Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

34 citation(s) found for "Rahim, Md Al".

Optimal therapy for pediatric B-ALL in first relapse: Comparative effectiveness of blinatumomab to hematopoietic cell transplantation versus CD19 CAR T cell therapy
Liu, Hongyan , Shinehouse, Laura K., Hinson, Ashley , Kohorst, Mira A. , Elias, Anna , Keenan, Ella, Acres, Hannah, Ahmed, Ibrahim , Al-Mulla, Abdulla , Arthur, Laura, Beck, Jill C., Berry, Abigale, Bhatla, Deepika, Briscoe, Eliza, Chu, Roland, Davis, Laurie , Elo, Lyannette, Eom, Elizabeth, Vasco, Alejandra Escobar, Faulk, Kelly , Galán‐Gómez, Víctor , Goode, Erin , Hamill, Darcy, Vasanna, Smitha Hosahalli, Kinoshita, Hannah , Krieger, Elizabeth , Lee‐Miller, Cathy , Lind, Katherine , Milner, Jordan , Moore‐Higgs, Giselle J., Murphy, Lindsey , Murphy, Megan , Nguyen, Gabriella, Patel, Hiren P. , Prosser-Dombrowski, Alexandra, Rahrig, April , Ramachandran, Shanti , Hammoud, Miza Salim, Saraf, Amanda J. , Shoag, Jamie , Symons, Heather J. , Tastet, Nicholas, Thomas, Stephanie , Thornock, Molly, Weisnicht, Allison , Zarnegar‐Lumley, Sara , Shah, Nirali, Maude, Shannon L. , Quigg, Troy C. , Elgarten, Caitlin W. , Myers, Regina M. , Li, Yimei , Hoover, Alex , Keenan, Ella, Arthur, Laura, Briscoe, Eliza, Chang, Grace, Dolan, J. Gregory , Fabrizio, Vanessa A , Grupp, Stephan A. , Hall, Anurekha G. , Moskop, Amy , Murphy, Megan, Ortega, Maria, Ferrer, Antonio Pérez , Pfeiffer, Thomas , Rahim, Mahvish Qureshi , Toner, Keri , Shah, Nirali N , Rubinstein, Jeremy , Bhojwani, Deepa

Blood | December 4, 2025 | Volume: 146 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 3339-3339

10.1182/blood-2025-3339 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Outcomes for 1st relapse of pediatric B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), especially high/intermediate-risk (HR/IR) relapse, remain unacceptably poor. Limited enrollment of this population on cooperative group clinical trials has impeded our ability to study potentially effective regimens. In the current era, patients can access innovative immunotherapies commercially. However, there is no mechanism to capture outcomes for these off-study patients and no comparative effectiveness data to guide treatment selection. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study of patients <30 years who initiated 1st relapse therapy at a participating center from 2018-2022 (ReCALL-1 Study). Objectives were to define real-world survival outcomes, compare response rates of reinduction strategies, describe the post-reinduction treatment landscape, and, for patients with HR/IR relapse, assess the comparative effectiveness (CE) of blinatumomab to hematopoietic cell transplant (blina/HCT) v CD19 CAR T cells (CART). For the CE analysis, we emulated an open-label, randomized study of blina/HCT v CART who achieved an M1/M2 marrow at the end of an intensive reinduction (EoRI). Patients were classified by their intended treatment at EoRI. Cox regression models were used to adjust for unbalanced patient and disease features by arms. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) from EoRI. RESULTS The full cohort included 479 patients from 33 centers (31 US, 2 international). Median time to relapse was 31 months (m); 77% had bone marrow (BM) involvement and 31% central nervous sytem involvement. With a median follow-up of 49m from relapse, 4 year (y) OS, event-free survival (EFS), and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 64%, 43%, and 13%, respectively. Among patients with very early BM (<18m, n=79), early BM (18-35m, n=76), late BM (≥36m, n=162), and isolated CNS (n=85) relapses, 4y OS/EFS were 29%/20%, 57%/35%, 78%/49%, and 84%/61%, respectively. Only 19% received reinduction therapy on a clinical trial. Among patients with BM disease, R3 reinduction (n=179) and VXLD (n=61) had identical MRD-negative (<0.01%) CR rates of 38% (p=1.00) and equivalent treatment failure (TF; M3 or extramedullary disease) rates: R3, 8% v VXLD 7%, p=0.79. Blina (n=33) and inotuzumab-based (n=21) reinductions achieved MRD-negative CR rates of 39% and 52%, respectively, but higher TF rates of 39% and 24%. Reinduction mortality was 2%: R3, n=5; VXLD, n=3; 3-drug reinduction, n=1. Overall, as part of 1st relapse therapy, 36% received CART (78% commercial product), 44% HCT, 40% blina, and 11% inotuzumab. The emulated trial included 159 patients, 95 on blina/HCT and 64 on CART. Study arms were well matched by demographics, cytogenetics, and relapse sites, but CART patients were more likely to have relapsed <18m from diagnosis (34% v 24%) and have EoRI M2 marrows (31% v 11%), and less likely to have private insurance (36% v 51%). Unadjusted OS was comparable between arms (log rank p=0.18): CART, 60% at 4y; blina/HCT, 71%, as was NRM (10% v 13% at 4y). EFS was lower for CART (p=0.049): 4y EFS 35% v 49% for blina/HCT. After adjustment for unbalanced covariates, the hazard of death was equivalent for CART as compared to blina/HCT (aHR 1.1, 95% CI 0.6-2.1, p=0.67) and EFS became more comparable (aHR 1.3, 95% CI 0.8-2.1, p=0.22). 91% of blina/HCT and 97% of CART received their intended cell therapy; time from EoRI to cell therapy was shorter for CART (67 v 86 days, p<.001). In the CART arm, 34% underwent consolidative HCT; 1/3 were preplanned and 2/3 due to loss of B cell aplasia or NGS-MRD positivity. Of those with a 2nd relapse, CART patients were more likely to be CD19 negative (47% v 10%, p=0.003). CONCLUSION In this multicenter, real-world cohort of children treated for 1st relapse in the immunotherapy era, suboptimal outcomes for early BM relapse persisted, with particularly dismal 4y OS of 29% for relapses <18m after diagnosis. In contrast, survival for late BM and isolated CNS relapses compared favorably to historic data. Only 1 in 5 patients initiated relapse therapy on a clinical trial and although 1st relapse is not an approved indication for commercial CART in pediatrics, 36% received CART. In an emulated trial of post-reinduction blina/HCT v CART, adjusted EFS and OS were comparable, suggesting that CART may be a viable alternative to HCT for select patients. Post hoc analyses will identify whether specific subgroups may benefit more from one strategy.
The Comprehensive Cost of Pursuing Plastic Surgery
Akhter, Maheen F. , Cevallos, Priscila , Grande, Payton , Saldana, Golddy M. , Stingl, Cybil S. , Cole, Naomi A., Lavin, Christopher V. , Shen, Abra H. , Nazerali, Rahim , Grande, Payton K , Thawanyarat, Kometh , Friedrich, Jeffrey B.

Annals of Plastic Surgery | August 27, 2025 | Volume: 95 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 344-349

10.1097/sap.0000000000004422 | PMID 40864610 Get It

Objective Preparation for a career in plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) begins long before the residency application process. Given the challenging nature of matching into integrated PRS, the expectations for competitive applicants, including research productivity and networking at conferences, incur significant expenses. Our study is the first to detail the comprehensive costs of pursuing PRS, highlighting many hidden expenses that precede the application process. Design and Setting A branched logic survey was created to inquire about respondents' demographics, personal finances, expenses related to education and research, and opinions on the comprehensive costs of pursuing PRS. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Participants The survey was distributed to PRS residency applicants in the 2023–2024 cycle and to senior members of a virtual PRS research group. The survey achieved a 28.9% response rate. Results Most respondents were fourth-year medical students (57.3%) and attended a school without a home integrated residency program (42.7%). Of students who pursued a research year (37.1%), 40.7% were unpaid, and 53.3% reported living expenses exceeding their income. Most attended more than 5 PRS conferences (29.9%), corresponding to a median total cost of $2000 to $3000. Fourth-year students typically participated in 3 away rotations (40.0%) at a cost of $6000 to $9000. The financial burden of pursuing a career in PRS, including PRS-related extracurricular activities and application-associated costs, is estimated to be $33,400–$45,479. Nearly all respondents (96.6%) believed this cost was too high or excessively high; however, 93.3% determined that it was probably or definitely worth a career in PRS. Conclusions The lofty costs associated with pursuing PRS are unsustainable for many. Additional efforts should be made to reduce financial barriers for PRS applicants. Ensuring funding to all students pursuing a research year, diversifying scholarships for conference attendance and away rotations, increasing loan forgiveness opportunities, and expanding use of lower-cost application options such as the Plastic Surgery Common Application are potential solutions to offset the cost of pursuing PRS.
Safety and efficacy of preoperative embolization in the treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations with perinidal aneurysms and single draining vein: a multicenter study with propensity score-weighting
Adeeb, Nimer , Abdalrazeq, Hammam , Salim, Hamza , Tjoumakaris, Stavropoula , Kandregula, Sandeep , Ogilvy, Christopher S. , Sheehan, Jason , Aslan, Assala , Patel, Pious D. , Lan, Matthews , Baldassari, Michael P. , Koduri, Sravanthi , Atallah, Elias , Zeineddine, Hussein A. , Pontarelli, Mary-Katharine , Naamani, Kareem El, Ironside, Natasha , Gummadi, Sanjeev, Başkaya, Mustafa K. , Ataoglu, Cagdas , Mccarthy, Finn, Sanchez‐Forteza, Anthony , Essibayi, Muhammed Amir , Muram, Sandeep , Sconzo, Daniel , Riina, Howard A. , Rezai, Arwin, Alwakaa, Omar , Erginoğlu, Ufuk , Sen, Rajeev , Devia, Diego A., Perez-Mendez, Wilfran, Puentes, Juan C. , Spiotta, Alejandro M , Puri, Ajit S , Singh, Jasmeet, Burkhardt, Jan Karl, Starke, Robert M., Sekhar, Laligam N., Haranhalli, Neil , McAvoy, Malia , Eltiti, Marah, Abushehab, Abdallah, Foreman, Paul M. , Zaidat, Osama O. , Ruppert-Gomez, Marcella , Stapleton, Christopher J. , Koch, Matthew J. , Srinivasan, Visish M, Alshahrani, Rabab, Gooch, M Reid, Rosenwasser, Robert H. , Bulsara, Ketan R., Kan, Peter , Kim, Louis J. , Pukenas, Bryan , Li, Yan-Lin , Alaraj, Ali , Fuschi, Maurizio , Patel, Aman B. , Notarianni, Christina , Cuellar, Hugo H, Lawton, Michael T., Guthikonda, Bharat , Jabbour, Pascal , Salim, Hamza , Tjoumakaris, Stavropoula , Kandregula, Sandeep , Ogilvy, Christopher S , Dmytriw, Adam A , Aslan, Assala , Essibayi, Muhammed Amir , Alwakaa, Omar , Griessenauer, Christoph J , Abo Kasem, Rahim , Spiotta, Alejandro M , Levitt, Michael R , Altschul, David J , Shakir, Hakeem J , Zaidat, Osama O , Stapleton, Christopher , Koch, Matthew J , Chen, Peng R , Kan, Peter , Choudhri, Omar , Alaraj, Ali , Guthikonda, Bharat , Jabbour, Pascal , Erginoglu, Ufuk , Li, Yan-Lin , Burkhardt, Jan‐Karl , Musmar, Basel , Roy, Joanna M. , Kondziolka, Douglas , Dmytriw, Adam A. , Abou‐Al‐Shaar, Hussam , Naamani, Kareem El, Abdelsalam, Ahmed , Kumbhare, Deepak , Mccarthy, Finn, Keleş, Abdullah , Tos, Salem M , Mantziaris, Georgios , Park, Min S, Hanalıoğlu, Şahin , Pöppe, Johannes , Sen, Rajeev D, Griessenauer, Christoph J. , Ocampo-Navia, María Isabel , Kasem, Rahim Abo , Kühn, Anna Luisa , Sekhar, Laligam N. , Levitt, Michael R. , Altschul, David , Almajali, Mohammad , See, Alfred P. , Abla, Adib A. , Patel, Aashay , Nguyen, Andrew , Srinivasan, Visish M. , Blackburn, Spiros , Gooch, Michael Reid , Kim, Louis J. , Choudhri, Omar , Simonato, Davide , Savardekar, Amey Rajan , Lawton, Michael T. , Morcos, Jacques J.

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery | August 22, 2025 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1765-1772

10.1136/jnis-2025-023873 | PMID 40846482 Get It

Background and objectives Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) with perinidal aneurysms and single draining vein are associated with an elevated risk of rupture and increased procedural complexity. The role of preoperative embolization in this high-risk anatomical subset remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of microsurgery with preoperative embolization, compared with microsurgery alone in patients with such AVMs. Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of an AVM registry from the MISTA (Multicenter International Study for Treatment of Brain AVMs) consortium and included AVMs with perinidal aneurysms and a single draining vein. Baseline characteristics, angiographic outcomes, functional outcomes, and complication rates were compared. Propensity score weighting (PSW) using the covariate balancing method was applied to adjust for baseline differences. Results Out of a total of 1919 patients, 65 met the inclusion criteria; 45 patients underwent preoperative embolization followed by microsurgery, and 20 underwent microsurgery alone. After adjustment, complete obliteration rates were similar between groups (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.04 to 16.33, P=0.92), as were rates of functional independence at discharge and follow-up. Overall complication, symptomatic complication, and mortality rates did not differ significantly between groups. However, permanent complications were significantly lower in patients with preoperative embolization (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.004 to 0.84, P=0.03). Discussion In patients with AVMs featuring perinidal aneurysms and single draining vein, preoperative embolization followed by microsurgery was associated with fewer permanent complications and no increase in adverse outcomes compared with microsurgery alone. However, given the small number of events, this finding should be interpreted cautiously.
Tactile Sensory Recovery in Neurotized Versus Non‐Neurotized Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Aristizábal, Alejandra , Herrera, Harrison, Escandón, Joseph M. , Ciudad, Pedro , Corral, Gabriel Del, Nazerali, Rahim , Mascaró, Andrés, Escandón, Joseph M , Delgado, Harrison Herrera

Microsurgery | July 19, 2025 | Volume: 45 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/micr.70096 | PMID 40682250 Get It

ABSTRACTBackgroundTactile sensory recovery in autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) has been shown to prevent injuries and improve quality of life. However, the studies comparing neurotized versus non‐neurotized outcomes are still controversial due to methodological heterogeneity. This review uses consistent and objective outcomes to evaluate the current evidence's qualitative characteristics and quantitative tactile sensory recovery.MethodsWe conducted a systematic electronic literature search from database inception through 10 February 2024, of the following databases: PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, SCOPUS, and CINAHL to identify all studies reporting outcomes of tactile sensory recovery using the Semmes‐Weinstein Measuring scale in free‐flap ABR comparing neurotization versus non‐neurotization. The SWM scale score, demographic characteristics, and surgical features were extracted from each study. Due to the data heterogeneity within the studies, we transformed the data into means and pooled the qualitative information.ResultsWe identified 264 articles. After thorough screening, 12 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis. Finally, 7 were quantitatively analyzed with a total of 251 breasts that underwent ABR with free flap neurotization and 244 breasts without neurotization. This revealed a mean SWM score difference of −0.67 and a significant p‐value < 0.05. A subgroup DIEP flap analysis performed for 177 neurotized compared to 175 non‐eurotized flaps yielded a significant mean difference of −0.86 p < 0.05. There were no significant differences between groups in age (48.8 vs. 49.8, p = 0.5), history of chemotherapy (72 vs. 74, p = 0.91), radiotherapy (61 vs. 56, p = 0.84), or follow‐up time (21.85 vs. 25.09 months, p = < 0.05) that could have influenced tactile sensory recovery.ConclusionNeurotization in free‐flap ABR could allow better tactile sensory recovery than the spontaneous sensation gained without it. The additional surgical time required for coaptation is short, and no studies have reported associated complications, making it a safe procedure that can potentially improve patients´ quality of life. Nonetheless, higher‐quality studies, such as randomized control trials with standardized sensation testing and more rigorous methodologies, are needed before making final clinical recommendations.
Global, Regional, and National Burden of Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Collaborators, GBD 2021 Global Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Risk Factors, Rautalin, Ilari, Stark, Benjamin, Johnson, Catherine O., Kaprio, Jaakko , Korja, Miikka, Krishnamurthi, Rita , Nair, Balakrishnan , Vergouwen, Mervyn D. I. , Abdelkader, Atef , Abdullahi, Auwal , Abualruz, Hasan , Abukhadijah, Hana J , Adamu, Lawan Hassan, Adegboye, Oyelola A. , Adzigbli, Leticia Akua, Agyemang‐Duah, Williams , Ahinkorah, Bright Opoku, Ahmad, Aqeel , Ahmad, Danish , Ahmadzade, Amir Mahmoud , Akkaif, Mohammed Ahmed , Ali, Mohammed Usman, Alif, Sheikh Mohammad , Alimohamadi, Yousef, Alsabri, Mohammed , Altaf, Awais , Alvis‐Guzmán, Nelson , Alwafi, Hassan , Al‐Wardat, Mohammad , Alyahya, Mohammad S. , Amin, Tarek Tawfik , Amindarolzarbi, Alireza , Amusa, Ganiyu , Angappan, Dhanalakshmi , Anuoluwa, Boluwatife Stephen, Anwar, Saleha, Anyasodor, Anayochukwu Edward , Apostol, Geminn Louis Carace, Areda, Demelash, Artamonov, Anton A, Artanti, Kurnia Dwi , Ashemo, Mubarek Yesse , Athar, Mohammad , Aujayeb, Avinash , Awotidebe, Adedapo Wasiu , Azadnajafabad, Sina , Aziz, Shahkaar , Bagheri, Nasser , Taqanaki, Pegah Bahrami , Bahramian, Saeed , Bai, Ruhai , Baig, Atif Amin , Baltatu, Ovidiu Constantin , Bam, Kiran, Barker‐Collo, Suzanne , Bärnighausen, Till , Bastan, Mohammad‐Mahdi , Basu, Sanjay , Bell, Shelly L, Benseñor, Isabela M , Berhie, Alemshet Yirga , Bhagavathula, Akshaya Srikanth , Bhaskar, Sonu , Bhat, Ajay Nagesh, Bhat, Vivek , Birhan, Mekuriaw Mesfin , Borhany, Hamed, Breitner, Susanne , Bulamu, Norma B. , Butt, Zahid A , Cabral, Lucas Scotta , Santos, Florentino Luciano Caetano dos , Cámera, Luis Alberto , Capodici, Angelo , Chadwick, Joshua , Chakraborty, Promit Ananyo , Chanie, Gashaw Sisay , Chattu, Vijay Kumar , Chi, Gerald, Chichagi, Fatemeh , Columbus, Alyssa , Criqui, Michael H, Ohadi, Mohammad Amin Dabbagh , Dadras, Omid , Dalli, Lachlan L. , Debopadhaya, Shayom , Dervišević, Emina , Devanbu, Vinoth Gnana Chellaiyan, Dewan, Syed Masudur Rahman , Dhane, Amol S. , Chi, Thanh, Phuong, Thao Huynh, Dohare, Sushil , Докова, Клара , Dowou, Robert Kokou , Dsouza, Haneil Larson , Dutta, Siddhartha , Dziedzic, Arkadiusz , E’mar, Abdel Rahman, Edvardsson, David , Efendi, Ferry, Nahas, Nevine El , Elgendy, Islam Y. , Eltaha, Chadi, Emeto, Theophilus I. , Fakhradiyev, Ildar , Faris, Pawan , Fauk, Nelsensius Klau , Fazylov, Timur, Fekadu, Ginenus , Fetensa, Getahun, Fischer, Florian, Foschi, Matteo , Fridayani, Ni Kadek Yuni, Gaipov, Abduzhappar , Gajjar, Avi A. , Ganesan, Balasankar , Gebregergis, Miglas Welay, Gebremeskel, Teferi Gebru , Getie, Molla , Ghadirian, Fataneh , Ghasemzadeh, Afsaneh , Gholamalizadeh, Maryam , Gil, Artyom , Goleij, Pouya , Goulart, Alessandra C. , Goulart, Bárbara Niegia Garcia de , Guan, Shi‐Yang , Gupta, Sapna , Habibzadeh, Farrokh , Hadi, Najah R, Hankey, Graeme J. , Harlianto, Netanja I. , Hasani, Hamidreza, Hasnain, Md Saquib , Haubold, Johannes , Havmoeller, Rasmus, Hay, Simon I , Hbid, Youssef , Heidari, Golnaz , Hiraike, Yuta, Hoan, Nguyen Quoc , Hosseinzadeh, Mehdi , Hwang, Bing‐Fang , Ibitoye, Segun Emmanuel , Ikiroma, Adalia , Isola, Gaetano , Iwagami, Masao , Jacob, Louis, Jain, Akhil, Jakovljević, Mihajlo , Jatau, Abubakar Ibrahim , Jawaid, Talha, Jayapal, Sathish Kumar , Jonas, Jost B, Joseph, Nitin , Jürisson, Mikk , Kadashetti, Vidya, Kalani, Rizwan, Kamireddy, Arun , Kandel, Himal , Behnagh, Arman Karimi , Kashoo, Faizan , Kayode, Gbenga A , Kazemi, Foad , Khader, Yousef , Khaing, Inn Kynn , Khan, Fayaz Ahmad , Khan, Mohammad Jobair , Kashani, Hamid Reza Khayat , Khosla, Atulya Aman , Kim, Kwanghyun , Kim, Yun Jin , Korzh, Oleksii , Krishan, Kewal , Krishna, Varun, Krishnamoorthy, Vijay , Kuddus, Mohammed , Kulimbet, Mukhtar , Lahariya, Chandrakant, Lai, Daphne Teck Ching , Lai, Hanpeng , Laksono, Tri, Lallukka, Tea , Latifinaibin, Kaveh, Le, Nhi Huu Hanh, Le, Thao T. , Lee, Munjae , Lee, Yo Han , Lenzi, Jacopo , Leonardi, Matilde, Li, Ming‐Chieh , Li, Xiaopan , Lim, Stephen S , Lin, Jialing , Saute, Ricardo Lutzky , Malik, Ahmad Azam , Marateb, Hamid Reza , Maroufi, Seyed Farzad , Maugeri, Andrea , McPhail, Steven , Mehndiratta, Man Mohan, Mestrovic, Tomislav, Mettananda, Chamila Dinushi Kukulege , Miazgowski, Tomasz , Minervini, Giuseppe , Mithra, Prasanna , Mohamed, Abdalla Z. , Mohammad, Ameen Mosa , Mohammed, Shafiu , Moni, Mohammad Ali , Moradi, Yousef, Moraga, Paula , Morawska, Lídia , Munjal, Kavita , Murray, Christopher J L , Nagarajan, Ahamarshan Jayaraman , Naik, Ganesh R. , Najdaghi, Soroush , Davani, Delaram Narimani , DELETE-ME, Nawsherwan, Nazri-Panjaki, Athare , Negoi, Ruxandra Irina , Nematollahi, Soroush , Nguyen, Hau Thi Hien, Nguyen, Hau Thi Hien, Nguyen, Phat Tuan , Nguyễn, Văn Thành , Niazi, Robina Khan, Nikoobar, Ali , Sá, Antonio Tolentino Nogueira de , Nomura, Shuhei , Nzoputam, Chimezie Igwegbe , Oancea, Bogdan , Ojo-Akosile, Tolulope R, Oliveira, Gláucia Maria Moraes de , Olorukooba, Abdulhakeem Abayomi , Osuagwu, Uchechukwu Levi , Ouyahia, Amel, A, Mahesh Padukudru P, Panagiotakos, Demosthenes B. , Parikh, Romil R., Park, Seoyeon , Pedersini, Paolo , Peprah, Emmanuel , Perico, Norberto, Petermann-Rocha, Fanny Emily, Plotnikov, Evgenii , Полибин, Р. В. , Postma, Maarten J. , Prasad, Manya , Qian, Gangzhen , Rahmanian, Mohammad , Rajaa, Sathish , Rajput, Prashant , Ramadan, Mahmoud M. , Rane, Amey, Rashidi, Mohammad‐Mahdi , Razo, Christian , Reddy, Murali Mohan Rama Krishna, Remuzzi, Giuseppe, Rezaei, Negar , Rezaeian, Mohsen , Rocha, Hermano Alexandre Lima , Rodriguez, Jefferson Antonio Buendia, Roever, Leonardo , Romoli, Michele, Romozzi, Marina, Roy, Nitai , Saddik, Basema Ahmad, Sahoo, Pragyan Monalisa , Salaroli, Luciane Bresciani , Samuel, Vijaya Paul, Samy, Abdallah M , Santric-Milicevic, Milena M., Saravanan, Aswini, Schlaich, Markus P. , Sethi, Yashendra , Seylani, Allen, Shaaban, Ahmed Nabil , Shafie, Mahan , Shaikh, Summaiya Zareen , Shamsutdinova, Alfiya, Sharifan, Amin , Rad, Javad Sharifi, Sharma, Vishal, Shashamo, Bereket Beyene , Shetty, Premalatha K, Shigematsu, Mika, Shorofi, Seyed Afshin, Singh, Paramdeep , Singh, Puneetpal , Singh, Surjit , Sobia, Farrukh , Solanki, Shipra, Soraneh, Soroush , Spartalis, Michael, Srinivasamurthy, Suresh Kumar , Stanikzai, Muhammad Haroon , Sun, Zhong , Swain, Chandan Kumar , Damavandi, Payam Tabaee , Tabatabaeizadeh, Seyed-Amir, Tabche, Celine , Taiba, Jabeen , Tamuzi, Jacques Lukenze , Tan, Ker‐Kan , Teramoto, Masayuki , Thakur, Ramna, Thankappan, Kavumpurathu Raman , Thayakaran, Rasiah , Thirunavukkarasu, Sathish, Ticoalu, Jansje Henny Vera, Tiwari, Krishna Raj , Tonelli, Marcello , Topór-Mądry, Roman , Tovani-Palone, Marcos Roberto Roberto, Tran, Jasmine, Tran, Thang Huu , Duc, Nguyen Tran Minh , Truelsen, Thomas Clement, Unim, Brigid, Vahdati, Sanaz, Vaithinathan, Asokan Govindaraj , Eynde, Jef Van den , Vladimirov, Sergey Konstantinovitch , Waheed, Yasir, Wahood, Waseem , Walde, Mandaras Tariku, Wang, Yanzhong , Wickramasinghe, Nuwan Darshana , Wolfe, Charles D. A., Wubie, Yihun Miskir, Xiao, Hong , Xu, Xiaoyue , Yano, Yuichiro , Yarahmadi, Amir , Ye, Pengpeng, Yon, Dong Keon , Zanghì, Aurora , Zare, Iman, Zastrozhin, Michael, Zhang, Zhi-Jiang , Zhang, Zhiqiang , Zhang, Zhiqiang, Zhao, Hanqing , Zhou, Shang Cheng, Zhumagaliuly, Abzal , Zia, Hafsa, Roth, Gregory A., Topór‐Mądry, Roman , Oliveira, Arão Belitardo , Rahim, Fakher , Saddik, Basema , Waheed, Yasir , Liu, Xuefeng , Zhang, Yunquan , Ozair, Ahmad , Buendía, Jefferson Antonio , Korja, Miikka , Baig, Atif Amin , Shanawaz, Mohd , Elgendy, Islam Y , Hankey, Graeme J , Alif, Sheikh M , Rezaei, Negar , Bhagavathula, Akshaya Srikanth , Van den Eynde, Jef , Ozair, Ahmad , Collaborators, GBD 2021 Global Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Risk Factors, Rautalin, Ilari Matias , Volovici, Victor , Ranta, Annemarei , Rinkel, Gabriël J.E. , Abate, Yohannes Habtegiorgis, Abbastabar, Hedayat , Abd-Allah, Foad , Abdi, Parsa , Abdollahi, Arash , Abiodun, Olugbenga Olusola , Aboagye, Richard Gyan , Abouzid, Mohamed , Abtahi, Dariush , Abu‐Rumeileh, Samir , Abualhasan, Ahmed , Abu‐Zaid, Ahmed , Addo, Isaac Yeboah , Adedoyin, Rufus Adesoji , Adra, Saryia , Ahinkorah, Bright Opoku , Ahmed, Ali , Ahmed, Haroon , Ahmed, Syed Anees , Aji, Budi , Al‐Ajlouni, Yazan A. , Al‐Aly, Ziyad , ALBashtawy, Mohammed , Aljunid, Syed Mohamed , Alomari, Mahmoud A. , Alrawashdeh, Ahmad , Alsabri, Mohammed A., Salman, Rustam Al‐Shahi , Al‐Tammemi, Ala’a B. , Al‐Worafi, Yaser Mohammed , Aly, Hany Z. , Alzoubi, Karem Hasan , Amani, Reza, Anderlini, Deanna , Anil, Abhishek , Arabloo, Jalal , Ärnlöv, Johan , Arumugam, Ashokan , Aryan, Zahra , Jafarabadi, Mohammad Asghari , Ashraf, Tahira , Athari, Seyyed Shamsadin , Azzam, Ahmed Y , Babu, Giridhara R. , Bako, Abdulaziz Tijjani , Banach, Maciej , Bandyopadhyay, Soham , Banik, Biswajit , Bardhan, Mainak , Barqawi, Hiba Jawdat , Barua, Lingkan , Beyene, Kebede Abera , Bhat, Vivek, Bhatti, Gurjit Kaur , Bhatti, Jasvinder Singh , Bijani, Ali , Bikbov, Boris , Birhanu, Mulugeta Molla , Bitra, Veera Raghavulu , Boloor, Archith , Brenner, Hermann , Bugiardini, Raffaele , Călina, Daniela Cornelia , Campos, Luciana Aparecida , Campos‐Nonato, Ismael , Carvalho, Félix , Castañeda-Orjuela, Carlos A , Catapano, Alberico Luigi , Cegolon, Luca , Chakraborty, Chiranjib , Chakraborty, Sandip , Chandika, Rama Mohan , Chaudhary, Anis Ahmad , Chi, Gerald , Ching, Patrick R , Chopra, Hitesh , Choudhari, Sonali Gajanan , Chowdhury, E. , Chu, Dinh‐Toi , Chung, Sheng‐Chia , Silva, Alanna Gomes da , Dai, Xiaochen , Dalal, Koustuv , D’Amico, Emanuele , Dashti, Mohsen , Davletov, Kairat , Cruz-Góngora, Vanessa Vianey De la , Delgado‐Enciso, Iván , Devanbu, Vinoth Gnana Chellaiyan, Dibas, Mahmoud , Doheim, Mohamed Fahmy , Dongarwar, Deepa , D’Oria, Mario , Doshi, Ojas Prakashbhai , Doshi, Rajkumar , Efendi, Defi , Efendi, Ferry , Elhadi, Muhammed , Eltahir, Mohd. Elmagzoub , Fabin, Natalia , Fagbamigbe, Adeniyi Francis , Fahim, Ayesha , Fares, Jawad , Ferreira, Nuno Bravo , Gandhi, Aravind P. , Garg, Ravindra Kumar , Gebrehiwot, Mesfin , Ghadimi, Delaram J. , Ghahramani, Sulmaz , Ghazy, Ramy Mohamed , Ghozy, Sherief , Gilani, Jaleed Ahmed , Gnedovskaya, Elena V. , Hadei, Mostafa , Hamidi, Samer , Hanifi, Nasrin , Haro, Josep María , Hasan, Faizul , Tabatabaei, Mahgol Sadat Hassan Zadeh , Heidari, Mohammad , Hemmati, Mehdi , Holla, Ramesh , Hostiuc, Sorin , Huang, Junjie , Huynh, Hong-Han , Ikeda, Nayu , Ilaghi, Mehran , Ilesanmi, Olayinka Stephen , Ilić, Irena , Ilić, Milena , Islam, Md. Rabiul , Ismail, Nahlah Elkudssiah , Iso, Hiroyasu , Jafarzadeh, Abdollah , Jairoun, Ammar Abdulrahman , Kalani, Rizwan, Kamal, Vineet Kumar , Kanchan, Tanuj , Karami, Jafar , Karaye, Ibraheem M. , Karimi, Yeganeh , Kesse‐Guyot, Emmanuelle , Khan, Fayaz, Khatatbeh, Haitham , Khatatbeh, Moawiah Mohammad , Kheirallah, Khalid Ahmed , Khidri, Feriha Fatima , Khormali, Moein , Kısa, Adnan , Kısa, Sezer , Kivimäki, Mika , Kolahi, Ali‐Asghar , Kompani, Farzad , Kostev, Karel , Kothari, Nikhil , Kunutsor, Setor K. , Kurniasari, Maria Dyah , Kusuma, Dian Palupi , Kytö, Ville , Vecchia, Carlo La , Lahariya, Chandrakant , Latief, Kamaluddin , Lee, Seung Won , Lee, Wei‐Chen , Leonardi, Matilde, Liu, Xuefeng , Lohner, Valerie , Lorenzovici, László , Lotufo, Paulo A. , Lucchetti, Giancarlo , Lusk, Jay B. , Amin, Hawraz Ibrahim M. , Malhotra, Armaan Kush , Malhotra, Kashish , Malta, Déborah Carvalho , Mansournia, Mohammad Alì , Mantovani, LG , Manu, Emmanuel, Marino, Mirko , Martínez, Ramón , Martini, Santi , Martorell, Miquel , Marzo, Roy Rillera , Mathangasinghe, Yasith , Mathews, Elezebeth , Mehmood, Asim , Mehrabani-Zeinabad, Kamran , Menezes, Ritesh G. , Meo, Sultan A , Meretoja, Atte , Meštrović, Tomislav , Sá, Ana Carolina Micheletti Gomide Nogueira de , Minh, Le Huu Nhat , Mirică, Andreea , Мirrakhimov, Erkin М , Mirza‐Aghazadeh‐Attari, Mohammad , Mishra, Ajay Kumar , Mohamed, Ahmed Ismail , Mohammadi, Soheil , Mohammadian-Hafshejani, Abdollah , Mokdad, Ali H. , Molinaro, Sabrina , Momani, Shaher , Ghalibaf, AmirAli Moodi , Moradi, Maryam , Msherghi, Ahmed A.A. , Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin , Nargus, Shumaila , Natto, Zuhair S. , Nauman, Javaid , DELETE-ME, Nawsherwan, Nayak, Vinod C , Newton, Charles R. , Nigatu, Yeshambel T. , Noubiap, Jean Jacques , Nugen, Fred , Oduro, Michael Safo , Okati‐Aliabad, Hassan , Okeke, Sylvester Reuben , Okekunle, Akinkunmi Paul , Olagunju, Andrew T , Olaiya, Muideen Tunbosun , Olufadewa, Isaac Iyinoluwa , Ornello, Raffaele , Ortiz‐Prado, Esteban , Ouyahia, Amel , Owolabi, Mayowa , Padrón‐Monedero, Alicia , Padubidri, Jagadish Rao , Panos, Leonidas D , Pantazopoulos, Ioannis N. , Parikh, Romil R., Patel, Jay , Patel, Urvish , Patoulias, Dimitrios , Pereira, Gavin F , Perianayagam, Arokiasamy , Perna, Simone , Petermann‐Rocha, Fanny , Philip, Anil K. , Пирадов, М. А. , Pradhan, Jalandhar , Puvvula, Jagadeesh , Qasim, Nameer Hashim , Raggi, Alberto , Rahimi‐Movaghar, Vafa , Rahman, Muhammad Aziz , Rahmani, Amir Masoud , Sanati, Ali Rajabpour , Ramasamy, Shakthi Kumaran , Ramazanu, Sheena , Rathish, Devarajan , Rawaf, Salman , Redwan, Elrashdy M , Remuzzi, Giuseppe , Romoli, Michele, Romozzi, Marina , Ross, Allen Guy , Rout, Himanshu Sekhar , Roy, Priyanka , Saad, Aly M A , Saadatian, Zahra , Sabour, Siamak , Sacco, Simona , Sadeghi, Erfan , Saeed, Usman, Sharif‐Askari, Fatemeh Saheb , Sahebkar, Amirhossein , Sajib, Md Refat Uz Zaman , Saleh, Mohamed A. , Samodra, Yoseph Leonardo , MİLİCEVİC, Milena Santric, Saravanan, Aswini , Sarkar, Tanmay, Sarode, Sachin Chakradhar , Sartorius, Benn , Satpathy, Maheswar , Schneider, Ione Jayce Ceola , Schuermans, Art , Selvaraj, Siddharthan , Senthilkumaran, Subramanian , Sepanlou, Sadaf Ghajarieh , Shahwan, Moyad Jamal , Shamim, Muhammad Aaqib , Shamsi, Anas , Shannawaz, Mohammed , Rad, Javad Sharifi, Sharma, Vishal , Shittu, Aminu , Shiue, Ivy , Shlobin, Nathan A. , Siddig, Emmanuel Edwar , Spartalis, Michael , Stanaway, Jeffrey D , Starodubova, Antonina Vladimirovna , Szarpak, Łukasz , Tabatabaeizadeh, Seyed‐Amir , Tabatabaeizadeh, Seyed-Amir, Talaat, Iman Mamdouh , Temsah, Mohamad‐Hani , Thakur, Ramna , Thirunavukkarasu, Sathish, Tiwari, Krishna, Truyen, Thien Tan Tri Tai , Tsai, Daniel Hsiang‐Te , Ullah, Atta , Unnikrishnan, Bhaskaran , Unsworth, Carolyn Anne, Usman, Jibrin Sammani , Valizadeh, Rohollah , Varghese, Joe , Vasankari, Tommi Juhani , Venketasubramanian, Narayanaswamy , Vervoort, Dominique , Villafañe, Jorge Hugo , Vinayak, Manish , Wafa, Hatem A , Walde, Mandaras Tariku, Willeit, Peter , Wolfe, Charles D.A. , Wolfe, Charles D. A., Yamagishi, Kazumasa , Yaribeygi, Habib , Yaya, Sanni , Ye, Pengpeng, Yonemoto, Naohiro , Yu, Chuanhua , Zastrozhin, Michael, Zhang, Chen , Zhang, Zhiqiang, Zielińska, Magdalena , Zyoud, Samer H. , Roth, Gregory A. , Feigin, Valery L. , Kulimbet, Mukhtar , Rahim, Fakher

JAMA Neurology | May 23, 2025 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 765

10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.1522 | PMID 40406922 Get It

Importance Nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) represents the third most common stroke type with unique etiologies, risk factors, diagnostics, and treatments. Nevertheless, epidemiological studies often cluster SAH with other stroke types leaving its distinct burden estimates obscure. Objective To estimate the worldwide burden of SAH. Design, Setting, and Participants Based on the repeated cross-sectional Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 study, the global burden of SAH in 1990 to 2021 was estimated. Moreover, the SAH burden was compared with other diseases, and its associations with 14 individual risk factors were investigated with available data in the GBD 2021 study. The GBD study included the burden estimates of nontraumatic SAH among all ages in 204 countries and territories between 1990 and 2021. Exposures SAH and 14 modifiable risk factors. Main Outcomes and Measures Absolute numbers and age-standardized rates with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) of SAH incidence, prevalence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) as well as risk factor–specific population attributable fractions (PAFs). Results In 2021, the global age-standardized SAH incidence was 8.3 (95% UI, 7.3-9.5), prevalence was 92.2 (95% UI, 84.1-100.6), mortality was 4.2 (95% UI, 3.7-4.8), and DALY rate was 125.2 (95% UI, 110.5-142.6) per 100 000 people. The highest burden estimates were found in Latin America, the Caribbean, Oceania, and high-income Asia Pacific. Although the absolute number of SAH cases increased, especially in regions with a low sociodemographic index, all age-standardized burden rates decreased between 1990 and 2021: the incidence by 28.8% (95% UI, 25.7%-31.6%), prevalence by 16.1% (95% UI, 14.8%-17.7%), mortality by 56.1% (95% UI, 40.7%-64.3%), and DALY rate by 54.6% (95% UI, 42.8%-61.9%). Of 300 diseases, SAH ranked as the 36th most common cause of death and 59th most common cause of DALY in the world. Of all worldwide SAH-related DALYs, 71.6% (95% UI, 63.8%-78.6%) were associated with the 14 modeled risk factors of which high systolic blood pressure (population attributable fraction [PAF] = 51.6%; 95% UI, 38.0%-62.6%) and smoking (PAF = 14.4%; 95% UI, 12.4%-16.5%) had the highest attribution. Conclusions and Relevance Although the global age-standardized burden rates of SAH more than halved over the last 3 decades, SAH remained one of the most common cardiovascular and neurological causes of death and disabilities in the world, with increasing absolute case numbers. These findings suggest evidence for the potential health benefits of proactive public health planning and resource allocation toward the prevention of SAH.
Closed Loop, Full Automation of Suspicious Lung Nodule Risk Assessment With AI in Screening Cases
Taha, Abtahir Rahim, Reisenauer, Janani , Kalra, A., Muelly, M. , Reicher, Joshua , Kalra, Angad

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | May 11, 2025 | Volume: 211 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: A5226-A5226

10.1164/ajrccm.2025.211.abstracts.a5226 Get It

Abstract RATIONALE: Research since 2017 has highlighted artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies to assist in detecting and/or classifying lung nodules on Computed Tomography (CT) scans. However, few have combined detection and classification tasks, and most have required extensive hands-on image manipulation to process the cases, which is both costly and time-consuming. Here, we present a closed loop, fully automated software package, Bronchosolve, which handles cases from scan to result without manual intervention. METHODS: The software package combined pre-processing, analysis, and result generation system including a deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) for assessment of suspicious pulmonary nodules. Model inputs were full CT cases formatted in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM), without demographics or clinical variables. Automated steps included 1) automatic selection of the optimal CT series for analysis; 2) normalization and pre-processing of the series; 3) AI-based analysis of the images to both detect and classify suspicious lung lesions; and 4) generation of analysis report. The system was trained using a multi-center dataset of over 2,358 cases of suspicious lung nodules, including cancers and non-cancers. A United States-based, multi-site cohort (n=184) was used for initial algorithm validation where positive cases were defined as biopsy-proven cancer within 1 year, and negatives as negative biopsy or 2+ year negative follow-up. RESULTS: In the validation set, the system achieved a technical completion rate of 100%, automatically for all cases. Median patient age was 62.5 years (interquartile range 58.5 to 66.5 years), 45% were former smokers, 55% were current smokers, and 40% were female. The AI cancer risk (CA-risk) model achieved an area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.828 [CI: 0.773 – 0.883] in differentiating cancer from non-cancer in cases with known suspicious pulmonary nodules, as confirmed by biopsy, surgery, and/or follow-up. These results were statistically superior to Lung-RADS pAUC of 0.669 [CI: 0.601 – 0.737] and trended better than Brock model AUC of 0.783 [CI: 0.723 – 0.842], Figure 1. At the Youden operating point, model sensitivity was 73.1% [CI: 66.7 – 79.5%], and specificity was 82.5% [CI: 77.0 – 88.0%]. The model's performance was consistent across various CT scanner manufacturers and tested slice thickness. CONCLUSIONS: The closed loop, automated software system, Bronchosolve, consistently processed and analyzed a wide range of CT scans, providing accurate assessment in risk-classifying suspicious lung nodules. This approach has the potential to improve non-invasive assessment of lung nodules eliminating the need for additional user training and time.
Traumatic Brain Injury and Artificial Intelligence: Shaping the Future of Neurorehabilitation—A Review
Orenuga, Seun , Jordache, Philip , Mirzai, Daniel A., Monteros, Tyler, Gonzalez, Ernesto, Madkoor, Ahmed , Hirani, Rahim , Tiwari, Raj K. , Etienne, Mill

Life | March 7, 2025 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 424

10.3390/life15030424 | PMID 40141769 Get It

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of disability and death globally, presenting significant challenges for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. As healthcare technology advances, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool in enhancing TBI rehabilitation outcomes. This literature review explores the current and potential applications of AI in TBI management, focusing on AI’s role in diagnostic tools, neuroimaging, prognostic modeling, and rehabilitation programs. AI-driven algorithms have demonstrated high accuracy in predicting mortality, functional outcomes, and personalized rehabilitation strategies based on patient data. AI models have been developed to predict in-hospital mortality of TBI patients up to an accuracy of 95.6%. Furthermore, AI enhances neuroimaging by detecting subtle abnormalities that may be missed by human radiologists, expediting diagnosis and treatment decisions. Despite these advances, ethical considerations, including biases in AI algorithms and data generalizability, pose challenges that must be addressed to optimize AI’s implementation in clinical settings. This review highlights key clinical trials and future research directions, emphasizing AI’s transformative potential in improving patient care, rehabilitation, and long-term outcomes for TBI patients.
Comparative efficacy and safety of stent retrievers as a bailout strategy following failed contact aspiration technique in acute stroke thrombectomy
Ezzeldin, Mohamad , Hukamdad, Mishaal , Kasem, Rahim Abo , Ezzeldin, Rime , Maier, Ilko , Rai, Ansaar , Jabbour, Pascal , Kim, Joon‐Tae , Howard, Brian M. , Wolfe, Stacey Q , Starke, Robert M., Psychogios, Marios‐Nikos , Dye, Justin , Alaraj, Ali , Yoshimura, Shinichi, Tanweer, Omar , Navía, Pedro , Polifka, Adam , Siddiqui, Fazeel , Brinjikji, Waleed , Dağlıoğlu, Ergün , Williamson, Richard A., Altschul, David , Ogilvy, Christopher S. , Crosa, Roberto , Gory, Benjamin , Kan, Peter , Casagrande, Walter, Chowdhry, Shakeel , Stiefel, Michael , Chaubal, Varun , Spiotta, Alejandro M , Abo Kasem, Rahim , Rai, Ansaar , Wolfe, Stacey Quintero , Shaban, Amir , Alaraj, Ali , Fiorella, David , Navia, Pedro , Cuellar-Saenz, Hugo H , Fragata, Isabel , Mascitelli, Justin R , Osbun, Joshua W , Mokin, Maxim , Matouk, Charles , Brinjikji, Waleed , Altschul, David J , Ogilvy, Christopher S , Crosa, Roberto , Levitt, Michael R , Grandhi, Ramesh , Paul, Alexandra R , Kan, Peter , Spiotta, Alejandro M , Howard, Brian M , Jabbour, Pascal , Alawieh, Ali , Goyal, Nitin , Fiorella, David , Romano, Daniele G, Cuellar, Hugo , Fragata, Isabel , Moss, Mark, Limaye, Kaustubh , Matouk, Charles , Park, Min S, Williamson, Richard, Levitt, Michael R. , Grandhi, Ramesh

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery | January 30, 2025 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 390-398

10.1136/jnis-2024-022781 | PMID 39884851 Get It

Background The contact aspiration (CA) technique is often used to perform endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS); however, rescue strategies are necessary if CA fails to achieve recanalization. This study investigates the outcomes of incorporating stent retriever (SR) thrombectomy in the rescue strategy following failed CA. Methods EVT patients with failed CA attempts were identified from a large multicenter registry and stratified by rescue technique: CA alone or incorporating SR in the rescue strategy. Outcomes included successful recanalization, 90-day functional outcomes (defined by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality. Results Among 1885 patients with failed CA attempts, conversion to SR was associated with higher recanalization rates (85.2% vs 80.6%; p=0.03), higher rates of second-pass recanalization (31.2% vs 23.4%; p<0.001), and better 90-day outcomes (mRS 0–2: 35.2% vs 29.9%; p=0.04) when compared with repeated CA attempts. Trevo SRs showed higher odds of successful recanalization (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.9; p=0.02), second-pass recanalization (aOR=1.7; p=0.01), and reduced odds of sICH (aOR=0.3; p=0.02). EmboTrap SRs were associated with higher odds of 90-day mortality (aOR=2.6; p=0.004) and sICH (aOR=2.9; p=0.04) and lower odds of recanalization (aOR=0.5; p=0.03). Conclusions Incorporating SR in the rescue strategy after a failed CA improves recanalization rates and functional outcomes. Trevo SRs demonstrated superior efficacy and safety when incorporated into the rescue strategy.
Phase I Clinical Trial of High Doses of Seleno-L-methionine in Combination with Axitinib in Patients with Previously Treated Metastatic Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Zakharia, Yousef , Reis, Ryan J. , Kroll, Matthew R. , Rataan, Aseel O. , Manchkanti, Srija , Rahim, Bilal , Garje, Rohan , Swami, Umang , Mott, Sarah L. , Zamba, K.D. , Sieren, Jessica C. , Rustum, Youcef M. , Zamba, K D , Salem, Aliasger K , Rustum, Youcef , Garje, Rohan , Zakharia, Yousef , Salem, Aliasger K.

Clinical Cancer Research | January 29, 2025 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1204-1211

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-3234 | PMID 39879383 Get It

Abstract Purpose: Data on clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) xenografts defined the seleno-L-methionine (SLM) dose and the plasma selenium concentrations associated with the enhancement of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α/2α degradation, stabilization of tumor vasculature, enhanced drug delivery, and efficacy of axitinib. The data provided the rationale for the development of this phase I clinical trial of SLM and axitinib in advanced or metastatic relapsed ccRCC. Patients and Methods: Patients were ≥18 years with histologically and radiologically confirmed advanced or metastatic ccRCC who had received at least one prior systemic therapy, which could include axitinib (last dose ≥6 months prior to enrollment). Escalating dose levels of SLM (2,500, 3,000, and 4,000 μg) were administered orally twice daily for 14 days and then once daily concurrently with axitinib 5 mg twice daily using a 3 + 3 design in phase I. Patients were treated at the 4,000 μg dose level in the expansion cohort to obtain preliminary estimates of efficacy. Results: No dose-limiting toxicities occurred at the 4,000 μg SLM dose level. Among the 27 patients treated with 4,000 μg of SLM, the overall response rate was 55.6%, median duration of response was 18.4 months, median progression-free survival was 14.8 months, and median overall survival was 19.6 months. Preliminary results have shown that plasma selenium concentrations, inhibition of TGF-β1, and stabilization of tumor vasculature by SLM are time dependent. Conclusions: SLM (4,000 μg) in sequential combination with axitinib is well tolerated with encouraging efficacy.