McKean, Heidi

TPS3172 Background: Ulixertinib (BVD-523) is a small molecule inhibitor of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2) in development as a novel anti-cancer drug. Early clinical data demonstrated anti-tumor activity, especially for patients with tumors harboring atypical BRAF or MEK1/2 alterations (Sullivan et al., Cancer Discov. 2018;8(2):184-195). Atypical BRAF (non-V600) alterations can be categorized according to characteristics of molecular signaling (Class II or III), are seen in approximately 3% of all human cancers, and there are currently no approved therapies for this indication. Similar to atypical BRAF alterations, the incidence of MEK1/2 alterations are rare in human tumors (< 1 %). Preclinical data have demonstrated activity of ulixertinib in MEK mutant models. Ulixertinib has FDA fast-track designation for patients with solid tumors, other than CRC, with specific BRAF mutations (G469A, L485W, or L597Q). Designed with intent to register, the BVD-523-ABC clinical trial will continue evaluation of ulixertinib in patients with tumors harboring any atypical BRAF or MEK1/2 alteration (NCT04488003). Methods: This multi-center, phase II study, will be conducted in two parts and assess the clinical benefit, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ulixertinib in patients with advanced malignancies. Ulixertinib will be administered at the RP2D of 600 mg BID for 28-day treatment cycles. Eligible patients will have locally advanced or metastatic cancer which progressed following standard systemic therapies, or for which the patient is not a candidate or refused systemic therapy. Planned correlative analyses include reverse phase protein array and transcriptomics of tumor tissue. Part A is open-label and tumor agnostic, except for group 4 and 6 (CRC patients only). Patients will enroll into one of six groups based on BRAF (groups 1-4) or MEK1/2 (groups 5-6) tumor alteration (38 patients per group). Overall response rate (ORR) is the primary endpoint for Part A, with secondary endpoints including duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Part B is tumor histology specific. Patients will be randomized to receive either ulixertinib or physician's choice of treatment in a 2:1 ratio. Up to three specified tumor histologies will be defined, guided by available Part A data (n = 80-100 per histology). The primary endpoint of Part B is PFS, and secondary endpoints include OS, ORR, and DOR. This study has enrolled 43 patients of the planned 228 in Part A at the time of abstract submission. Clinical trial information: NCT04488003.

550 Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a heterogeneous group of non-invasive cancers with varying propensity for recurrence. There are no validated markers that identify patients at risk for invasive recurrence following lumpectomy. HOXB13/IL17BR (H/I) is expressed in both DCIS and invasive cancer (Ma Cancer Cell. 2004) and associated with recurrence in stage I cancer. A 5-gene molecular grade index (MGI) distinguishes outcome in grade II disease (Ma Clin Cancer Res. 2008). We sought to determine whether H/I or MGI was associated with invasive recurrence in resected DCIS. Methods: We identified patients at Mayo Rochester who underwent lumpectomy ± radiation for DCIS between 1988 and 2001 and performed a nested case/control study. Cases were patients with ipsilateral invasive recurrence, matched to controls based on age, surgery date, length of follow-up, and adjuvant radiation. DCIS was macrodissected from paraffin sections and RNA extracted to obtain H/I and MGI RT-PCR profiles. The association of H/I and MGI with case-control status was assessed with conditional logistic regression; results reported are odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The association of H/I and MGI as continuous variables with nuclear grade (low, intermediate, high) was estimated with Spearman's rank correlation. Results: 427 patients underwent lumpectomy for DCIS, and 33 were identified as possible cases. Histologic review excluded 8 (non-sufficient tissue or DCIS recurrence without invasion). 25 cases were matched to 48 controls (2 controls for 23 cases, 1 control for 2 cases). Both H/I (r = 0.43, p = 0.0001) and MGI (r = 0.41, p = 0.0004) were significantly correlated with nuclear grade. Positive H/I was associated with trend towards higher recurrence (OR 1.9; p = 0.22) that was most pronounced in cases/controls (15/28) treated with lumpectomy alone (OR 3.3; CI: 0.8–13.2, p = 0.09). Similarly, positive MGI was associated with a trend towards higher recurrence risk in patients treated with surgery alone (OR 2.0; CI: 0.6–6.4, p = 0.27). Conclusions: These data suggest that both HOXB13/IL17BR and MGI can identify a subset of patients with surgically resected DCIS who are at risk for invasive recurrence. Further studies in larger cohorts are needed to confirm these findings. [Table: see text]

Abstract Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is a heterogenous group of proliferative cellular lesions that have the potential to become invasive. Very little is known about the molecular alterations involved in the progression from DCIS to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Heparan endosulfatases HSulf-1 and -2 catalyze or edit sulfate moieties on heparan sulfate proteoglycans and have been implicated in modulating heparin binding growth factor signaling. Several studies have suggested that while expression of HSulf-1 is down-regulated and is considered a tumor suppressor gene, expression of HSulf-2 is over-expressed in primary breast tumors and cell lines. However, the role of HSulf-2 in breast tumorigenesis is poorly understood. Here we have evaluated the effect of HSulf-2 in an in vivo model of breast cancer progression (MCF10DCIS.com). These cells form comedo type DCIS and progress to IDC when transplanted in immune-deficient mice and therefore are an ideal model to study breast cancer progression. Methods: Stable clones depleted of HSulf-2 in MCF10DCIS.com cells were generated and injected into mouse mammary fat pads with non-targeted control shRNA clones (NTC) as controls. HSulf-1, HSulf-2, smooth muscle actin immunostaining and H&E staining was perfromed at weeks 3, 5 and 7. Matrixmetallo Protease (MMP) expression by real time PCR was evaluated at Weeks 3 and 5 in both groups. Results: A significant reduction in tumor growth was observed in HSulf-2 depleted clones compared to NTC clones (p=&lt;0.01). HSulf-2 immunohistochemical staining showed distinct pattern of staining localized to ductal lesions as well as stromal (myoepithelial and myofibroblasts cells). In contrast, the closely related family member, HSulf-1 expression was restricted largely to stromal and myoepithelial layer in ductal lesions. While HSulf-2 staining remained intense from weeks 3 to 7, HSulf-1 expression was diminished during the same time period. In NTC clones, ductal like lesions were observed by week 3 with disruption of the basement membrane and appearance of invasive phenotype by weeks 5 and 7. In contrast, HSulf2 knockdown xenografts showed retention of ductal like structures even at week 5 and retention of basement membrane (p=&lt;0.05). Additionally marked necrotic areas were also observed in HSulf-2 silenced clones. Previous studies have shown that the malignant epithelium induces the development of the stroma necessary for the development of invasive phenotype. Consistent with this observation, we demonstrated decreased MMP expression in xenografts derived from HSulf-2 depleted clones compared with NTC xenografts (p=&lt;0.05). Conclusions: Our data suggest that HSulf-2 may play an important role in the transition from DCIS to an invasive phenotype (IDC) potentially by up regulating MMP expression and activity. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-05-12.