Tran, Nho V.

ABSTRACT Genital lymphedema presents significant challenges in surgical management, with limited effective interventions. This case report explores the use of contrast‐enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with microbubble injection as an alternative adjunct technique for lymphatic mapping in lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) surgery for genital lymphedema. A retrospective chart review approved by our institutional review board was performed for patients with genital lymphedema undergoing LVA surgery between 2020 and 2024. Intraoperative CEUS for lymphatic mapping was used with intradermal injection of microbubble suspension Lumason (Bracco Suisse, Monroe Township, NJ, USA). Data regarding demographics, comorbidities, clinical and operative characteristics, complications, and surgical outcomes were retrieved. Three patients with genital lymphedema who underwent LVA were identified. The first patient was a 34‐year‐old female with recurrent lymphangioma circumscriptum and vesicular drainage. She successfully underwent CEUS‐guided LVA followed by two debulking procedures. The second patient was a 16‐year‐old male with congenital scrotal and lower extremity lymphedema. He had two CEUS‐guided LVAs and subsequent debulking for anterior scrotal swelling, with long‐term reduction in edema. The third patient was a 31‐year‐old female with primary lymphedema of the right lower extremity and genital region. She underwent seven CEUS and indocyanine green lymphography (ICG) guided anastomoses targeting the mons and lower abdomen, resulting in substantial symptomatic and volumetric improvement. CEUS detected target lymphatic vessels in all cases, including cases where ICG imaging failed to identify candidate lymphatic vessels. CEUS with intradermal microbubble injection successfully identified target lymphatic vessels in the preoperative planning for LVA surgery in patients with genital lymphedema.

Background: Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) is an effective surgical treatment for extremity lymphedema. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescent lymphography, the traditional standard for imaging lymphatic vessels, has limitations, including difficulty depicting deeper or congested lymphatics and contraindication in iodine hypersensitivity. This study evaluated contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with microbubbles for identifying lymphatic vessels for LVA and compared it with ICG lymphography. Methods: In this single-center retrospective review, intraoperative CEUS with intradermal injection of microbubble suspension (Lumason, Bracco Diagnostics, Inc.) was used in patients before LVA surgery between October 2019 and February 2023. Pre- or intraoperative ICG lymphography was also used to identify target lymphatic vessels. All patients diagnosed with primary or secondary extremity lymphedema who underwent LVA were included. Technical success rate was defined as lymphatic vessels identified by CEUS that led to successful LVAs. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: Thirty-two patients underwent LVA surgery, with a mean age of 58.5 ± 13.9 years. CEUS identified lymphatic vessels in all 32 patients, including 7 in whom ICG failed. Two patients with ICG allergy underwent CEUS only. CEUS identified more candidate lymphatics per patient (5.3 ± 4.2) compared with ICG (2.5 ± 2.7). Of the 182 anastomoses, 96 (52.8%) were identified by both CEUS and ICG, 75 (41.2%) by CEUS only, and 11 (6%) by ICG only. Conclusions: CEUS is a promising tool for identifying lymphatic vessels in patients with lymphedema undergoing LVA, particularly when ICG lymphography is inadequate or contraindicated.

Background and Objectives: Perineal wound complications and pelvic fluid collections or abscesses following proctectomy for Crohn’s disease are a common cause of morbidity and might be mitigated by filling the pelvis and occluding the pelvic inlet with a flap. Alternative flap options can be considered when inadequate omentum is available and when avoiding myofasciocutaneous flaps. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of our Crohn’s proctectomy database was conducted to identify patients who underwent a non-omental or non-myofasciocutaneous local pedicle flap to their pelvis or pelvic exclusion using biological material during surgery. The techniques and outcomes of these alternative techniques are described in detail. Results: 228 patients underwent proctectomy for Crohn’s disease during the 10-year study period. However, only six patients had their pelvis filled or pelvic inlet occluded using a non-omental, non-myofasciocutaneous local pedicled flap or biological material. The techniques identified included two sigmoid mesocolic flaps, one peritoneal, preperitoneal fat and falciform ligament flap, one perivesical fat flap, one Gerota’s fat pad flap, and one bovine pericardial patch assisted pelvic exclusion. These flaps’ clinicopathological and operative characteristics, surgical outcomes, and technical aspects are described. Conclusions: When greater omentum is unavailable or inadequate and myofasciocutaneous flaps need to be avoided, local pedicled flaps using a range of intra-abdominal tissues or biological material can be used to fill the pelvis or occlude the pelvic inlet after proctectomy for Crohn’s disease. These techniques may help to prevent short and long-term complications associated with having a pelvic dead space.

Abstract Managing pelvic osteomyelitis (POM) in the setting of stage IV pressure injuries requires multidisciplinary evaluation as well as patient and caregiver engagement and is complicated by the lack of high-evidence data to guide best practices. In this review, we describe our approach to pressure injury and POM evaluation and management through multidisciplinary collaboration and highlight areas of future research that are necessary to enhance patient outcomes, reduce healthcare costs, and improve the quality of life of those affected by POM.

Abstract Managing pelvic osteomyelitis (POM) in the setting of stage IV pressure injuries requires multidisciplinary evaluation as well as patient and caregiver engagement and is complicated by the lack of high-evidence data to guide best practices. In this review, we describe our approach to pressure injury and POM evaluation and management through multidisciplinary collaboration and highlight areas of future research that are necessary to enhance patient outcomes, reduce healthcare costs, and improve the quality of life of those affected by POM.

Summary: Prior studies on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) lymphography for preoperative mapping before lymphaticovenous anastomosis surgery in patients with extremity lymphedema have been limited to using only Lumason and Sonazoid as microbubble contrast agents. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of using two other Food & Drug Administration–approved microbubble agents, Optison and Definity, for imaging lymphatic vessels in the upper extremities. Nine female adults with unilateral upper extremity lymphedema anticipating lymphaticovenous anastomosis surgery underwent CEUS lymphography of the unaffected upper extremity randomized to either Lumason, Definity, or Optison. Lymphatic vessels were visualized in all but one case when undilated Definity was used. In the eight upper extremities where lymphatic vessels were visualized, an average of eight intradermal injections of microbubbles were performed in the extremity. Lymphatic vessels could be identified in 57% (36 of 63) of the injections. The effective dilution for each of the microbubble agents is provided. This was the first successful demonstration of lymphatic vessel visualization using either Definity or Optison. Broadening the range of available microbubble agents for CEUS lymphography could improve accessibility to the procedure and provide potentially safer alternatives.

Summary: Lymphedema following oncologic intervention can cause significant lifelong morbidity for patients in whom conservative management fails. The associated swelling, discomfort, pain, and recurrent cellulitis greatly diminish quality of life. Surgical procedures, including suction-assisted lipectomy, lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA), and vascularized lymph node transfers, show effectiveness in both volume reduction in affected extremities and symptom relief. However, the success of procedures like LVA is dependent on effective preoperative lymphatic mapping to identify suitable vessels for anastomosis. Traditional superficial lymphatic mapping uses near infrared fluorescence indocyanine green (ICG) imaging. Moreover, recent advances in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) lymphography increased lymphovenous bypass target identification for LVA in the extremities.7 CEUS lymphography uses microbubbles as a contrast-enhancing agent injected intradermally into the affected extremity with subsequent identification of superficial collecting lymphatic vessels using ultrasound. Although a recent report noted an uptick in severe and critical adverse drug reactions to an ultrasound contrast agent injected intravenously in stress echocardiography, adverse drug reactions associated with ultrasound contrast-enhancing agents in body ultrasound are rare. The safety profile and potential complications from CEUS lymphography in the lymphedema population have yet to be fully characterized. In this case report, the authors present the first cutaneous adverse drug event following a secondary exposure to the contrast used for CEUS imaging. Mechanisms and justifications for an immune-mediated process are explored, and a review of similar manifestations in other related contrast applications is discussed.

Abstract Background Implant-based breast augmentation is a gold standard procedure for transfeminine patients to create a more feminine-appearing chest. In many cases, ancillary procedures are performed simultaneously to achieve an optimal aesthetic result. Objectives To determine the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing feminizing gender-affirming breast surgery in a single academic institution. Methods A retrospective electronic chart review of feminizing gender-affirming breast surgery patients at Mayo Clinic, Rochester from 2017 to 2022 was conducted. Patients demographics and surgical outcomes were gathered. A survival analysis was performed to obtain the time-to-event complication rate. Results Over 5 years, 46 patients (92 breasts) were included. The mean age was 39 years (SD ±15), and most had an above-normal Body Mass Index (58.7%). Thirty (65%) had previous gender-affirming surgeries. The mean implant volume was 289 ml (SD ±95; 140 - 520). Most implants were placed in a subglandular plane (81%) with an inframammary fold incision (91.3%). All implants used were smooth round cohesive silicone gel implants. Ancillary procedures were performed in thirty-two patients (69.57%). Eight patients presented complications (4 major vs 4 minor) in a median postoperative follow-up of 372 vs 392 days; at 1-month follow-up, the probability of a complication to have occurred is 2.17% (95% CI: 0–6.3%) vs 5% (95% CI: 0–11.5%) and at 1 year is 10.21% (95% CI: 0–20.9%) vs 12.5% (95% CI: 0–23.4%) ​which remain the same up to 4 years. Conclusions Breast augmentation with implants is a safe procedure to achieve feminization of the breast with a low rate of complications.

Summary: Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) surgery is an effective surgery for the treatment of lymphedema in the extremities. Indocyanine green lymphography is the reference standard for visualizing lymphatics for LVA surgery, but it has several limitations; most notably, superficial dermal congestion can mask deeper lymphatic vessels. To overcome the limitations, we add contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) lymphography. We have previously reported that CEUS lymphography can identify lymphatic vessels for LVA surgery that indocyanine green lymphography does not. Here, we describe how we perform CEUS lymphography, including workflow, technique, and documentation. Before informed consent, the patient must be screened for possible adverse reactions to microbubbles. The procedure involves multiple intradermal injections of the microbubble agent at various sites along the extremity. After each injection, imaging for microbubble uptake by lymphatic vessels is performed using an ultrasound scanner with contrast-specific software. We use sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres (Lumason/SonoVue; Bracco Suisse SA), but we are investigating the performance of other Food & Drug Administration–approved microbubble agents for CEUS lymphography. Having a systematic approach to marking the skin can mitigate the hindrance of marking over ultrasound coupling gel. Another benefit of CEUS lymphography is the rapid identification of neighboring veins compatible in size and location for anastomosis. We hold regular scheduled multidisciplinary meetings for coordination of care, discussion of outcomes, quality assurance, and ongoing innovation.