Citations

AbstractMulti‐energy computed tomography (MECT) offers the opportunity for advanced visualization, detection, and quantification of select elements (e.g., iodine) or materials (e.g., fat) beyond the capability of standard single‐energy computed tomography (CT). However, the use of MECT requires careful consideration as substantially different hardware and software approaches have been used by manufacturers, including different sets of user‐selected or hidden parameters that affect the performance and radiation dose of MECT. Another important consideration when designing MECT protocols is appreciation of the specific tasks being performed; for instance, differentiating between two different materials or quantifying a specific element. For a given task, it is imperative to consider both the radiation dose and task‐specific image quality requirements. Development of a quality control (QC) program is essential to ensure the accuracy and reproducibility of these MECT applications. Although standard QC procedures have been well established for conventional single‐energy CT, the substantial differences between single‐energy CT and MECT in terms of system implementations, imaging protocols, and clinical tasks warrant QC tests specific to MECT. This task group was therefore charged with developing a systematic QC program designed to meet the needs of MECT applications. In this report, we review the various MECT approaches that are commercially available, including information about hardware implementation, MECT image types, image reconstruction, and postprocessing techniques that are unique to MECT. We address the requirements for MECT phantoms, review representative commercial MECT phantoms, and offer guidance regarding homemade MECT phantoms. We discuss the development of MECT protocols, which must be designed carefully with proper consideration of MECT technology, imaging task, and radiation dose. We then outline specific recommended QC tests in terms of general image quality, radiation dose, differentiation and quantification tasks, and diagnostic and therapeutic applications.

Abstract The scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) joint is involved in load transmission between the wrist and thumb. A quantitative description of baseline STT joint morphometrics is needed to capture the variation of normal anatomy as well as to guide staging of osteoarthritis. Statistical shape modeling (SSM) techniques quantify variations in three‐dimensional shapes and relative positions. The objectives of this study are to describe the morphology of the STT joint using a multi‐domain SSM. We asked: (1) What are the dominant modes of variation that impact bone and articulation morphology at the STT joint, and (2) what are the morphometrics of SSM‐generated STT joints? Thirty adult participants were recruited to a computed tomography study of normal wrist imaging and biomechanics. Segmentations of the carpus were converted to three‐dimensional triangular surface meshes. A multi‐domain, particle‐based entropy system SSM was used to quantify variation in carpal bone shape and position as well as articulation morphology. Articular surface areas and interosseous proximity distributions were calculated between mesh vertex pairs on adjacent bones within distance (2.0 mm) and surface‐normal angular (35°) thresholds. In the SSM, the first five modes of variation captured 76.2% of shape variation and contributed to factors such as bone scale, articular geometries, and carpal tilt. Median interosseous proximities—a proxy for joint space—were 1.39 mm (scaphotrapezium), 1.42 mm (scaphotrapezoid), and 0.61 mm (trapeziotrapezoid). This study quantifies morphological and articular variations at the STT joint, presenting a range of normative anatomy. The range of estimated interosseous proximities may guide interpretation of imaging‐derived STT joint space.

Abstract Objective . Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT enables routine virtual-monoenergetic image (VMI) reconstruction. We evaluated the performance of an automatic VMI energy level (keV) selection tool on a clinical PCD-CT system in comparison to an automatic tube potential (kV) selection tool from an energy-integrating-detector (EID) CT system from the same manufacturer. Approach. Four torso-shaped phantoms (20–50 cm width) containing iodine (2, 5, and 10 mg cc −1 ) and calcium (100 mg cc −1 ) were scanned on PCD-CT and EID-CT. Dose optimization techniques, task-based VMI energy level and tube-potential selection on PCD-CT (CARE keV) and task-based tube potential selection on EID-CT (CARE kV), were enabled. CT numbers, image noise, and dose-normalized contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR d ) were compared. Main results . PCD-CT produced task-specific VMIs at 70, 65, 60, and 55 keV for non-contrast, bone, soft tissue with contrast, and vascular settings, respectively. A 120 kV tube potential was automatically selected on PCD-CT for all scans. In comparison, EID-CT used x-ray tube potentials from 80 to 150 kV based on imaging task and phantom size. PCD-CT achieved consistent dose reduction at 9%, 21% and 39% for bone, soft tissue with contrast, and vascular tasks relative to the non-contrast task, independent of phantom size. On EID-CT, dose reduction factor for contrast tasks relative to the non-contrast task ranged from a 65% decrease (vascular task, 70 kV, 20 cm phantom) to a 21% increase (soft tissue with contrast task, 150 kV, 50 cm phantom) due to size-specific tube potential adaptation. PCD-CT CNR d was equivalent to or higher than those of EID-CT for all tasks and phantom sizes, except for the vascular task with 20 cm phantom, where 70 kV EID-CT CNR d outperformed 55 keV PCD-CT images. Significance . PCD-CT produced more consistent CT numbers compared to EID-CT due to standardized VMI output, which greatly benefits standardization efforts and facilitates radiation dose reduction.

AbstractBackgroundThe detectability performance of a CT scanner is difficult to precisely quantify when nonlinearities are present in reconstruction. An efficient detectability assessment method that is sensitive to small effects of dose and scanner settings is desirable. We previously proposed a method using a search challenge instrument: a phantom is embedded with hundreds of lesions at random locations, and a model observer is used to detect lesions. Preliminary tests in simulation and a prototype showed promising results.PurposeIn this work, we fabricated a full‐size search challenge phantom with design updates, including changes to lesion size, contrast, and number, and studied our implementation by comparing the lesion detectability from a nonprewhitening (NPW) model observer between different reconstructions at different exposure levels, and by estimating the instrument sensitivity to detect changes in dose.MethodsDesigned to fit into QRM anthropomorphic phantoms, our search challenge phantom is a cylindrical insert 10 cm wide and 4 cm thick, embedded with 12 000 lesions (nominal width of 0.6 mm, height of 0.8 mm, and contrast of −350 HU), and was fabricated using PixelPrint, a 3D printing technique. The insert was scanned alone at a high dose to assess printing accuracy. To evaluate lesion detectability, the insert was placed in a QRM thorax phantom and scanned from 50 to 625 mAs with increments of 25 mAs, once per exposure level, and the average of all exposure levels was used as high‐dose reference. Scans were reconstructed with three different settings: filtered‐backprojection (FBP) with Br40 and Br59, and Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (SAFIRE) with strength level 5 and Br59 kernel. An NPW model observer was used to search for lesions, and detection performance of different settings were compared using area under the exponential transform of free response ROC curve (AUC). Using propagation of uncertainty, the sensitivity to changes in dose was estimated by the percent change in exposure due to one standard deviation of AUC, measured from 5 repeat scans at 100, 200, 300, and 400 mAs.ResultsThe printed insert lesions had an average position error of 0.20 mm compared to printing reference. As the exposure level increases from 50 mAs to 625 mAs, the lesion detectability AUCs increase from 0.38 to 0.92, 0.42 to 0.98, and 0.41 to 0.97 for FBP Br40, FBP Br59, and SAFIRE Br59, respectively, with a lower rate of increase at higher exposure level. FBP Br59 performed best with AUC 0.01 higher than SAFIRE Br59 on average and 0.07 higher than FBP Br40 (all P < 0.001). The standard deviation of AUC was less than 0.006, and the sensitivity to detect changes in mAs was within 2% for FBP Br59.ConclusionsOur 3D‐printed search challenge phantom with 12 000 submillimeter lesions, together with an NPW model observer, provide an efficient CT detectability assessment method that is sensitive to subtle effects in reconstruction and is sensitive to small changes in dose.

Abstract Objectives. To improve quality of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) images using a generalizable motion-correction algorithm. Approach . A neural network with attention gate and spatial transformer (ATOM) was developed to correct coronary motion. Phantom and patient CCTA images (39 males, 32 females, age range 19–92, scan date 02/2020 to 10/2021) retrospectively collected from dual-source CT were used to create training, development, and testing sets corresponding to 140- and 75 ms temporal resolution, with 75 ms images as labels. To test generalizability, ATOM was deployed for locally adaptive motion-correction in both 140- and 75 ms patient images. Objective metrics were used to assess motion-corrupted and corrected phantom and patient images, including structural-similarity-index (SSIM), dice-similarity-coefficient (DSC), peak-signal-noise-ratio (PSNR), and normalized root-mean-square-error (NRMSE). In objective quality assessment, ATOM was compared with several baseline networks, including U-net, U-net plus attention gate, U-net plus spatial transformer, VDSR, and ResNet. Two cardiac radiologists independently interpreted motion-corrupted and -corrected images at 75 and 140 ms in a blinded fashion and ranked diagnostic image quality (worst to best: 1–4, no ties). Main results . ATOM improved quality metrics ( p < 0.05) before/after correction: in phantom, SSIM 0.87/0.95, DSC 0.85/0.93, PSNR 19.4/22.5, NRMSE 0.38/0.27; in patient images, SSIM 0.82/0.88, DSC 0.88/0.90, PSNR 30.0/32.0, NRMSE 0.16/0.12. ATOM provided more consistent improvement of objective image quality, compared to the presented baseline networks. The motion-corrected images received better ranks than un-corrected at the same temporal resolution ( p < 0.05): 140 ms images 1.65/2.25, and 75 ms images 3.1/3.2. The motion-corrected 75 ms images received the best rank in 65% of testing cases. A fair-to-good inter-reader agreement was observed (Kappa score 0.58). Significance . ATOM reduces motion artifacts, improving visualization of coronary arteries. This algorithm can be used to virtually improve temporal resolution in both single- and dual-source CT.

Objectives Photon-counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) offers improved spatial and contrast resolution, which can impact quantitative measurements. This work aims to determine in human subjects the effect of dual-source PCD-CT on the quantitation of coronary artery calcification (CAC) compared with dual-source energy-integrating detector (EID) CT in both 1- and 3-mm images. Methods This prospective study enrolled patients receiving a clinical EID-CT CAC examination to undergo a research PCD-CT CAC examination. Axial images were reconstructed with a 512 × 512 matrix, 200-mm field of view, 3-mm section thickness/1.5-mm interval using a quantitative kernel (Qr36). Sharper kernels (Qr56/QIR strength 4 for PCD and Qr49/ADMIRE strength 5 for EID) were used to reconstruct images with 1-mm section thickness/0.5-mm interval. Pooled analysis was performed for all calcifications with nonzero values, and volume and Agatston scores were compared between EID-CT and PCD-CT. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results In 21 subjects (median age, 58 years; range, 50–75 years; 13 male [62%]) with a total of 42 calcified arteries detected at 3 mm and 46 calcified arteries at 1-mm images, EID-CT CAC volume and Agatston scores were significantly lower than those of PCD-CT (P ≤ 0.001). At 3-mm thickness, the mean (standard deviation) volume and Agatston score for EID-CT were 55.5 (63.4) mm3 and 63.8 (76.9), respectively, and 61.5 (69.4) mm3 and 70.4 (85.3) for PCD-CT (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0013). At 1-mm thickness, the mean (standard deviation) volume and score for EID-CT were 50.0 (56.3) mm3 and 61.1 (69.3), respectively, and 59.5 (63.9) mm3 and 72.5 (79.9) for PCD-CT (P < 0.0001 for both). The applied radiation dose (volume CT dose index) for the PCD-CT scan was 2.1 ± 0.6 mGy, which was 13% lower than for the EID-CT scan (2.4 ± 0.7 mGy, P < 0.001). Conclusions Relative to EID-CT, PCD-CT demonstrated a small but significant increase in coronary artery calcium volume and Agatston score.