Back to Authors

Caan, Bette J

0000-0002-5803-310X

Mayo Clinic

Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.

Citations 8

Plant-based diet and survival among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Cheng, En , Ou, Fang‐Shu , Gatten, Clare A., Lenz, Heinz‐Josef , Campbell, Peter T. , Blanke, Charles D. , Ng, Kimmie , Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A. , Gatten, Clare , Campbell, Peter T , Caan, Bette J , Ng, Kimmie , Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A , Ou, Fang-Shu , Ma, Chao , Venook, Alan P. , O’Reilly, Eileen M. , Kuang, Chaoyuan , Caan, Bette J. , Cheng, En

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | August 29, 2024 | Volume: 117 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 169-179

10.1093/jnci/djae213 Get It

Abstract Background A plant-based diet is associated with better survival among patients with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), but its association in metastatic CRC is unknown. Methods Using an National Cancer Institute–sponsored trial (CALGB/SWOG 80405), we included 1284 patients who completed validated food frequency questionnaires at the initiation of metastatic CRC treatment. We calculated 3 indices: overall plant-based diet index (PDI), which emphasized consumption of all plant foods while reducing animal food intake; healthful plant-based diet index (hPDI), which emphasized consumption of healthful plant foods such as whole grains, fruits, and vegetables; and unhealthful plant-based diet index (uPDI), which emphasized consumption of less healthful plant foods such as fruit juices, refined grains, and sugar-sweetened beverages. We estimated the associations of 3 indices (quintiles) with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Results We observed 1100 deaths and 1204 progression events (median follow-up = 6.1 years). Compared with the lowest quintile, patients in the highest quintile of PDI had significantly better survival (hazard ratio [HR] for OS = 0.76 [0.62-0.94], Ptrend = .004; PFS = 0.81 [0.66-0.99], Ptrend = .09). Similar findings were observed for hPDI (HR for OS = 0.81 [0.65-1.01], Ptrend = .053; PFS = 0.80 [0.65-0.98], Ptrend = .04), whereas uPDI was not associated with worse survival (HR for OS = 1.16 [0.94-1.43], Ptrend = .21; PFS = 1.12 [0.92-1.36], Ptrend = .42). Conclusions Our study suggests that a plant-based diet, especially when rich in healthful plant foods, is associated with better survival among patients with metastatic CRC. The cause of survival benefits warrants further investigation.
Postdiagnosis Loss of Skeletal Muscle, but Not Adipose Tissue, Is Associated with Shorter Survival of Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
Babić, Ana , Rosenthal, Michael H. , Bamlet, William R. , Takahashi, Naoki , Sugimoto, Motokazu , Danai, Laura V. , Morales‐Oyarvide, Vicente, Khalaf, Natalia , Dunne, Richard F. , Welch, Marisa W., Zellers, Caitlin L., Dennis, Courtney , Rifai, Nader , Prado, Carla M. , Caan, Bette J. , Sundaresan, Tilak , Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A. , Kulke, Matthew H. , Clish, Clary B. , Ng, Kimmie , Petersen, Gloria M. , Wolpin, Brian M. , Vander Heiden, Matthew G , Bamlet, William R , Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A , Clish, Clary , Takahashi, Naoki , Caan, Bette J , Brais, Lauren K

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | September 18, 2019 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2062-2069

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-19-0370 Get It

Abstract Background: Pancreatic cancer is associated with development of cachexia, a wasting syndrome thought to limit survival. Few studies have longitudinally quantified peripheral tissues or identified biomarkers predictive of future tissue wasting. Methods: Adipose and muscle tissue were measured by computed tomography (CT) at diagnosis and 50 to 120 days later in 164 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Tissue changes and survival were evaluated by Cox proportional hazards regression. Baseline levels of circulating markers were examined in relation to future tissue wasting. Results: Compared with patients in the bottom quartile of muscle change per 30 days (average gain of 0.8 ± 2.0 cm2), those in the top quartile (average loss of 12.9 ± 4.9 cm2) had a hazard ratio (HR) for death of 2.01 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12–3.62]. Patients in the top quartile of muscle attenuation change (average decrease of 4.9 ± 2.4 Hounsfield units) had an HR of 2.19 (95% CI, 1.18–4.04) compared with those in the bottom quartile (average increase of 2.4 ± 1.6 Hounsfield units). Changes in adipose tissue were not associated with survival. Higher plasma branched chain amino acids (BCAA; P = 0.004) and lower monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1; P = 0.005) at diagnosis were associated with greater future muscle loss. Conclusions: In patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, muscle loss and decrease in muscle density in 2 to 4 months after diagnosis were associated with reduced survival. BCAAs and MCP-1 levels at diagnosis were associated with subsequent muscle loss. Impact: BCAAs and MCP-1 levels at diagnosis could identify a high-risk group for future tissue wasting.
DNA repair and cancer in colon and rectum: Novel players in genetic susceptibility
Pardini, Barbara , Corrado, Alda, Berndt, Sonja I. , Brenner, Hermann , Caan, Bette J. , Casey, Graham , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Gala, Manish , Gallinger, Steven , Haile, Robert W. , Harrison, Tabitha A. , Hayes, Richard B. , Hoffmeister, Michael , Huyghe, Jeroen R. , Jenkins, Mark A. , Lindor, Noralane M. , Nan, Hongmei , Slattery, Martha L. , Vodičková, Ludmila, Vodička, Pavel , Gemignani, Federica , Peters, Ulrike , Naccarati, Alessio , Hoffmeister, Michael , Slattery, Martha L , Jenkins, Mark A , Haile, Robert W , Harrison, Tabitha A , Brenner, Hermann , Hayes, Richard B , Nan, Hongmei , Vodicka, Pavel , Caan, Bette J , Paolicchi, Elisa , Cugliari, Giovanni , Bezieau, Stéphane , Bien, Stephanie A. , Campbell, Peter T. , Chan, Andrew T. , Cotterchio, Michelle , Hopper, John L. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Lin, Yi , Newcomb, Polly A. , Ogino, Shuji , Potter, John D. , Schoen, Robert E. , White, Emily E. , Vymetalkova, Veronika Polakova , Landi, Stefano

International Journal of Cancer | June 18, 2019 | Volume: 146 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 363-372

10.1002/ijc.32516 Get It

Interindividual differences in DNA repair systems may play a role in modulating the individual risk of developing colorectal cancer. To better ascertain the role of DNA repair gene polymorphisms on colon and rectal cancer risk individually, we evaluated 15,419 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within 185 DNA repair genes using GWAS data from the Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR) and the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO), which included 8,178 colon cancer, 2,936 rectum cancer cases and 14,659 controls. Rs1800734 (in MLH1 gene) was associated with colon cancer risk (p‐value = 3.5 × 10−6) and rs2189517 (in RAD51B) with rectal cancer risk (p‐value = 5.7 × 10−6). The results had statistical significance close to the Bonferroni corrected p‐value of 5.8 × 10−6. Ninety‐four SNPs were significantly associated with colorectal cancer risk after Binomial Sequential Goodness of Fit (BSGoF) procedure and confirmed the relevance of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and homologous recombination pathways for colon and rectum cancer, respectively. Defects in MMR genes are known to be crucial for familial form of colorectal cancer but our findings suggest that specific genetic variations in MLH1 are important also in the individual predisposition to sporadic colon cancer. Other SNPs associated with the risk of colon cancer (e.g., rs16906252 in MGMT) were found to affect mRNA expression levels in colon transverse and therefore working as possible cis‐eQTL suggesting possible mechanisms of carcinogenesis.
Novel Common Genetic Susceptibility Loci for Colorectal Cancer
Schmit, Stephanie L. , Edlund, Christopher K., Schumacher, Fredrick R. , Harrison, Tabitha A. , Huyghe, Jeroen R. , Qu, Chenxu, Melas, Marilena , Berg, David Van Den , Wang, Hansong, Tring, Stephanie, Plummer, Sarah J. , Alonso, M. Henar , Anton, Kristen , Aragaki, Aaron K. , Arndt, Volker , Barry, Elizabeth L. , Berndt, Sonja I. , Bloomer, Amanda M. , Boehm, Juergen , Brenner, Hermann , Brezina, Stefanie , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Butterbach, Katja, Caan, Bette J. , Carlson, Christopher S. , Castelao, Jose E. , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Cheng, Ya‐Wen , Chin, Lee Soo, Church, Timothy R. , Correa, Marcia Cruz, Curtis, Keith R. , Duggan, David , Easton, Douglas F. , English, Dallas R. , Fischer, Rocky, Fritsche, Lars G. , Fuchs, Charles S. , Gago-Domínguez, Manuela , Gala, Manish , Gallinger, Steven , Gauderman, W. James, Giovannucci, Edward L. , Gogarten, Stephanie M. , González‐Villalpando, Clicerio, Gonzalez-Villalpando, Elena M., Greenson, Joel K. , Gsur, Andrea , Gunter, Marc J. , Haiman, Christopher A. , Hampe, Jochen , Harlid, Sophia , Harju, John F., Hayes, Richard B. , Hofer, Philipp , Hoffmeister, Michael , Huang, Shu-Chen, Huerta, José María , Hunter, David J., Idos, Gregory , Jackson, Rebecca D. , Jacobs, Eric J. , Jee, Sun Ha , Jenkins, Mark A. , Jia, Wei-Hua , Jiao, Shuo , Joshi, Amit D. , Kolonel, Laurence N. , Kono, Suminori , Krogh, Vittorio , Küehn, Tilman, Küry, Sébastien , LaCroix, Andrea Z. , Laurie, Cecelia , Lejbkowicz, Flavio, Lemire, Mathieu , Lenz, Heinz‐Josef , Levine, David , Li, Li , Lindor, Noralane M. , Liu, Yun-Ru, Lu, Yingchang , Luh, Frank , Ma, Jing , Mancao, Christoph , Manion, Frank J. , Markowitz, Sanford D. , Martín, Vicente , Matsuo, Keitaro , McDonnell, Kevin , McNeil, Caroline E, Murphy, Neil , Offit, Kenneth, Omichessan, Hanane , Cotoré, Jesús Paredes, Pérez‐Mayoral, Julyann, Rennert, Gad , Rennert, Hedy S., Riggs, Bridget M., Schafmayer, Clemens, Sellers, Thomas A. , Seminara, Daniela, Shibata, David , Siegel, Erin M. , Slattery, Martha L. , Stintzing, Sebastian , Taverna, Darin, Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Thomas, Duncan C. , Trichopoulou, Antonia , Duijnhoven, Fränzel J.B. van , Guelpan, Bethany van, Virtamo, Jarmo, Weinstein, Stephanie J. , Win, Aung Ko , Woods, Michael O. , Wu, Anna H. , Wu, Kana , Xiang, Yong-Bing , Zanke, Brent W., Zeng, Yi-Xin , Zhang, Ben , Zubair, Niha, Figueiredo, Jane C. , Lindblom, Annika , Moreno, Vı́ctor , Peters, Ulrike , Conti, David V. , Gruber, Stephen B. , Kühn, Tilman , Buchanan, Daniel D , Win, Aung K , Rennert, Gad , Hoffmeister, Michael , Arndt, Volker , English, Dallas R , Martín, Vicente , Moreno, Victor , Gunter, Marc J , Jenkins, Mark A , Van Den Berg, David J , Harrison, Tabitha A , Matsuo, Keitaro , Kury, Sebastien , Brenner, Hermann , Gago-Dominguez, Manuela , Hampe, Jochen , Murphy, Neil , Hayes, Richard B , Brezina, Stefanie , Conti, David V , Gong, Jian Feng , Albanes, Demetrius , Amos, Christopher I. , Bezieau, Stéphane , Bien, Stephanie A. , Boutron‐Ruault, Marie‐Christine , Campbell, Peter T. , Chan, Andrew T. , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Cheng, Iona C. , Church, James M. , Coetzee, Gerhard A. , Cotterchio, Michelle , Feskens, Edith J. M. , FitzGerald, Liesel M. , Fortini, Barbara K. , Giles, Graham G. , Grady, William M. , Hopper, John L. , Hudson, Thomas J , Iwasaki, Motoki , Kooperberg, Charles , Li, Christopher I , Lieb, Wolfgang , Lin, Yi , Liu, Yun‐Ru , Loupakis, Fotios , Matsuda, Koichi , McNeil, Caroline E, Milne, Roger L. , Molina, Antonio José , Mukherjee, Bhramar , Newcomb, Polly A. , Palli, Domenico , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Potter, John D. , Qu, Conghui , Raskin, Leon , Schoen, Robert E. , Severi, Gianluca , Shi, Wei , Shu, Xiao‐Ou , Southey, Melissa C. , Stadler, Zsofia , Stern, Mariana Carla , Tsugane, Shoichiro , Ulrich, Cornelia M. , Vijai, Joseph , White, Emily E. , Wolk, Alicja , Yen, Yun , Kweon, Sun-Seog , Zheng, Wei , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Casey, Graham , Church, Timothy R , Caan, Bette J , Lindblom, Annika

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | April 30, 2018 | Volume: 111 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 146-157

10.1093/jnci/djy099 Get It

Abstract Background Previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified 42 loci (P < 5 × 10−8) associated with risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Expanded consortium efforts facilitating the discovery of additional susceptibility loci may capture unexplained familial risk. Methods We conducted a GWAS in European descent CRC cases and control subjects using a discovery–replication design, followed by examination of novel findings in a multiethnic sample (cumulative n = 163 315). In the discovery stage (36 948 case subjects/30 864 control subjects), we identified genetic variants with a minor allele frequency of 1% or greater associated with risk of CRC using logistic regression followed by a fixed-effects inverse variance weighted meta-analysis. All novel independent variants reaching genome-wide statistical significance (two-sided P < 5 × 10−8) were tested for replication in separate European ancestry samples (12 952 case subjects/48 383 control subjects). Next, we examined the generalizability of discovered variants in East Asians, African Americans, and Hispanics (12 085 case subjects/22 083 control subjects). Finally, we examined the contributions of novel risk variants to familial relative risk and examined the prediction capabilities of a polygenic risk score. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results The discovery GWAS identified 11 variants associated with CRC at P < 5 × 10−8, of which nine (at 4q22.2/5p15.33/5p13.1/6p21.31/6p12.1/10q11.23/12q24.21/16q24.1/20q13.13) independently replicated at a P value of less than .05. Multiethnic follow-up supported the generalizability of discovery findings. These results demonstrated a 14.7% increase in familial relative risk explained by common risk alleles from 10.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.9% to 13.7%; known variants) to 11.9% (95% CI = 9.2% to 15.5%; known and novel variants). A polygenic risk score identified 4.3% of the population at an odds ratio for developing CRC of at least 2.0. Conclusions This study provides insight into the architecture of common genetic variation contributing to CRC etiology and improves risk prediction for individualized screening.
Mendelian Randomization Study of Body Mass Index and Colorectal Cancer Risk
Gong, Jian , Peters, Ulrike , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Slattery, Martha L. , Locke, Adam E. , Kahali, Bratati , Justice, Anne E. , Pers, Tune H. , Gallinger, Steven , Hayes, Richard B. , Caan, Bette J. , Ogino, Shuji , Berndt, Sonja I. , Casey, Graham , Haile, Robert W. , Du, Mengmeng , Harrison, Tabitha A. , Thornquist, Mark, Duggan, David , Lindor, Noralane M. , Seminara, Daniela, Song, Mingyang , Wu, Kana , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Win, Aung Ko , Jenkins, Mark A. , Potter, John D. , Hoffmeister, Michael , Brenner, Hermann , Thrift, Aaron P. , Rudolph, Anja , Chan, Andrew T. , Baron, John A. , Ogino, Shuji , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Cotterchio, Michelle , Hopper, John L. , Ulrich, Cornelia M. , Newcomb, Polly A. , White, Emily E. , Hsu, Li , Campbell, Peter T. , Win, Aung K , Hoffmeister, Michael , Jenkins, Mark A , Haile, Robert W , Harrison, Tabitha A , Potter, John D , Brenner, Hermann , Song, Mingyang , Hayes, Richard B , Caan, Bette J

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | May 14, 2015 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1024-1031

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-1309 Get It

Abstract Background: High body mass index (BMI) is consistently linked to increased risk of colorectal cancer for men, whereas the association is less clear for women. As risk estimates from observational studies may be biased and/or confounded, we conducted a Mendelian randomization study to estimate the causal association between BMI and colorectal cancer. Methods: We used data from 10,226 colorectal cancer cases and 10,286 controls of European ancestry. The Mendelian randomization analysis used a weighted genetic risk score, derived from 77 genome-wide association study–identified variants associated with higher BMI, as an instrumental variable (IV). We compared the IV odds ratio (IV-OR) with the OR obtained using a conventional covariate-adjusted analysis. Results: Individuals carrying greater numbers of BMI-increasing alleles had higher colorectal cancer risk [per weighted allele OR, 1.31; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10–1.57]. Our IV estimation results support the hypothesis that genetically influenced BMI is directly associated with risk for colorectal cancer (IV-OR per 5 kg/m2, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.13–2.01). In the sex-specific IV analyses higher BMI was associated with higher risk of colorectal cancer among women (IV-OR per 5 kg/m2, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.26–2.61). For men, genetically influenced BMI was not associated with colorectal cancer (IV-OR per 5 kg/m2, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.73–1.92). Conclusions: High BMI was associated with increased colorectal cancer risk for women. Whether abdominal obesity, rather than overall obesity, is a more important risk factor for men requires further investigation. Impact: Overall, conventional epidemiologic and Mendelian randomization studies suggest a strong association between obesity and the risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(7); 1024–31. ©2015 AACR.
Pleiotropic effects of genetic risk variants for other cancers on colorectal cancer risk: PAGE, GECCO and CCFR consortia
Kocarnik, Jonathan , Lindor, Noralane M. , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Caberto, Christian, Love, Shelly-Ann, Slattery, Martha L. , Hindorff, Lucia A. , Park, Sungshim Lani, Schumacher, Fredrick R. , Hoffmeister, Michael , Duggan, David , Hou, Lifang , Carlson, Chris , Carty, Cara L. , Mann, Sue, Giovannucci, Edward L. , Fuchs, Charles S. , Jenkins, Mark A. , Haile, Robert W. , Conti, David V. , Potter, John D. , Caan, Bette J. , Hayes, Richard B. , Berndt, Sonja I. , Küry, Sébastien , Bezieau, Stéphane , Ambite, José Luis , Kumaraguruparan, Gowri, Richardson, Danielle , Goodloe, Robert, Dilks, Holli H., Baker, Paxton, Zanke, Brent W., Lemire, Mathieu , Gallinger, Steven , Jiao, Shuo , Harrison, Tabitha A. , Seminara, Daniela, Haiman, Christopher A. , Hutter, Carolyn M., Crawford, Dana C. , Heiss, Gerardo , Brenner, Hermann , Bush, William S. , Casey, Graham , Peters, Ulrike , Cheng, Iona C. , Dumitrescu, Logan , Avery, Christy L. , Chan, Andrew T. , Baron, John A. , Kraft, Peter , Butler, Anne Marie E. , Monroe, Kristine R. , Lin, Yi , Ma, Jing , Newcomb, Polly A. , Hopper, John L. , Campbell, Peter T. , Schoen, Robert E. , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Hsu, Li , Kooperberg, Charles , Wilkens, Lynne R. , White, Emily E. , Hudson, Thomas J , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Hoffmeister, Michael , Jenkins, Mark A , Haile, Robert W , Harrison, Tabitha A , Potter, John D , Kury, Sebastien , Brenner, Hermann , Hayes, Richard B , Bézieau, Stéphane , Conti, David V , Hou, Lifang , Caan, Bette J , Bush, William S

Gut | August 10, 2013 | Volume: 63 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 800-807

10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305189 Get It

Objective Genome-wide association studies have identified a large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with a wide array of cancer sites. Several of these variants demonstrate associations with multiple cancers, suggesting pleiotropic effects and shared biological mechanisms across some cancers. We hypothesised that SNPs previously associated with other cancers may additionally be associated with colorectal cancer. In a large-scale study, we examined 171 SNPs previously associated with 18 different cancers for their associations with colorectal cancer. Design We examined 13 338 colorectal cancer cases and 40 967 controls from three consortia: Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE), Genetic Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer (GECCO), and the Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR). Study-specific logistic regression results, adjusted for age, sex, principal components of genetic ancestry, and/or study specific factors (as relevant) were combined using fixed-effect meta-analyses to evaluate the association between each SNP and colorectal cancer risk. A Bonferroni-corrected p value of 2.92×10 −4 was used to determine statistical significance of the associations. Results Two correlated SNPs—rs10090154 and rs4242382—in Region 1 of chromosome 8q24, a prostate cancer susceptibility region, demonstrated statistically significant associations with colorectal cancer risk. The most significant association was observed with rs4242382 (meta-analysis OR=1.12; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.18; p=1.74×10 −5 ), which also demonstrated similar associations across racial/ethnic populations and anatomical sub-sites. Conclusions This is the first study to clearly demonstrate Region 1 of chromosome 8q24 as a susceptibility locus for colorectal cancer; thus, adding colorectal cancer to the list of cancer sites linked to this particular multicancer risk region at 8q24.