Citations

Background Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among children in the United States (US), with severity and outcomes linked to social determinants of health (SDOH) and regional differences. Data on the impact of SDOH including race, sex, and Child Opportunity Index (COI) level on TBI severity in southeastern US are sparse in children. Methods We analyzed data retrospectively in 1063 children with TBI, admitted at a Level I Pediatric Trauma Center in the Southeast US between January 2017-June 2023. TBI severity was categorized using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOHS), intensive care unit stay (LOICUS), and craniotomy frequency. Patients were classified by race ( white , Black , non-Black people of color [ NBPOC ]), COI (low, moderate, high), and sex (male, female). Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and post-hoc comparisons. Results Significant disparities were observed by race and COI. Black children and children with low COI had lower GCS scores ( P < 0.01), longer LOHS and LOICUS ( P < 0.01) compared to white children and those with high COI. Additionally, Black and NBPOC children were more likely to undergo craniotomies than white children ( P < 0.05). No sex-based differences in TBI severity or outcomes were found. Discussion This study highlights the significant impact of SDOH, particularly race and COI, on pediatric TBI severity, surgical interventions, and outcomes. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to address health care disparities in vulnerable pediatric populations.

Abstract Aims Significant advancements have been made in the management of obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM), yet the extent of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient reduction achieved with commonly used pharmacological therapies [beta-blockers (BBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), disopyramide, and cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMIs)] relative to each other is still unclear. Methods and results PubMed and Scopus were searched up to September 2024. Clinical trials or observational studies that assessed the changes associated with BBs, CCBs, disopyramide, or CMIs in LVOT gradient at rest or with provocation in patients with oHCM were included. Mean changes in LVOT gradients were pooled as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in a random-effects model. Thirty-seven studies, with 44 arms and 1898 patients, were included in the analysis. At the therapeutic class level, pooled analysis showed that disopyramide was associated with the highest reduction in LVOT gradient at rest [MD: −43.5 (95% CI, −51.6 to −35.3)], followed by CMIs [MD: −34.8 (95% CI, −40.6 to −29.0)], BBs [MD: −20.7 (95% CI, −29.4 to −12.0)], and then CCBs [MD: −14.7 (95% CI, −23.3 to −6.1)], inter-action P &lt; 0.01. Within CMIs, mavacamten had a higher effect than aficamten on gradient reduction; among the included BBs, metoprolol showed the highest gradient reduction, while among CCBs, verapamil was the most effective (inter-action P &lt; 0.01). Similar results were observed for provocable LVOT gradients. Conclusion Pharmacological therapies effectively reduced LVOT gradients in oHCM patients to varying degrees, with disopyramide and CMIs showing the highest effect, followed by BBs and CCBs.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of recombinant human prourokinase (rhPro-UK) administered via intravenous (IV) and intra-arterial (IA) routes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients compared with standard treatments. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines across Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed until 11 December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing rhPro-UK’s efficacy and safety were included. Outcomes included the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), mortality, and adverse events (AEs). Data analysis used risk difference (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Six RCTs (n = 3993) met the inclusion criteria. IV rhPro-UK showed comparable efficacy to the comparator for the mRS 0–1 at 90 days (RD: 0.00, 95% CI: [−0.04, 0.04]) and the mRS 0–2 (RD: −0.01, 95% CI: [−0.03, 0.01], P = 0.23). IA rhPro-UK significantly improved the mRS 0–1 (RD: 0.13, 95% CI: [0.01, 0.26], P = 0.04). The NIHSS reduction was significant for IV rhPro-UK (MD: −0.83, 95% [CI: −1.36, −0.29]). IV rhPro-UK did not significantly reduce the risk of systemic bleeding (RD: −0.10, 95% CI: [−0.24, 0.03], P = 0.12), serious AEs (RD: −0.01, 95% CI: [−0.04, 0.02], P = 0.53), or mortality (RD: 0.01, 95% CI: −0.01, 0.02). IA rhPro-UK significantly increased hemorrhage with neurological deterioration (RD: 0.08, 95% CI: [0.01, 0.14], P = 0.02). Conclusions: IV rhPro-UK provides non-inferior efficacy to both alteplase and standard care with a better safety profile at 35 mg, while IA rhPro-UK enhances functional outcomes in middle cerebral artery occlusions, albeit with safety concerns. Further trials are needed to confirm long-term outcomes, optimal dosing, and broader applicability.

ABSTRACT Ventricular arrhythmias (VA), including ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation, are critical cardiac conditions that are often managed by catheter ablation among those unresponsive to pharmacologic therapy. The choice of anesthesia and sedation regimens for VA ablations may impact arrhythmia inducibility and hemodynamic stability, which can affect procedural success and complication rates. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of sedation versus general anesthesia (GA) among patients undergoing VA ablation. The review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023441553). Database searches were conducted across five major databases from inception to March 9, 2024 to identify randomized trials or observational studies including adult patients undergoing ablations for VA. Screening and data extraction were completed in duplicate. Risk-of-bias assessments were conducted using ROBINS-I as all included studies were observational, and the quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework. Six observational studies (N = 16,435) were included. No significant differences were found between sedation and GA for total procedure time (MD: −14.16 minutes; 95%CI: −38.61 to 10.29 minutes), arrhythmia non-inducibility (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.33–1.58), acute ablation success (RR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.65–1.71), or procedural complications (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.28–1.85). However, sedation was associated with significantly lower intraprocedural hemodynamic instability (RR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.12–0.70). These findings indicate that while sedation and GA have comparable outcomes, sedation may be associated with less hemodynamic instability during VA ablation. However, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm these results.

Abstract Introduction Case reports and series are critical to guide initial decision-making in a pandemic, but may have lower rigor because of the need to publish them quickly. This meta-epidemiologic study compares the methodological quality of case series that described the acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020 versus those that described long-haul cases. Methods We conducted a systematic review in multiple databases for long-haul case series and reports. We identified early cases of acute COVID-19 synthesized in published systematic reviews. We evaluated the methodological quality by pairs of independent reviewers using a tool dedicated for appraising case series. Results We included 239 original case series (81 published in the first year of the pandemic and 158 published later describing long-haul COVID). The methodological quality of both groups of case series was very good (80–100% of series satisfying quality items) except for two items, the selection approach of cases included in the series and ruling out other causes that can explain the main finding described in the series. The appraisal tool demonstrated high agreement and reliability between reviewers. Conclusion The methodological quality of modern case series is high, except for two quality items that represent an area for potential for improvement for authors of case series describing future pandemics.

Background Flow-diverter stents (FDS) have become the standard of care for a wide range of intracranial aneurysms, but their efficacy/safety in the context of recurrent/recanalized aneurysms following stent-assisted coiling (SAC) is not well established. We evaluate the outcomes of FDS retreatment in a large multicenter cohort. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from 118 patients across 22 institutions who underwent FDS retreatment for recurrent/persistent aneurysms after SAC (2008–22). The primary outcome was angiographic occlusion status at last follow-up, categorized as complete (100%), near-complete (90–99%), or incomplete (<90%) occlusion. Secondary outcomes included procedural complications and clinical outcomes measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Results A total of 118 patients (median age 57, 74.6% female) with median follow-up of 15.3 months were identified. Complete occlusion was achieved in 62.5% and near-complete occlusion in 25%. FDS deployment within the pre-existing stent was successful in 98.3% of cases. Major complications occurred in 3.4% of cases, including postoperative aneurysmal rupture with resultant mortality (1.6%) and thromboembolic events with long-term disability (1.6%). Favorable clinical outcomes (mRS 0–2) were observed in 95.1% of patients. Wider aneurysm neck diameter was a significant predictor of incomplete occlusion (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.23 per mm, P=0.044), with male sex trending towards association with non-occlusion (aOR 3.2, P=0.07), while baseline hypertension was associated with complete occlusion (aOR 0.32, P=0.048). Conclusions FDS treatment for recurrent/residual aneurysms after SAC represents a viable treatment option for these challenging cases with acceptable safety and reasonable occlusion rates, although lower than de novo FDS occlusion rates.

Abstract Aims Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Although lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is known to be a well-established risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, its role in the development of AF, independent of this association, remains unclear. Methods and results Adult patients from the three Mayo Clinic sites with a baseline Lp(a) and without AF history were included. Patients were categorized into two groups based on their Lp(a) levels: high Lp(a) (≥50 mg/dL) and low Lp(a) (&lt;50 mg/dL). Survival probabilities free from incident AF were compared between Lp(a) groups, during a follow-up period up to 15 years, using the Kaplan–Meier curve and the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was also conducted. A total of 75 376 patients were included (median age: 55 years, 59% males), with a median follow-up duration of 8.8 (inter-quartile range: 3.4, 14.8) years. Incident AF was detected in 5738 (7.6%) patients. Survival probability free from incident AF was significantly lower in patients with elevated Lp(a) (86%) compared with those with low Lp(a) (88%, log-rank P &lt; 0.001). Multivariable analysis adjusted for potential risk factors of AF showed a statistically significant association of elevated Lp(a) with an 11% increase in AF risk (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.11, 95% confidence interval: 1.05–1.18). Conclusion Our study suggests that elevated Lp(a) (≥50 mg/dL) is an independent risk factor for incident AF. Future prospective studies are warranted to validate our results and to test if reducing Lp(a) could mitigate the burden of AF.

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a well-established causal risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), as reported by multiple Mendelian randomization studies and large epidemiological studies. When elevated Lp(a) is combined with other risk factors, most notably elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), a synergistic atherogenic effect has been reported. However, the current literature is conflicting regarding how Lp(a) interacts in the context of controlled LDL-C levels (e.g., <70 mg/dL) and whether reducing LDL-C can modify the atherogenic effect of Lp(a). In some studies, elevated Lp(a) was still significantly associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events, despite controlled levels of LDL-C. In contrast, multiple studies have reported attenuation of the cardiovascular risk mediated by elevated Lp(a) with lower LDL-C levels. Moreover, the relationship between Lp(a) and triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, and very low-density lipoprotein remains unclear. In this literature review, we summarize and discuss the current evidence regarding the interactions between Lp(a) and other lipid molecules, how they contribute to the pathogenesis of CVD, and future perspectives, particularly in the current era where promising targeted Lp(a)-lowering therapies are under development.