Fargen, Kyle M

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Flow-diverting stents (FDSs) have improved treatment options for intracranial aneurysms. Although FDS have proven successful in treating aneurysms that would previously have required complex microsurgical or endovascular repairs, treatment failures remain a concern. In this multicenter study, we aim to analyze the predictors of residual aneurysmal filling at early angiographic follow-up. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained neuroendovascular database at 14 high-volume US centers was conducted for all patients who underwent FDS placement for intracranial aneurysms between 2011 and 2019. Aneurysms were graded on the O'Kelly-Marotta scale (OKM). RESULTS: A total of 2277 patients underwent FDS embolization for intracranial aneurysms during the study period. The patient's mean age was 55 (SD ± 13.5) years, and 82% were female. The median maximal aneurysm diameter was 6.7 mm (IQR 4.10-11 mm). Complete aneurysm obliteration (OKM grade 4) occurred in 1109 patients (68%), and 146 (9%) were OKM grade 3, 188 (12%) were OKM grade 2, and 174 (11%) were OKM grade 1. In the adjusted multivariate analysis, individuals in the 65-74 years and 75+ years age groups had significantly increased risk of residual aneurysm filling at 6-month follow-up compared with the 18-44 years age group (odds ratio [OR] 1.92 (95% CI: 1.33-2.78) and 2.92 (95% CI: 1.79-4.77), respectively). Aneurysms arising from the superior cerebellar artery, the basilar artery, and the carotid terminus were more likely to have a residual filling (OR 12.6, 95% CI: 1.39–14.7; OR 4.27, 95% CI: 1.39–14.7; OR 3.16, 95% CI: 1.24–8.06, respectively). CONCLUSION: As the utilization of FDS for intracranial aneurysms becomes more widespread, the efficacy of aneurysm obliteration needs to be assessed. Our results indicate that several patient-dependent factors, such as age, aneurysm location, and size, predict the likelihood of residual aneurysm filling 6 months post-treatment.

Objective Cognitive impairment is increasingly recognized in patients with cerebral venous congestion (CVC), yet the cognitive tools used are largely adapted from stroke and dementia research. This review examines current literature on cognitive function in CVC, including conditions such as cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), and dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs). Special emphasis is placed on the limitations of common screening tools like the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Cognitive dysfunction—primarily affecting executive function, processing speed, and attention—is reported in up to 86% of CVC cases, yet only about 20% of studies use validated cognitive testing tools, most of which may lack sensitivity for CVC-specific deficits. Emerging techniques such as ocular motor testing and physiological markers show promise but require further validation. There is an urgent need for standardized, CVC-specific cognitive assessment protocols that reflect the unique pathophysiology of venous disorders. Future research should prioritize the development of targeted cognitive batteries and integrate objective physiological measures to enhance diagnostic accuracy.

Background Nickel hypersensitivity is the most common metal related allergy. Nickel containing alloys are frequently used in endovascular devices. The use of intracranial stents in patients with nickel hypersensitivity appears to be safe, but these small series only evaluated arterial stent placement. This case series aimed to assess the safety of intracranial venous stent placement in patients with documented nickel allergy. Methods In this retrospective multicenter case series, patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension and documented nickel allergy underwent treatment with a permanently implanted nickel containing stent in the dural venous sinuses. Results Nine patients with nickel allergy were included. All patients reported clinical improvement in their idiopathic intracranial hypertension symptoms. Of the five patients who had follow-up intracranial venous imaging, all stents remained patent. No patients experienced intraoperative, postoperative, or long term procedure related complications, with follow-up ranging from 1.8 weeks to 49.1 months. Conclusion In this limited case series, the use of nickel containing stents in intracranial venous sinuses in patients with nickel allergy did not result in any allergic reaction or adverse outcome.

OBJECTIVE The placement of flow-diverting devices has become a common method of treating unruptured intracranial aneurysms of the internal carotid artery. The progressive improvement of aneurysm occlusion after treatment—with low complication and rupture rates—has led to a dilemma regarding the management of aneurysms in which occlusion has not occurred within 6–24 months. The authors aimed to identify clinical consensus regarding management of intracranial aneurysms displaying persistent filling 6–24 months after flow diversion and to ascertain questions that may drive future investigation. METHODS An international panel of 67 experts was invited to participate in a multistep Delphi consensus process on the treatment of intracranial aneurysms after failed flow diversion. RESULTS Of the 67 experts invited, 23 (34%) participated. Qualitative analysis of an initial survey with open-ended questions resulted in 51 statements regarding management of aneurysms showing persistent filling after flow diversion. The statements were grouped into 8 categories, and in the second round, respondents rated the degree of their agreement with each statement on a 5-point Likert scale. Flow diverters with surface modifiers did not influence administration of dual-antiplatelet therapy according to 83%. Consensus was also reached regarding the definition of treatment failure at specific time points, including at 6 months if there is aneurysm growth or persistent rapid flow through the entirety of the aneurysm (96%), at 12 months if there is aneurysm growth or symptom onset (78%), and at 24 months if there is persistent filling regardless of size and filling characteristics (74%). Although experts agreed that the degree of intimal hyperplasia or in-device stenosis could not be ascertained by noninvasive imaging alone (83%), only 65% chose digital subtraction angiography as the preferred modality. At 6 and 12 months, retreatment is preferred if there is persistent filling with aneurysm growth (96%, 96%), device malposition (48%, 87%), or a history of subarachnoid hemorrhage (65%, 70%), respectively, and at 24 months if there is persistent filling without reduction in aneurysm size (74%). Experts favored treatment with an additional flow diverter (87%) over aneurysm clipping, applying the same principles for follow-up (83%) and treatment failure (91%) as for the first flow diverter. CONCLUSIONS The authors present the consensus practices of experts in the management of intracranial aneurysms without occlusion 6–24 months after treatment with a flow-diverting device.

Background The recognition of venous sinus stenosis as a contributing factor in the majority of patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension coupled with increasing cerebral venography and venous sinus stenting experience have dramatically improved our understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms driving this disease. There is now a dense, growing body of research in the neurointerventional literature detailing anatomical and physiological mechanisms of disease which has not been widely disseminated among clinicians. Methods A literature search was conducted, covering the most recent neurointerventional literature on idiopathic intracranial hypertension, the pathophysiology of idiopathic intracranial hypertension, and management strategies (including venous sinus stenting), and subsequently summarized to provide a comprehensive review of the most recently published studies on idiopathic intracranial hypertension pathophysiology and management. Conclusion Recent studies in the neurointerventional literature have greatly improved our understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms causing idiopathic intracranial hypertension and its associated conditions. The ability to make individualized, patient-specific treatment approaches has been made possible by advances in our understanding of how venous sinus stenosis and cerebral venous hypertension fundamentally contribute to idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Several collateral venous pathways exist to assist in cranial venous drainage in addition to the internal jugular veins. The important extrajugular networks (EJN) are often readily identified on diagnostic cerebral angiography. However, the angiographic pattern of venous drainage through collateral EJN has not been previously compared among patients with and without idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). OBJECTIVE: To quantify EJN on cerebral angiography among patients both with and without IIH and to determine whether there is a different EJN venous drainage pattern in patients with IIH. METHODS: Retrospective imaging review of 100 cerebral angiograms (50 IIH and 50 non-IIH patients) and medical records from a single academic medical center was performed by 2 independent experienced neuroendovascular surgeons. Points were assigned to EJN flow from 0 to 6 using an increasing scale (with each patient's dominant internal jugular vein standardized to 5 points to serve as the internal reference). Angiography of each patient included 11 separately graded extrajugular networks for internal carotid and vertebral artery injections. RESULTS: Patients in the IIH group had statistically significant greater flow in several of the extrajugular networks. Therefore, they preferentially drained through EJN compared with the non-IIH group. Right transverse-sigmoid system was most often dominant in both groups, yet there was a significantly greater prevalence of codominant sinus pattern on posterior circulation angiograms. CONCLUSION: Patients with IIH have greater utilization of EJN compared with patients without IIH. Whether this is merely an epiphenomenon or possesses actual cause-effect relationships needs to be determined with further studies.

Background While venous congestion in the peripheral vasculature has been described and accepted, intracranial venous congestion remains poorly understood. The characteristics, pathophysiology, and management of cerebral venous stasis, venous hypertension and venous congestion remain controversial, and a unifying conceptual schema is absent. The cerebral venous and lymphatic systems are part of a complex and dynamic interaction between the intracranial compartments, with interplay between the parenchyma, veins, arteries, cerebrospinal fluid, and recently characterized lymphatic-like systems in the brain. Each component contributes towards intracranial pressure, occupying space within the fixed calvarial volume. This article proposes a framework to consider conditions resulting in brain and neck venous congestion, and seeks to expedite further study of cerebral venous diagnoses, mechanisms, symptomatology, and treatments. Methods A multi-institution retrospective review was performed to identify unique patient cases, complemented with a published case series to assess a spectrum of disease states with components of venous congestion affecting the brain. These diseases were organized according to anatomical location and purported mechanisms. Outcomes of treatments were also analyzed. Illustrative cases were identified in the venous treatment databases of the authors. Conclusion This framework is the first clinically structured description of venous pathologies resulting in intracranial venous and cerebrospinal fluid hypertension. Our proposed system highlights unique clinical symptoms and features critical for appropriate diagnostic work-up and potential treatment. This novel schema allows clinicians effectively to approach cases of intracranial hypertension secondary to venous etiologies, and furthermore provides a framework by which researchers can better understand this developing area of cerebrovascular disease.

Abstract BACKGROUND There are conflicting data between natural history studies suggesting a very low risk of rupture for small, unruptured intracranial aneurysms and retrospective studies that have identified a much higher frequency of small, ruptured aneurysms than expected. OBJECTIVE To use the prospective International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms cohort to identify morphological characteristics predictive of unruptured intracranial aneurysm rupture. METHODS A case-control design was used to analyze morphological characteristics associated with aneurysm rupture in the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms database. Fifty-seven patients with ruptured aneurysms during follow-up were matched (by size and location) with 198 patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms without rupture during follow-up. Twelve morphological metrics were measured from cerebral angiograms in a blinded fashion. RESULTS Perpendicular height ( P = .008) and size ratio (ratio of maximum diameter to the parent vessel diameter; P = .01) were predictors of aneurysm rupture on univariate analysis. Aspect ratio, daughter sacs, multiple lobes, aneurysm angle, neck diameter, parent vessel diameter, and calculated aneurysm volume were not statistically significant predictors of rupture. On multivariate analysis, perpendicular height was the only significant predictor of rupture (Chi-square 7.1, P -value .008). CONCLUSION This study underscores the importance of other morphological factors, such as perpendicular height and size ratio, that may influence unruptured intracranial aneurysm rupture risk in addition to greatest diameter and anterior vs posterior location.