Raper, Daniel

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: First-line therapy for most intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) is endovascular embolization, but some require microsurgical ligation due to limited endovascular accessibility, anticipated lower cure rates, or unacceptable risk profiles. We investigated the most common surgically treated dAVF locations and the approaches and outcomes of each. METHODS: The Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research database was retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent dAVF microsurgical ligation were included. Patient demographics, angiographic information, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were collected. The 5 most common surgically treated dAVF locations were analyzed about used surgical approaches and postoperative outcomes. Univariate analyses were performed with statistical significance set at a threshold of P < .05. RESULTS: In total, 248 patients in the Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research database met inclusion criteria. The 5 most common surgically treated dAVF locations were tentorial, anterior cranial fossa (ACF), transverse-sigmoid sinus (TSS), convexity/superior sagittal sinus (SSS), and torcular. Most tentorial dAVFs were approached using a suboccipital, lateral supracerebellar infratentorial approach (39.3%); extended retrosigmoid approach (ERS) (25%); or posterior subtemporal approach (19.6%). All ACF dAVFs used a subfrontal approach; 5.3% also included an anterior interhemispheric approach. Most TSS dAVFs were ligated via ERS (31.3%) or subtemporal (31.3%) approaches. All convexity/SSS dAVFs used an interhemispheric approach. All torcular dAVFs used the suboccipital, lateral supracerebellar infratentorial approach, with 10.5% undergoing simultaneous ERS craniotomy. Angiographic occlusion rates after microsurgery were 85.5%, 100%, 75.8%, 79.2%, and 73.7% for tentorial, ACF, TSS, convexity/SSS, and torcular dAVFs, respectively ( P = .02); the permanent neurological complication rates were 1.8%, 2.6%, 9.1%, 0%, and 0% ( P = .31). There were no statistically significant differences in development of complications ( P = .08) or Modified Rankin Scale at the last follow-up ( P = .11) by fistula location. CONCLUSION: Although endovascular embolization is the first-line treatment for most intracranial dAVFs, surgical ligation is an important alternative. ACF and tentorial fistulas particularly demonstrate high rates of postoperative obliteration.

OBJECTIVE The placement of flow-diverting devices has become a common method of treating unruptured intracranial aneurysms of the internal carotid artery. The progressive improvement of aneurysm occlusion after treatment—with low complication and rupture rates—has led to a dilemma regarding the management of aneurysms in which occlusion has not occurred within 6–24 months. The authors aimed to identify clinical consensus regarding management of intracranial aneurysms displaying persistent filling 6–24 months after flow diversion and to ascertain questions that may drive future investigation. METHODS An international panel of 67 experts was invited to participate in a multistep Delphi consensus process on the treatment of intracranial aneurysms after failed flow diversion. RESULTS Of the 67 experts invited, 23 (34%) participated. Qualitative analysis of an initial survey with open-ended questions resulted in 51 statements regarding management of aneurysms showing persistent filling after flow diversion. The statements were grouped into 8 categories, and in the second round, respondents rated the degree of their agreement with each statement on a 5-point Likert scale. Flow diverters with surface modifiers did not influence administration of dual-antiplatelet therapy according to 83%. Consensus was also reached regarding the definition of treatment failure at specific time points, including at 6 months if there is aneurysm growth or persistent rapid flow through the entirety of the aneurysm (96%), at 12 months if there is aneurysm growth or symptom onset (78%), and at 24 months if there is persistent filling regardless of size and filling characteristics (74%). Although experts agreed that the degree of intimal hyperplasia or in-device stenosis could not be ascertained by noninvasive imaging alone (83%), only 65% chose digital subtraction angiography as the preferred modality. At 6 and 12 months, retreatment is preferred if there is persistent filling with aneurysm growth (96%, 96%), device malposition (48%, 87%), or a history of subarachnoid hemorrhage (65%, 70%), respectively, and at 24 months if there is persistent filling without reduction in aneurysm size (74%). Experts favored treatment with an additional flow diverter (87%) over aneurysm clipping, applying the same principles for follow-up (83%) and treatment failure (91%) as for the first flow diverter. CONCLUSIONS The authors present the consensus practices of experts in the management of intracranial aneurysms without occlusion 6–24 months after treatment with a flow-diverting device.

BACKGROUND: The new sonolucent cranioplasty implant (clear polymethyl methacrylate, PMMA) adds functionality besides surgical reconstruction. One possible application uses the transcranioplasty ultrasound (TCUS) technique after PMMA cranioplasty to assess graft patency of extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass procedures. OBJECTIVE: To report our early multicenter experience. METHODS: This is a multicenter analysis of consecutive EC-IC bypass patients from 5 US centers (2019-2022) with closure postbypass using PMMA implant. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (median age 53 years, 68.2% females) were included. The most common indication for bypass was Moyamoya disease/syndrome (77.3%), and superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery bypass was the most common procedure (79.5%). Pretreatment modified Rankin Scales of 0 and 1 to 2 were noted in 11.4% and 59.1% of patients, respectively. Intraoperative imaging for bypass patency involved a combination of modalities; Doppler was the most used modality (90.9%) followed by indocyanine green and catheter angiography (86.4% and 61.4%, respectively). Qualitative TCUS assessment of graft patency was feasible in all cases. Postoperative inpatient TCUS confirmation of bypass patency was recorded in 56.8% of the cases, and outpatient TCUS surveillance was recorded in 47.7%. There were no cases of bypass failure necessitating retreatment. Similarly, no implant-related complications were encountered in the cohort. Major complications requiring additional surgery occurred in 2 patients (4.6%) including epidural hematoma requiring evacuation (2.3%) and postoperative surgical site infection (2.3%) that was believed to be unrelated to the implant. CONCLUSION: This multicenter study supports safety and feasibility of using sonolucent PMMA implant in EC-IC bypass surgery with the goal of monitoring bypass patency using TCUS.