Marsh, Jeffrey F.

Color Doppler twinkling is associated with rough-surfaced objects like kidney stones, some clinical breast biopsy markers, and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement. Microbubbles are theorized as the predominant source of twinkling, supported by decreased twinkling under increased pressure. PMMA, metallic breast markers, a low-twinkling PMMA sample, and a non-twinkling metal rod were scanned in a pressure chamber up to 1000 psi using a General Electric Logiq E9 system and C1-6 probe (1.7–3.6 MHz Doppler transmit frequency). Clinical markers maintained distinct twinkling up to 250 psi. PMMA often twinkled at higher pressures, sometimes up to 1000 psi. The controls showed no twinkling. To understand physical structure associations with twinkling, the samples were scanned in a micro-CT system with a pixel resolution of 2 μm. Analysis of PMMA and Cork internal voids showed no correlation with twinkling. However, a correlation between Sa (average difference between the mean surface profile and actual surface profile) values and twinkling was found. This indicates that internal structure is not important for twinkling, and certain surface roughness is critical, possibly providing sites for surface microbubbles to oscillate from incident ultrasound waves.

Abstract Background Photon counting detector CT (PCD‐CT) has the potential to sort detected x‐ray photons into more than two energy bins to perform multi‐material decomposition using K‐edge materials without additional mathematical constraints/assumptions. The availability of multiple energy thresholds in PCD‐CT opens the possibility for unique clinical applications such as simultaneous multi‐contrast‐agent imaging. Purpose To evaluate the technical performance of a PCD‐CT system with four energy thresholds for conducting multi‐material decomposition of iodine, gadolinium, and water after a comprehensive system calibration procedure. Methods Experiments were performed on a commercial PCD‐CT scanner (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens Healthineers) using a research mode with four energy thresholds. Material calibration was performed by scanning contrast materials with known concentration placed in various sizes of cylindrical water‐equivalent phantoms at various tube currents and positions. From these data, per‐voxel contrast models were derived for each material by multiple linear regressions up to second order, where the predictor variables were combinations of tube current, phantom diameter, and distance to isocenter. After calibration, small (20 cm diameter) and large (30 cm × 40 cm) uniform multi‐energy CT phantoms and an anthropomorphic thorax phantom (31 cm × 39 cm), each containing bone, soft tissue, and several quantitative inserts of iodine (0.2–5.0 mg/ml), gadolinium (0.3–5.0 mg/ml), and a mixture of both (5.0 mg/ml each) were scanned using the four‐energy threshold mode at 140 kV with energy thresholds set at 20, 52, 75, and 82 keV. Images for each energy threshold were reconstructed with a filtered back‐projection algorithm and a quantitative kernel (Qr44). Subsequent image‐based material decomposition was performed on individual voxels of the energy threshold images using the models derived from the calibration process to generate water, iodine, and gadolinium basis images. Quantitative material concentrations and image noise magnitudes, and noise power spectra (NPS) were measured. Results Iodine and gadolinium concentrations above 1.25 mg/ml were visible in the material basis images in all phantoms. Averaged quantitative accuracy for iodine and gadolinium in the small, large, and thorax phantoms were 0.39 ± 0.30 mg/ml, 0.96 ± 0.53 mg/ml, and 0.53 ± 0.35 mg/ml, respectively. In the water basis images, accuracy was within 24 HU in all phantoms. Noise magnitudes in iodine and gadolinium basis images were 2.91 and 3.52 times that of the lowest energy threshold image for the small phantom, and were 6.92 and 7.17 times that of the lowest threshold image for the large phantom. Noise texture did not change between the energy threshold and material basis images for either size phantom as measured by the NPS. Conclusions After a comprehensive system calibration, a commercial PCD‐CT with four energy thresholds performed multiple material decomposition of iodine, gadolinium, and water for concentrations above 1.25 mg/ml in human‐sized phantoms. Noise amplification and quantitative accuracy from the decomposition greatly depended on object size.

Abstract Background To utilize high spatial resolution reconstructions for cardiac imaging at energy‐integrating detector CT (EID)‐CT with comparable noise to similar reconstructions at photon‐counting detector (PCD)‐CT, methods to control EID‐CT image noise are needed. Supervised convolutional neural networks (CNN) have shown promise for denoising, but a challenge remains to efficiently create high‐quality and unbiased estimates of noise without access to dedicated software or proprietary information, such that natural noise texture is retained in CNN‐denoised CT images. Purpose This study aims to develop and test image‐based noise estimation methods that can be used to train a CNN model, and to evaluate denoising performance and noise texture preservation for EID‐CT coronary CT angiography (cCTA) images reconstructed with high‐resolution kernels. Methods U‐net CNN models were trained for denoising. To supervise training, noise‐only images were estimated directly from high‐resolution kernel (Bv59) reconstructed EID‐CT (HR EID‐CT) patient images using two different methods: subtraction of low‐ and high‐strength iterative reconstruction (IR); subtraction of adjacent image slices with the same IR strength. The noise estimates from these methods contain differing noise texture and anatomical information. Networks were trained and validated separately for three data sets: the training data from each of the two noise‐estimation methods, and a 50%–50% partition of training data between the two methods. The trained models were applied to two sets of testing data: CT images of a uniform water phantom to measure noise power spectra (NPS), and an independent cohort of seven patient cCTA HR EID‐CT exams. The denoised patient images were compared to standard resolution EID‐CT reconstructions (Bv40). As a low‐noise reference, patient images acquired on the same day with a PCD‐CT and reconstructed using a similar kernel as HR EID‐CT were used for comparison. Results Models trained with each noise‐image estimation method denoised the HR EID‐CT images by 74%–79% to achieve a comparable noise magnitude to the HR PCD‐CT images. The peak, average, and 10% peak frequencies of the NPS of the input images (6.08, 6.24, and 12.0 cm −1 ) were better approximated by the model trained on adjacent slice subtraction (6.56, 5.87, and 11.5 cm −1 ) than by the model trained on subtraction of low‐ and high‐IR images (4.64, 5.44, and 11.3 cm −1 ). In cCTA images, the IR subtraction model images retained anatomic structures from input images but resulted in undesirable salt‐and‐pepper noise texture and CT number bias. The model trained on adjacent slice subtraction images had more natural texture and no significant bias, but the model sometimes removed small anatomic structures. The model trained on the mixed training dataset preserved both noise texture and anatomy from the model inputs and enabled visualization of small structures seen in PCD‐CT images that were previously unresolved by EID‐CT. Conclusions The noise texture and anatomical accuracy in CT images denoised with an image‐based supervised CNN are greatly influenced by the characteristics and partitioning of training data. With higher‐resolution reconstructions and noise texture‐preserving deep learning denoising, the quality of cCTA images from EID‐CT can be enhanced to enable resolvability of subtle anatomy similar to PCD‐CT.

AbstractBackgroundThe feasibility of oral dark contrast media is under exploration in abdominal computed tomography (CT) applications. One of the experimental contrast media in this class is dark borosilicate contrast media (DBCM), which has a CT attenuation lower than that of intra‐abdominal fat.PurposeTo evaluate the performances of DBCM using single‐ and multi‐energy CT imaging on a clinical photon‐counting‐detector CT (PCD‐CT).MethodsFive vials, three with iodinated contrast agent (5, 10, and 20 mg/mL; Omnipaque 350) and two with DBCM (6% and 12%; Nextrast, Inc.), and one solid‐water rod (neutral contrast agent) were inserted into two multi‐energy CT phantoms, and scanned on a clinical PCD‐CT system (NAEOTOM Alpha) at 90, 120, 140, Sn100, and Sn140 kV (Sn: tin filter) in multi‐energy mode. CARE keV IQ level was 180 (CTDIvol: 3.0 and 12.0 mGy for the small and large phantoms, respectively). Low‐energy threshold images were reconstructed with a quantitative kernel (Qr40, iterative reconstruction strength 2) and slice thickness/increment of 2.0/2.0 mm. Virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) were reconstructed from 40 to 140 keV at 10 keV increments. On all images, average CT numbers for each vial/rod were measured using circular region‐of‐interests and averaged over eight slices. The contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) of iodine (5 mg/mL) against DBCM was calculated and plotted against tube potential and VMI energy level, and compared to the CNR of iodine against water. Similar analyses were performed on iodine maps and VNC images derived from the multi‐energy scan at 120 kV.ResultsWith increasing kV or VMI keV, the negative HU of DBCM decreased only slightly, whereas the positive HU of iodine decreased across all contrast concentrations and phantom sizes. CT numbers for DBCM decreased from −178.5 ± 9.6 to −194.4 ± 6.3 HU (small phantom) and from −181.7 ± 15.7 to −192.1 ± 11.9 HU (large phantom) for DBCM‐12% from 90 to Sn140 kV; on VMIs, the CT numbers for DBCM decreased minimally from −147.1 ± 15.7 to −185.1 ± 9.2 HU (small phantom) and −158.8 ± 28.6 to −188.9 ± 14.7 HU (large phantom) from 40 to 70 keV, but remained stable from 80 to 140 keV. The highest iodine CNR against DBCM in low‐energy threshold images was seen at 90 or Sn140 kV for the small phantom, whereas all CNR values from low‐energy threshold images for the large phantom were comparable. The CNR values of iodine against DBCM computed on VMIs were highest at 40 or 70 keV depending on iodine and DBCM concentrations. The CNR values of iodine against DBCM were consistently higher than iodine to water (up to 460% higher dependent on energy level). Further, the CNR of iodine compared to DBCM is less affected by VMI energy level than the identical comparison between iodine and water: CNR values at 140 keV were reduced by 46.6% (small phantom) or 42.6% (large phantom) compared to 40 keV; CNR values for iodine compared to water were reduced by 86.3% and 83.8% for similar phantom sizes, respectively. Compared to 70 keV VMI, the iodine CNR against DBCM was 13%–79% lower on iodine maps and VNC.ConclusionsWhen evaluated at different tube potentials and VMI energy levels using a clinical PCD‐CT system, DBCM showed consistently higher CNR compared to iodine versus water (a neutral contrast).

AbstractBackgroundCoronary calcification is a strong indicator of coronary artery disease, and patients with a “zero” coronary calcification score have a much lower risk of future cardiac events than those with even small amounts of calcium. However, false‐negative (incorrect zero scores) may occur if small calcifications are missed at CT due to limited spatial resolution.PurposeTo demonstrate lower limits of detection for coronary calcification using an ultra‐high‐resolution (UHR) mode on a clinical photon‐counting‐detector CT (PCD‐CT), compared to a conventional energy‐integrating‐detector CT (EID‐CT).MethodsChicken eggshell fragments (0.4–0.8 mm) mimicking coronary calcifications were scanned on a clinical PCD‐CT (NAEOTOM Alpha) in UHR mode and a conventional EID‐CT (SOMATOM Force) with matched tube potential and radiation dose levels to the PCD‐CT. PCD‐CT images were reconstructed with a sharp kernel (Qr68) and a quantum iterative algorithm (QIR‐3). Two sets of EID‐CT images were reconstructed: routine clinical kernel (Qr36, ADMIRE‐3) and a sharper kernel (Qr54) with similar noise to PCD‐CT images. With institutional review board approval, in vivo exams performed with the PCD‐CT in UHR mode were compared against patients’ clinical EID‐CT exams. The visibility of calcifications on PCD‐CT and EID‐CT images was assessed and compared qualitatively.ResultsPCD‐CT images visualized all calcified fragments, while EID‐CT failed to detect those below 0.6 mm using a routine protocol. EID‐CT with Qr54 improved visibility but distorted boundaries. Calcifications were less visible on EID‐CT than PCD‐CT as phantom sizes increased. 0.6‐ and 0.7‐mm calcified fragments were barely visible on 35‐ and 40‐cm phantom EID‐CT images. Patient cases showed small calcifications missed on EID‐CT but detected on PCD‐CT.ConclusionAt matched radiation dose, PCD‐CT in UHR mode provided higher spatial resolution and improved the detectability of small calcified fragments for different phantom/patient sizes in comparison to EID‐CT.

AbstractBackgroundPhoton‐counting‐detector CT (PCD‐CT) enables the production of virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) at a high spatial resolution (HR) via simultaneous acquisition of multi‐energy data. However, noise levels in these HR VMIs are markedly increased.PurposeTo develop a deep learning technique that utilizes a lower noise VMI as prior information to reduce image noise in HR, PCD‐CT coronary CT angiography (CTA).MethodsCoronary CTA exams of 10 patients were acquired using PCD‐CT (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens Healthineers). A prior‐information‐enabled neural network (Pie‐Net) was developed, treating one lower‐noise VMI (e.g., 70 keV) as a prior input and one noisy VMI (e.g., 50 keV or 100 keV) as another. For data preprocessing, noisy VMIs were reconstructed by filtered back‐projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR), which were then subtracted to generate “noise‐only” images. Spatial decoupling was applied to the noise‐only images to mitigate overfitting and improve randomization. Thicker slice averaging was used for the IR and prior images. The final training inputs for the convolutional neural network (CNN) inside the Pie‐Net consisted of thicker‐slice signal images with the reinsertion of spatially decoupled noise‐only images and the thicker‐slice prior images. The CNN training labels consisted of the corresponding thicker‐slice label images without noise insertion. Pie‐Net's performance was evaluated in terms of image noise, spatial detail preservation, and quantitative accuracy, and compared to a U‐net‐based method that did not include prior information.ResultsPie‐Net provided strong noise reduction, by 95 ± 1% relative to FBP and by 60 ± 8% relative to IR. For HR VMIs at different keV (e.g., 50 keV or 100 keV), Pie‐Net maintained spatial and spectral fidelity. The inclusion of prior information from the PCD‐CT data in the spectral domain was able to improve a robust deep learning‐based denoising performance compared to the U‐net‐based method, which caused some loss of spatial detail and introduced some artifacts.ConclusionThe proposed Pie‐Net achieved substantial noise reduction while preserving HR VMI's spatial and spectral properties.

Abstract We report a comprehensive evaluation of a full field-of-view (FOV) photon-counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) system using phantoms, and qualitatively assess image quality in patient examples. A whole-body PCD-CT system with 50 cm FOV, 5.76 cm z-detector coverage and two acquisition modes (standard: 144 × 0.4 mm collimation and ultra-high resolution (UHR): 120 × 0.2 mm collimation) was used in this study. Phantoms were scanned to assess image uniformity, CT number accuracy, noise power spectrum, spatial resolution, material decomposition and virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) performance. Four patients were scanned on the PCD-CT system with matched or lower radiation dose than their prior clinical CT scans performed using energy-integrating detector (EID) CT, and the potential clinical impact of PCD-CT was qualitatively evaluated. Phantom results showed water CT numbers within ±5 HU, and image uniformity measured between peripheral and central regions-of-interests to be within ±5 HU. For the UHR mode using a dedicated sharp kernel, the cut-off spatial frequency was 40 line-pairs cm −1 , which corresponds to a 125 μ m limiting in-plane spatial resolution. The full-width-at-half-maximum for the section sensitivity profile was 0.33 mm for the smallest slice thickness (0.2 mm) using the UHR mode. Material decomposition in a multi-energy CT phantom showed accurate material classification, with a root-mean-squared-error of 0.3 mg cc −1 for iodine concentrations (2–15 mg cc −1 ) and 14.2 mg cc −1 for hydroxyapatite concentrations (200 and 400 mg cc −1 ). The average percent error for CT numbers corresponding to the iodine concentrations in VMI (40–70 keV) was 2.75%. Patient PCD-CT images demonstrated better delineation of anatomy for chest and temporal bone exams performed with the UHR mode, which allowed the use of very sharp kernels not possible with EID-CT. VMI and virtual non-contrast images generated from a patient head CT angiography exam using the standard acquisition mode demonstrated the multi-energy capability of the PCD-CT system.