Punjani, Nahid

Abstract Introduction There is wide variation in male fertility preservation practices. While physician preference accounts for some of this diversity, practice patterns often reflect multiple extrinsic factors including patient demographics, equipment availability, laboratory protocols, and state law. Objective We sought to characterize national trends in sperm retrieval and storage across reproductive urology practices in the United States. Methods An anonymous 34-item survey characterizing provider demographics, practice settings, fertility preservation procedures, andrology laboratory practices, and cryopreservation expenses was designed. Practicing reproductive urologists were identified using information available through professional societies. Our survey was constructed using the Qualtrics platform and distributed electronically between October 2024 and May 2025. Results 39 responses were received by urologists practicing across 21 states (response rate: 21%, n=189). A majority (74%, n=29) of survey responders practiced at academic medical centers, with others practicing at non-academic hospitals (8%, n=3) and private practices (13%, n=5). The most common indications for fertility preservation reported included oncologic care (42%), gamete storage for planned ART (31%), transgender care (18%), pre-vasectomy sperm banking (10%), and pre-deployment banking for military personnel (5%). Nearly all providers performed microsurgical sperm retrievals (97%, n=38, Figure) and oncologic testicular sperm extractions (85%, n=33) when indicated. More than half of providers offered conventional testicular sperm extractions (72%, n=28), microsurgical epididymal sperm aspirations (59%, n=23), testicular sperm aspirations (56%, n=22), penile vibratory stimulation (54%, n=21), or percutaneous epididymal sperm aspirations (52%, n=20). Fewer providers offered post-mortem sperm retrieval (49%, n=19), pre-pubertal testicular tissue cryopreservation (36%, n=14), or electroejaculation (31%, n=12). Most respondents (62%, n=24) had access to an on-site andrology laboratory. Semen analyses were evaluated using manual (53%, n=20), computer-assisted (11%, n=4), or combinatorial methods (26%, n=10). Though many (37%, n=14) providers were uncertain about institutional costs for semen specimen processing, a plurality of respondents (40%, n=15) reported fees ranging from $100-500 with the remainder (23%, n=9) reporting fees exceeding $500. Respondents most frequently reported semen storage fees ranging between $100-300 per year (39%, n=15), while approximately a third (31%, n=12) estimated these costs to range between $300-600 per year. However, 18% (n=7) of respondents reported higher costs for specimen storage and 13% (n=5) were uncertain about the expense of this service. Conclusions This multi-institutional, geographically diverse survey reveals significant variation in reproductive urology practice patterns and cost associated with semen analyses and storage. Future studies will explore differences in practice patterns to better understand the factors influencing this variation and their effect on male reproductive healthcare. In the absence of society guidelines, reproductive urologists must collaborate, share best practices, and maintain price transparency to ensure sperm retrieval remains accessible and affordable. Disclosure No

Abstract Introduction The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (June 2022), which overturned Roe v. Wade, has prompted significant shifts in reproductive health behavior, particularly among men. Several studies have reported trends in vasectomy-related interest and procedural volume following the decision, suggesting a growing inclination to pursue vasectomy as a long-term contraceptive option amid changing abortion access on national and statewide levels. Emerging research has also begun to explore the motivations behind this trend, pointing to a complex interplay of personal, social, and policy-related factors. However, the current body of evidence is fragmented, spanning various settings and study designs. Thus, there is a need to map the breadth and scope of this literature, identify key themes, and highlight gaps in knowledge. Objective To review the published literature assessing changes in vasectomy interest and utilization following the Dobbs decision. Methods This scoping review was conducted in accordance with established methodological frameworks to systematically map the existing literature on vasectomy trends in the United States following the Dobbs decision. A scoping review was chosen rather than a systematic review or meta-analysis due to the heterogeneity in study designs, populations, and outcome measures. Eligible studies included peer-reviewed articles examining adult patients concerning vasectomy in U.S. settings, with a focus on changes in utilization, interest, or related behaviors in response to abortion policy shifts. A comprehensive search strategy was developed to capture English-language peer-reviewed literature from 2010 onward. Searches were conducted in January 2025 across six databases: PubMed (n=207), Embase (n=243), Scopus (n=195), Web of Science (n=48), Cochrane Library (n=17), and ClinicalTrials.gov (n=0). Search terms included variations of “vasectomy” and “abortion.” Two independent reviewers screened articles and extracted data using a piloted form on the Covidence platform, collecting information on study characteristics, population demographics, outcomes related to vasectomy trends, patient motivations, and contextual policy factors. Results A total of 405 unique records were identified through the literature search, with 34 articles reviewed in full text. Seventeen studies met final inclusion criteria. Internet search analyses (29%, n=5) demonstrated increased interest in both vasectomy and tubal ligation following the Dobbs decision, with all reporting greater relative increases for “vasectomy” across short-, mid-, and long-term timeframes. Procedural trend analyses (29%, n=5) showed overall increases in vasectomy volume compared with 6-month to 5-year pre-Dobbs baselines. Six studies found that men undergoing or seeking vasectomy post-Dobbs were significantly younger. Five studies reported higher proportions of childless or fewer-child patients. Additionally, five studies identified shifts in marital or partner status, with increased rates of single, unpartnered, or nonmarried patients post-Dobbs. Geographic differences were observed across 47% of studies (n=8), with greater vasectomy and tubal ligation interest reported in states with abortion trigger laws or more restrictive abortion environments. Conclusions This scoping review identified key demographic and geographic patterns in vasectomy trends following the Dobbs decision. Findings underscore increased interest and utilization, particularly among younger, childless, and unpartnered men, and highlight regional variation aligned with abortion policy restrictiveness. These results warrant further prospective study on patient-level motivations for permanent sterilization. Disclosure No

Abstract Introduction Erectile Dysfunction (ED) is becoming increasingly recognized as a potential marker of chronic medical conditions. Recent research has examined the association between ED and Parkinson’s disease. In fact, recent findings indicate that men with ED have upwards of a fourfold higher risk of developing Parkinson’s disease compared to those without a diagnosis of ED. Objective Our research investigates associations between self-reported ED severity and neurobiological factors, including measures of cognitive function and neuroimaging of dopaminergic integrity. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 93 male research participants with ED extracted from an observational cohort study of aging and Parkinson’s disease biomarkers. Though some patients experienced some age-related mild cognitive changes, all participants were classified as clinically neurologically healthy. Patients received cognitive testing through the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), with scores ranging from 0-30. Neuroimaging of the bilateral caudate and putamen, components of the striatum implicated in Parkinson’s disease pathology and dopaminergic binding, was measured through dopamine transporter SPECT imaging (DaTScan) binding ratios. ED was self-reported using questions 22-23 on the Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson’s Disease – Autonomic Dysfunction (SCOPA-AUT). Question 22 stated “In the past month, have you been impotent (unable to have or maintain an erection?)” and question 23 stated “In the past month, how often have you been unable to ejaculate?”. SCOPA-AUT scores ranged from 0 (sometimes) to 3 (often) and were averaged across both questions. Patients taking dopaminergic Parkinson’s disease medications or PDE5 inhibitors at baseline were excluded due to potential confounding. Due to violations of normality assumption, numerical associations utilized an age-adjusted partial spearman correlation coefficient. Descriptive statistics are displayed as median (IQR). Results Of the 93 selected participants, one individual was excluded due to incomplete neuroimaging DaTScan data. Therefore, 92 patients were included in our analysis. The median age of participants was 67.3 years (61.4 – 73.0) and the median MoCA score was 27.2 (26.0, 28.7) which represents minimal cognitive impairment. Age-adjusted spearmen correlation coefficient showed no association between MoCA measured cognitive performance and ED severity (r = -0.116, p = 0.275). Age-adjusted associations of striatal DaTScan showed a significant, mild relationship between ED severity and both right caudate dopamine binding ratios (r = 0.236, p=0.0242) and left putamen dopamine binding ratios (r = 0.262, p = 0.0121). However, associations between ED severity and both left caudate (r = 0.150, p = 0.155) and right putamen (r = 0.143, p = 0.176) dopamine binding ratios did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions Although no association was observed between ED severity and cognitive function, greater ED severity was significantly associated with increased striatal dopaminergic binding. This positive, age-adjusted association may reflect a compensatory dopaminergic response similar to that seen in the early stages of Parkinson’s disease. Overall, our findings suggest that ED could serve as a potential marker of central dopaminergic and autonomic alterations, even in the absence of clinically evident neurological disease. Disclosure No

Abstract Introduction While microdeletions in the azoospermia factor (AZF) regions of the Y chromosome are a well-recognized cause of genetic male infertility, reproductive outcomes and broader health profiles among affected men remain poorly characterized. Objective We explore the distribution of AZF deletion subtypes and evaluate comorbidities and fertility management patterns in this unique population. Methods We performed a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study of men diagnosed with AZF deletions following evaluation by a reproductive urologist and genetic testing. The primary exposure variable was the AZF subtype (AZFa, AZFb, AZFc, or multilocus [e.g., AZFabc]).Clinical data were extracted to assess the presence of comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, liver disease, and cardiac disease. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the distribution of AZF subtypes, comorbidity profile, and outcomes of sperm retrieval procedures within our cohort. Results Among 40 men with confirmed AZF microdeletions across three academic centers, four patients with SRY translocations were excluded. Of the remaining 36, AZFc was the most common subtype (75%), followed by multilocus (16.6%), AZFa (5.5%), and AZFb (2.7%). The median age was 32.8 years (IQR: 29.2–33.6) and median BMI was 28.6 kg/m2 (IQR: 25.6–32.8). Comorbid conditions were identified in 8% of the cohort, with hyperlipidemia (13.9%), hypertension (11%), and diabetes (11%) most commonly reported. Sperm retrieval was attempted in 31% (n=11) of patients, exclusively among those with AZFc (n=10) andAZFb (n=1) deletions. Microscopic testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) was the predominant technique (91%). Sperm was successfully retrieved in 46% of these cases, all within the AZFc subgroup. Conclusions This study advances limited literature on AZF microdeletions by characterizing systemic health profiles and post-diagnosis infertility management. Our results support a broad phenotype associated with genetic causes of male infertility. In this cohort of men with YCMD, AZFc was the most prevalent subtype. Compared to national estimates for similarly aged men, our findings suggest that men with YCMD may have a distinct comorbidity profile compared to the general population, with an elevated prevalence of metabolic disease. Our findings reinforce male infertility as a heterogeneous condition that may serve as an early marker for broader metabolic disease. In addition, nearly all patients who underwent sperm retrieval were within the AZFc group. Fertility management trends favored mTESE, with moderate success rates in sperm retrieval, particularly among AZFc patients. Our results highlight provider preferences in surgical fertility management in patients withYCMD. Our findings underscore the need for a holistic approach to men with YCMD, addressing both surgical fertility management and systemic health risks. Clear patient counseling on sperm retrieval success rates and early identification of comorbidities may redefine outcomes for this unique population. Our results support a broad phenotype associated with genetic causes of male infertility. Disclosure No

Abstract Introduction Sperm cryopreservation is becoming increasingly accessible and cost-effective. One of the most common indications for cryopreservation remains prior to gonadotoxic therapies and surgeries. However, it may be used by patients undergoing vasectomy as an alternative to potential future more invasive procedures including reversal or sperm retrieval. Objective To characterize demographic and individual factors associated with the utilization of cryopreservation prior to vasectomy. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of all patients from January 2023 to May 2025 at a single academic medical center who underwent a vasectomy. All 186 patients who completed the pre-vasectomy questionnaire were included in our analysis. At the time of vasectomy consultation, patients were informed of the procedure’s permanent nature and, per guidelines, were educated on future fertility options, including vasectomy reversal and sperm retrieval for use with in vitro fertilization. All patients were also separately offered sperm cryopreservation. Demographic and questionnaire data was collected and analyzed. Pre-vasectomy questionnaire information included age, relationship information, familial information, and reason for vasectomy, among other factors. Numerical variables were described as medians with interquartile range and categorical variables were described in counts. Due to violation of the normality assumption, Fisher’s Exact test was used for categorical variables and the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was used for numerical variables. Results 186 patients completed the pre-vasectomy questionnaire and were used in our analysis. Of these individuals, 5.4% (n=10) utilized cryopreservation at the time of vasectomy. Individuals utilizing cryopreservation had a median age 5 years younger than those who did not utilize the same service (p = 0.046). Moreover, 40.0% (n=4) of individuals in the cryopreservation group had children compared to 83.5% (n=147) in the no cryopreservation group (p=0.004). Current relationship length was significantly longer for individuals who did not utilize cryopreservation, with a median reported relationship length of 11 years as compared to a median length of 5 years for individuals utilizing cryopreservation (p=0.025). The shorter relationship length is likely related to an additional finding that the percentage of individuals who utilized cryopreservation were married approximately 30% less often than individuals who did not use the same service (p=0.039). Conclusions While only a small proportion of patients undergoing vasectomy choose to pursue cryopreservation despite counselling at their visit, significant differences in demographic and individual characteristics were observed for those who did. These individuals tended to be younger, married at lower rates, without children, and in shorter relationships. With improved access to reproductive services, further work is needed to understand decision choices for men offered sperm cryopreservation prior to permanent sterilization. Disclosure No

Abstract Introduction The EROS (Erectile Restoration Outcomes and Satisfaction) registry provides prospective questionnaire-based follow-up after IPP was founded in 2020 at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester. Objective We sought to assess general trends in the open-ended responses portion of the questionnaire. Methods Data were collected from 2020 to 2025, with a total of 568 responses. The survey included six open-ended questions pertaining to lifestyle change since IPP, reasons not to repeat the procedure, impediments to use, dissatisfaction, what patients wish they had known more about the procedure, and other recommendations. Evaluable data included 6-month responses from Rochester, Jacksonville, and Phoenix. Results Open-ended feedback was given by 66% of patients on what they wished they had known, 54% gave other recommendations, 38% gave lifestyle feedback, 7% elaborated upon reasons not using, 3% on reasons for dissatisfaction, and 2% on reasons they would not repeat IPP. There was an overall very positive response (“Significant Improvement”, n=74.3%) from those who underwent the IPP placement, with some patients reporting that it was far more convenient than other forms of treatment, and even increased spontaneity in their sexual lives, leading to improved relationships. Among the reported responses are increased confidence (n=39.4%), increased sexual activity (n=13.3%), and improved health and exercise levels (n=6.6%). When questioning patients on why they would not repeat the procedure and what their sources of dissatisfaction were, of those who responded to each question (n=12, n=16), the most report complaint was exaggeration of pre-existing curves (n=41.7%, n=25.0%), particularly due to Peyronie’s disease. When questioned about what prevents use, the main response was partner-related or due to personal problems (n=45.2%). The patients did not have many recommendations but hoped for a better way to deflate and inflate the device (n=20.4%) and reported adequate pre-operative education and use of the pump. The table below outlines the categories of responses and the percentage of each keyword reported per question type. Conclusions In addition to standard pre-operative IPP counseling, providers should provide additional focus on potential difficulty with device inflation/deflation, length loss (IPP not in glans), pain/ recovery expectations, potential of new or worsened curve (erect or flaccid), and potential change in sensation. IPP satisfaction is high, as only 2% of patients gave responses on why they would not repeat the IPP, with many men expressing an increased level of overall confidence. Disclosure No

Abstract Introduction Chronic scrotal content pain (CSCP), defined as three or more months of scrotal pain interfering with daily life, affects approximately 100,000 men annually in the United States. Historically, the absence of standardized guidelines led to wide variability in diagnosis and treatment. At the time of our study design and data collection, no formal guidance existed for CSCP. In April 2025, after the study’s completion, the American Urological Association (AUA) published its first clinical guidelines for CSCP. Our findings now offer important context regarding real-world practice patterns before guideline publication. Objective To characterize diagnostic and treatment strategies for CSCP among U.S. reproductive urologists. Methods An anonymous 25-question Qualtrics survey was distributed to U.S.-based reproductive urologists. The survey assessed physician demographics, diagnostic evaluations, conservative and surgical treatment strategies, and perceived patient outcomes. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and comparisons were performed using Mann-Whitney U, chi-square, or Fisher’s exact tests, as appropriate. Results Of 183 invited physicians, 41 (22.4%) completed the survey in full. All respondents were fellowship-trained, practicing urologists, with most board-certified (82.9%). Respondents were nearly evenly split between ≤5 years (48.8%) and >5 years (51.2%) in practice. Among ten conservative treatment options, reassurance (41.5%) and NSAIDs (31.7%) were the most frequently selected first-line treatments, with median ranks of 2.5 and 2, respectively (Figure 1). Opioid medications were the least favored (median rank: 10), with 56.1% ranking them last. Pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) had a favorable median rank of 3 and was ranked higher by those with ≤5 years in practice compared to those in practice >5 years (median: 3 vs. 4, p = 0.019). GABA analogues and tricyclic antidepressants were assigned median ranks of 6 and 7.5, respectively. The most commonly performed surgical procedure for CSCP was microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord (MDSC, 95.1%), followed by varicocelectomy (92.7%), vasectomy reversal (78.0%), epididymectomy (73.2%), and orchiectomy (51.2%). For post-vasectomy pain syndrome, MDSC was preferred by 63.4%, followed by vasectomy reversal (22.0%) and epididymectomy (9.8%). Among those performing vasectomy reversals, 80% of patients paid out-of-pocket (IQR: 50.0–93.5%). Respondents perceived surgical management as more effective than conservative treatment, with median complete symptom resolution rates of 70% (IQR: 50–80%) versus 25% (IQR: 10–40%) (p < 0.001). Only 7.3% reported using validated tools like the Chronic Orchialgia Symptom Index (COSI) to evaluate patient outcomes. Conclusions Our study offers a contemporary snapshot of CSCP management among reproductive urologists, revealing substantial variability in practice. Surgery was consistently perceived as more effective than conservative approaches. These findings underscore areas of alignment and divergence with the newly released AUA guidelines and support the need for future comparative trials and implementation studies to guide standardized, evidence-based care. Disclosure No