Abecassis, Isaac Josh

OBJECTIVE Dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) are rare cerebrovascular anomalies. Tentorial dAVFs (TDAVFs) have more aggressive features, making them prone to symptomatic presentations and hemorrhage. TDAVFs are heterogenous and require tailored surgical approaches. Presented is a multicenter analysis of TDAVF surgical outcomes. METHODS The Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research (CONDOR) consortium compiled data on dAVFs from 16 international centers from 1990 to 2021 retrospectively. Microsurgical treatment success was defined as angiographically confirmed complete obliteration of the fistula or discontinuation of cortical venous drainage (CVD) in high-grade TDAVFs. TDAVF subtypes and tailored surgical approaches were reviewed. RESULTS Of 1360 patients in CONDOR, 161 had TDAVFs and 27% (44/161) of these patients underwent surgical management, with the majority (52% [23/44]) receiving surgery as a salvage treatment following failed embolization. The mean age (SD) of this cohort was 56 (15) years, and 68% (30/44) were male. In total, 91% (40/44) of surgically treated patients presented with aggressive symptoms: 64% (28/44) presented with hemorrhage and 27% (12/44) with nonhemorrhagic neurological deficit (NHND). The median (IQR) duration from symptom onset to diagnosis was 1 (1–4) day. The median time (IQR) between diagnosis and surgery was 15 (3–80) days. Surgical approaches varied across the cohort, with the retrosigmoid being the most common (44% [18/41]), followed by the midline suboccipital (24% [10/41]) and occipital (15% [6/41]) approaches. Perioperative complications occurred in 11% (5/44) of cases, as well as permanent neurological deficits in 2% (1/44). Surgical success was achieved in 90% of patients (38/42). During the mean 3-year follow-up, 2 patients experienced a recurrence of their fistula including representation of CVD (2/38 [5%]) and 1 patient had a new NHND (1/43 [2%]). Shorter symptom duration was significantly associated with success (15.6 vs 181.5 days, p = 0.001). Primary versus salvage microsurgery showed no difference in outcomes. Both patients with recurrent fistula were effectively treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery. CONCLUSIONS Resection is safe and durable for the treatment of TDAVF not otherwise amenable to embolization. It can achieve a high degree of success with a low rate of perioperative complications and permanent neurological deficits, benefits far exceeding the risks associated with TDAVF natural history or management with less effective modalities.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: First-line therapy for most intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) is endovascular embolization, but some require microsurgical ligation due to limited endovascular accessibility, anticipated lower cure rates, or unacceptable risk profiles. We investigated the most common surgically treated dAVF locations and the approaches and outcomes of each. METHODS: The Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research database was retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent dAVF microsurgical ligation were included. Patient demographics, angiographic information, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were collected. The 5 most common surgically treated dAVF locations were analyzed about used surgical approaches and postoperative outcomes. Univariate analyses were performed with statistical significance set at a threshold of P < .05. RESULTS: In total, 248 patients in the Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research database met inclusion criteria. The 5 most common surgically treated dAVF locations were tentorial, anterior cranial fossa (ACF), transverse-sigmoid sinus (TSS), convexity/superior sagittal sinus (SSS), and torcular. Most tentorial dAVFs were approached using a suboccipital, lateral supracerebellar infratentorial approach (39.3%); extended retrosigmoid approach (ERS) (25%); or posterior subtemporal approach (19.6%). All ACF dAVFs used a subfrontal approach; 5.3% also included an anterior interhemispheric approach. Most TSS dAVFs were ligated via ERS (31.3%) or subtemporal (31.3%) approaches. All convexity/SSS dAVFs used an interhemispheric approach. All torcular dAVFs used the suboccipital, lateral supracerebellar infratentorial approach, with 10.5% undergoing simultaneous ERS craniotomy. Angiographic occlusion rates after microsurgery were 85.5%, 100%, 75.8%, 79.2%, and 73.7% for tentorial, ACF, TSS, convexity/SSS, and torcular dAVFs, respectively ( P = .02); the permanent neurological complication rates were 1.8%, 2.6%, 9.1%, 0%, and 0% ( P = .31). There were no statistically significant differences in development of complications ( P = .08) or Modified Rankin Scale at the last follow-up ( P = .11) by fistula location. CONCLUSION: Although endovascular embolization is the first-line treatment for most intracranial dAVFs, surgical ligation is an important alternative. ACF and tentorial fistulas particularly demonstrate high rates of postoperative obliteration.

OBJECTIVE There is a reported elevated risk of cerebral aneurysms in patients with intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs). However, the natural history, rate of spontaneous regression, and ideal treatment regimen are not well characterized. In this study, the authors aimed to describe the characteristics of patients with dAVFs and intracranial aneurysms and propose a classification system. METHODS The Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research (CONDOR) database from 12 centers was retrospectively reviewed. Analysis was performed to compare dAVF patients with (dAVF+ cohort) and without (dAVF-only cohort) concomitant aneurysm. Aneurysms were categorized based on location as a dAVF flow-related aneurysm (FRA) or a dAVF non–flow-related aneurysm (NFRA), with further classification as extra- or intradural. Patients with traumatic pseudoaneurysms or aneurysms with associated arteriovenous malformations were excluded from the analysis. Patient demographics, dAVF anatomical information, aneurysm information, and follow-up data were collected. RESULTS Of the 1077 patients, 1043 were eligible for inclusion, comprising 978 (93.8%) and 65 (6.2%) in the dAVF-only and dAVF+ cohorts, respectively. There were 96 aneurysms in the dAVF+ cohort; 10 patients (1%) harbored 12 FRAs, and 55 patients (5.3%) harbored 84 NFRAs. Dural AVF+ patients had higher rates of smoking (59.3% vs 35.2%, p < 0.001) and illicit drug use (5.8% vs 1.5%, p = 0.02). Sixteen dAVF+ patients (24.6%) presented with aneurysm rupture, which represented 16.7% of the total aneurysms. One patient (1.5%) had aneurysm rupture during follow-up. Patients with dAVF+ were more likely to have a dAVF located in nonconventional locations, less likely to have arterial supply to the dAVF from external carotid artery branches, and more likely to have supply from pial branches. Rates of cortical venous drainage and Borden type distributions were comparable between cohorts. A minority (12.5%) of aneurysms were FRAs. The majority of the aneurysms underwent treatment via either endovascular (36.5%) or microsurgical (15.6%) technique. A small proportion of aneurysms managed conservatively either with or without dAVF treatment spontaneously regressed (6.2%). CONCLUSIONS Patients with dAVF have a similar risk of harboring a concomitant intracranial aneurysm unrelated to the dAVF (5.3%) compared with the general population (approximately 2%–5%) and a rare risk (0.9%) of harboring an FRA. Only 50% of FRAs are intradural. Dural AVF+ patients have differences in dAVF angioarchitecture. A subset of dAVF+ patients harbor FRAs that may regress after dAVF treatment.

Background and Purpose: Given the benign natural history of intracranial low-grade dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs), their routine treatment remains controversial. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of low-grade dAVF treatment to conservative management. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of dAVF patients derived from 12 institutions participating in the Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research (CONDOR). Patients with low-grade (Borden I) dAVFs were included and categorized into treatment and observation cohorts. Primary outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at final follow-up. Secondary outcomes were rates of excellent (mRS 0-1) and good (mRS 0-2) functional outcomes, symptomatic improvement, mortality, and obliteration at final follow-up. Results: The treatment and observation cohorts comprised 230 and 112 patients, respectively. At last follow up, no difference in primary or secondary outcomes was observed between the two cohorts, with the exception of obliteration, which was higher in the treatment cohort (79.3% vs. 28.2%, p<0.001; Table 1). The two cohorts were then matched in a 1:1 ratio, resulting in 64 patients in each matched cohort. No difference in primary or secondary outcomes was observed between the matched cohorts, with the exception of obliteration, which was higher in the matched treatment cohort (75.4% vs. 28.6%, p<0.001; Table 2). Subgroup analysis of symptomatic patients demonstrated higher obliteration rate in the treatment cohort, but no difference in primary or other secondary outcomes were found. Conclusions: Low-grade dAVF treatment was not associated with increased functional disability compared to conservative management. Although higher obliteration rates were achieved in the treatment cohort, rates of symptomatic improvement were similar between the two cohorts. This study did not provide evidence to support the routine treatment of low-grade dAVFs.

Abstract BACKGROUND Low-grade intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVF) have a benign natural history in the majority of cases. The benefit from treatment of these lesions is controversial. OBJECTIVE To compare the outcomes of observation versus intervention for low-grade dAVFs. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed dAVF patients from institutions participating in the CONsortium for Dural arteriovenous fistula Outcomes Research (CONDOR). Patients with low-grade (Borden type I) dAVFs were included and categorized into intervention or observation cohorts. The intervention and observation cohorts were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity scores. Primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at final follow-up. Secondary outcomes were excellent (mRS 0-1) and good (mRS 0-2) outcomes, symptomatic improvement, mortality, and obliteration at final follow-up. RESULTS The intervention and observation cohorts comprised 230 and 125 patients, respectively. We found no differences in primary or secondary outcomes between the 2 unmatched cohorts at last follow-up (mean duration 36 mo), except obliteration rate was higher in the intervention cohort (78.5% vs 24.1%, P < .001). The matched intervention and observation cohorts each comprised 78 patients. We also found no differences in primary or secondary outcomes between the matched cohorts except obliteration was also more likely in the matched intervention cohort ( P < .001). Procedural complication rates in the unmatched and matched intervention cohorts were 15.4% and 19.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION Intervention for low-grade intracranial dAVFs achieves superior obliteration rates compared to conservative management, but it fails to improve neurological or functional outcomes. Our findings do not support the routine treatment of low-grade dAVFs.