See, Alfred P.

Background and objectives Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) with perinidal aneurysms and single draining vein are associated with an elevated risk of rupture and increased procedural complexity. The role of preoperative embolization in this high-risk anatomical subset remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of microsurgery with preoperative embolization, compared with microsurgery alone in patients with such AVMs. Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of an AVM registry from the MISTA (Multicenter International Study for Treatment of Brain AVMs) consortium and included AVMs with perinidal aneurysms and a single draining vein. Baseline characteristics, angiographic outcomes, functional outcomes, and complication rates were compared. Propensity score weighting (PSW) using the covariate balancing method was applied to adjust for baseline differences. Results Out of a total of 1919 patients, 65 met the inclusion criteria; 45 patients underwent preoperative embolization followed by microsurgery, and 20 underwent microsurgery alone. After adjustment, complete obliteration rates were similar between groups (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.04 to 16.33, P=0.92), as were rates of functional independence at discharge and follow-up. Overall complication, symptomatic complication, and mortality rates did not differ significantly between groups. However, permanent complications were significantly lower in patients with preoperative embolization (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.004 to 0.84, P=0.03). Discussion In patients with AVMs featuring perinidal aneurysms and single draining vein, preoperative embolization followed by microsurgery was associated with fewer permanent complications and no increase in adverse outcomes compared with microsurgery alone. However, given the small number of events, this finding should be interpreted cautiously.

Background Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is a well-established treatment modality for large vessel occlusion (LVO) in adults, but there are limited data in the pediatric population. The rarity of the condition makes prospective trial design difficult, and therefore evaluation of MT devices and outcomes is sparse. In pediatric LVO cases, some newer devices may be appropriate for use in revascularization procedures. Furthermore, illustrative specific device-access combinations have rarely been presented in young patients under the age of 5 years. Methods This was a single institution experience in intracranial MT procedures for pediatric acute ischemic stroke (AIS). A given procedure was included if there was an attempt at MT between 2015 and 2023. Results Sixteen endovascular procedures were performed in 15 patients with AIS, with a mean age of 7.4 years; eight patients were <5 years of age. MT was attempted in 15/16 (93.7%) procedures, including 11 (73.3%) in the anterior circulation and four (26.7%) in the posterior circulation; one case recanalized after medical treatment. The most common MT techniques were combined aspiration with a stentriever (n=10, 66.7%) and aspiration alone (n=3, 20%). Traditional stentrievers (4–6 mm) were used in seven cases and low-profile stentrievers in four cases. Improved reperfusion was achieved in all low-profile stentriever cases. Reperfusion of modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infaction ≥2b was obtained in 73.3% of cases, including 72.7% of those in which a stentriever was used. Conclusions Low-profile thrombectomy devices may achieve similar revascularization results to other approaches in challenging clinical scenarios observed in younger children.