Komforti, Miglena K.

Abstract High-risk breast lesions (HRLs) encompass a heterogeneous group of pathologies that coexist with an adjacent or synchronous malignancy, confer an increased risk of future breast cancer, or warrant surgical consideration because of upgrade potential or local behavior. Despite their clinical importance, management of HRLs remains variable. The American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) and the Society of Breast Imaging are collaborating to establish unified, evidence-based guidelines for managing these lesions. While these recommendations are currently in development, this review summarizes the existing literature and current guidance, including ASBrS recommendations, to provide context for multidisciplinary management. The article reviews the histopathologic features, imaging appearance, and management strategies for HRLs, including atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH), lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), flat epithelial atypia (FEA), papillomas with and without atypia, radial scar/complex sclerosing lesion (RS/CSL), mucocele-like lesion (MLL), desmoid tumor, and pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (PASH). Recent literature supports nonoperative management for specific radiologic-pathologic concordant lesions, particularly limited ADH, pure FEA, and pure RS, highlighting the important role of multidisciplinary discussion for personalized care. Lesions such as LCIS subtypes, papilloma with atypia, and MLL with atypia continue to warrant excision due to higher reported upgrade rates to malignancy. Beyond short-term management, HRLs such as ADH, ALH, and LCIS serve as biomarkers of long-term breast cancer risk, informing recommendations for surveillance, risk assessment, and chemoprevention counseling. Achieving a consensus among radiology, pathology, and surgical disciplines is essential to ensure oncologic safety while minimizing overtreatment in the era of precision breast care.

Abstract Introduction and rationale: There is a wide-spread urgent need for an objective reproducible diagnostic tool capable of precisely classifying atypical mammary lesions into cancer vs. benign. Current diagnostic methods in pathology rely on routine and highly subjective histomorphologic and immunophenotypic features. Some authors report a 35% error rate in pathologic interpretation of atypical lesions of the breast (Elmore, 2015). Diagnostic variability can drop to the flip-of-the-coin 50%, even amongst expert breast pathologists (Tozbekian, 2017; Samples, 2017) and is largely attributed to the lack of innovative tools to adequately distinguish biologic differences (Allison, 2016), resulting in diagnoses that are described as “murky” and “arbitrary” (Khoury, 2022). Genomic imprinting, a vital epigenetic regulatory mechanism, is critical in mammalian development and tumorigenesis (Barlow, 2014, Murrell, 2006). Typically, imprinted genes exhibit parent-specific allele silencing through differential methylation. However, in cancer, this regulation often breaks down, resulting in the aberrant activation of the typically silenced allele—a phenomenon known as loss of imprinting (LOI) (Jelinic, 2016). LOI is considered one of the earliest molecular changes in cancer development, occurs early in tumorigenesis, making it ideal for identifying precursor lesions. Objectives: We hypothesize loss of imprinting (LOI) can be developed as a diagnostic, predictive and prognostic novel epigenetic marker (Quantitative Chromogenic Imprinted Gene In-Situ Hybridization, QCIGISH) for breast precancerous lesions and cancer detection. Our objective is to initiate a proof of concept for atypical breast lesions with QCIGISH and develop a diagnostic model. Methods: We retrospectively identified benign, atypical, and carcinoma core needle specimens from year 2023 in the Department of Pathology at Mayo Clinic Florida. Inclusion criteria included female patients, ages 18-99, with archived breast material obtained through standard of care (n=20). All diagnoses were ascertained by a breast pathologist (MKK). Following a thorough literature review, we processed the material for in situ hybridization, and pretreated with RNA scope preparation procedure using probes targeting noncoding intronic regions of nascent RNAs (QCIGISH). Based on high Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve (AUROC), 2 genes - HM13 and GRB10 were identified as the most promising candidates for classification with QCIGISH. Upon test completion, the detected gene-expression site appeared as a distinct red dot on the slide under the common bright-field microscope. Next, the gene expression signals were counted and further classified as bi-allelic (BAE), multi-allelic (MAE) and total expression (TE). Results: A decision tree model based on BAE, MAE, and TE metrics showed differential signal expression. High MAE was a strong predictor for malignancy. We achieved 100% sensitivity and specificity with the ground truth, thereby initiating proof of concept. Furthermore, one histomorphologically challenging atypical lesion, for which the positive LOI finding accurately classified as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), was confirmed indeed DCIS by ground truth validation on the excision specimen. Conclusion: We have demonstrated a breakthrough molecular biomarker that is fully objective, reproducible, and practical. First of its kind, the innovative QCIGISH has superior performance than the current standard of care in breast cancer diagnostics allowing for single-cell resolution of epigenetic changes. Next, we seek to undergo full model validation. Citation Format: M. Abdollahi Neisani, R. Guo, T. Cheng, M. K. Komforti. Epigenetic Imprinting as a Novel Precision Biomarker for Early Breast Cancer and Precancer Diagnosis and Detection [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-07-09.

Abstract Introduction/Objective Microglandular adenosis (MGA) of the breast is an uncommon lesion characterized by a benign course. However atypical MGA (AMGA) and MGA-associated carcinoma have been described, suggesting that MGA may represent a non-obligate precursor of carcinoma. We report five cases of MGA-associated breast carcinoma and describe the key pathological features of this entity. Methods/Case Report Five cases of MGA-associated breast carcinoma were identified. Clinical data, histologic and immunohistochemical characteristics were reviewed and analyzed. Results All cases involved women with ages ranging 48 to 75 with a median of 70. Four of five cases demonstrated invasive carcinoma, while one case showed ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS). Invasive carcinomas encompassed various histologic types: metaplastic carcinoma with chondromyxoid matrix production (2 cases), invasive carcinoma with secretory features (1 case), and invasive carcinoma of no special type (ductal) (1 case). A morphologic transition from MGA to AMGA to carcinoma was observed in all cases. S100 was consistently positive in all cases. Myoepithelial markers demonstrated the absence of myoepithelial cells in the invasive carcinoma as well as MGA / AMGA component. Conclusion This series highlights the histologic spectrum and key diagnostic features of MGA-associated carcinoma. Awareness of this entity is crucial for appropriate diagnosis and clinical management.

Abstract The practice of formally documenting radiologic and pathologic concordance after percutaneous breast biopsies was instituted more than 20 years ago. There are several ways in which this can be done, but in many practices the performing radiologist independently compares the imaging findings with the pathology report to determine concordance. However, some studies show that a multidisciplinary review of breast biopsy results can maximize cancer detection, identify discordant cases in a timely manner, decrease imaging follow-up, and avoid unnecessary surgical intervention. This article will propose a practical method to establish a formal radiology-pathology conference in which percutaneous breast biopsies are reviewed with multidisciplinary input to increase efficiency and improve patient care. With the wide implementation of digital radiologic imaging and digital pathology evaluation plus the recent adoption of virtual meeting platforms, a successful radiology-pathology conference can be implemented in nearly any practice setting. Case examples will be presented demonstrating the utility of such a conference.

e12615 Background: Breast MRI after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has demonstrated high sensitivity and positive predictive value in evaluating response to NAC. It is widely recognized as the most accurate imaging technique for assessing tumor response, outperforming mammography and ultrasound. However, there remains a knowledge gap in its potential as an early predictor of pathological response, when performed at the midpoint of NAC. Here, we investigated the correlation between MRI findings at the midpoint of NAC and subsequent pathological response at definitive surgery. Methods: A retrospective study was performed of patients with breast cancer who received NAC at Mayo Clinic, Florida and had at least 2 breast MRIs, one at midpoint and one either pre- or post-treatment. Patients with prior ipsilateral breast cancer were excluded. Participants were stratified into three molecular subtypes: hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-positive (HER2+), and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). All MRIs were re-reviewed by dedicated breast radiologists, with tumor response classified as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD) based on RECIST criteria. Pathological outcomes, including pathologic complete response (pCR) and residual cancer burden (RCB), were extracted from pathology reports and confirmed by a single breast pathologist, as indicated. pCR was defined as the absence of residual invasive tumor in both the breast and axillary lymph nodes. Results: A total of 154 patients met inclusion criteria from 2012 to 2022. Similar to previous studies, the positive predictive value for the post-treatment MRI was high at 82.4%, with 14 of 17 patients with imaging complete responses (iCR) achieving pCR. For the midpoint MRI, the positive predictive value for patients with iCR was 100%, with 8 out of 8 patients achieving pCR. Patients with certain subtypes of breast cancer with at least PR in both breast and axillary lymph nodes at midpoint MRI had numerically higher pCR rate, specifically HER2+ (22/37, 59.5%) and TNBC (8/13, 61.5%) but not HR+ tumors (12/45, 26.7%). In contrast, patients with less than PR in either breast or axillary lymph nodes showed numerically lower rate pCR in TNBC (7/18, 38.9%) and HR+ tumors (3/18, 16.7%). However, 15/23 (65.2%) patients with HER2+ tumors achieved pCR despite having less than PR at midpoint MRI. Conclusions: Midpoint breast MRI may serve as an early predictor of pathological response, particularly in patients with iCR. Patients with less than PR, especially those with HR+ and TNBC, have lower chances of achieving pCR. These findings highlight the importance of considering additional therapies for these subgroups of patients to improve the treatment outcomes, as they are less likely to achieve pCR with the current standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen.

Aims . To identify the most common reasons for consultation to a large specialty breast pathology service at a major institution. To provide insight into the overall challenges in practicing breast pathology. Methods . The anatomic pathology database at one institution was searched for all breast consultations received in 2021, excluding in-house patients and patients who were transferring care. Results . A total of 553 patients met the criteria ( n = 553) from a variety of academic and private practices. For each patient, the paperwork from the submitting institution was reviewed to identify the specific question, and subsequently classified into 14 categories. The reason for the consultation request was not provided for 78 (14%) patients, and a review of the outside diagnoses, where applicable, was performed. In summary, the top 5 reasons for consultation were: (1) assistance with classification of atypical intraductal epithelial proliferations (32%); (2) evaluation for the presence of (micro-)invasive carcinoma (14%); (3) evaluation of fibroepithelial (12%), (4) papillary (11%), and (5) spindle cell lesions (7%). Conclusion . We show an ongoing educational and practice gap for pathologists who most commonly struggle with classifying atypical precursor lesions, specifically when these are small and focal, or bordering on intraductal carcinoma (32%, 177/553). The second most common reason for consultation was classifying invasive carcinomas as microinvasive and subtypes (total of 20.4%, 113/553). As such, our data supports the continued need for rigid and clear criteria for diagnosing threshold lesions (namely atypical hyperplasias) and intraductal carcinoma of the breast.

NGS used to diagnose and treat NSCLC patient with initial concern for metaplastic breast cancer

Abstract Background Metaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC) is an unusual malignancy that presents a diagnostic challenge due to the presence of varying cytomorphologies that can be seen in benign and malignant tumors. We posit that metastatic disease to the breast, itself an uncommon entity, should be considered in the differential diagnosis of MBC. We report a unique case of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with an actionable driver mutation that presented as a symptomatic breast mass and was initially considered to represent MBC. Report A 74-year-old woman with a 22-pack-year smoking history presented to the breast clinic complaining of a palpable left breast mass that had grown rapidly over the previous month. Ultrasound-guided biopsy of the breast mass revealed high-grade poorly differentiated carcinoma. On immunohistochemical (IHC) evaluation, tumor cells were strongly positive for epithelial markers CAM5.2 and keratin AE1/AE3, weakly positive for breast cancer (BC) marker TRPS1, and negative for BC marker GATA3, squamous cell carcinoma markers p63 and CK5, and melanoma marker SOX10. Metaplastic triple-negative BC was diagnosed. However, concern remained for metastasis from a non-breast primary tumor due to the patient’s constitutional symptoms such as fatigue, night sweats, and 60-pound unintentional weight loss over the previous year, as well as interval development of a suspicious nodular rash on her right upper extremity. An FDG-PET-CT was obtained and demonstrated a hypermetabolic left lung consolidation (maximum SUV 33.3) measuring 7.2 cm, pulmonary nodules, and extensive thoracic lymphadenopathy. Due to rising suspicion for a primary lung tumor, additional IHC staining on the original breast biopsy was requested. Tumor cells were positive for TTF-1, consistent with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Tissue next-generation sequencing (NGS) identified a MET exon 14 skipping mutation, making the patient eligible for treatment with capmatinib, a first-line kinase inhibitor targeted therapy for metastatic NSCLC. At the time of this report, the patient has completed a course of palliative stereotactic body radiation therapy to the left lung and started capmatinib 400 mg BID, which she is tolerating well. Her first restaging scans after treatment initiation will be obtained one week after the time of this report. Conclusion In the absence of heightened suspicion for a non-breast primary tumor, our patient had initially received a diagnosis of triple-negative MBC. This diagnosis would have exposed her to increased treatment-related toxicities from cytotoxic chemotherapy and poor prognosis from MBC without survival benefit from targeted therapy for NSCLC. We advocate for the use of supplemental body imaging, expert and comprehensive IHC evaluation, and multidisciplinary discussion in cases of MBC and undifferentiated breast malignancy to facilitate accurate diagnosis and treatment. Citation Format: Tanmayi Pai, Marte Wasserman, Jason Lewis, Miglena Komforti, James Jakub, Augustine Lee, Yanyan Lou, Pooja Advani, Rohit Rao. Metastatic Lung Cancer Masquerading as Metaplastic Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-20-08.

Papillary carcinoma of the breast is a rare histologic subtype of invasive breast cancer. In contrast, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a noninvasive, nonobligate precursor to invasive mammary carcinoma, confined within the terminal duct lobular unit of the breast and surrounded by an intact myoepithelial cell layer at the stromal/epithelial interface. We present an unusual case in which a patient with only DCIS of the breast exhibited papillary carcinoma within a sentinel lymph node, leading to questions about the origin of the lymph node lesion—whether it represents a true metastasis or iatrogenic displacement during diagnostic procedures. This case underscores the diagnostic challenges and clinical implications associated with such rare presentations.

Context.— The Nottingham Grading System (NGS) developed by Elston and Ellis is used to grade invasive breast cancer (IBC). Glandular (acinar)/tubule formation is a component of NGS. Objective.— To investigate the ability of pathologists to identify individual structures that should be classified as glandular (acinar)/tubule formation. Design.— A total of 58 hematoxylin-eosin photographic images of IBC with 1 structure circled were classified as tubules (41 cases) or nontubules (17 cases) by Professor Ellis. Images were sent as a PowerPoint (Microsoft) file to breast pathologists, who were provided with the World Health Organization definition of a tubule and asked to determine if a circled structure represented a tubule. Results.— Among 35 pathologists, the κ statistic for assessing agreement in evaluating the 58 images was 0.324 (95% CI, 0.314–0.335). The median concordance rate between a participating pathologist and Professor Ellis was 94.1% for evaluating 17 nontubule cases and 53.7% for 41 tubule cases. A total of 41% of the tubule cases were classified correctly by less than 50% of pathologists. Structures classified as tubules by Professor Ellis but often not recognized as tubules by pathologists included glands with complex architecture, mucinous carcinoma, and the “inverted tubule” pattern of micropapillary carcinoma. A total of 80% of participants reported that they did not have clarity on what represented a tubule. Conclusions.— We identified structures that should be included as tubules but that were not readily identified by pathologists. Greater concordance for identification of tubules might be obtained by providing more detailed images and descriptions of the types of structures included as tubules.