Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

344 citation(s) found for "Yu, Tina".

Calibration of Flow Cytometers Enables Reproducible Measurements of Extracellular Vesicle Concentrations and Reference Range Establishment
Bettin, Britta , Li, Bo , Falkena, Kim, Leeuwen, Ton G. van , Gollwitzer, Christian , Varga, Zoltán , Antović, Jovan P. , Berckmans, Pascale , Buzás, Edit I. , Cook, Sean, Dignat‐George, Françoise , Lacroix, Romaric , Maaninka, Katariina , Menezes, Erika G. Marques de , Meyer, Annette, Mizenko, Rachel R. , Nelissen, Inge , Norris, Philip J. , Pink, Desmond , Poudel, Sumeet , Robert, Stéphane, Siljander, Pia , Tang, Vera A. , Broeck, Tina Van Den, Bettin, Britta A , van Leeuwen, Ton G , Ajzenberg, Nadine , Berckmans, Pascale , Buzas, Edit I , Carney, Randy P , Dignat-George, Françoise , Faille, Dorothee , Giebel, Bernd , Jones, Jennifer C , Lacroix, Romaric , Lannigan, Joanne , Lucien, Fabrice , Maaninka, Katariina , de Menezes, Erika G Marques , Mizenko, Rachel R , Nelissen, Inge , Pink, Desmond , Poudel, Sumeet , Siljander, Pia R-M , Tang, Vera A , Tertel, Tobias , Wang, Lili , Welsh, Joshua A , Nieuwland, Rienk , van der Pol, Edwin , Cook, Sean M, Giebel, Bernd , Jones, Jennifer , Kim, Yohan , Lucien, Fabrice , Meyer, Annette, Nolan, John, Welsh, Joshua A , Nieuwland, Rienk

Journal of Extracellular Vesicles | December 15, 2025 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 12 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/jev2.70189 | PMID 41392534 Get It

ABSTRACT The concentration of cells is a key component of modern blood tests. Given the biomarker potential of extracellular vesicles (EVs) in blood, we aimed to establish reference ranges for blood cell‐derived EVs using flow cytometry. To address the orders‐of‐magnitude variability in reported EV concentrations between different flow cytometers (FCMs), we first validated a calibration methodology to enable reproducible EV concentration measurements. The methodology was evaluated in an interlaboratory comparison study and shows that calibration reduces the median absolute deviation of EV concentrations measured on 25 different FCMs from 67 % to 25 %–31 %. The calibration methodology was then used to determine reference ranges of erythrocyte‐, leukocyte‐, and platelet‐derived EVs in human blood plasma in a cohort of healthy individuals ( n = 224). This study demonstrates that calibration enables comparable concentration measurements of blood cell‐derived EVs, thereby bringing EVs one step closer to clinical applications.
Determination of Adult Critical Care Physician Core Knowledge and Skills: Results of a Multidisciplinary, Modified Delphi Process
Tisherman, Samuel A. , Spevetz, Antoinette, Farmer, Joseph C. , Michener, Ed, Sreedharan, Roshni , Strickler, Samantha , Cuschieri, Joseph , Ellender, Timothy J., Kaups, Krista L. , Keegan, Mark T. , Lee, May M. , Malaiyandi, Deepa , Michetti, Christopher P. , Mohr, Nicholas M. , Moitra, Vivek K. , O’Neil, Kevin , Palmieri, Tina L. , Park, Pauline K., Raksin, P B , Shapshak, Angela Hays , Siddiqui, Shahla , Stein, Deborah M. , Timmons, Shelly D. , Vespa, Paul , Wessman, Brian T. , Wittwer, Erica D. , Medicine, on behalf of the Adult Critical Care Physician Core Knowledge and Skills Task Force of the Society of Critical Care, Farmer, J Christopher, Mohr, Nicholas M , Kashyap, Rahul , Leichtle, Stefan W. , Chang, Cherylee W. J. , Yataco, Angel Coz , Dudzinski, David M. , Emlet, Lillian L. , Fahy, Brenda G. , Geller, Bram J. , Hennessey, Erin , Park, Pauline K. , Pathak, Abhijit S. , Medicine, on behalf of the Adult Critical Care Physician Core Knowledge and Skills Task Force of the Society of Critical Care, Siddiqui, Shahla

Critical Care Medicine | December 9, 2025 | Volume: 54 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 224-233

10.1097/ccm.0000000000006978 | PMID 41363909 Get It

Objectives: In the United States, training for physicians who manage critically ill adult patients (intensivists) evolved through parallel subspecialty critical care medicine (CCM) pathways with significant commonality. The Society of Critical Care Medicine Adult Critical Care Physician Core Knowledge and Skills Task Force aimed to delineate the common core knowledge and skills required of all intensivists. Design: A master list of content areas and procedural skills was compiled from all CCM subspecialty program requirements and blueprints of the certification examinations. Using a modified Delphi approach, participants were asked to categorize the knowledge items as “advanced knowledge is essential,” “general, but not advanced, knowledge is essential,” or “knowledge is not essential.” Procedures were categorized as “intensivist performs routinely,” “intensivist only performs in an emergency,” or “intensivist knows” about the procedure. Setting: Representatives from CCM stakeholder organizations, including accreditation and certification organizations, critical care societies, and program directors’ societies, were invited to participate. SUBJECTS: Members of the Adult Critical Care Physician Core Knowledge and Skills Task Force of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Interventions: For the first two rounds of the modified Delphi process, Research Electronic Data Capture was used. For the third and fourth rounds, the process was completed through online meetings with Zoom (Zoom Video Corporations, San Jose, CA) utilizing Zoom’s polling feature. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 541 items were determined to be essential, with 145 requiring advanced knowledge and 323 requiring general knowledge. For 73 items, consensus regarding advanced vs. general could not be achieved, but they remained essential. Only eight items were felt to be nonessential. Of the 16 procedures, most were categorized as “intensivist performs.” Conclusions: The large number of items included in the list of essential knowledge and skills demonstrates the complexity of modern CCM. Utilization of a common framework across the subspecialties of CCM could lead to greater harmonization among the fellowship program requirements and certification examinations.
Automated Insulin Delivery Is Beneficial in Adults With Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes With and Without GAD65 Antibodies
Beck, Roy W. , Hirsch, Irl B., Raghinaru, Dan, Lum, John W. , Pinsker, Jordan E. , Kudva, Yogish C. , Group*, 2IQP Study, Desjardins, Donna, Kurek, Corey, Kaur, Ravinder Jeet , Livingood, Daine, Rizvi, Shafaq , Graham, Timothy E., Terry, Adrienne, Luker, Ryan, Mellenthin, Melanie, Rezac, Stephanie, Liljenquist, David R., Rogers, Justin, Williams, Jonathan, Christensen, Rochelle, Lee, In‐Kyoung, Malone, Joann, Spanakis, Elias K. , Singh, Lakshmi G., Churchill, Jade, Comen, Kathleen, Scott, William H., Davis, Georgia M. , Arroyo, Lizda Guerrero, Oladejo, Omolade , Usman, Sabeena, Ahmann, Andrew , Schmid, Caleb, Dean, Ariel, Branigan, Deborah , Caswell, Brittany, Heyerman, Tess, Tessman, Brian, Vanderheide, Jnh, Dennis, Brittany , Hendricks, Lisa, Reyes-Rodriguez, Clemente, Wolf, Valerie, Coyne, Kasey, Kravarusic, Jelena, Fronczyk, Evelyn, Herrmann, Stefanie, Penn, Samsam C., Blevins, Thomas , Casaubon, Luis, Espinosa, Valerie, Pandit, Keta, Perez, Jennifer, Stewart, Ana, Assir, Courtney, Fields, Cory, Kruger, Davida , Estrada, Kathleen, Jones, J. Kimberly, Mukhashen, Shereen, Corker, Natalie, Hunter, Heather, Layton, Paula, Brown, Sue A. , Afreen, Samina , Dhillon, Jasmeen, Emory, Emma, Fulkerson, David, Fuller, Morgan, Holmes, Viola, Kollar, Laura, Toole, Elyse, Levister, Camilla, O’Malley, Grenye , Ipek, Aslihan, Alabi, Denise, Ellis, Emily, Hassan, Shaziah, Ogyaadu, Selassie, Tamarez, Denisa, Weinstock, Ruth S. , Stone, Sheri , Bzdick, Suzan, Agostini, Lynn, Bulger, Jane , Wolpert, Howard , Atakov-Castillo, Astrid , Sullivan, Asya, Aia, Corinne, Brouillard, Elizabeth, Driscoll, Marsha, Lapier, Heather, Payra, Sherryl, Vancer, Louise, Averkiou, Xenia, Baran, Jesica, Holod, Rosanna, Litvicov, Patrisia, Mandava, Patali, Swinton, Sydney, Khakpour, Dori , Broyles, Frances E. , Marks, Sheryl, Mitchell, Tina, Hairston, Babette, Costello, Reilly, Curtis, Stella, Kamimoto, Jorge Jo, Peleckis, Amy J. , Sultan, Rahaf , Dalton-Bakes, Cornelia, Bourne, Patricia, Haidar, Ahmad, Pasqua, Melissa, Tardio, Vanessa , Moore, Adelyn, Kemp, Gabrielle, Raskin, Philip, Jordan, L.F., Shao, Baomei, DoNguyen, Trang, Meeks, Tram, Phan, Michael , Lesniak, Amanda, Becerra, Mario, Bellini, Natalie J. , Denallo, Erica, Lewis, Claudia , Tribout, Jerry, Tribout, Megan, DiFrancesco, Kathryn, Phillips, Kylie, Raghinaru, Dan, Campos, Tiffany, Morrell, Beth, Oduah, Vanessa, Cardenas-Villamil, Gabriela, Morales, Amanda, Murphy, Carlos, Strayer, Heidi, Spanbauer, Charles , Kollman, Craig, Sasson-Katchalski, Ravid, Piquette, Nicole, Wheatcroft, Alex, WHITE, KIRSTIN N., Carmelo, KC, Janicek, Robert, Gabrielson, Deanna, Mercado, Kevin, Beck, Roy W , Group*, 2IQP Study, Smith, Joshua W. , Christensen, Rochelle, Malone, Joann, Pasquel, Francisco J. , Tajrishi, Farbod Zahedi , Arroyo, Lizda Guerrero, Dean, Ariel, Howard, Matthew, Vander-Heide, Jesse, Ahn, David , Aleppo, Grazia , Fields, Cory, Layton, Paula, Oliveri, Mary Clancy , Levy, Carol J. , Agostini, Lynn, Steenkamp, Devin W , Spaic, Tamara , Liu, Selina , Marks, Sheryl, Mitchell, Tina, Costello, Reilly, Curtis, Stella, Rickels, Michael R. , Bourne, Patricia, Tsoukas, Michael A. , Pasqua, Melissa-Rosina , Moore, Adelyn, Kemp, Gabrielle, Meeks, Tram, Phan, Michael, Hatipoğlu, Betül , Lesniak, Amanda, Howard, Quiana , DiFrancesco, Kathryn, Raghinaru, Dan, Morrell, Beth, Morales, Amanda, Kanapka, Lauren , Le, Van

Diabetes Care | December 5, 2025 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 2 | Pages: e18-e20

10.2337/dc25-2059 | PMID 41348329 Get It

Comparison of partial breast radiation modalities in women with early-stage breast cancer: a target trial emulation
Shumway, Dean A. , Corbin, Kimberly S. , Farah, Magdoleen H. , Fleti, Farah, Hasan, Bashar , Firwana, Mohammed , Saadi, Samer , Nayfeh, Tarek , Hegazi, Moustafa , Waddle, Mark R. , Amundson, A., Vallow, Laura A., Mutter, Robert W. , Shiraishi, Satomi , Farah, Magdoleen H , Fleti, Farah , Hasan, Bashar , Firwana, Mohammed M , Saadi, Samer , Nayfeh, Tarek , Hegazi, Moustafa , Waddle, Mark R , Amundson, Adam C., Hieken, Tina J , Park, Sean S , Mutter, Robert W , Murad, M Hassan , Shumway, Dean A , Shiraishi, Satomi , Vargas, Carlos E, Oladeru, Oluwadamilola T. , Hieken, Tina J. , Park, Sean S. , Murad, M. Hassan , Wang, Zhen

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | December 5, 2025 | Volume: 118 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 691-698

10.1093/jnci/djaf346 | PMID 41352976 Get It

Abstract Background Partial breast irradiation (PBI) is an effective treatment for early-stage breast cancer. However, evidence comparing different PBI modalities is limited. Methods This trial emulation uses electronic health records from a multi-state large tertiary health system. Three PBI modalities were compared: proton radiation therapy, photon radiation therapy, and applicator-based brachytherapy. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to balance confounders. The primary outcome was ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR). Results Between 2013 and 2023, 1041 women with early-stage breast cancer were treated with PBI. Of these, 1026 patients were included in the analyses. The median age was 66 years; 22.51% had ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and 97.56% were estrogen receptor positive. With median follow-up of 38.2 months, the rate of IBR in the overall group was 3.05% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.99% to 4.65%) at 3 years. After IPW, compared with photon PBI, the hazard ratio for IBR for proton PBI was 2.11 (95% CI = 0.70 to 6.33) and for brachytherapy, 3.86 (95% CI = 1.39 to 10.69). Compared with proton PBI, the hazard ratio for IBR for brachytherapy was 1.83 (95% CI = 0.88 to 3.81). IBR risk was similar across PBI modalities for patients with tumor size ≤ 10 mm and in patients treated for DCIS. Among patients with tumor size >10 mm, the hazard ratio for IBR for brachytherapy was 7.64 (95% CI = 1.64 to 35.58) and 3.59 (95% CI = 1.22 to 10.56) relative to photons and protons, respectively. Conclusion PBI with applicator-based brachytherapy was associated with higher IBR than photon or proton PBI in patients with tumor size > 10 mm, suggesting the need for more careful PBI patient selection for this modality.
Physiologic Transition During Delayed Cord Clamping With Assisted Ventilation in Preterm Infants
Fang, Jennifer L. , Petroni, Gina R. , Law, Brenda Hiu Yan , Gorman, Terri, Leone, Tina A. , Thomas, Sumesh , Niermeyer, Susan, Kattwinkel, John, Duda, Gina M, Petroni, Gina R. , Varhegyi, Nikole, Thielen, Monika, Chisholm, Christian A., Liedl, Lavonne M., Amsbaugh, Amy, Niermeyer, Susan, Barry, John-S, Lamprecht, Amy, Berlinski, Carolyn S, Johnson, Jacque-Lynne F, Irvine, Leigh , Ciorogariu-Ivan, Anna-Maria, Byrne, Bobbi J., Underwood, Mark A. , Poulain, Francis R., Pesavento, Rosa R, Fray, Caroline , Athaide, Melba, Kane, Andrea F., Carlo, Waldemar A., Bulas, Dorothy , Fairchild, Karen D. , Strand, Marya L. , Warren, Jamie B. , Niermeyer, Susan, Niermeyer, Susan, Barry, James A, Rincon, Monica P. , Josephsen, Justin , Hawkins, Melissa, Ciorogariu‐Ivan, Anna‐Maria, Travers, Colm P. , Carlo, Waldemar A. , Kline‐Fath, Beth M. , Epelman, Mónica

JAMA Network Open | November 24, 2025 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 11 | Pages: e2545258

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.45258 | PMID 41284295 Get It

Importance Assisted ventilation during delayed cord clamping (DCC) may improve the physiologic transition of extremely preterm infants immediately after birth. Objective To determine whether assisted ventilation during 120 seconds of DCC was associated with reduced higher-level resuscitative interventions (intubation, chest compressions, or epinephrine administration) compared with DCC for 30 to 60 seconds followed by resuscitation. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a secondary analysis of the VentFirst randomized clinical trial that was conducted from September 2, 2016, through February 21, 2023, at 12 centers in the US and Canada. Infants born at 23 weeks 0 days’ to 28 weeks 6 days’ gestational age (GA) were included. Intervention Infants randomized to the intervention received either positive-pressure ventilation or continuous positive airway pressure from 30 to 120 seconds after birth, followed by umbilical cord clamping. Those randomized to control received 30 to 60 seconds of DCC followed by assisted ventilation. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was the odds of higher-level resuscitative interventions in the delivery room (DR). Intention-to-treat analyses within 2 a priori cohorts (infants breathing well and not breathing well 30 seconds after birth) used the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) of intervention vs control. Results All 570 infants enrolled in the trial were included. Infants had a median (IQR) GA of 26.6 (25.2-27.9) weeks and 273 (47.9%) were female. A total of 271 infants (47.5%) were assessed as not breathing well 30 seconds after birth (150 intervention and 121 control), and 299 (52.5%) were assessed as breathing well 30 seconds after birth (128 intervention and 171 control). In the not-breathing-well cohort, 146 infants (53.9%) were intubated in the DR, 4 received chest compressions (2 intervention and 2 control), and 1 received epinephrine (control). Intubation was less frequent in the intervention group (71 infants [47.3%] vs 75 infants [62.0%]; OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.30-0.89). When adjusted by GA strata at randomization, infants in the 26 to 28 weeks’ GA stratum who were in the intervention group were less likely to be intubated in the DR (18 of 79 infants [22.8%] vs 29 of 60 infants [48.3%]; OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.15-0.65). However, there was no difference in intubation rates for infants in the 23 to 25 weeks’ GA stratum (53 of 71 infants [74.7%] vs 46 of 61 infants [75.4%]; OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.44-2.12). Among infants breathing well at 30 seconds, 74 (24.7%) were intubated in the DR, and none received compressions or epinephrine. Intubation rates were similar between intervention and control in the breathing-well cohort. Conclusions and Relevance While the VentFirst trial did not find a difference in death or intraventricular hemorrhage, this secondary analysis found that assisted ventilation during DCC was associated with less intubation in the DR, primarily among infants born at 26 to 28 weeks’ gestation who were not breathing well 30 seconds after birth. Additional studies are needed before implementing assisted ventilation during DCC in clinical practice. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02742454
Macrophage repolarization by immune checkpoint blockade drives T-cell engagement in the tumor microenvironment 2076
Kwok, Tina , Lancaster, Jessica N. , Dong, Haidong , Silva, Ildefonso

The Journal of Immunology | November 21, 2025 | Volume: 214 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/jimmun/vkaf283.041 Get It

Abstract Description Immunotherapy combinations can improve patient outcomes, yet the interactions within the tumor microenvironment (TME) that drive therapeutic synergy are poorly understood. Tumor establishment drives monocyte recruitment and differentiation into tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), which have essential roles in coordinating immune responses and are thus attractive targets for therapeutic modulation. In a murine model of combination anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 checkpoint blockade, tumor control was associated with increased infiltration of CD8+ T cells and M1-like repolarization of TAMs. Live-cell imaging of the tumor microenvironment revealed stable contacts between tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells and TAMs, in which the extent of the contact interfaces increased with combination immunotherapy. Treatment with anti-PD-L1 was able to increase macrophage expression of pro-inflammatory factors and phagocytic activity, suggesting a role for TAMs to reactivate CD8+ T cells in the TME. However, co-treatment with anti-PD-1 was ultimately necessary for tumor control, indicating the need for combination targeting of the TME. Funding Sources Mayo Clinic David and Margaret Grohne Cancer Immunotherapy Pilot Award Topic Categories Tumor Immunology: Cellular Responses and Tumor Microevironment (TIME)
Evaluation of Interventions for Cognitive Symptoms in Long COVID
Koltai, Deborah, Laskowitz, Daniel T. , Wisnivesky, Juan P., Federman, Alex D. , Silverstein, Adam M. , Lokhnygina, Yuliya, Haddad, Michelle M., Mahncke, Henry W. , Vleet, Tom Van, Huang, Rong , Cox, Wendy C., Terry, Diana, Karwowski, Jeannie, McCray, Netia, Lin, Jenny , Singh, Upinder , Geng, Linda N. , Reece, Rebecca , Moy, James N., Arvanitakis, Zoe , Parthasarathy, Sairam , Patterson, Thomas F., Gupta, Aditi , Parsonnet, Jeffrey, Kiriakopoulos, Elaine T. , Mullington, Janet , Jolley, Sarah E. , Shah, Nirav S. , Morimoto, Sarah Shizuko , Lee‐Iannotti, Joyce , Isache, Carmen, Frontera, Jennifer , O’Steen, Ashley, James, Melissa, Harper, Barrie, Zimmerman, Kanecia O. , Lawler, Andrew , Johnson, Brandon M. , Pitsch, Chloe E. , Feuerriegel, Elen , McKeehan, Jeffrey, Molden, Joie, Reid, Kayleigh M., Dowling, Sarah , Wodushek, Thomas, Canton, Diara, Turut, Dilara, Sheppard, Ethan , Scott‐Sutherland, Jennifer, Shaughnessy, Lynn, Beck, Michelle L. , Heisey, Sabrina, Katragadda, Vaishanvi, Yusuff, Amidat, Perlack, Amy, Merisme, Christie, Krause, David, Schulte, Duncan, Dupre, Fabiola, Sanchez, Gina A. Montealegre , Asupoto, Olanike, Simmons, Quinneil, Schroeder, Ryan W. , Timlin, Shannon, Devis, Ycar, Carter, Della, Caceres, Leomaris Caba, Rodríguez, Miguel Grande, Alvarez, Zariya , Yakubov, Amin , Engelson, Celia, Reyes, Michael, Youkhana, Alvin, Jennings, Cheryl , Naquiallah, Dina, Behun, Dylan , Stephen, Ellen, Timm, Emily , Bilimoria, Farrah, Li, Grace , Stricker, Thomas, Michelle, Kang, Minnie, Suarez, Rebeca Tojo, Carmona, Tania, Ramírez, Ana, Kadubek, Grace, Baker, Aileen, Romo-Serna, Andrea, Predki, Barbara, Leman, Cindy, Panhans, Cristina, Roth, Genevieve E., Rudraraju, Gowrisree , Miller, Hannah , DeLisa, Julie A., Williams, Kat, Woodson, Kimberly S., Jennette, Kyle J. , Villanueva, Laura, Norwick, Maria, Martínez, M. T., Rowley, Matt, Carrithers, Michael D. , Pliskin, Neil H. , Pérez, Nicolás , Durkin, Nicole M., Maniar, Nikita, Beety, Rachel, Daspgupta, Raktima, Ramchandran, Ramaswamy, Jaramillo, R., Hasek, Sharon, Macías, S Aguirre, Schuh, Tina , Ialacci, Sarah, Bailey, Christopher , Labbato, Danielle, Hautmann, Amanda , Smith, Beth, Nath, Dia, Meyer, Jessica , DiFrancesco, Kathryn, Pettinato, Kimberly, Curtis, Lynette, Daher, Joviane , Koberssy, Ziad , Mavar, Caleb, Andrefsky, John, Merheb, Alexander, Hernandez, Carla, Baissary, Jhony , Atieh, Ornina , Pereira, Carol, Carpenter, Deborah, Raynor, Jennifer , Brunton, Kristine, Podgoreanu, Andreea, Bunch, P. C., O’Brien, Sean M. , Dickey, Sheila, McNulty, Steven E., Gajjar, Varsha, Neale, Alec C. , Cohen, Cari, Geary, Elizabeth, Campanella, Franco, Anderson, Kirsten, Prestige, Laura, Guidotti-Breting, Leslie, Biewer, Megan, Morton, Melissa , Mathenia, Nicholas, Adeyemi, Oluwadamilola A. , Hengst, Samanike, Ning, Wei , Vanderloo, Adam, Caplan, Amanda, Chen, July, Acree, Mary Ellen , Nakhate, Mukund, Dan, Zaw Nu, Pk, Switzer, Aryal, Shambhu , Sanchez, Jessica, Sims, Luke, Ferdinand, Rebecca , Mammadova, Mehriban, Grimes, Carolyn Z. , Vidales, Elizabeth, Pham, Hau , Nielsen, Laura, Keller, Maryjane, Uruba, Syeda, Hernandez, Maria, Patel, Bela , Umana-Sanchez, Virginia, Pak, Chong, Gainer, Jeffery, BURR, R, Trapuzzano, Ashleigh, Celso, Brian G. , Bienkowski, Grace, Bowman, Jennifer, Verdecia, Jorge , Zerwekh, Kathryn, Serrano, Liliana , Marotz, Meghan, Propp, Piper, Sarig, Yonatan , Murphy, Annie, Comfort, Brandon, Torres, Iri, Klein, Jeffrey A. , Walker, John, Moore, John J., Tempest-Browning, Lisa, Arain, Mudassar, Kemp, Pamela, Sullivan, Samantha, Way, Sonja, Chevalier, Jessica, Sykes, Carly, Kruck, Carrie L., Sackett, L. W., Bang, Claire, Hynes, Mary, Gallagher, Torrey L., Childers-Kakos, Margaret, Zia, Ahmad, South, AP, Oravets, Anne, Ferreyra, Carolyn, Glaze, Chad, Villanueva, Daphne-Dominique , Blystone, Erica, Pritchard, Jane, Alyward, Laura, Cooper, Melissa, Chidester, Michelle, Alderson, R. Matt , Clark, Renee D., Hodder, Sally , Sarwari, Arif R, Juskowich, Joy, Welch, Shelly, Civil, Alyssa, Bendl, Ashley, Dicker, Elisa, Hanson, Hannah, Viola, Heather, Morinigo, Janice, Pantaleon, Karisma, Marcon, Kathryn, Stone, Kimberly, Stewart, Kiwan, Evo-Ortega, Lorraine, McVeety, Megan, Guliyeva, Sabina , Watson, Eric , Pehel, Shayna, Ko, Tim, Caropolo, Leah, Kocas, H. Deniz , O’Donnell, Andrew, Saperia, Corey , Thai, Daniel, Pathak, Divya , Keller, Jennifer M. , Olszewski, Kelly, Clinton, Kimberly, Cherian, Kirsten , Dutton, L M, Elepano, Ma, Mohapatra, Sukanya , Chen, Ting , Wroolie, Tonita, Leang, Zenita, Shashidhar, Sumana, Nguyen, T L, Ravisankar, Ashwath, Weiden, Brycie, Bolliger, Dawn, Glesne, Heather, Dixon, Jennifer , Chebrolu, Praneeth, Gazali, Zarine, Hurst, Whitney, Fry, Avery, Murthy, Ganesh, Grischo, Garrett, Erickson, Heidi L. , Gomez, Isaias, Copeland, Jacquelynn, Galaz, Judy, Autry, Lynn, DiLise-Russo, Marjorie, Marshell, Nikki, Borwege, Sabine, Vadovicky, Sheila, Marsh, Stephanie, Hartley, William, Murtagh, Linda, Kennedy, Anna, Meltzer-Christensen, Annie, Stringham, Caitlyn, Gaskin, Ella, Judd, Melissa, Côté, Sarah , Mahasenan, Shreya, Bjorklund, Todd, Farner, Cheryl E., Taylor, Barbara S. , Soileau, Bridgette, Cote, Cyrena , Hromas, Gabrielle A., Scholler, Irma, Longoria, Lisa, Heard, Patricia, Jones, Johnnie, Tragus, Robin , Harris, Maya, Pinones, Alexis, Anderson, Alyssa , Hastings, Gabrielyd, Courtright, jessica, Jayakumar, Madhumita, Fischer, M, Solis, Pamela, Harteloo, Alex, Elias-Warren, Anna, Nguyen, Daniel , McDonald, Dylan , Rau, Holly , Mernaugh, Jean, Pagulayan, Kathleen F. , Watanabe, Kino, Huden, Kristen, Peabody, Laurel, Mei, Tiffany, Ogunwuyi, Catherine, Cobbina, Esther, Sankar, Ian, Nguyen, Lisa , Fromm, N., Arnold, R. Douglas, Ogu, Stephanie, Yuan, Ying , Ibrahim, Homam , Szum, Izabella, Patel, Jignesh, Sultan, Sonia, Jazayeri, Yasmin, Anderson, Betty Lise, Muñoz, Isabel , Rhys, Logan, Vane, Ryan, Kim, Jessica , Diaz, Leticia M., Yee, Nathan, Gruhn, Robert, Browngoetz, Sarah, Johnson, Elisha, Chand, Arista , Bottrill, Kenneth , Henderson, Kymberly, Johnson, DeArmond, Richard C., Hughes, Trina, Silverstein, A , Silverstein, Adam P , Frontera, Jennifer , Geng, Linda N. , Knopman, David S. , Becker, Jacqueline , Charvet, Leigh , Pilloni, Giuseppina , Huang, Rong, Cox, Wendy, Karwowski, Jeannie, McComsey, Grace A. , Chu, Helen Y. , Ostrosky‐Zeichner, Luis , Fong, Tamara G. , Killgore, William D. S. , Dwyer, Brigid C. , Stringer, William W. , Krishnan, Jerry A , James, Melissa, Johnson, Brandon, Erlandson, Kristine M. , Dowling, Sarah, Hauser, Kristine , Doyle, Michael, Beck, Michelle, Tran, Anh, Altaras, Caroline , Sanchez, Gina, Krengel, Maxine , Ly, Monica T. , Asupoto, Olanike, Schroeder, Ryan, Rodriguez, Miguel, González, David Andrés , Torres, Jimena, García, Maria Luisa , Carrera, Laura, Rutherford, Melissa, Perez, Nicolas, Jaramillo, Ruthie, Smith, Beth, Walkup, Kevin, Scott, Sarah , Mavar, Caleb B., Carpenter, Deborah, Bunch, Pyper, Brown, Richard, Escobar, Carolina, Campanella, Franco, Mathenia, Nicholas, Glickman, Michael S. , Sims, Luke A., Pham, Hoai Phuang, Lopez, John, Hernandez, Maria, Lin, Matthew Junda , Gainer, Jeffery, Brown, Gina , Klein, Jeffrey, Reed, Jessica, Walker, John, Sackett, Lisa, Kaden, Sarah J. , Childers-Kakos, Margaret G, South, Amy, Blystone, Erica, Cooper, Melissa, Alderson, Rachael, Clark, Renee, Bardes, James M. , Hanson, Hannah, Loizos, Maria , Caropolo, Leah J., Fernandez, Luis, Keller, Jennifer, Lin, Rebecca, Brown, Daniel, Dixon, Jennifer, James, Michelle, Kala, Mrinalini , Smith, Ryan S. , Mahasenan, Shreya, Johnson, Hillary, Anderson, Alyssa, Hernandez, Jessica, Sullivan, Michael, Nguyen, Helen , Logue, Jennifer, Mei, Tiffany, Arnold, Rowan, Szum, Izabella , Hatlen, Timothy J. , Anderson, Betty, Munoz, Isabel, Wright, Matthew, Diaz, Leticia, DeCato, Thomas W. , Ortiz, Ernesto, Hildebrand, Lindsey L. , DeArmond, Richard

JAMA Neurology | November 10, 2025 | Volume: 83 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 49

10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.4415 | PMID 41212544 Get It

Importance Treatment for cognitive dysfunction due to postacute sequelae of long COVID (ie, symptoms of fatigue, malaise, weakness, confusion that persist beyond 12 weeks after an initial COVID infection) remains a significant unmet need. Objective To test evidence-based rehabilitation strategies for improving cognitive symptoms in persons with long COVID. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a 5-arm, multicenter, randomized clinical trial of 3 remotely delivered interventions conducted between August 17, 2023, and June 10, 2024. The study took place at 22 trial sites and included the screening of individuals with cognitive long COVID. Interventions Participants were randomized to 1 of 5 arms: adaptive computerized cognitive training (BrainHQ [Posit Science]), cognitive-behavioral rehabilitation involving both group and individual counseling sessions (PASC-Cognitive Recovery [PASC-CoRE]) paired with BrainHQ, and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) paired with BrainHQ. Two comparator arms were included as follows: unstructured computer puzzles and games (active comparator) and sham tDCS paired with BrainHQ. The interventions occurred 5 times per week over 10 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures Cognitive and behavioral in-person assessments were performed at baseline, midintervention, at the end of intervention, and 3 months after the end of the intervention. The primary outcome measure was the modified Everyday Cognition Scale 2 (ECog2) completed at the end of the intervention compared to the baseline visit based on participant self-report looking back over the prior 7 days. Results A total of 378 individuals were screened, from which there were 328 participants (median [IQR] age, 48.0 [37.0-58.0] years; 241 female [73.5%]; race: 15 Asian [4.6%], 47 Black [14.3%], and 235 White [71.6%]; ethnicity: 52 Hispanic [15.9%]). None of the 3 active interventions demonstrated benefits on the modified ECog2 in the intention-to-treat population by the end of the intervention period. The adjusted differences in mean change were 0.0 (95% CI, −0.2 to 0.2) for BrainHQ vs active comparator, 0.1 (95% CI, −0.1 to 0.3) for PASC-CoRE + BrainHQ vs active comparator, 0.0 (95% CI, −0.2 to 0.2) for tDCS-active + BrainHQ vs tDCS-sham + BrainHQ, and 0.1 (95% CI, −0.1 to 0.3) for PASC-CoRE + BrainHQ vs BrainHQ alone. Secondary participant-reported outcomes and neuropsychological tests showed no differential benefits for any treatment arm. All 5 arms demonstrated some improvements over time on the modified ECog2 and on secondary outcomes. There were no serious adverse events attributable to the interventions. Conclusions and Relevance This phase 2 randomized clinical trial failed to demonstrate differential benefits for online cognitive training, a structured cognitive rehabilitation program, and tDCS for cognitive long COVID. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05965739 .
MON-829 Sex-Specific Cardiometabolic Benefits of Tirzepatide: A Real-World Study on ASCVD Risk Mitigation
Bechenati, Dima, Castaneda, Regina, Villamarin, Jose L. , Tama, Elif , Meek, Jesse Lu, Taaffe, Tina M, Bennett, Pamela K, Gutiérrez, René de Jesús Rivera , Castaneda, Regina, Espinosa, Maria A, Meek, Jesse Lu, Acosta, Andrés , Faubion, Stephanie S. , Shufelt, Chrisandra , Hurtado, Maria D.

Journal of the Endocrine Society | October 23, 2025 | Volume: 9 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1210/jendso/bvaf149.068 Get It

Abstract Disclosure: R.D. Rivera Gutierrez: None. D. Bechenati: None. R. Castaneda: None. M.A. Espinosa: None. J.L. Villamarin: None. E. Tama: None. J.L. Meek: None. T.M. Taaffe: None. P.K. Bennett: None. A.J. Acosta: Novo Nordisk, Gila Therapeutics, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Amgen Inc, General Mills, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Currax, Nestle, Phenomix Sciences, Busch Health, RareDiseases, National Institute of Health, Vivus Pharmaceuticals, Apollo Endosurgery, Satiogen Pharmaceuticals, Spatz Medical. S. Faubion: Era Women’s Health Platform, PriMed, AiCME, MedAll, Medscape, Weight Watchers. C. Shufelt: Bayer Advisory Board. M.D. Hurtado: Novo Nordisk, National Institute of Health, Phenomix Sciences. Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have demonstrated cardiovascular (CV) benefits. Tirzepatide (TZP), a dual GLP-1 and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonist approved for weight management and glycemic control, currently lacks evidence on CV outcomes. This study evaluates TZP’s impact on cardiometabolic parameters and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk scores. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of adults prescribed TZP from June 1, 2022, to November 1, 2024. Inclusion criteria included 12 months of TZP use and age >18 years. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, active malignancy, concurrent FDA-approved antiobesity medications, and prior bariatric surgery. Endpoints included changes in blood pressure, lipid profiles, liver enzymes, glucose control parameters, medication use (statins, aspirin, antihypertensives), and ASCVD risk scores from baseline to 12 months, stratified by sex. Data were obtained from electronic medical records. We present data as mean differences [95% CI]. We used T-tests and multivariate regression analyses for analyses. Results: Among 831 participants (59.4% female; 91.2% White; mean age: 58 ± 12 years), 12-month weight loss was -12% [-13, -11], p<0.001. We observed significant improvement in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (-4 [-5, -3] mmHg, p<0.001), triglycerides (TG) (-38 [-52, -23] mg/dL, p<0.001), total cholesterol (TC) (-7 [-10, -4] mg/dL, p<0.001), LDL cholesterol (LDL) (-6 [-9, -4] mg/dL, p<0.001), fasting glucose (FG) (-39 [-48, -29] mg/dL, p<0.001), ALT (-10 [-15, -5] U/L, p<0.001), HbA1c (-1.3% [-1.5, -1.2], p<0.001), and HDL cholesterol (HDL) (+4 [+3, +5] mg/dL, p<0.001). The Lifetime and 10-year ASCVD scores did not significantly change after 12 months (p>0.05), underscoring TZP’s potential in mitigating the aging-associated increase in CV risk. Considering sex, females had greater weight loss (-13% [-14, -12] vs. -10% [-11, -9], p<0.001), and greater improvements in TC (-5% [-8, -2] vs -3% [-6, 0.1], p<0.001) and LDL (-10% [-14, -6] vs -4% [-8, 1], p<0.001). Males had a greater reduction in DBP (-2% [-4, -1] vs (-1% [-6, 3], p=0.006). Both males and females demonstrated similar improvements in FG and HbA1c. Conclusion: TZP significantly improved CV and metabolic parameters after 12 months, with greater benefits observed in females. These improvements effectively mitigated the age-related rise in ASCVD risk scores. Larger, prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and further investigate TZP’s long-term CV effects. Presentation: Monday, July 14, 2025
Gene Expression Profile–Based Test to Predict Melanoma Sentinel Node Status
Hyngstrom, John , Bresler, Scott C. , Harms, Kelly L. , Lehman, Julia S. , Wasif, Nabil , McMasters, Kelly M. , Wada, David A., Delman, Keith A. , Busam, Klaus J. , Messina, Jane L. , Sondak, Vernon K., Lehman, Julia S , Hieken, Tina J. , Egger, Michael E. , Angeles, Christina V. , Burke, Erin E. , Lowe, Michael C , Beasley, Georgia M. , Bartlett, Edmund K. , Zager, Jonathan S. , Bagaria, Sanjay P. , Pandalai, Prakash Krishnan , Lee, Jay Soong-Jin , Sondak, Vernon K.

JAMA Surgery | October 22, 2025 | Volume: 160 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1358

10.1001/jamasurg.2025.4399 | PMID 41123931 Get It

Importance Contemporary guidelines recommend sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for patients with melanoma with predicted risk of SLN metastasis greater than 10% and consideration of SLNB when the risk is 5% to 10%. A gene expression profile (GEP)–based test that can accurately identify patients with a low risk of SLN metastasis would refine selection for SLNB. Objective To establish the predictive capability of the combined clinicopathological factors and GEP (CP-GEP) test to identify patients with primary cutaneous melanoma who can safely forgo SLNB and to investigate the prognostic value of CP-GEP regarding the outcome in patients with cutaneous melanoma after a negative SLNB (not reported herein). Design, Setting, and Participants This prognostic study was conducted from September 2021 to June 2024 at 9 academic medical centers with experienced melanoma surgeons. Included were patients with biopsy-proven invasive cutaneous melanoma with T1 to T3 tumors and clinically negative regional LNs. All patients were deemed candidates for SLNB using standard clinical criteria. GEP was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue from the primary melanoma biopsy. Analyses were performed from December 2024 to August 2025. Intervention CP-GEP testing to determine risk of having a positive SLNB in patients with T1 to T3 cutaneous melanoma who were considered appropriate candidates for the procedure based on standard clinical parameters. Main Outcomes and Measures CP-GEP results were reported as low risk or high risk; the primary outcome measure was negative predictive value (NPV) in low-risk cases. Analyses included NPV assessment by tumor (T) subcategory, primary site, and age. Results A total of 1761 patients (median [IQR] age, 64 [53-72] years; 997 male [56.6%]) underwent SLNB (310 [17.6%] SLN positive) and had a successful CP-GEP test; GEP was successful in 97.7% of samples. A total of 651 patients (37.0%) were considered low risk by CP-GEP. Among low-risk cases, 46 (7.1%) were SLN positive, and NPV was 92.9% (95% CI, 90.7%-94.8%). High-risk cases had a 23.8% (264 of 1110) SLN-positive rate. The percentage of cases with low-risk CP-GEP declined with increasing T category (T1 = 346 of 507 [68.2%]; T2 = 295 of 897 [32.9%]; T3 = 10 of 357 [2.8%]). CP-GEP results were consistent in discriminating SLN-positive rates across primary sites, histologic subtypes, and mitotic count categories. In 2 large subsets, clinical stage IB (n = 1187) and patients 65 years and older (n = 832), 6.5% (95% CI, 4.6%-8.8%) of low-risk clinical stage IB cases and 6.6% (95% CI, 4.2%-9.7%) of all low-risk cases in patients 65 years and older were SLN positive vs 18.3% (95% CI, 15.3%-21.6%) and 20.3% (95% CI, 16.8%-24.2%) for high-risk cases, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance In this multicenter, prospective, blinded, prognostic study, the CP-GEP test reliably identified patients with melanoma with less than 10% SLN metastasis risk. SLN metastasis rates were approximately 3-fold greater for high-risk vs low-risk CP-GEP cases. In appropriately selected patients, the CP-GEP test may add value for shared patient-surgeon decision-making.
Primary Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Deep Breast Parenchyma
Nielson, Kaitlyn J. , Cook, David , Hieken, Tina J. , Olave, Maria C. , Solanki, Malvika , Guo, Ruifeng , Jiménez, Rafael E. , Cook, David J , Solanki, Malvika H , Hieken, Tina J , Guo, Ruifeng

International Journal of Surgical Pathology | October 21, 2025 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 559-563

10.1177/10668969251384887 | PMID 41117418 Get It

Neuroendocrine carcinomas of the breast are a rare subtype of invasive breast carcinomas, and those with morphologic and immunophenotypic features supporting Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) are even more rare. Accurate diagnosis of these entities is important for clinical decision-making regarding the selection of optimal treatments. We report a patient withMCC in the deep breast parenchyma of a 52-year-old woman, without evidence of a cutaneous component. This tumor exhibited characteristic morphologic and immunophenotypic features of MCC, including sheets of high grade, hyperchromatic tumor cells, with perinuclear dot-like staining of keratin 20. To our knowledge, this is the sixth report of parenchymal breast MCC, and due to its rarity and aggressive course, we reviewed the literature, including prior experience on its diagnosis and management.