Downs, Erinn

A 64-year-old Asian woman diagnosed with synchronous breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and stage IV EGFR-mutated non-small cell carcinoma of the lung (NSCLC). A decision was made to defer management of the DCIS and initiate Osimertinib for lung cancer treatment, since this was a life-limiting diagnosis. At 9 months, restaging FDG-PET CT showed an interval response in the NSCLC and complete loss of FDG avidity at the biopsy-proven DCIS site. Breast MRI confirmed complete imaging resolution of the DCIS. The clinical resolution of breast DCIS during third-generation EGFR inhibitor therapy has not been previously reported in humans and highlights a potential role for the EGFR/HER2 (ERBB) pathway in pre-invasive breast cancer.

Pleomorphic adenoma of the breast is a rare tumor, with fewer than 100 patients described in the English literature, mainly as case reports and small case series. Histologically, breast pleomorphic adenoma resembles its more common salivary gland counterpart; however, it can present diagnostic challenges, particularly on core needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration. The differential diagnosis includes benign and malignant tumors, which carry major treatment implications, from the extent of surgical intervention to the potential use of chemotherapy. Herein we describe a tumor that was initially diagnosed as a triple-negative matrix-producing metaplastic carcinoma, but a secondary review led to the diagnosis of pleomorphic adenoma of the breast. Prior to the secondary review, the patient underwent an excisional biopsy, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and one round of chemotherapy. This report adds to the limited literature surrounding this entity and discusses the differential diagnosis along with histopathologic and immunohistochemical findings that aid in the diagnosis and reviews the radiologic findings observed throughout the patient's clinical course. This patient underscores the difficulty of diagnosis and highlights the need for multidisciplinary consideration and communication to avoid overtreatment.

Aims . To identify the most common reasons for consultation to a large specialty breast pathology service at a major institution. To provide insight into the overall challenges in practicing breast pathology. Methods . The anatomic pathology database at one institution was searched for all breast consultations received in 2021, excluding in-house patients and patients who were transferring care. Results . A total of 553 patients met the criteria ( n = 553) from a variety of academic and private practices. For each patient, the paperwork from the submitting institution was reviewed to identify the specific question, and subsequently classified into 14 categories. The reason for the consultation request was not provided for 78 (14%) patients, and a review of the outside diagnoses, where applicable, was performed. In summary, the top 5 reasons for consultation were: (1) assistance with classification of atypical intraductal epithelial proliferations (32%); (2) evaluation for the presence of (micro-)invasive carcinoma (14%); (3) evaluation of fibroepithelial (12%), (4) papillary (11%), and (5) spindle cell lesions (7%). Conclusion . We show an ongoing educational and practice gap for pathologists who most commonly struggle with classifying atypical precursor lesions, specifically when these are small and focal, or bordering on intraductal carcinoma (32%, 177/553). The second most common reason for consultation was classifying invasive carcinomas as microinvasive and subtypes (total of 20.4%, 113/553). As such, our data supports the continued need for rigid and clear criteria for diagnosing threshold lesions (namely atypical hyperplasias) and intraductal carcinoma of the breast.

e13156 Background: Breast Cancer (BC) patients are classified as HER2-positive (IHC3+ or IHC2+/ISH+) or HER2-negative (IHC0, IHC1+ and 2+/ISH-). Within the HER2-negative category, patients who meet HER2-low (IHC1+ or IHC2+/ISH-) criteria can benefit from HER2 targeted therapy like trastuzumab deruxtecan. Patients who meet IHC0 criteria with incomplete and faint membrane staining in >0 but ≤10% of tumor cells — defined as “HER2 Ultra-low”, may also benefit from HER2 targeted therapy. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” expression based on re-scored HER2 IHC biopsy slides. Methods: This study utilized EHR data from all three US Mayo Clinic campuses. A total of 300 patients with advanced BC (stages III-IV), and clinically documented HER2 IHC0 status between Jan 2017 and Jan 2023, were identified. One biopsy slide per patient (IHC assay: VENTANA Pathway anti-HER2/neu (4B5) rabbit monoclonal primary antibody) was digitized and scanned at 40x magnification. Two Mayo Clinic pathologists independently scored and reported HER2 status according to 2023 ASCO-CAP guidelines and included tumor stain percentage for each slide. Patients were considered “HER2 Ultra-Low” if their slide was scored as IHC0 with >0% but ≤10% staining. Cohen’s κ was used to quantify agreement between pathologists. Results: The re-scored patients (n=300) had a mean age of 57.8 years (SD=13.5), with ~97% having IHC0 documentation within 30 days of the reviewed biopsy slide. A total of 285 (95%) patients remained classified as IHC0 by at least one pathologist. Of these, 60% (n=171) were determined as “HER2 Ultra-low” by at least one pathologist. The rate of “HER2 Ultra-Low” per pathologist ranged from 43% (n=121) to 45% (n=104). The overall inter-pathologist concordance was 57%; patients with no observable HER2 IHC staining accounted for majority of the concordant patients (Table). Conclusions: About 3 in 5 advanced BC patients originally classified as HER2 IHC0 met the “HER2 Ultra-Low” criteria by at least one pathologist, implying that significant number of additional patients may benefit from HER2 targeted therapy. The relatively low concordance between HER2 expert pathologists in identifying lower levels of HER2 expression suggests the need for increased precision enabled by digital tools, leveraging AI, training for community practice pathologists, and continuing to follow best practice recommendations in determining HER2 IHC status. [Table: see text]

Introduction: Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a fibroblastic tumor with malignant potential that is underpinned by a recurrent inv12(q13q13)-derived NAB2::STAT6 fusion. Breast and axilla are uncommon locations for this entity. Methods: Records of two academic institutions were electronically searched for breast and axillary SFTs. Clinical and pathologic data were reviewed. Literature review for breast or axillary SFTs was performed. Present study and previously reported tumors were stratified using five SFT risk models: original and modified Demicco metastatic risk, Salas local recurrence risk, Salas metastatic risk, and Thompson local recurrence risk. Results: Five patients with breast or axillary SFT were identified. Median age was 49 years, and median follow-up (available for four patients) was 82 months. Three patients showed no evidence of disease, and one developed recurrence. Literature review identified 58 patients with breast or axillary SFT. Median age was 54 years, and median follow-up (available for 35 patients) was 24 months. Thirty-one patients showed no evidence of disease, three developed recurrence, and one developed metastasis. Original and modified Demicco models and Thompson model showed the highest sensitivity; original and modified Demicco models and Salas metastatic risk model demonstrated the highest specificity. Kaplan–Meier models were used to assess recurrence-free probability (RFP). Original and modified Demicco models predicted RFP when stratified by “low risk” and “moderate/intermediate and high risk” tumor, though sample size was small. Conclusions: While many SFTs of breast and axilla remain indolent, a subset may develop recurrence and rarely metastasize. The modified Demicco risk model demonstrated optimal performance characteristics.

AimsDue to its rarity and non‐specific clinical and pathological features, low‐grade adenosquamous carcinoma (LGASC) of the breast continues to pose diagnostic challenges. Unlike other triple‐negative breast carcinomas, LGASC tends to have an indolent clinical behaviour. It is essential to recognise this lesion for accurate diagnosis and appropriate management.Methods and resultsTwenty‐five cases of LGASC were identified in our archives and collaborating institutes. Cases of LGASC with dominant coexisting other type carcinomas were excluded. We studied the clinical presentation, morphological features, patterns of the commonly used immunohistochemical stains and follow‐up. In our cohort, LGASC was commonly located at the outer aspect of the breast and associated with intraductal papilloma. The morphology of LGASC is characterised by infiltrating small glands and nests with variable squamous differentiation. We also found cuffing desmoplastic (fibrolamellar) stromal change in 75% of patients and peripheral lymphocytic aggregates in 87.5% of patients. P63 and smooth muscle myosin (SMM) were the most common myoepithelial markers used to assist in diagnosis. P63 often stained peripheral tumour cells surrounding invasive glands (circumferential staining in 80% of the cases), mimicking myoepithelial cells. It also stained the small nests with squamous differentiation. However, SMM was negative in 63% of the cases. The vast majority of our cases were triple‐negative; only a few had focal and weak expressions of ER and PR. One patient who did not have excision developed lymph node metastasis. Most patients underwent excision or mastectomy with negative margins as surgical treatment; there were no recurrences or metastases in these patients with clinical follow‐ups up to 108 months.ConclusionsLGASC has some unique, although not entirely specific, morphological features and immunohistochemical staining patterns. Fibrolamellar stromal change, peripheral lymphocytic aggregates and variable staining of p63 and SMM are valuable features to facilitate the diagnosis.