Bruesewitz, Michael R.

Abstract Background Evaluation of middle ear prostheses requires high-resolution imaging to assess position and structural integrity. Purpose To assess the diagnostic performance of photon-counting-detector (PCD)-CT for middle ear prosthesis imaging in cadaveric specimens. Materials and Methods Nine different middle ear prostheses were implanted in five fresh-frozen whole-head specimens, both in correct anatomic position and displaced to mimic malposition. Specimens were scanned on PCD-CT (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens) and energy-integrating-detector (EID)-CT (SOMATOM Force, Siemens), reconstructed at 0.2mm and 0.4mm, respectively. Eighteen cases (9 prostheses, 2 positions) per scanner were evaluated by two neuroradiologists (36 readings), blinded to scanner and position, who scored prosthesis position, reader confidence, and overall image quality. Agreement with the reference standard and between readers was compared. Results PCD-CT showed higher diagnostic confidence compared with EID-CT, while accuracy and inter-reader agreement did not demonstrate significant differences between scanners. Correct readings, PCD-CT versus EID-CT: lateral contact, 31/36 (86.1%; 95% CI: 58.3%-94.4%) vs. 29/36 (80.6%; 55.6%-91.7%), p = 0.500; medial contact, 30/36 (83.3%; 55.6%-94.4%) vs. 26/36 (72.2%; 50.0%-83.3%), p = 0.250. PCD-CT identified all cases of complete contact loss (score 3), while EID-CT missed one reading per contact. Inter-reader agreement may be higher with PCD-CT vs EID-CT (lateral: κw: 0.804 [0.578-0.941] vs. 0.571 [0.302-0.778], p = 0.250; medial: 0.684 [0.191-0.934] vs. 0.481 [0.024-0.835], p = 0.250). Reader confidence was significantly higher with PCD-CT; mean paired differences for Readers 1 and 2 were 9.4 (1.8-17.1; Holm-adjusted p = 0.019) and 23.1 points (13.4-32.7; p < 0.001) for lateral contact, and 16.4 (10.0-22.8; p < 0.001) and 17.8 points (6.8-28.8; p = 0.007) for medial contact. Readers preferred PCD-CT image quality in 16/18 (88.9%; 65.3%-98.6%) and 17/18 cases (94.4%; 72.7%-99.9%), respectively. Conclusion PCD-CT was associated with significantly higher reader confidence and preferred image quality, without significant differences in diagnostic accuracy or inter-reader agreement. These findings suggest PCD-CT is a promising modality for postoperative middle ear evaluations that warrants further investigations.

AbstractPurposeA dual‐source CT system can be operated in a high‐pitch helical mode to provide a temporal resolution of 66 ms, which reduces motion artifacts in CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA). It can also be operated in a multi‐energy (ME) mode to provide iodine maps, beneficial in the evaluation of pulmonary embolism (PE). No energy‐integrating detector (EID) CT can perform simultaneous ME and high‐pitch acquisition. This phantom study aimed to evaluate the ability of a photon‐counting‐detector (PCD) CT to perform simultaneous high‐pitch and ME imaging for CTPA.MethodsA motion phantom was used to mimic the respiratory motion. Two tubes filled with iodine with intravascular thrombus mimicked by injecting glue within the tubes were placed along with 5, 10, and 15 mg/mL iodine samples, on a motion phantom at 20 and 30 revolutions per minute. Separate high‐pitch and ME EID‐CT scans and a single high‐pitch ME PCD scan were acquired and virtual monoenergetic images and iodine maps reconstructed. Percent thrombus occlusion was measured and compared between static and moving images.ResultsWhen there was motion, EID‐CT ME suffered from significant motion artifacts. The measured iodine concentrations with PCD‐CT in high‐pitch ME were more stable when there was a motion, with a lower standard deviation than EID‐CT in ME mode. The estimated percent thrombus occlusion dropped significantly with applied motion on EID‐CT, while PCD‐CT high‐pitch ME mode showed good agreement between measurements on static or moving images.ConclusionPCD‐CT with combined ME and high‐pitch mode facilitates simultaneous accurate iodine quantification and assessment of intravascular occlusion.

Abstract Objective . Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT enables routine virtual-monoenergetic image (VMI) reconstruction. We evaluated the performance of an automatic VMI energy level (keV) selection tool on a clinical PCD-CT system in comparison to an automatic tube potential (kV) selection tool from an energy-integrating-detector (EID) CT system from the same manufacturer. Approach. Four torso-shaped phantoms (20–50 cm width) containing iodine (2, 5, and 10 mg cc −1 ) and calcium (100 mg cc −1 ) were scanned on PCD-CT and EID-CT. Dose optimization techniques, task-based VMI energy level and tube-potential selection on PCD-CT (CARE keV) and task-based tube potential selection on EID-CT (CARE kV), were enabled. CT numbers, image noise, and dose-normalized contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR d ) were compared. Main results . PCD-CT produced task-specific VMIs at 70, 65, 60, and 55 keV for non-contrast, bone, soft tissue with contrast, and vascular settings, respectively. A 120 kV tube potential was automatically selected on PCD-CT for all scans. In comparison, EID-CT used x-ray tube potentials from 80 to 150 kV based on imaging task and phantom size. PCD-CT achieved consistent dose reduction at 9%, 21% and 39% for bone, soft tissue with contrast, and vascular tasks relative to the non-contrast task, independent of phantom size. On EID-CT, dose reduction factor for contrast tasks relative to the non-contrast task ranged from a 65% decrease (vascular task, 70 kV, 20 cm phantom) to a 21% increase (soft tissue with contrast task, 150 kV, 50 cm phantom) due to size-specific tube potential adaptation. PCD-CT CNR d was equivalent to or higher than those of EID-CT for all tasks and phantom sizes, except for the vascular task with 20 cm phantom, where 70 kV EID-CT CNR d outperformed 55 keV PCD-CT images. Significance . PCD-CT produced more consistent CT numbers compared to EID-CT due to standardized VMI output, which greatly benefits standardization efforts and facilitates radiation dose reduction.

AbstractPurposeTo determine the suitability of a quality assurance (QA) program based on the American College of Radiology's (ACR) CT quality control (QC) manual to fully evaluate the unique capabilities of a clinical photon‐counting‐detector (PCD) CT system.MethodsA daily QA program was established to evaluate CT number accuracy and artifacts for both standard and ultra‐high‐resolution (UHR) scan modes. A complete system performance evaluation was conducted in accordance with the ACR CT QC manual by scanning the CT Accreditation Phantom with routine clinical protocols and reconstructing low‐energy‐threshold (T3D) and virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) between 40 and 120 keV. Spatial resolution was evaluated by computing the modulation transfer function (MTF) for the UHR mode, and multi‐energy performance was evaluated by scanning a body phantom containing four iodine inserts with concentrations between 2 and 15 mg I/cc.ResultsThe daily QA program identified instances when the detector needed recalibration or replacement. CT number accuracy was impacted by image type: CT numbers at 70 keV VMI were within the acceptable range (defined for 120 kV). Other keV VMIs and the T3D reconstruction had at least one insert with CT number outside the acceptable range. The limiting resolution was nearly 40 lp/cm based on MTF measurements, which far exceeds the 12 lp/cm maximum capability of the ACR phantom. The CT numbers in the iodine inserts were accurate on all VMIs (3.8% average percentage error), while the iodine concentrations had an average root mean squared error of 0.3 mg I/cc.ConclusionProtocols and parameters must be properly selected on PCD‐CT to meet current accreditation requirements with the ACR CT phantom. Use of the 70 keV VMI allowed passing all tests prescribed in the ACR CT manual. Additional evaluations such an MTF measurement and multi‐energy phantom scans are also recommended to comprehensively evaluate PCD‐CT scanner performance.

AbstractIt is important to employ radiation dose reduction techniques in pediatric computed tomography (CT) to reduce potential risks of radiation‐induced malignancy. Automatic tube potential (kV) selection tools have been developed and become available on many CT scanners, which select the optimum kV based on the patient size and clinical task to improve the radiation dose efficiency. However, its use in pediatric CT has been mostly empirical, following manufacturer’s default recommendation without solid demonstration for quality improvement. This study aimed to implement an automatic tube potential tool (CAREkV, Siemens Healthcare) into routine pediatric CT practice, using the “Plan‐Do‐Study‐Act” quality improvement process, in place of an existing kV/mAs technique chart. The design of this quality improvement project involved Plan‐Do‐Study‐Act stages. Plan and Do stages identified the criteria for optimal automatic kV selection; a range of phantoms representing typical pediatric groups were scanned on a dual‐source 128‐slice scanner using a fast‐pitch scanning mode. The identified CAREkV settings were implemented into the CT protocol and evaluated after a 6‐month period. In the Study stage, an objective evaluation of the image metrics and radiation dose for two similar patient cohorts using CAREkV and the technique‐chart, respectively, were compared. The kV selected, image quality and radiation dose determined by CAREkV were comparable to those obtained while using the technique‐chart. The CAREkV was successfully implemented into our pediatric abdominopelvic CT practice. By utilizing the “PDSA” process optimal image quality and radiation dose reduction were achieved with an automatic kV selection tool to improve CT workflow.

Purpose To determine the accuracy of CT number and calcium score of a kV‐independent technique based on an artificial 120 kV reconstruction, and its potential to reduce radiation dose. Methods Anthropomorphic chest phantoms were scanned on a third‐generation dual‐source CT system equipped with the artificial 120 kV reconstruction. First, a phantom module containing a 20‐mm diameter hydroxyapatite (HA) insert was scanned inside the chest phantoms at different tube potentials (70–140 kV) to evaluate calcium CT number accuracy. Next, three small HA inserts (diameter/length = 5 mm) were inserted into a pork steak and scanned inside the phantoms to evaluate calcium score accuracy at different kVs. Finally, the same setup was scanned using automatic exposure control (AEC) at 120 kV, and then with automatic kV selection (auto‐kV). Phantoms were also scanned at 120 kV using a size‐dependent mA chart. CT numbers of soft tissue and calcium were measured from different kV images. Calcium score of each small HA insert was measured using commercial software. Results The CT number difference from 120 kV was small with tube potentials from 90 to 140 kV for both soft tissue and calcium (maximal difference of 4/5 HU, respectively). Consistent calcium scores were obtained from images of different kVs compared to 120 kV, with a relative difference <8%. Auto‐kV provided a 25–34% dose reduction compared to AEC alone. Conclusion A kV‐independent calcium scoring technique can produce artificial 120 kV images with consistent soft tissue and calcium CT numbers compared to standard 120 kV examinations. When coupled with auto‐kV, this technique can reduce radiation by 25–34% compared to that with AEC alone, while providing consistent calcium scores as that of standard 120 kV examinations.

PurposeThe aim of this study was to demonstrate that a low helical pitch causes increased photon starvation artifacts at ultra‐low‐dose CT.MethodsA cylindrical water phantom with a diameter of 30 cm was scanned on two different generation CT scanners: a 64‐slice scanner (Sensation 64, Siemens Healthcare) and a 192‐slice scanner (Somatom Force, Siemens Healthcare) at multiple effective mAs levels (mAs/pitch = 200, 100, 50, 25, and 12). The corresponding CTDIvol values were 4.1, 2.0, 1.0, 0.5 mGy, on the 64‐slice scanner and 3.8, 1.9, 1.0, 0.5 mGy on the 192‐slice scanner, for the selected effective mAs values. For each dose setting, the scan was repeated at four helical pitches: 1.2, 0.9, 0.6, and the lowest achievable pitch on each scanner. The tube current was automatically adjusted by the scanner so that the effective mAs, and thus CTDIvol, were kept the same for different pitches. All CT data sets were reconstructed with a slice thickness of 3mm and a medium smooth kernel. Images acquired at the same dose level but different helical pitches were visually inspected to assess photon starvation artifacts and noise levels.ResultsAt the same radiation dose, image noise increased with the decreasing helical pitch. The increase was more severe on the old‐generation 64‐slice scanner. Photon starvation artifacts were evident at 200 effective mAs on the 64‐slice scanner at 80 kV. On the 192‐slice scanner there was no visible photon starvation artifacts at both 200 and 50 effective mAs (CTDIvol = 4.1 mGy and 1.0 mGy, respectively); nor was there a visible impact from the lower helical pitch. Only when the dose was lowered to be extremely low (~0.26 mGy, achievable at 70 kV), did photon starvation artifacts become evident.ConclusionsA low helical pitch may increase image noise and photon starvation artifacts compared to a higher pitch for the same dose level, particularly at ultra‐low dose CT.

AbstractObjectivesBoth projection and dual‐energy (DE)‐based methods have been used for metal artifact reduction (MAR) in CT. The two methods can also be combined. The purpose of this work was to evaluate these three MAR methods using phantom experiments for five types of metal implants.Materials and MethodsFive phantoms representing spine, dental, hip, shoulder, and knee were constructed with metal implants. These phantoms were scanned using both single‐energy (SE) and DE protocols with matched radiation output. The SE data were processed using a projection‐based MAR (iMAR, Siemens) algorithm, while the DE data were processed to generate virtual monochromatic images at high keV (Mono+, Siemens). In addition, the DE images after iMAR were used to generate Mono+ images (DE iMAR Mono+). Artifacts were quantitatively evaluated using CT numbers at different regions of interest. Iodine contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) was evaluated in the spine phantom. Three musculoskeletal radiologists and two neuro‐radiologists independently ranked the artifact reduction.ResultsThe DE Mono+ at high keV resulted in reduced artifacts but also lower iodine CNR. The iMAR method alone caused missing tissue artifacts in dental phantom. DE iMAR Mono+ caused wrong CT numbers in close proximity to the metal prostheses in knee and hip phantoms. All musculoskeletal radiologists ranked SE iMAR > DE iMAR Mono+ > DE Mono+ for knee and hip, while DE iMAR Mono+ > SE iMAR > DE Mono+ for shoulder. Both neuro‐radiologists ranked DE iMAR Mono+ > DE Mono+ > SE iMAR for spine and DE Mono+ > DE iMAR Mono+ > SE iMAR for dental.ConclusionsThe SE iMAR was the best choice for the hip and knee prostheses, while DE Mono+ at high keV was best for dental implants and DE iMAR Mono+ was best for spine and shoulder prostheses. Artifacts were also introduced by MAR algorithms.