Aristizábal, Alejandra

ABSTRACT Genital lymphedema presents significant challenges in surgical management, with limited effective interventions. This case report explores the use of contrast‐enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with microbubble injection as an alternative adjunct technique for lymphatic mapping in lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) surgery for genital lymphedema. A retrospective chart review approved by our institutional review board was performed for patients with genital lymphedema undergoing LVA surgery between 2020 and 2024. Intraoperative CEUS for lymphatic mapping was used with intradermal injection of microbubble suspension Lumason (Bracco Suisse, Monroe Township, NJ, USA). Data regarding demographics, comorbidities, clinical and operative characteristics, complications, and surgical outcomes were retrieved. Three patients with genital lymphedema who underwent LVA were identified. The first patient was a 34‐year‐old female with recurrent lymphangioma circumscriptum and vesicular drainage. She successfully underwent CEUS‐guided LVA followed by two debulking procedures. The second patient was a 16‐year‐old male with congenital scrotal and lower extremity lymphedema. He had two CEUS‐guided LVAs and subsequent debulking for anterior scrotal swelling, with long‐term reduction in edema. The third patient was a 31‐year‐old female with primary lymphedema of the right lower extremity and genital region. She underwent seven CEUS and indocyanine green lymphography (ICG) guided anastomoses targeting the mons and lower abdomen, resulting in substantial symptomatic and volumetric improvement. CEUS detected target lymphatic vessels in all cases, including cases where ICG imaging failed to identify candidate lymphatic vessels. CEUS with intradermal microbubble injection successfully identified target lymphatic vessels in the preoperative planning for LVA surgery in patients with genital lymphedema.

ABSTRACTBackgroundTactile sensory recovery in autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) has been shown to prevent injuries and improve quality of life. However, the studies comparing neurotized versus non‐neurotized outcomes are still controversial due to methodological heterogeneity. This review uses consistent and objective outcomes to evaluate the current evidence's qualitative characteristics and quantitative tactile sensory recovery.MethodsWe conducted a systematic electronic literature search from database inception through 10 February 2024, of the following databases: PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, SCOPUS, and CINAHL to identify all studies reporting outcomes of tactile sensory recovery using the Semmes‐Weinstein Measuring scale in free‐flap ABR comparing neurotization versus non‐neurotization. The SWM scale score, demographic characteristics, and surgical features were extracted from each study. Due to the data heterogeneity within the studies, we transformed the data into means and pooled the qualitative information.ResultsWe identified 264 articles. After thorough screening, 12 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis. Finally, 7 were quantitatively analyzed with a total of 251 breasts that underwent ABR with free flap neurotization and 244 breasts without neurotization. This revealed a mean SWM score difference of −0.67 and a significant p‐value < 0.05. A subgroup DIEP flap analysis performed for 177 neurotized compared to 175 non‐eurotized flaps yielded a significant mean difference of −0.86 p < 0.05. There were no significant differences between groups in age (48.8 vs. 49.8, p = 0.5), history of chemotherapy (72 vs. 74, p = 0.91), radiotherapy (61 vs. 56, p = 0.84), or follow‐up time (21.85 vs. 25.09 months, p = < 0.05) that could have influenced tactile sensory recovery.ConclusionNeurotization in free‐flap ABR could allow better tactile sensory recovery than the spontaneous sensation gained without it. The additional surgical time required for coaptation is short, and no studies have reported associated complications, making it a safe procedure that can potentially improve patients´ quality of life. Nonetheless, higher‐quality studies, such as randomized control trials with standardized sensation testing and more rigorous methodologies, are needed before making final clinical recommendations.

ABSTRACT Long segment losses exceeding 10 cm in the sciatic nerve are challenging in both the reconstructive techniques and optimizing sensory and motor function recovery. This case report and literature review describes our experience of using a pedicled vascularized common peroneal nerve graft to repair a 14‐cm sciatic nerve defect, involving L4 , L5 , and S1 nerve roots. Additionally, we conducted a literature review of various types of nerve autografts for large sciatic nerve defects, summarizing their characteristics and outcomes to aid clinicians in decision‐making and expected results in different scenarios. The patient, a 23‐year‐old female diagnosed with neurofibromatosis type I, underwent R0 tumor resection of the proximal left sciatic nerve due to a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. She received an ipsilateral pedicled vascularized common peroneal nerve graft. The reconstruction included the L4 , L5 , and S1 nerve roots beyond the greater sciatic foramen into the inner pelvis. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful. At the 26‐month follow‐up, she showed MRC grade 4/5 strength in hamstrings with 90°knee flexion and a steady gait pattern. At the 32‐month follow‐up, she could ambulate very well with an ankle‐foot orthosis. The outcomes support the use of a pedicled vascularized common peroneal nerve graft in a single‐staged surgery to restore motor function for large sciatic nerve defects. Our literature review revealed that in cases where sural nerves are insufficient or injured for sciatic nerve reconstruction, the common peroneal nerve is a viable alternative to help patients regain functional independence.

Background: There is an increasing demand for body contouring and gender-affirming surgeries, and so is the need to compare outcomes between techniques. Gender dysphoria is a discrepancy between gender identity and the sex assigned at birth. One way to address this is to perform procedures to enable patients to look according to their desired gender identity. Gaps in knowledge regarding the best approaches and which surgical techniques yield the most patient satisfaction remain. This article summarizes up-to-date studies, including upper and lower body contouring procedures. Methods: A systematic review was performed using terms related to body contouring in gender-affirming surgery for transgender patients. All articles included surgical and patient-reported outcomes following either chest or lower body contouring procedures. Results: 15 studies, including trans male chest wall contouring, trans female breast augmentation, and lower body contouring, with 1811 patients, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The double incision (DI) techniques consistently resected more tissue and had better BODY Q scores than non-overweight patients. Bleeding was increased in periareolar, semicircular, and obese patients with DI techniques. Nipple depigmentation and sensation loss were more common with double-incision-free nipple graft techniques (DIFNG). Lower body contouring patients had average implant sizes bigger than 200 mL and reported 2 gluteal implant displacements, 1 exposure, and one rupture. Eight percent of patients who underwent large-volume fat grafting reported dissatisfaction due to fat reabsorption. Conclusions: The debate between the double incision and periareolar techniques continues. Variations of the DIFNG technique continue to be the most common approach; however, nipple depigmentation and loss of sensation are also more common with it. Regarding increased bleeding with periareolar techniques, there is still no evidence that hormonal therapy may be playing a role in it. For lower-body trans female contouring, implants could help with the longevity of contouring results in patients needing large-volume fat grafting. There is an increasing evaluation of gender-affirming body contouring patient-reported outcomes; however, there is still a need for a validated way to report satisfaction scores in lower body contouring. Validated surveys could help identify surgical candidates based on satisfaction patterns, specifically for transgender and non-binary patients.