Treb, Kevin

Abstract Background Evaluation of middle ear prostheses requires high-resolution imaging to assess position and structural integrity. Purpose To assess the diagnostic performance of photon-counting-detector (PCD)-CT for middle ear prosthesis imaging in cadaveric specimens. Materials and Methods Nine different middle ear prostheses were implanted in five fresh-frozen whole-head specimens, both in correct anatomic position and displaced to mimic malposition. Specimens were scanned on PCD-CT (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens) and energy-integrating-detector (EID)-CT (SOMATOM Force, Siemens), reconstructed at 0.2mm and 0.4mm, respectively. Eighteen cases (9 prostheses, 2 positions) per scanner were evaluated by two neuroradiologists (36 readings), blinded to scanner and position, who scored prosthesis position, reader confidence, and overall image quality. Agreement with the reference standard and between readers was compared. Results PCD-CT showed higher diagnostic confidence compared with EID-CT, while accuracy and inter-reader agreement did not demonstrate significant differences between scanners. Correct readings, PCD-CT versus EID-CT: lateral contact, 31/36 (86.1%; 95% CI: 58.3%-94.4%) vs. 29/36 (80.6%; 55.6%-91.7%), p = 0.500; medial contact, 30/36 (83.3%; 55.6%-94.4%) vs. 26/36 (72.2%; 50.0%-83.3%), p = 0.250. PCD-CT identified all cases of complete contact loss (score 3), while EID-CT missed one reading per contact. Inter-reader agreement may be higher with PCD-CT vs EID-CT (lateral: κw: 0.804 [0.578-0.941] vs. 0.571 [0.302-0.778], p = 0.250; medial: 0.684 [0.191-0.934] vs. 0.481 [0.024-0.835], p = 0.250). Reader confidence was significantly higher with PCD-CT; mean paired differences for Readers 1 and 2 were 9.4 (1.8-17.1; Holm-adjusted p = 0.019) and 23.1 points (13.4-32.7; p < 0.001) for lateral contact, and 16.4 (10.0-22.8; p < 0.001) and 17.8 points (6.8-28.8; p = 0.007) for medial contact. Readers preferred PCD-CT image quality in 16/18 (88.9%; 65.3%-98.6%) and 17/18 cases (94.4%; 72.7%-99.9%), respectively. Conclusion PCD-CT was associated with significantly higher reader confidence and preferred image quality, without significant differences in diagnostic accuracy or inter-reader agreement. These findings suggest PCD-CT is a promising modality for postoperative middle ear evaluations that warrants further investigations.

Abstract Objective. Four-dimensional CT (4DCT) enables visualization of dynamic wrist joint pathology but may be compromised by motion artifacts. Deep learning (DL)-assisted motion correction has the potential to enhance wrist 4DCT quality, but model development is hindered by scarce training data. To address this, we developed a model-based motion simulation framework that generated realistic 4DCT data with paired static ground truth images to demonstrate wrist motion correction using a physics-informed DL model trained with simulated data. Approach. Wrist motion was simulated by synchronizing rotational and translational movements of carpal bones and connective tissues. Elastic deformation guided by analytically-derived motion vector fields was applied to static wrist scans at neutral positions to create artifact-free images at multiple angular positions. Virtual motion-corrupted 4DCT images were produced via forward projection and reconstruction with synchronized gantry and wrist motion. Experimental data from 4DCT cadaver scans were collected to validate simulation quality. Low-intensity region score (LIRS), positivity, and entropy were used to assess simulated motion artifacts. A physics-informed motion correction network was adapted exclusively using simulated training data and subsequently deployed on simulated, real cadaveric, and in vivo 4DCT scans. LIRS and structural similarity index (SSIM) were used to evaluate motion correction quality. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were conducted ( α = 0.05). Results. The simulation method created realistic motion artifacts compared to real scan reference ( p > 0.05). Motion artifacts were effectively mitigated across testing cases demonstrating generalizability. In simulated scans, LIRS improved from 0.55 ± 0.12–0.75 ± 0.04 and SSIM from 0.87 ± 0.08–0.95 ± 0.03 at bone regions (each p < 0.01). In experimental cadaveric scans, LIRS improved from 0.05 ± 0.01–0.31 ± 0.17 in marker regions and from 0.58 ± 0.19–0.77 ± 0.14 in bone regions (each p < 0.01). Significance. Our simulation method facilitates training DL-assisted motion correction algorithms by providing high-quality training data, effectively supporting 4DCT image quality enhancement.

Abstract Background Photon counting detector CT (PCD‐CT) has the potential to sort detected x‐ray photons into more than two energy bins to perform multi‐material decomposition using K‐edge materials without additional mathematical constraints/assumptions. The availability of multiple energy thresholds in PCD‐CT opens the possibility for unique clinical applications such as simultaneous multi‐contrast‐agent imaging. Purpose To evaluate the technical performance of a PCD‐CT system with four energy thresholds for conducting multi‐material decomposition of iodine, gadolinium, and water after a comprehensive system calibration procedure. Methods Experiments were performed on a commercial PCD‐CT scanner (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens Healthineers) using a research mode with four energy thresholds. Material calibration was performed by scanning contrast materials with known concentration placed in various sizes of cylindrical water‐equivalent phantoms at various tube currents and positions. From these data, per‐voxel contrast models were derived for each material by multiple linear regressions up to second order, where the predictor variables were combinations of tube current, phantom diameter, and distance to isocenter. After calibration, small (20 cm diameter) and large (30 cm × 40 cm) uniform multi‐energy CT phantoms and an anthropomorphic thorax phantom (31 cm × 39 cm), each containing bone, soft tissue, and several quantitative inserts of iodine (0.2–5.0 mg/ml), gadolinium (0.3–5.0 mg/ml), and a mixture of both (5.0 mg/ml each) were scanned using the four‐energy threshold mode at 140 kV with energy thresholds set at 20, 52, 75, and 82 keV. Images for each energy threshold were reconstructed with a filtered back‐projection algorithm and a quantitative kernel (Qr44). Subsequent image‐based material decomposition was performed on individual voxels of the energy threshold images using the models derived from the calibration process to generate water, iodine, and gadolinium basis images. Quantitative material concentrations and image noise magnitudes, and noise power spectra (NPS) were measured. Results Iodine and gadolinium concentrations above 1.25 mg/ml were visible in the material basis images in all phantoms. Averaged quantitative accuracy for iodine and gadolinium in the small, large, and thorax phantoms were 0.39 ± 0.30 mg/ml, 0.96 ± 0.53 mg/ml, and 0.53 ± 0.35 mg/ml, respectively. In the water basis images, accuracy was within 24 HU in all phantoms. Noise magnitudes in iodine and gadolinium basis images were 2.91 and 3.52 times that of the lowest energy threshold image for the small phantom, and were 6.92 and 7.17 times that of the lowest threshold image for the large phantom. Noise texture did not change between the energy threshold and material basis images for either size phantom as measured by the NPS. Conclusions After a comprehensive system calibration, a commercial PCD‐CT with four energy thresholds performed multiple material decomposition of iodine, gadolinium, and water for concentrations above 1.25 mg/ml in human‐sized phantoms. Noise amplification and quantitative accuracy from the decomposition greatly depended on object size.

Abstract Background To utilize high spatial resolution reconstructions for cardiac imaging at energy‐integrating detector CT (EID)‐CT with comparable noise to similar reconstructions at photon‐counting detector (PCD)‐CT, methods to control EID‐CT image noise are needed. Supervised convolutional neural networks (CNN) have shown promise for denoising, but a challenge remains to efficiently create high‐quality and unbiased estimates of noise without access to dedicated software or proprietary information, such that natural noise texture is retained in CNN‐denoised CT images. Purpose This study aims to develop and test image‐based noise estimation methods that can be used to train a CNN model, and to evaluate denoising performance and noise texture preservation for EID‐CT coronary CT angiography (cCTA) images reconstructed with high‐resolution kernels. Methods U‐net CNN models were trained for denoising. To supervise training, noise‐only images were estimated directly from high‐resolution kernel (Bv59) reconstructed EID‐CT (HR EID‐CT) patient images using two different methods: subtraction of low‐ and high‐strength iterative reconstruction (IR); subtraction of adjacent image slices with the same IR strength. The noise estimates from these methods contain differing noise texture and anatomical information. Networks were trained and validated separately for three data sets: the training data from each of the two noise‐estimation methods, and a 50%–50% partition of training data between the two methods. The trained models were applied to two sets of testing data: CT images of a uniform water phantom to measure noise power spectra (NPS), and an independent cohort of seven patient cCTA HR EID‐CT exams. The denoised patient images were compared to standard resolution EID‐CT reconstructions (Bv40). As a low‐noise reference, patient images acquired on the same day with a PCD‐CT and reconstructed using a similar kernel as HR EID‐CT were used for comparison. Results Models trained with each noise‐image estimation method denoised the HR EID‐CT images by 74%–79% to achieve a comparable noise magnitude to the HR PCD‐CT images. The peak, average, and 10% peak frequencies of the NPS of the input images (6.08, 6.24, and 12.0 cm −1 ) were better approximated by the model trained on adjacent slice subtraction (6.56, 5.87, and 11.5 cm −1 ) than by the model trained on subtraction of low‐ and high‐IR images (4.64, 5.44, and 11.3 cm −1 ). In cCTA images, the IR subtraction model images retained anatomic structures from input images but resulted in undesirable salt‐and‐pepper noise texture and CT number bias. The model trained on adjacent slice subtraction images had more natural texture and no significant bias, but the model sometimes removed small anatomic structures. The model trained on the mixed training dataset preserved both noise texture and anatomy from the model inputs and enabled visualization of small structures seen in PCD‐CT images that were previously unresolved by EID‐CT. Conclusions The noise texture and anatomical accuracy in CT images denoised with an image‐based supervised CNN are greatly influenced by the characteristics and partitioning of training data. With higher‐resolution reconstructions and noise texture‐preserving deep learning denoising, the quality of cCTA images from EID‐CT can be enhanced to enable resolvability of subtle anatomy similar to PCD‐CT.

Abstract Quantitative computed tomography (CT) enables the measurement of biophysical processes characterized by morphology, composition, flow, and/or motion to aid in clinical diagnosis and intervention. Since its initial application for determining bone mineral density for skeletal fragility assessment, quantitative CT has continued to evolve alongside CT’s technological advancements. A key challenge facing quantitative CT is the lack of standardization pertinent to image acquisition, reconstruction, and image analysis. With the introduction of spectral CT involving dual-energy approaches and photon-counting detectors (PCD), we are now able to obtain detailed information regarding mass densities of endogenous and exogeneous materials. Furthermore, energy-resolved CT yields spectral image types (eg, virtual monoenergetic image) that are, in principle, independent of tube potential and patient size. This paves the way for workflow standardization and helps improve the consistency and reproducibility of CT-derived measurements. In this article, we review clinical applications of quantitative CT, discuss key challenges associated with quantitative CT and its adoption into routine practice, and outline the unique benefits ushered by new CT technologies such as PCD-CT towards improving quantitative imaging.

Abstract Background Multi‐energy CT (MECT) enables quantification of material concentrations by measuring linear attenuation coefficient line integrals with multiple x‐ray spectra. Photon counting detector (PCD)‐CT utilizes a detector‐based approach for MECT that can suffer from substantial spectral overlap, resulting in amplified material quantification noise. Dual‐source dual‐kV approaches for MECT are currently utilized in some energy‐integrating detector (EID)‐CT systems and can potentially be utilized with PCD‐CT for improved spectral separation. Purpose To evaluate the iodine quantification performance of a novel dual‐source (DS)‐PCD‐CT scan mode and compare to single‐source (SS)‐PCD‐CT and DS‐EID‐CT. Materials and Methods A 30 cm × 40 cm solid water phantom with four iodine inserts (2, 5, 10, and 15 mg/mL) was scanned with the three spectral modalities: SS‐PCD‐CT with two energy thresholds, DS‐PCD‐CT (90/Sn150 kV), and DS‐EID‐CT (90/Sn150 kV). For each modality, full‐dose (12 mGy) and half‐dose scans were acquired, and images were reconstructed with filtered back‐projection using a quantitative (Qr40) kernel. When scanning in a DS configuration, the total radiation dose budget is split between two detectors, increasing the strength of a signal‐dependent filter compared to a SS acquisition. To account for this effect, the modulation transfer function (MTF) for each modality was measured from a 0.05 mm tungsten wire. A linear spatial filter was applied to the SS images to match their MTF to that of the DS images. The resulting high‐ and low‐energy images were input into an image‐domain least squares material decomposition algorithm with iodine and water as the two basis materials. Iodine quantification accuracy and noise measured from the iodine basis images were used as figures of merit, and t‐tests used to compare between modalities. Results The 10% MTF cutoffs were 0.56, 0.57, 0.60, and 0.57 lp/mm for DS‐EID‐CT, DS‐PCD‐CT, SS‐PCD‐CT, and SS‐PCD‐CT after MTF‐matching, respectively, with the SS‐PCD‐CT MTF cutoff dropping to 0.58 lp/mm at half‐dose. Without accounting for the signal‐dependent filter by matching the MTFs, the noise in iodine material basis images from SS‐PCD‐CT was 10% higher than that of DS‐EID‐CT. After matching the MTFs, the noise in the SS‐PCD‐CT iodine image was 9%–22% lower than that of the DS‐EID‐CT. The lowest iodine image noise was from the DS‐PCD‐CT, which was 39%–41% lower than the DS‐EID‐CT. The DS‐PCD‐CT noise magnitude was significantly different from the other modalities. Mean iodine quantification accuracy across all measured concentrations was within 5% for all modalities at full dose, but was only below 5% for the DS‐PCD‐CT at half‐dose. Conclusions SS‐PCD‐CT with two energy thresholds outperformed DS‐EID‐CT in terms of image noise in iodine basis images when spatial resolution was matched. DS‐PCD‐CT gave the lowest noise due to the combination of PCD technology and improved spectral separation from the different x‐ray spectra.