Ghaith, Summer

Abstract Through emerging interpretations of individual “medical freedoms,” a panoply of state legislative bills seeks to undermine long-standing public health and health care requirements including recommendations to test, screen, treat, and vaccinate persons. To the extent these bills could upend decades of laws and policies protecting individual and communal health, especially among vulnerable individuals, they threaten the health — and freedoms — of all persons.

ABSTRACTObjectivesWe describe the types of emergency department (ED) visits managed by non‐physician providers (NPPs), including physician assistants and nurse practitioners, and emergency medicine (EM) physicians, assessing shifts in care patterns over time.MethodsWe used data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey collected from 2009 to 2021. We classified visits by provider type: physician only, physician with resident, physician with NPP, and NPP only. We described characteristics of visits by provider type, including patient demographics, triage urgency, imaging, length of stay, and disposition, and analyzed using Poisson regression. We described the change in type of provider seen over this study period and further analyzed by triage urgency and hospital location.ResultsOf 1.684 billion estimated ED visits from 2009 to 2021, 1.171 billion were managed by physicians without residents or NPPs (physicians only), 136.3 million by physicians with residents, 209.1 million by physicians with NPPs, and 167.4 million by NPPs only. Patients seen by physicians only were older, were triaged as having more urgent needs, had a longer ED length of stay, and were more likely to be admitted compared to those seen by NPPs only. Physician‐only visits decreased from 77% to 62%, while NPP‐only visits increased from 6% to 11%. The physician with the NPP group similarly grew from 9% to 17%. For visits assigned a triage urgency level of 2 (“emergent”), physician‐only visits decreased by 20%, physician with NPP visits increased by 13%, and NPP‐only visits increased by 3%. In metropolitan areas, physician‐only visits dropped 14%, with a 5% increase in NPP‐only visits. In non‐metropolitan areas, physician‐only visits decreased 17%, with a 9% increase in NPP‐only visits.ConclusionsThe EM workforce has shifted, with NPPs seeing a higher percentage of patients, including both lower‐ and higher‐acuity patients. This shift is particularly prominent in rural areas but is evident across all regions.

ABSTRACT Objective We sought to characterize patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) with abdominal pain and to validate risk categories defined by the Guidelines for Reasonable and Appropriate Care in the Emergency Department (GRACE‐2) for low‐risk recurrent abdominal pain. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients presenting with abdominal pain between November 2019 and November 2023 across 21 EDs in Arizona, the Midwest, and Florida. Patients were categorized per GRACE‐2 into recurrent and non‐recurrent pain as well as low‐ and high‐risk groups. Primary outcomes included 72‐h returns and mortality at 30 and 90 days. Results The study included 162,494 visits (112,896 unique patients; median age 46 years; 61.2% female). Among these, 4.3% had low‐risk recurrent abdominal pain. Patients with recurrent and non‐recurrent low‐risk pain had similar ED length of stay and discharge rates to each other, compared to patients with high‐risk pain who had longer length of stay and lower discharge rates. At 30 days after the ED encounter, patients with low‐risk recurrent abdominal pain had similar mortality to patients with low‐risk non‐recurrent pain (0.4% vs. 0.3%; adjusted RR = 1.31, 95% CI: 0.85–2.03), while they had significantly lower mortality than patients with high‐risk recurrent abdominal pain (0.4% vs. 2.3; adjusted RR = 3.14, 95% CI: 2.02–4.89). Conclusions This study highlights the heterogeneity in patients presenting to the ED with abdominal pain. Among these patients, those with low‐risk recurrent pain demonstrated similar lengths of stay, discharges, and mortality rates to those with low‐risk non‐recurrent pain and less favorable lengths of stay, discharges, and mortality rates compared to those with any high‐risk features. These findings suggest that low‐ and high‐risk features may be more useful than recurrent or non‐recurrent pain in identifying patients who could benefit from more robust ED evaluations.

Objective: There is little existing literature describing the evaluation and treatment of patients referred to surgical subspecialities for recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs). We hypothesised female patients referred to urology and urogynaecology for rUTI undergo multiple diagnostic tests and few would undergo surgery. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective review of female patients referred to urology or urogynaecology at a single institution between 2016 and 2019. Data on demographics, provider speciality, diagnostic tests performed, and surgeries were abstracted. Descriptive statistics were used and a logistic regression was performed to determine the adjusted odds ratio of undergoing a surgery. Results: A total of 990 patients were included with a mean age of 62 and on average underwent 3.7 different testing modalities, including genitourinary (GU) examination (62.3%), urodynamic testing (72.7%), cystoscopy (66.0%), and imaging (70.7%). Urologists more commonly pursued urodynamic testing, cystoscopy, and imaging than urogynaecologists. Ultimately, 21.4% of all patients underwent a surgical procedure. Patients who were seen by urogynaecology, underwent GU examination, urodynamic testing, or cystoscopy had higher likelihoods of eventually undergoing surgery (procedure under anaesthesia). Conclusion: Female rUTI patients referred to urology or urogynaecology undergo considerable evaluation and testing. The majority of patients are ultimately managed medically rather than surgically, indicating continued need for resource stewardship. Level of evidence: Not applicable.

Abstract Introduction Recent literature suggests growing rates of malpractice claims against Urologists, with the incidence of being sued seeming to be unrelated to one’s professional reputation. These cases provide insight into errors that may lead to litigation. Given national trends of rising malpractice cases, estimates that a Urologist can expect to be sued at least twice in their careers are likely underestimates. Malpractice cases can give insight into the common medical errors rising to the level of litigation. Given the elective nature of procedures within sexual medicine, understanding litigation related to these cases is crucial. Objective We aim to analyze malpractice suits related to men’s health and highlight clinical presentations and legal outcomes. Methods Per STROBE guidelines, we searched the publicly available Thomson Reuters Westlaw legal database for “jury verdicts and settlements” from January 1970 to August 2023 to identify medical malpractice cases in Urology. Patient demographics, clinical presentation, alleged error, and legal outcomes were abstracted during full case review by an independent screener. Cases related to men’s sexual health or fertility that named a urologist as the defendant were fully analyzed. Results A total of 553 Urology cases were extracted, with 23 men’s health related cases subsequently analyzed and summarized in Table 1. The most common conditions associated with litigation were erectile dysfunction (penile prosthesis) (39%), epidydimal pathology (13%), and varicocele (13%). The most common allegations were misdiagnosis (26%), surgical complication (22%), lack of informed consent (22%), and violation of standard of care (22%). Of the 23 cases, 57% ruled “no liability” in favor of the urologist, 39% ruled in favor of the plaintiff with a median award of $335,000 (IQR = 100,000-450,000), and one was settled for $316,338. Among cases ruled as negligent, performing the incorrect procedure, surgical complications, and violating the standard of care were prominent allegations. Florida (26%) and Pennsylvania (17%) had the most cases in this sample. Of note, there were no cases for penile plication, plaque excision, microsurgical cord denervation, vasectomy reversal, or sperm retrieval, and only one for vasectomy. Conclusions This study characterizes malpractice cases related to men’s sexual health naming urologists as defendants. Despite fear of litigation, this review of the Westlaw database revealed only 23 cases related to men’s health since 1970. Moreover, the majority of cases ruled in favor of the Urologist. Obtaining comprehensive informed consent, following national guidelines, and responding appropriately to surgical complications may minimize likelihood of litigation and maximize patient outcomes. Disclosure No.

Abstract Purpose This scoping review summarises five decades of research on gender bias in subjective performance evaluations of medical trainees. Method A medical librarian searched PubMed, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane DBSR in June 2020. Two researchers independently reviewed each abstract to determine if it met inclusion criteria (original research article investigating gender bias in subjective medical trainee evaluations by staff). References from selected articles were also reviewed for inclusion. Data were extracted from the articles, and summary statistics were performed. Results A total of 212 abstracts were reviewed, and 32 met criteria. Twenty (62.5%) evaluated residents, and 12 (37.5%) studied medical students. The majority of studies on residents were Internal Medicine ( n = 8, 40.0%) and Surgery ( n = 7, 35.0%). All studies were performed in North America and were either retrospective or observational. Nine (28.0%) were qualitative, and 24 (75.0%) were quantitative. The majority of studies were published in the last decade ( n = 21, 65.6%). Twenty (62.5%) studies documented gender bias, of which 11 (55%) found that males received higher quantitative performance evaluations and 5 (25%) found that females received higher evaluation scores. The remaining 4 (20%) reported gender differences in qualitative evaluations. Conclusions Most studies detected gender bias in subjective performance evaluations of medical trainees, with a majority favouring males. There is a paucity of studies on bias in medical education with a lack of standardised approach to investigating bias.

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to compare the association between migraine and sleep quality in premenopausal versus perimenopausal women. Methods A cross-sectional analysis from the Data Registry on the Experiences of Aging, Menopause and Sexuality was conducted using questionnaire data from premenopausal and perimenopausal women seen at women's health clinics at 3 geographic locations from 2015 to 2021. Sleep quality and duration were assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Associations between poor sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index >5) and self-reported migraine history (Y/N) were evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression model, adjusting for body mass index, anxiety, depression, and vasomotor symptoms. Results Of 2,067 women (mean age 43.2 years) included in the analysis, 594 (28.7%) reported a migraine history. Women were mostly white (92.2%), partnered (75.1%), and educated (86% with at least some college); 46.5% (n = 962) were premenopausal, 53.5% (n = 1,105) were perimenopausal, and 71.2% met the criteria for poor sleep. In univariate analysis, migraine history predicted poor sleep in both premenopausal and perimenopausal women (P = 0.005 and P = 0.004, respectively). However, in multivariable analysis, migraine history remained associated with poor sleep in premenopausal women (P = 0.044), but not in perimenopausal women (P = 0.46). Conclusions A migraine history was associated with poor sleep in premenopausal women. The relationship in perimenopausal women seemed to be influenced by confounding factors that are more prevalent during the menopause transition and are known to affect the frequency of migraine and sleep disturbances, such as anxiety, depression, and vasomotor symptoms. These conditions may need to be the focus of management in migraineurs with sleep disturbances during the menopause transition.

BACKGROUND: Promotions in academic medicine are frequently based on number of publications and leadership positions held. While prior study has established women publish less than men, many evaluations are limited to individual specialties and do not evaluate involvement with educational activities. OBJECTIVE: To compare gender differences in academic output, intramural leadership positions, and educational leadership positions of academic physicians. METHODS: The curriculum vitae and de-identified demographic data of all permanent physicians employed at a multi-site academic medical center were reviewed from April to May 2020. Multivariable logistic and Poisson regressions evaluated leadership positions and number of publications. RESULTS: Of 3,359 physicians in the demographic database, 32.3% (n = 1,087) were women and 72.5% were white (n = 2,510). Of the 3,015 physicians in the curriculum vitae database, 32% (n = 962) were women. Women were more likely (p < 0.001) to be assistant professor (54% vs. 42.7%) and less likely to be associate (18.1% vs. 20.3%) or full professor (14.6% vs. 29.1%). Women assistant professors published 22% fewer articles (ratio estimate = 0.78, p < 0.001), associate professors 18% less (coefficient = 0.82, p < 0.001), and full professors 23% less (coefficient = 0.77, p < 0.001). Fewer women were program directors for residencies (1.6% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.02) or fellowships (5.4% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.04), and held fewer division or department leadership positions (OR 0.8, 95% CI as [0.6, 1.0], p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Women physicians do not outperform men across any education, leadership, or publication category. A cultural shift is needed to redefine traditional metrics for leadership appointments if academic medicine hopes to achieve equity.