Citations

Abstract Background: ENESTop (NCT01698905) is an ongoing, single-arm, phase 2 study evaluating treatment-free remission (TFR) in patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) who achieved sustained molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5; BCR-ABL1 ≤ 0.0032% on the International Scale [BCR-ABL1IS]) on second-line nilotinib (NIL). In the primary analysis, 57.9% (95% CI, 48.8%-66.7%) of pts who stopped NIL maintained TFR (no loss of major molecular response [MMR; ie, BCR-ABL1IS > 0.1%], confirmed loss of MR4 [ie, consecutive BCR-ABL1IS > 0.01%], or treatment reinitiation) at 48 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 73.8% of pts during the first 48 weeks of TFR vs 77.0% during the year prior to stopping treatment. The incidence of musculoskeletal pain-related AEs was higher during TFR (42.1% vs 14.3%). To assess the potential effect of stopping NIL on quality of life (QOL), pt-reported outcomes were assessed before and during TFR. Methods: ENESTop enrolled adult pts with CML-CP with ≥ 3 years of prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy (> 4 weeks of imatinib [IM], then ≥ 2 years of NIL). Pts must have achieved sustained MR4.5 on NIL after switching from IM. Enrolled pts entered a 1-year NIL treatment consolidation phase; those without confirmed loss of MR4.5 (ie, consecutive BCR-ABL1IS > 0.0032%) entered the TFR phase and stopped NIL. Pts with loss of MMR or confirmed loss of MR4 during the TFR phase reinitiated NIL. QOL was assessed via questionnaires completed by pts at specified time points. The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for CML (MDASI-CML) questionnaire assessed, for a defined set of symptoms, the levels of severity and interference with daily life on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being the lowest level. The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire assessed problems experienced by pts (no, slight, moderate, severe, or extreme [ie, interfering with functioning] problems) in 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, anxiety/depression, and pain/discomfort; additionally, overall level of health was assessed on a scale of 0 to 100 using the EQ VAS, with 0 being the lowest level. Results: Of 163 enrolled pts, 126 met the criteria for stopping NIL in the TFR phase; of these 126, 53 had loss of MMR or confirmed loss of MR4, of whom 51 reinitiated NIL. Among pts who completed each questionnaire at week 48 of the consolidation phase, week 12 of the TFR phase, or week 48 of the TFR phase, mean MDASI-CML severity scores were 1.7, 1.5, and 1.2, respectively; mean MDASI-CML interference scores were 1.7, 1.6, and 1.4, respectively; and mean EQ VAS scores were 82.2, 78.8, and 82.3, respectively (Table). Among pts with sustained TFR and scores at both week 48 of the consolidation phase and week 12 or 48 of the TFR phase, minimal changes were observed in MDASI-CML and EQ VAS scores during TFR vs week 48 of the consolidation phase. Among pts who reinitiated NIL, mean MDASI-CML severity and interference scores and mean EQ VAS scores at 24 weeks after the start of retreatment were 1.6, 1.5, and 78.8, respectively; changes in scores between week 24 after treatment reinitiation and week 48 of the consolidation phase were minimal among pts with scores at both time points. Among pts who completed the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, the proportions who reported problems (any level of severity) in the 5 dimensions were generally similar across time points, although problems with mobility and pain/discomfort were more common during TFR vs week 48 of the consolidation phase, particularly at week 12 of the TFR phase (Table). Conclusion: Changes in QOL after stopping NIL, as assessed using these questionnaires, were minimal. This may be related to pts having a relatively high QOL prior to stopping treatment given that they had tolerated ≥ 3 years of TKI therapy, including ≥ 2 years of NIL, prior to enrollment. Despite the higher incidence of musculoskeletal pain-related AEs observed during TFR (42.1% vs 14.3%), the overall QOL was generally similar between the TFR and consolidation phases. This suggests that these AEs did not have a significant negative impact on QOL. Longer follow-up in ENESTop will be needed to further evaluate trends in QOL after stopping second-line NIL. Disclosures Mahon: NOVARTIS PHARMA: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; ARIAD: Honoraria; PFIZER: Honoraria. Boquimpani:BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Takahashi:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Shuvaev:Novartis pharma: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Ailawadhi:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen Inc: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy. Lipton:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Turkina:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Moiraghi:NOVARTIS: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Nicolini:Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sacha:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Adamed: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kim:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ILYANG: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Fellague-Chebra:Novartis: Employment. Acharya:Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd.: Employment. Brandt:Novartis: Employment. Gnanasakthy:Novartis: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Jin:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hughes:Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

INTRODUCTION: Early endoscopic intervention of pancreatitis with acute necrotic collection is conflicting with standard practice except in extenuating circumstances. The Atlanta criteria define necrotic collections based on the age from onset of disease as either acute necrotic collections (ANC ≤ 4 weeks) or walled-off necrosis (WON > 4 weeks). Some patients with ANCs will have clinically apparent infection of necrosis potentially necessitating infectious source control via endoscopic intervention where percutaneous drainage is technically challenging or inadequate. At present, data regarding early endoscopic intervention for acute necrotic collections is lacking. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing endoscopic intervention for pancreatic necrosis between 2008 and 2018 was performed. Included patients had definitive pancreatic/peri-pancreatic necrosis on contrast-enhanced computed tomography, signs/symptoms and laboratory evidence of pancreatitis in relation to hospital presentation, and endoscopic intervention within 28 days of symptom onset. Patients with prior percutaneous or surgical intervention were excluded. ANC cases were matched and compared to WON controls for analyzed parameters via conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Twenty four patients were identified to have attempted drainage within 28 days of symptom onset, three of which were excluded (imaging limitations, spontaneous drainage/fistulization, unclear date of symptom onset). Demographic and clinical characteristic data are summarized in Table 1, with procedure and outcome characteristics shown in Table 2 for the 21 ANC cases in comparison to WON controls. Overall, ANC cases had slightly larger collections, with statistically significantly longer hospital stays as compared to matched WON controls ( P < 0.01); otherwise measured variables were not statistically significant between the groups. CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of data regarding the safety and efficacy of intervention of ANCs complication pancreatitis. We found in this study that there was reasonable success in clinically indicated endoscopic drainage of ANCs without significant sequelae from the procedures undertaken as compared to matched WON controls. This study demonstrates the safety of intervening on ANCs as early as 15 days if clinically indicated. Further research in regards to efficacy/safety of intervention and prognostic indicators of early intervention is required to further discern whether this applies to general practice of ANC management.

The efficacy of radiosurgery for neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2)-associated vestibular schwannoma (VS) remains debatable. We retrospectively analyzed radiosurgical outcomes for NF2-associated VS compared to sporadic VS using our database of 422 consecutive VS patients. Twenty-five patients with 30 NF2-associated VSs with a mean follow-up of 121 months were identified. NF2-associated VSs exhibited excellent tumor control (10-year cumulative rate, 92% vs. 92% in sporadic VSs; p = 0.945) and worse overall survival (73% vs. 97%; p = 0.005), mainly due to tumor progression other than the treated VSs. The presence of NF2 was not associated with failed tumor control via multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses. No difference in radiation-induced adverse events (RAEs) was confirmed between cohorts, and prescription dose (hazard ratio 8.30, 95% confidence interval 3.19–21.62, p < 0.001) was confirmed as a risk for cranial nerve injuries via multivariate analysis. Further analysis after propensity score matching using age, volume, and sex as covariates showed that NF2-associated VSs exhibited excellent local control (100% vs. 93%; p = 0.240) and worse overall survival (67% vs. 100%; p = 0.002) with no significant difference in RAEs. Excellent long-term tumor control and minimal invasiveness may make radiosurgery a favorable therapeutic option for NF2 patients with small to medium VS, preferably with non-functional hearing or deafness in combination with postoperative tumor growth or progressive non-operated tumors, or with functional hearing by patients’ wish.

Abstract Background: Pancreatic cancer is associated with development of cachexia, a wasting syndrome thought to limit survival. Few studies have longitudinally quantified peripheral tissues or identified biomarkers predictive of future tissue wasting. Methods: Adipose and muscle tissue were measured by computed tomography (CT) at diagnosis and 50 to 120 days later in 164 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Tissue changes and survival were evaluated by Cox proportional hazards regression. Baseline levels of circulating markers were examined in relation to future tissue wasting. Results: Compared with patients in the bottom quartile of muscle change per 30 days (average gain of 0.8 ± 2.0 cm2), those in the top quartile (average loss of 12.9 ± 4.9 cm2) had a hazard ratio (HR) for death of 2.01 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12–3.62]. Patients in the top quartile of muscle attenuation change (average decrease of 4.9 ± 2.4 Hounsfield units) had an HR of 2.19 (95% CI, 1.18–4.04) compared with those in the bottom quartile (average increase of 2.4 ± 1.6 Hounsfield units). Changes in adipose tissue were not associated with survival. Higher plasma branched chain amino acids (BCAA; P = 0.004) and lower monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1; P = 0.005) at diagnosis were associated with greater future muscle loss. Conclusions: In patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, muscle loss and decrease in muscle density in 2 to 4 months after diagnosis were associated with reduced survival. BCAAs and MCP-1 levels at diagnosis were associated with subsequent muscle loss. Impact: BCAAs and MCP-1 levels at diagnosis could identify a high-risk group for future tissue wasting.

AbstractBackground and ObjectivesConclusive evidence in favor of neoadjuvant therapy for those with non‐metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is still lacking. The objective of this study was to evaluate the survival benefit of neoadjuvant therapy vs upfront surgery for patients with non‐metastatic PDAC.MethodsThe study involved 565 patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy or upfront surgery as the primary treatment for PDAC. Propensity score matching was performed between the neoadjuvant therapy group (NAT group) and the upfront surgery group (UFS group) using 20 clinical variables at diagnosis. Overall survival and surgical pathology were compared between the two treatment groups on an intent‐to‐treat basis.ResultsIn the matched cohort, the NAT group (n = 91) had a longer median overall survival than the UFS group (n = 91) (23.1 months vs 18.5 months, P = .043). The rate of patients undergoing surgical resection was lower in the NAT group (58% vs 80%, P = .001). Regarding surgical pathology, the NAT group had smaller tumor size (2.8 cm vs 4.0 cm, P = .001), lower incidence of positive surgical margins (8% vs 30%, P < .002), and less lymph node metastasis (45% vs 78%, P < .001).ConclusionsThe strategy of neoadjuvant therapy before surgical resection appears to offer pathologic effect and survival benefit for the patients presenting with non‐metastatic PDAC.

Objectives: Clinicians recommend diet and exercise for overweight/obese patients. We conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial evaluating goal setting and pedometer use versus usual care on weight, waist circumference, and blood pressure of patients with multiple chronic conditions. Methods: In this trial, we recruited and randomized patients over 18 years with multiple chronic conditions. There were two groups with an immediate intervention group who received behavioral coaching and a pedometer versus a delayed control who received the intervention after 2 months. We evaluated body weight, waist circumference, and blood pressure as outcomes. We used analysis of covariance to evaluate differences between the intervention and the control groups. Results: Of 130 patients, mean age was 63.4 years (SD, 17.3). At 2 months, intervention participants lost 0.2 kg versus a 0.1-kg gain in the control participants ( P = .44). The immediate intervention group had significantly smaller waist circumference change at 2-month follow-up compared to control at −1.6 cm (95% confidence interval = −3.1 to −0.1), which was driven by an increase in waist circumference in the delayed control group. No difference in systolic blood pressure was observed. Discussion: We observed no difference in weight or blood pressure between the groups with obesity and multiple chronic conditions.

Abstract Background: HER2-targeted therapies have improved survival for advanced HER2-positive breast cancers (BC), but none have been approved for tumors with low levels of HER2 expression (ie, HER2 IHC 1+ or 2+/ISH-negative). Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a) is a novel HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate with a humanized HER2 antibody attached to a potent topoisomerase I inhibitor payload by a cleavable peptide-based linker, which is designed to have broad antitumor activity in HER2-expressing tumors. It has a drug-to-antibody ratio of 7 to 8, a novel linker that is stable in plasma and that is selectively cleaved by lysosomal cathepsins which are upregulated in cancer cells, and its payload has a short systemic half-life. In 2015, a phase 1 study (NCT02564900) was initiated to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DS-8201a in subjects with advanced HER2-expressing or HER2-mutated solid tumors, including HER2-low expressing BC. In this study, the overall confirmed response rate (ORR) in the evaluable subjects was 49.3% (103/209) (April 2018 data cutoff; Iwata H, et al. ASCO 2018). Expanded results from the HER2-low expressing BC subjects are presented here. Methods: This ongoing phase 1 trial included 2 parts. The dose escalation part served to determine the dose-limiting toxicities, the maximum tolerated dose, and to select the recommended dose for expansion (RDE). The dose expansion part further evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the DS-8201a at the RDE (5.4 and 6.4 mg/kg; q3wks) in various advanced HER2-expressing or HER2-mutated solid tumors, including heavily pretreated HER2-low BC (IHC 1+ or 2+, ISH-negative). Enrollment of HER2-low subjects is ongoing. Results: At the cutoff date of 18 April 2018, data from 34 HER2-low BC subjects were collected. The median age was 55.8 (range; 33, 75) years, the median number of prior endocrine therapies was 2, and the median number of prior chemotherapies was 3. In this HER2-low BC population, most patients had hormone receptor (HR)-positive disease (85.3%; 29/34); of which 17.2% (5/29) received prior treatment with a CDK4/6 inhibitor. The confirmed ORR was 50.0% (17/34), the disease control rate was 85.3% (29/34), the median time to response was 2.8 (range; 1.2, 13.8) months, the median duration of response (DOR) was 11.0 months, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.9 months. In the subgroup with HR-positive disease, the ORR was 55.2% (16/29), the median DOR was 11.0 months, and the median PFS was 13.6 months. After exclusion of 8 HER2-low subjects who received prior HER2-targeted therapy, the ORR was 46.2% (12/26). In the overall study, among the 145 BC subjects who received ≥1 dose of DS-8201a (5.4 or 6.4 mg/kg), the most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events included anemia (14.5%), and decreased counts of neutrophils (13.8%) and white blood cells (10.3%). There were 4 fatal cases of interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis in BC subjects, including 2 fatal cases in HER2-low BC subjects. Conclusions: In this study, DS-8201a showed substantial antitumor activity and acceptable safety in heavily pretreated HER2-low BC. Citation Format: Modi S, Tsurutani J, Tamura K, Park H, Sagara Y, Murthy R, Iwata H, Krop IE, Doi T, Redfern C, Moreno-Aspitia A, Redman R, Lee C, Sugihara M, Fujisaki Y, Takahashi S. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a) in subjects with HER2-low expressing breast cancer: Updated results of a large phase 1 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-17-02.