane Borges , Madadin, Mohammed , Razek, Muhammed Magdy Abd El, Mahotra, Narayan Bahadur , Majdán, Marek , Majeed, Azeem , Maled, Venkatesh , Manafi, Navid , Manafi, Amir , Manda, Ana-Laura, Mansour-Ghanaei, Fariborz, Mason‐Jones, Amanda J. , Masoumi, Seyedeh Zahra , Massenburg, Benjamin B. , Maulik, Pallab K , Mehndiratta, Man Mohan, Melketsedik, Zeleke Aschalew , Memiah, Peter , Mendoza, Walter, Menezes, Ritesh G. , Mengesha, Melkamu Merid , Meretoja, Tuomo J , Meretoja, Atte , Merie, Hayimro Edemealem , Miazgowski, Bartosz , Miazgowski, Tomasz , Miller, Ted R. , Mini, GK , Мirrakhimov, Erkin М , Mithra, Prasanna , Moghadaszadeh, Masoud, Mohammad, Yousef , Mohammadian-Hafshejani, Abdollah , Mohammed, Shafiu , Mohammed, Jemal , Bandpei, Mohammad Ali Mohseni, Molokhia, Mariam , Monasta, Lorenzo , Moodley, Yoshan , Moradi, Masoud , Moradi, Ghobad , Morawska, Lídia , Velásquez, Ilais Moreno , Mossie, Tilahun Belete , Musa, Kamarul Imran , Mustafa, Ghulam , Naderi, Mehdi , Nagarajan, Ahamarshan Jayaraman , Naik, Gurudatta , Naimzada, Mukhammad David , Nangia, Vinay, Nascimento, Bruno Ramos , Naserbakht, Morteza , Ndwandwe, Duduzile , Negoi, Ionuţ , Ngunjiri, Josephine W, Nguyen, Cuong Tat , Nguyen, Diep Ngoc , Nikbakhsh, Rajan , Ningrum, Dina Nur Anggraini , Nnaji, Chukwudi A , Ofori‐Asenso, Richard , Ogbo, Felix Akpojene , Oghenetega, Onome Bright , Olagunju, Andrew T , Olagunju, Tinuke O , Bali, Ahmed Omar , Onwujekwe, Obinna , Orpana, Heather , Otstavnov, Nikita , Otstavnov, Stanislav S , Mahesh, P A , Padubidri, Jagadish Rao , Pakhalé, Smita , Pakshir, Keyvan , Panda‐Jonas, Songhomitra, Park, Eun‐Kee , Patel, Sangram Kishor , Pathak, Ashish , Pati, Sanghamitra , Paulos, Kebreab , Pepito, Veincent Christian Filipino , Полибин, Р. В. , Polinder, Suzanne, Pourmalek, Farshad , Pourshams, Akram , Poustchi, Hossein, Prakash, Swayam , Pribadi, Dimas Ria Angga , Puri, Parul , Syed, Zahiruddin Quazi, Rabiee, Navid , Radfar, Amir , Rafay, Anwar, Rafiee, Ata , Rafiei, Alireza , Rahim, Fakher , Rahman, Muhammad Aziz , Rajabpour-Sanati, Ali, Rajati, Fatemeh , Rakovac, Ivo , Rao, Sowmya J, Rashedi, Vahid , Rawal, Lal , Rawassizadeh, Reza , Renjith, Vishnu , Resnikoff, Serge , Rezapour, Aziz, Rickard, Jennifer , Saddik, Basema , Safdarian, Mahdi , Sajadi, S. Mohammad , Salamati, Payman, Salem, Marwa Rashad , Salem, Hosni , Salz, Inbal, Samy, Abdallah M , Sanabria, Juan , Sànchez-Riera, Lídia , Sarveazad, Arash , Sathian, Brijesh , Sawhney, Monika, Schwebel, David C. , Seedat, Soraya , Senthilkumaran, Subramanian , Seyedmousavi, Seyedmojtaba , Sha, Feng , Shaahmadi, Faramarz , Shaikh, Masood Ali , Shams-Beyranvand, Mehran , Shigematsu, Mika, Shin, Jae Il , Shiri, Rahman , Sigfúsdóttir, Inga Dóra, Singh, Pankaj Kumar , Sinha, Dhirendra Narain , Soriano, Joan B. , Soyiri, Ireneous N , Sufiyan, Mu’awiyyah Babale , Sykes, Bryan L. , Tabarés‐Seisdedos, Rafael , Tabb, Karen M. , Wogayehu, Biruk , Tefera, Yibekal Manaye , Tekulu, Gebretsadkan Hintsa , Kassie, Ayenew , Титова, М. В. , Tlaye, Kenean Getaneh , Tohidinik, Hamid Reza , Topór-Mądry, Roman , Tripathy, Jaya Prasad , Tsai, Alexander C. , Tsatsakis, Aristidis , Car, Lorainne Tudor , Ullah, Irfan , Ullah, Saif , Upadhyay, Era , Valdéz, Pascual , Violante, Francesco Saverio , Waheed, Yasir , Wang, Yuan‐Pang , Wiangkham, Taweewat , Wolde, Haileab Fekadu , Woldeyes, Dawit Habte , Wu, Ai-Min, Wyper, Grant M. A. , Yadav, Rajaram , Yadollahpour, Ali , Yano, Yuichiro , Yaya, Sanni , Yazdi‐Feyzabadi, Vahid , Ye, Pengpeng , Yisma, Engida , Yoon, Seok‐Jun , Youm, Yoosik , Younis, Mustafa Z , Yousefi, Zabihollah , Yu, Yong , Moghadam, Telma Zahirian , Zaman, Sojib Bin , Zarei, Fatemeh , Zhang, Zhi-Jiang, Zhang, Yunquan , Zodpey, Sanjay , Dandona, Rakhi , Dharmaratne, Samath Dhamminda , Hay, Simon I , Mokdad, Ali H. , Reiner, Robert C. , Vos, Theo , Topór‐Mądry, Roman , Feyissa, Garumma Tolu , Haghparast‐Bidgoli, Hassan , Kumar, G Anil , Zahiruddin, Quazi Syed , Dianatinasab, Mostafa , Sanati, Ali Rajabpour , Baig, Atif Amin , Kumar, Vivek , Castaldelli-Maia, João M , Farzadfar, Farshad , Shin, Jae I L , Islam, Sheikh Mohammed Shariful , Rahman, Muhammad Aziz , Bhagavathula, Akshaya Srikanth , Belete, T , Liu, Zichen , Roberts, Nicholas L S , Henry, Nathaniel J , Abdollahpour, Ibrahim , Adsuar, José Carmelo , Ahmed, Muktar Beshir , Ahmed, Rushdiá , Alghnam, Suliman Abdullah , Ali, Saqib , Alinia, Cyrus , Aljunid, Syed Mohamed , Almasi‐Hashiani, Amir , Antonio, Carl Abelardo T. , Arab-Zozani, Morteza , Asaad, Malke , Balachandran, Arun , Banach, Maciej , Bayati, Mohsen , Bazargan‐Hejazi, Shahrzad , Bedi, Neeraj , Behzadifar, Masoud , Benseñor, Isabela M. , Boloor, Archith , Borges, Guilherme , Boufous, Soufiane , Chatziralli, Irini , Cicuttini, Flavia , Coelho, João M, Dahlawi, Saad M A , Daryani, Ahmad , Demeke, Feleke Mekonnen , Forooshani, Zahra Sadat Dibaji, Do, Hoa , Duko, Bereket , El-Jaafary, Shaimaa I , Zaki, Maysaa El Sayed , Eskandarieh, Sharareh , Foroutan, Masoud , Franklin, Richard C. , Gebremariam, Hadush, Gedefaw, Getnet , Bante, Agegnehu , Gill, Tiffany K. , Goudarzian, Amir Hossein , Grivna, Michal , Guimarães, Rafael Alves , Gupta, Gaurav Kumar , Hamidi, Samer , Handiso, Demelash Woldeyohannes , Haro, Josep María , Hasanzadeh, Amir , Hassanipour, Soheil , Hassankhani, Hadi , Hendrie, Delia V. , Holla, Ramesh , Hu, Guoqing , Ilesanmi, Olayinka Stephen , Jalilian, Farzad , Jayatilleke, Achala Upendra , Jonas, Jost B , Jones, Kelly , Jozwiak, Jacek Jerzy , Jungari, Suresh Banayya , Kabir, Ali , Kanchan, Tanuj , Khalil, Ibrahim A, Khazaei, Salman , Khazaie, Habibolah , Kim, Young‐Eun , Kim, Daniel , Shivakumar, KM , Koyanagi, Ai , Kumar, Nithin , Lansingh, Van Charles , Latifi, Arman , Lauriola, Paolo , Vecchia, Carlo La , Lee, Shaun Wen Huey , Lopez, Alan D , Lotufo, Paulo A. , Malta, Déborah Carvalho , Manjunatha, Narayana , Mansour‐Ghanaei, Fariborz , Mansournia, Mohammad Alì , Maravilla, Joemer Calderon , Aschalew, Zeleke , Meštrović, Tomislav , Mirică, Andreea , Mirzaei-Alavijeh, Mehdi, Moazen, Babak , Mohamadi, Efat , Darwesh, Aso Mohammad , Mohammadpourhodki, Reza , Mohebi, Farnam , Moradi‐Lakeh, Maziar , Moradzadeh, Rahmatollah , Morrison, Shane D. , Muluneh, Atalay Goshu , Najafi, Farid , Nayak, Vinod C , Nazari, Javad , Nguyen, Trang Huyen , Nguyen, Huong Lan Thi , Oh, In‐Hwan , Ota, Erika , Peden, Amy E. , Pereira, Jeevan , Phillips, Michael , Rabiee, Mohammad , Rahimi, Siavash , Rastogi, Prateek , Rathi, Priya , Rawaf, Salman , Ribeiro, Ana Isabel , Ríos-González, Carlos Miguel , Roever, Leonardo , Ronfani, Luca , Roshandel, Gholamreza , Safarpour, Hamid , Salamati, Payman, Santric-Milicevic, Milena M , Sarker, Abdur Razzaque , Sayyah, Mehdi , Shahabi, Saeed , Sheikh, Aziz , Siabani, Soraya , Singh, Ambrish , Soheili, Amin , Sorrie, Muluken Bekele , Stokes, Mark Andrew , Tehrani‐Banihashemi, Arash , Tesfay, Berhe Etsay , Thapar, Rekha , Tran, Khanh Bao , Tran, Bach Xuan , Unnikrishnan, Bhaskaran , Uthman, Olalekan Abdulrahman , Vasankari, Tommi Juhani , Veisani, Yousef , Venketasubramanian, Narayanaswamy , Vlassov, Vasily , Wondmeneh, Temesgen Gebeyehu , Wondmieneh, Adam Belay , YIP, PAUL S. F. , Yonemoto, Naohiro , Yu, Chuanhua , Zaidi, Zoubida , Zamani, Mohammad , Zandian, Hamed , Zhang, Zhi‐Jiang , Ziapour, Arash , Pigott, David M. , Olagunju, Andrew T , Baig, Atif Amin , Desai, Rupak , Alahdab, Fares , Rahim, Fakher

Injury Prevention | August 24, 2020 | Volume: 26 | Issue: Suppl 2 | Pages: i125-i153

10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043531 | PMID 32839249 Get It

Background While there is a long history of measuring death and disability from injuries, modern research methods must account for the wide spectrum of disability that can occur in an injury, and must provide estimates with sufficient demographic, geographical and temporal detail to be useful for policy makers. The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2017 study used methods to provide highly detailed estimates of global injury burden that meet these criteria. Methods In this study, we report and discuss the methods used in GBD 2017 for injury morbidity and mortality burden estimation. In summary, these methods included estimating cause-specific mortality for every cause of injury, and then estimating incidence for every cause of injury. Non-fatal disability for each cause is then calculated based on the probabilities of suffering from different types of bodily injury experienced. Results GBD 2017 produced morbidity and mortality estimates for 38 causes of injury. Estimates were produced in terms of incidence, prevalence, years lived with disability, cause-specific mortality, years of life lost and disability-adjusted life-years for a 28-year period for 22 age groups, 195 countries and both sexes. Conclusions GBD 2017 demonstrated a complex and sophisticated series of analytical steps using the largest known database of morbidity and mortality data on injuries. GBD 2017 results should be used to help inform injury prevention policy making and resource allocation. We also identify important avenues for improving injury burden estimation in the future.
7T MR Safety
Fagan, Andrew , Bitz, Andreas K., Björkman‐Burtscher, Isabella M. , Collins, Christopher M. , Kimbrell, Vera , Raaijmakers, Alexander , Metzger, Gregory J. , Fagan, Andrew J

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | August 24, 2020 | Volume: 53 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 333-346

10.1002/jmri.27319 | PMID 32830900 Get It

Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy (MRI/MRS) at 7T represents an exciting advance in MR technology, with intriguing possibilities to enhance image spatial, spectral, and contrast resolution. To ensure the safe use of this technology while still harnessing its potential, clinical staff and researchers need to be cognizant of some safety concerns arising from the increased magnetic field strength and higher Larmor frequency. The higher static magnetic fields give rise to enhanced transient bioeffects and an increased risk of adverse incidents related to electrically conductive implants. Many technical challenges remain and the continuing rapid pace of development of 7T MRI/MRS is likely to present further challenges to ensuring safety of this technology in the years ahead. The recent regulatory clearance for clinical diagnostic imaging at 7T will likely increase the installed base of 7T systems, particularly in hospital environments with little prior ultrahigh‐field MR experience. Informed risk/benefit analyses will be required, particularly where implant manufacturer‐published 7T safety guidelines for implants are unavailable. On behalf of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, the aim of this article is to provide a reference document to assist institutions developing local institutional policies and procedures that are specific to the safe operation of 7T MRI/MRS. Details of current 7T technology and the physics underpinning its functionality are reviewed, with the aim of supporting efforts to expand the use of 7T MRI/MRS in both research and clinical environments. Current gaps in knowledge are also identified, where additional research and development are required. Level of Evidence 5 Technical Efficacy 2 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2021;53:333–346.