Melaku, Yohannes Adama

Abstract Background: The genotoxin colibactin causes a tumor single-base substitution (SBS) mutational signature, SBS88. It is unknown whether epidemiologic factors’ association with colorectal cancer risk and survival differs by SBS88. Methods: Within the Genetic Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium and Colon Cancer Family Registry, we measured SBS88 in 4,308 microsatellite stable/microsatellite instability low tumors. Associations of epidemiologic factors with colorectal cancer risk by SBS88 were assessed using multinomial regression (N = 4,308 cases, 14,192 controls; cohort-only cases N = 1,911), and with colorectal cancer–specific survival using Cox proportional hazards regression (N = 3,465 cases). Results: 392 (9%) tumors were SBS88 positive. Among all cases, the highest quartile of fruit intake was associated with lower risk of SBS88-positive colorectal cancer than SBS88-negative colorectal cancer [odds ratio (OR) = 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37-0.76; OR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.66–0.85, respectively, Pheterogeneity = 0.047]. Among cohort studies, associations of body mass index (BMI), alcohol, and fruit intake with colorectal cancer risk differed by SBS88. BMI ≥30 kg/m2 was associated with worse colorectal cancer–specific survival among those SBS88-positive [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.40, 95% CI 1.47–7.84], but not among those SBS88-negative (HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.78–1.21, Pheterogeneity = 0.066). Conclusions: Most epidemiologic factors did not differ by SBS88 for colorectal cancer risk or survival. Higher BMI may be associated with worse colorectal cancer–specific survival among those SBS88-positive; however, validation is needed in samples with whole-genome or whole-exome sequencing available. Impact: This study highlights the importance of identification of tumor phenotypes related to colorectal cancer and understanding potential heterogeneity for risk and survival.

Abstract Background: The genotoxin colibactin, produced by Escherichia coli containing the pks island, is associated with a tumor single base substitution (SBS) mutational signature SBS88. It is unknown whether lifestyle and environmental factors related to gut dysbiosis impact colorectal cancer (CRC) risk and survival differently by colibactin signature status. Methods: Utilizing the resources of the Genetic Epidemiology of Colorectal cancer Consortium and Colon Cancer Family Registry (GECCO-CCFR), a consortium including both case-control and cohort study designs, SBS88 tumor mutational signature was measured in 4308 CRC cases who were microsatellite stable (MSS) and had at least five somatic single nucleotide variants for signature decomposition. Associations of 13 lifestyle and environmental factors with CRC risk by colibactin signature status were assessed using logistic and multinomial regression; associations with CRC survival were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: 392 (9%) of the 4308 MSS tumors were positive for SBS88. Having a BMI ≥30 kg/m2 (versus a BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2) was strongly associated with worse CRC-specific survival among those with the SBS88 signature, but not among those with SBS88 negative CRC [further adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 3.40 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47, 7.84, and HR = 0.97 95% CI 0.78, 1.21, respectively, P for heterogeneity = 0.066]. Associations of fruit intake with CRC risk may be differential by SBS88 status. In minimally adjusted models, those in the highest quartile of fruit intake (versus the first quartile) had 0.53 (95% CI 0.37, 0.76) times the risk of SBS88 positive CRC, as opposed to 0.75 (95% CI 0.66, 0.85) times the risk of SBS88 negative CRC (P for heterogeneity = 0.047). Among cohort studies specifically, associations between CRC risk and BMI, alcohol, and fruit intake also differed by SBS88 status (P for heterogeneity ranging 0.02-0.05). Conclusions: Higher BMI may be associated with worse CRC-specific survival among those with SBS88 positive tumors. BMI, alcohol, and dietary factors may be differentially associated with CRC risk based on SBS88 status. Citation Format: Claire Elizabeth Thomas, Peter Georgeson, Conghui Qu, Robert S. Steinfelder, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark A. Jenkins, Andrea Gsur, Jane C. Figueiredo, Polly A. Newcomb, Peter T. Campbell, Christina Newton, Caroline Y. Um, Lisa Boardman, Victor Moreno, Jenny Chang-Claude, Michael Hoffmeister, Marc J. Gunter, Andrew T. Chan, Shuji Ogino, Ellen L. Goode, Brigid Lynch, Yohannes A. Melaku, Steven Gallinger, Sonja I. Berndt, Wen-Yi Huang, Ulrike Peters, Amanda I. Phipps. Lifestyle and environmental factors in relation to colorectal cancer risk and survival by colibactin tumor mutational signature status [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6453.

Abstract Background: The microbiome in colorectal cancer (CRC) tumors is now recognized as a potent facilitator of tumorigenesis. Identification of the intra-tumoral microbiome may provide an avenue to enhance prediction of adverse outcomes and ultimately lead to improved survival of CRC, the second leading cause of cancer death. Methods: We performed targeted sequencing of tumor and matched normal DNA samples for 3695 colorectal cancer cases within the Genetics and Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO) and the Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR). Tumor DNA was extracted primarily from formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) or from fresh frozen tissue. FFPE slides were dissected to ensure >70% tumor content. Normal DNA was primarily extracted from blood and otherwise normal surrounding colorectal tissue. We designed probes for bacterial pathogens including Bacteroides fragilis (ETBF), polyketide synthase positive E. coli (pks+ EC), enterotoxigenic and Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn). Logistic regression was used to assess tumor-associated bacteria and various clinical parameters, tumor molecular characteristics, and tumor stage adjusted for age, sex, and study and a Cox promotional hazard to assess association with CRC-specific survival adjusted for age at diagnosis, sex, mutational burden and microsatellite instability (MSI) and stratified baseline hazards by study. Survival data were available for 2357 patients. Results: The prevalence of patients with bacteria in tumors varied for ETBF (5.2%), pks+ EC (12.9%), and Fn (10.4%). Men had a lower probability of tumors with Fn (odds ratio (OR)=0.8, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.64-0.99,p=0.04) but higher odds of tumors with pks+ EC (OR=1.38, CI=1.14-1.68,p=0.001). Patients with proximal tumors had higher odds of carrying Fn (OR=1.76, CI=1.38-2.26, p<0.001) as did patients with MSI high tumors (OR 2.79, CI=2.08-3.74) p<0.001). Patients with MSI-high tumors had lower odds of carrying pks+ EC (OR=0.63, CI=0.44-0.88, p=0.008) when compared to patients with microsatellite stable tumors. Among non-hypermutated tumors, we observed that tumors positive for pks+ EC were associated with better CRC-specific survival (OR=0.73, CI=0.57-0.93,p=0.01 whereas in patients with ETBF positive tumors had shorter survival (OR=1.99,CI=1,18-3.36,p=0.009) as did patients with tumors positive for Fn (OR=1.33, CI=1.04-1.72, p=0.03). Conclusions: In this largest investigation of intra-tumoral bacteria in CRC, we demonstrate that inclusion of pathogenic intra-tumoral microbiome may enhance prediction of survival and can identify a subset of patients with CRC that may benefit from targeted therapies that modulate the tumor microbiome. Citation Format: Meredith A. J. Hullar, Keith R. Curtis, Tabitha A. Harrison, Yi Lin, Robert S. Steinfelder, Sonja I. Berndt, Daniel D. Buchanan, Andrew T. Chan, David Drew, Jane C. Figueiredo, Amy J. French, Ellen L. Goode, Mark A. Jenkins, Yohannes A. Melaku, Victor Moreno, Shuji Ogino, Stephen N. Thibideau, Amanda I. Phipps, Ulrike Peters. Evaluation of intra-tumoral pathogenic bacteria pks+ E. coli, enterotoxigenic B. fragilis and fusobacterium nucleatum in 3695 colorectal cancer cases [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Colorectal Cancer; 2022 Oct 1-4; Portland, OR. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(23 Suppl_1):Abstract nr PR008.