Melka, Elnata F.

Abstract Objectives Determine differences in quantitative stenosis severity measurements for ultra-high-resolution (UHR) photon-counting detector (PCD) coronary CT angiography (cCTA) relative to energy-integrating detector (EID) cCTA in a large patient cohort. Methods Adult participants seen between November 2022 and March 2023 underwent a clinical dual-source EID-CT cCTA and a research dual-source PCD-CT cCTA on the same day. Percent diameter stenosis (PDS) was measured, and stenosis severity was assigned based on the PDS of the most severe lesion per patient to determine a coronary artery disease reporting and data system (CAD-RADS) score. Agreement between EID-CT and PCD-CT for PDS and CAD-RADS was determined. Results A total of 112 participants were enrolled, yielding 82 subjects with at least 1 stenosis at PCD-CT (mean age, 68.0 ± 10.8 years; 69.5% [57/82] males). A total of 177 paired stenoses were quantified. The percent decrease in mean PDS from PCD-CT (24.3%) to EID-CT (29.4%) was 17.3% (median difference in PDS: −5.0%, 95% CI: −5.7% to −4.0%). The assigned CAD-RADS score changed in 31/82 subjects. In 11/31 subjects, the most severe stenosis was missed at EID-CT due to partial volume averaging of a small calcification, yet PCD clearly identified stenosis at those locations. In 20/31 subjects, the CAD-RADS score decreased at PCD-CT due to the decreased calcium blooming resulting from the improved spatial resolution. Conclusions UHR PCD cCTA decreases quantitative measures of stenosis severity when a stenosis is identified at EID, leading to decreases in CAD-RADS assignments. Advances in knowledge With its improved spatial resolution, PCD-CT identifies stenoses missed on EID-CT.

Objectives Photon-counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) offers improved spatial and contrast resolution, which can impact quantitative measurements. This work aims to determine in human subjects the effect of dual-source PCD-CT on the quantitation of coronary artery calcification (CAC) compared with dual-source energy-integrating detector (EID) CT in both 1- and 3-mm images. Methods This prospective study enrolled patients receiving a clinical EID-CT CAC examination to undergo a research PCD-CT CAC examination. Axial images were reconstructed with a 512 × 512 matrix, 200-mm field of view, 3-mm section thickness/1.5-mm interval using a quantitative kernel (Qr36). Sharper kernels (Qr56/QIR strength 4 for PCD and Qr49/ADMIRE strength 5 for EID) were used to reconstruct images with 1-mm section thickness/0.5-mm interval. Pooled analysis was performed for all calcifications with nonzero values, and volume and Agatston scores were compared between EID-CT and PCD-CT. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results In 21 subjects (median age, 58 years; range, 50–75 years; 13 male [62%]) with a total of 42 calcified arteries detected at 3 mm and 46 calcified arteries at 1-mm images, EID-CT CAC volume and Agatston scores were significantly lower than those of PCD-CT (P ≤ 0.001). At 3-mm thickness, the mean (standard deviation) volume and Agatston score for EID-CT were 55.5 (63.4) mm3 and 63.8 (76.9), respectively, and 61.5 (69.4) mm3 and 70.4 (85.3) for PCD-CT (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0013). At 1-mm thickness, the mean (standard deviation) volume and score for EID-CT were 50.0 (56.3) mm3 and 61.1 (69.3), respectively, and 59.5 (63.9) mm3 and 72.5 (79.9) for PCD-CT (P < 0.0001 for both). The applied radiation dose (volume CT dose index) for the PCD-CT scan was 2.1 ± 0.6 mGy, which was 13% lower than for the EID-CT scan (2.4 ± 0.7 mGy, P < 0.001). Conclusions Relative to EID-CT, PCD-CT demonstrated a small but significant increase in coronary artery calcium volume and Agatston score.