Solanki, Malvika

Abstract Objective To evaluate the clinical value of breast MRI in radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast (RAASB) for assessing disease extent at diagnosis and after neoadjuvant therapy compared with clinical examination and surgical pathology. Methods This IRB-approved retrospective study included 25 patients with breast MRIs between1995 and 2020. MRI estimated disease extent was compared to clinical exam and surgical pathology. MRI findings were evaluated for additional disease and impact on clinical management. Agreement between MRI and clinical assessment of disease was evaluated using Cohen’s kappa statistic. Results Baseline MRI demonstrated moderate agreement with clinical disease extent (Cohen’s κ = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.14-0.75). Thirteen of 24 (54%) of MRIs reflected clinical exam, 4/24 (17%) MRIs underestimated disease, and 5/24 (21%) MRIs overestimated disease. Baseline MRI changed surgical management in 4/24 (17%). In 8 patients who proceeded directly to surgery, MRI reflected pathology in 6/8 (75%). In 10 patients with post-neoadjuvant MRI, 4/10 (40%) pathology and MRI extent were similar, 5/10 (50%) MRI overestimated disease, and 1/10 (10%) MRI underestimated disease. Conclusion MRI has clinical value in assessing RAASB with the potential for significantly altering surgical management. In this small cohort, post-neoadjuvant MRI demonstrated limited additional clinical value. Larger studies are needed to define the optimal role and timing of post-neoadjuvant MRI. Advances in knowledge Baseline MRI detected additional disease not identified on initial clinical exam in 5/24 (21%) and changed surgical management in 4/24 (17%). Although baseline MRI demonstrated moderate agreement with clinical examination, post-neoadjuvant MRI frequently overestimated residual disease when compared with final pathology.

Abstract Introduction/Objective Microglandular adenosis (MGA) of the breast is an uncommon lesion characterized by a benign course. However atypical MGA (AMGA) and MGA-associated carcinoma have been described, suggesting that MGA may represent a non-obligate precursor of carcinoma. We report five cases of MGA-associated breast carcinoma and describe the key pathological features of this entity. Methods/Case Report Five cases of MGA-associated breast carcinoma were identified. Clinical data, histologic and immunohistochemical characteristics were reviewed and analyzed. Results All cases involved women with ages ranging 48 to 75 with a median of 70. Four of five cases demonstrated invasive carcinoma, while one case showed ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS). Invasive carcinomas encompassed various histologic types: metaplastic carcinoma with chondromyxoid matrix production (2 cases), invasive carcinoma with secretory features (1 case), and invasive carcinoma of no special type (ductal) (1 case). A morphologic transition from MGA to AMGA to carcinoma was observed in all cases. S100 was consistently positive in all cases. Myoepithelial markers demonstrated the absence of myoepithelial cells in the invasive carcinoma as well as MGA / AMGA component. Conclusion This series highlights the histologic spectrum and key diagnostic features of MGA-associated carcinoma. Awareness of this entity is crucial for appropriate diagnosis and clinical management.

Neuroendocrine carcinomas of the breast are a rare subtype of invasive breast carcinomas, and those with morphologic and immunophenotypic features supporting Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) are even more rare. Accurate diagnosis of these entities is important for clinical decision-making regarding the selection of optimal treatments. We report a patient withMCC in the deep breast parenchyma of a 52-year-old woman, without evidence of a cutaneous component. This tumor exhibited characteristic morphologic and immunophenotypic features of MCC, including sheets of high grade, hyperchromatic tumor cells, with perinuclear dot-like staining of keratin 20. To our knowledge, this is the sixth report of parenchymal breast MCC, and due to its rarity and aggressive course, we reviewed the literature, including prior experience on its diagnosis and management.

Abstract Cystic breast masses are a common entity encountered by breast radiologists. The imaging features of benign and malignant cystic masses may overlap, causing confusion and miscategorization with the potential to produce diagnostic delay and harm. This article provides a review of key differentiating imaging features that help guide appropriate mass characterization and treatment.

Abstract Adenomyoepithelioma (AME) is a rare, usually benign breast neoplasm with low potential for malignant transformation. Imaging features are nonspecific and overlap with other benign and malignant breast lesions. On mammography, AME most often presents as a mass, usually oval in shape, with variable reported margins. Less commonly, AME can present mammographically as an asymmetry or can be mammographically occult. Associated calcifications are uncommon. On US, AME is usually seen as a hypoechoic oval mass, but it can also manifest as a complex cystic and solid mass. On US, the majority of AME have noncircumscribed margins (indistinct, angular, or microlobulated). Internal vascularity is usually present, and posterior enhancement can be seen. Although there is limited literature on MRI features, the most frequent finding is an irregular mass with washout kinetics; T2 hyperintensity can be observed. These nonspecific and often suspicious imaging features usually merit biopsy. On histologic analysis, AME is characterized by a biphasic proliferation of myoepithelial and epithelial cells. Pathologic diagnosis can be difficult due to the variety of histologic features of AME and heterogeneity in these tumors, especially when sampling is limited, such as in core needle biopsies. Wide local surgical excision of AME is recommended due to potential for recurrence and malignant transformation.

Introduction. Assessment of axillary lymph nodes in breast carcinoma is an important part of staging to guide appropriate clinical management. Lymph node inclusions of different types, including nevoid, squamous, and glandular, are rare but have been reported in multiple different anatomic locations including the axilla. These can result in diagnostic challenges and pose risks of misdiagnoses. Rarely, malignancies may arise intrinsic to otherwise incidental benign nodal inclusions. Case Presentation. We report a case of ductal carcinoma diagnosed within a squamous epithelial inclusion cyst within an axillary lymph node in a patient with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the ipsilateral right breast. To our knowledge, this is the fifth report in the literature of breast carcinoma confirmed within an axillary inclusion in a patient with pure DCIS. Evaluation of the primary DCIS and lymph node inclusions, by routine and immunohistochemical stains, was performed for assessment. Discussion. The presence of lymph node inclusions can pose a challenge in assessment of benignity and malignancy, on frozen and permanent histologic sections. Pathologists should carefully evaluate lymph node inclusions to ensure that intrinsic malignancies are not missed within rare otherwise benign appearing incidental epithelial rests.

Context.— Progressive independence in medicine is critical to building confidence and decisiveness in trainees. However, this can be difficult to accomplish in the strict regulatory environment of pathology. Objective.— To pilot and adopt a process whereby surgical pathology fellows independently manage a subset of cases and release preliminary reports. Design.— Upon program approval, board-certified surgical pathology fellows were eligible for preliminary report sign-out at their discretion. Eligible cases were sent from outside institutions for confirmatory review. Preliminary reports were viewable in the electronic medical record. Safety measures were used to ensure timely release of final reports by attending pathologists. Results.— Fellows participating in the pilot (n = 4) released 59 preliminary reports out of 101 cases reviewed (58%), with 1 potentially significant discrepancy between preliminary and final report. Turnaround time was not affected. The process was endorsed by all participants and adopted as standard practice. During the first year, eligible fellows (n = 8) released 123 preliminary reports out of 1260 cases reviewed (9.8%). There were no major diagnostic discrepancies and no effects on turnaround time. The number of preliminary reports released by each fellow was variable (range, 2–48; median, 8), likely a reflection of both external factors (number of trainees on service, volume) and trainee-specific factors (confidence, efficiency). Conclusions.— Fellows showed good judgment when independently managing cases, with just 1 potentially significant discrepancy out of 182 cases (<1%). No patients were adversely impacted. Use of this process varied widely among fellows and may require closer monitoring and encouragement for fellows who are tentative about releasing preliminary reports.

Background A gap remains in the role of neoadjuvant therapy for patients with ILC. Method Single-institution retrospective review of patients with ILC who received neoadjuvant therapy between 2008 and 2019. Results 141 patients met inclusion criteria: 71 neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and 70 neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET). 7/71 (9.9%) patients had a pCR following NACT compared to 1/70 (1.4%) with NET ( P = .063). pCR was observed in 5/18 (27.8%) patients with Her2Neu-positive disease following NACT, compared to 2/53 (3.8%) with Her2Neu-negative disease ( P = .01). For luminal B tumors, median Ki-67 decrease was similar following NACT and NET (18.3 vs 16.3, P = .26). T category decreased in 59 (42.1%) patients following neoadjuvant therapy, increased in 9 (6.4%), and was unchanged in 72 (51.4%). More patients had an increase (28.6%) than decrease (12.1%) in their N category, including 13/60 (21.7%) who were clinically node-negative at diagnosis and identified to have node-positive disease following neoadjuvant therapy, at definitive surgery. Conclusion In Her2Neu-negative ILC, the potential of a pCR with NACT or NET is low. Most patients’ nodal status and tumor size remain unchanged. There is a potential for pathologic stage to be higher at surgery compared to the clinical stage prior to neoadjuvant therapy.