Back to Authors

Hegazi, Moustafa

0009-0006-8190-3915

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic Evidence-Based Practice Center, Rochester, MN, United States.

Citations 1

Comparison of partial breast radiation modalities in women with early-stage breast cancer: a target trial emulation
Shumway, Dean A. , Corbin, Kimberly S. , Farah, Magdoleen H. , Fleti, Farah, Hasan, Bashar , Firwana, Mohammed , Saadi, Samer , Nayfeh, Tarek , Hegazi, Moustafa , Waddle, Mark R. , Amundson, A., Vallow, Laura A., Mutter, Robert W. , Shiraishi, Satomi , Farah, Magdoleen H , Fleti, Farah , Hasan, Bashar , Firwana, Mohammed M , Saadi, Samer , Nayfeh, Tarek , Hegazi, Moustafa , Waddle, Mark R , Amundson, Adam C., Hieken, Tina J , Park, Sean S , Mutter, Robert W , Murad, M Hassan , Shumway, Dean A , Shiraishi, Satomi , Vargas, Carlos E, Oladeru, Oluwadamilola T. , Hieken, Tina J. , Park, Sean S. , Murad, M. Hassan , Wang, Zhen

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | December 5, 2025 | Volume: 118 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 691-698

10.1093/jnci/djaf346 Get It

Abstract Background Partial breast irradiation (PBI) is an effective treatment for early-stage breast cancer. However, evidence comparing different PBI modalities is limited. Methods This trial emulation uses electronic health records from a multi-state large tertiary health system. Three PBI modalities were compared: proton radiation therapy, photon radiation therapy, and applicator-based brachytherapy. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to balance confounders. The primary outcome was ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR). Results Between 2013 and 2023, 1041 women with early-stage breast cancer were treated with PBI. Of these, 1026 patients were included in the analyses. The median age was 66 years; 22.51% had ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and 97.56% were estrogen receptor positive. With median follow-up of 38.2 months, the rate of IBR in the overall group was 3.05% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.99% to 4.65%) at 3 years. After IPW, compared with photon PBI, the hazard ratio for IBR for proton PBI was 2.11 (95% CI = 0.70 to 6.33) and for brachytherapy, 3.86 (95% CI = 1.39 to 10.69). Compared with proton PBI, the hazard ratio for IBR for brachytherapy was 1.83 (95% CI = 0.88 to 3.81). IBR risk was similar across PBI modalities for patients with tumor size ≤ 10 mm and in patients treated for DCIS. Among patients with tumor size >10 mm, the hazard ratio for IBR for brachytherapy was 7.64 (95% CI = 1.64 to 35.58) and 3.59 (95% CI = 1.22 to 10.56) relative to photons and protons, respectively. Conclusion PBI with applicator-based brachytherapy was associated with higher IBR than photon or proton PBI in patients with tumor size > 10 mm, suggesting the need for more careful PBI patient selection for this modality.