Shumway, Dean A

BACKGROUND: Cardiac radioablation is emerging as a treatment modality for refractory ventricular tachycardia. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of radiation on the coronary arteries in a swine model of proton beam cardiac radioablation. METHODS: Eighteen swine underwent single-fraction 30 to 40 Gy pencil-beam scanning proton therapy targeting the left ventricle and were euthanized 12 to 40 weeks later. Treatment planning was performed without restricting the dose to the coronary arteries. The maximum point dose (D max ) to the epicardial coronary arteries was calculated. In secondary analyses, the mean (D mean ) and minimum dose received by the highest irradiated 0.01 cm 3 (D 0.01 ) of each coronary artery were also calculated. Coronary artery segments were harvested from the D max sites for histological analysis, and the D max was correlated with stenosis severity. RESULTS: Ninety-six coronary arteries were analyzed. No stenoses were observed by computed tomography imaging preirradiation. By histological analysis posteuthanasia, 25/96 (26%) coronaries sampled at their D max sites had ≥75% stenosis. The median D max was 4.7 Gy for the <75% stenosis group and 29.7 Gy for the ≥75% stenosis group ( P <0.001). The AUC-ROC for the association between D max and stenosis ≥75% was 92.2%. A D max value of 20.1 Gy best predicted stenosis ≥75%, with sensitivity 92.3% and specificity 87.1%. The AUC-ROCs for the associations of D mean and D 0.01 with stenosis ≥75% were 84.8% and 91.6%, respectively. In histopathologic analysis, intimal hyperplasia was the most common coronary artery abnormality at the D max sites, and it was present in 61.5% of all arteries and in 93.9% of arteries with D max ≥20 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: In this preclinical model of proton beam cardiac radioablation, coronary stenoses occurred in a dose-dependent manner, with D max showing the closest correlation with stenosis ≥75%. These data provide for the first time a framework for dose constraint considerations for the coronary arteries during treatment planning for cardiac radioablation and thoracic malignancy radiation.

Abstract Background Partial breast irradiation (PBI) is an effective treatment for early-stage breast cancer. However, evidence comparing different PBI modalities is limited. Methods This trial emulation uses electronic health records from a multi-state large tertiary health system. Three PBI modalities were compared: proton radiation therapy, photon radiation therapy, and applicator-based brachytherapy. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to balance confounders. The primary outcome was ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR). Results Between 2013 and 2023, 1041 women with early-stage breast cancer were treated with PBI. Of these, 1026 patients were included in the analyses. The median age was 66 years; 22.51% had ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and 97.56% were estrogen receptor positive. With median follow-up of 38.2 months, the rate of IBR in the overall group was 3.05% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.99% to 4.65%) at 3 years. After IPW, compared with photon PBI, the hazard ratio for IBR for proton PBI was 2.11 (95% CI = 0.70 to 6.33) and for brachytherapy, 3.86 (95% CI = 1.39 to 10.69). Compared with proton PBI, the hazard ratio for IBR for brachytherapy was 1.83 (95% CI = 0.88 to 3.81). IBR risk was similar across PBI modalities for patients with tumor size ≤ 10 mm and in patients treated for DCIS. Among patients with tumor size &gt;10 mm, the hazard ratio for IBR for brachytherapy was 7.64 (95% CI = 1.64 to 35.58) and 3.59 (95% CI = 1.22 to 10.56) relative to photons and protons, respectively. Conclusion PBI with applicator-based brachytherapy was associated with higher IBR than photon or proton PBI in patients with tumor size &gt; 10 mm, suggesting the need for more careful PBI patient selection for this modality.

Abstract Background Early-stage breast cancer is among the most common cancer diagnoses. Adjuvant radiotherapy is an essential component of breast-conserving therapy, and several options exist for tailoring its extent and duration. This study assesses the comparative effectiveness of partial-breast irradiation (PBI) compared with whole-breast irradiation (WBI). Methods A systematic review was completed to identify relevant randomized clinical trials and comparative observational studies. Independent reviewers working in pairs selected studies and extracted data. Randomized trial results were pooled using a random effects model. Prespecified main outcomes were ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR), cosmesis, and adverse events (AEs). Results Fourteen randomized clinical trials and 6 comparative observational studies with 17 234 patients evaluated the comparative effectiveness of PBI. PBI was not statistically significantly different from WBI for IBR at 5 years (RR = 1.34, 95% CI = 0.83 to 2.18; high strength of evidence [SOE]) and 10 years (RR = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.91; high SOE). Evidence for cosmetic outcomes was insufficient. Statistically significantly fewer acute AEs were reported with PBI compared with WBI, with no statistically significant difference in late AEs. Data from subgroups according to patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were insufficient. Intraoperative radiotherapy was associated with higher IBR at 5, 10, and over than 10 years (high SOE) compared with WBI. Conclusions Ipsilateral breast recurrence was not statistically significantly different between PBI and WBI. Acute AEs were less frequent with PBI. This evidence supports the effectiveness of PBI among selected patients with early-stage, favorable-risk breast cancer who are similar to those represented in the included studies.