Sugiyama, Takehiro

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is known to provide excellent tumor control with functional preservation for vestibular schwannomas (VS), but its efficacy in the other major intracranial schwannomas including trigeminal (TS), facial (FS), and jugular foramen schwannomas (JFS) has not been established yet due to their rarity. We retrospectively analyzed data of 514 consecutive patients who had intracranial schwannomas (460 VS, 22 TS, 7 FS, and 25 JFS) and underwent SRS. The 5- and 10-year tumor control rates were 97% and 94% for VS, 100% and 100% for TS, 80% and 80% for FS, and 100% and 80% for JFS. Radiation-induced complications included one hydrocephalus for TS (4.5%), no cases for FS (0%), and one hydrocephalus and one lower palsy for JFS (8.0%). Through matched cohort analysis between patients with VS and each of the non-VS, we found no statistical difference in tumor control and radiation-induced adverse events. SRS seems to provide long-term tumor control with functional preservation for TS, FS and JFS and the efficacies are similar to VS.

Abstract BACKGROUND High-definition vascular imaging is desirable for treatment planning in Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS; Elekta AB) for brain arteriovenous malformations (BAVMs). Currently, rotational angiography (RA) provides the clearest 3-dimensional visualization of niduses with high spatial resolution; however, its efficacy for GKRS has not been clarified. At our institution, RA has been integrated into GKRS (RA-GKRS) for better treatment planning and outcomes since 2015. OBJECTIVE To evaluate RA-GKRS outcomes of BAVMs and compare them with conventional GKRS (c-GKRS) outcomes. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the radiosurgical outcomes of 50 BAVMs treated with RA-GKRS compared with the 306 BAVMs treated with c-GKRS. Considering possible differences in the baseline characteristics, we also created propensity score-matched cohorts and compared the radiosurgical outcomes between them to ensure comparability. RESULTS The obliteration time was shorter in the RA-GKRS group (cumulative rate, 88% vs 65% at 4 yr [ P = .001]). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that the RA-GKRS group (hazard ratio 2.38, 95% CI 1.58-3.60; P = .001) had a better obliteration rate. The cumulative 4-yr post-GKRS hemorrhage rates were 4.0% and 2.6% in the RA-GKRS and c-GKRS groups, respectively ( P = .558). There was a trend toward early post-GKRS signal change in the RA-GKRS group compared with the c-GKRS group (cumulative rate, 38% vs 29% at 2 yr; P = .118). Those results were also confirmed in the matched cohort analyses. CONCLUSION The integration of RA into GKRS is promising and may provide earlier nidus obliteration.

The efficacy of radiosurgery for neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2)-associated vestibular schwannoma (VS) remains debatable. We retrospectively analyzed radiosurgical outcomes for NF2-associated VS compared to sporadic VS using our database of 422 consecutive VS patients. Twenty-five patients with 30 NF2-associated VSs with a mean follow-up of 121 months were identified. NF2-associated VSs exhibited excellent tumor control (10-year cumulative rate, 92% vs. 92% in sporadic VSs; p = 0.945) and worse overall survival (73% vs. 97%; p = 0.005), mainly due to tumor progression other than the treated VSs. The presence of NF2 was not associated with failed tumor control via multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses. No difference in radiation-induced adverse events (RAEs) was confirmed between cohorts, and prescription dose (hazard ratio 8.30, 95% confidence interval 3.19–21.62, p < 0.001) was confirmed as a risk for cranial nerve injuries via multivariate analysis. Further analysis after propensity score matching using age, volume, and sex as covariates showed that NF2-associated VSs exhibited excellent local control (100% vs. 93%; p = 0.240) and worse overall survival (67% vs. 100%; p = 0.002) with no significant difference in RAEs. Excellent long-term tumor control and minimal invasiveness may make radiosurgery a favorable therapeutic option for NF2 patients with small to medium VS, preferably with non-functional hearing or deafness in combination with postoperative tumor growth or progressive non-operated tumors, or with functional hearing by patients’ wish.