Abstract Objective β-Catenin–mutated hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) carry an increased malignant transformation risk and are screened by interpreting glutamine synthetase (GS) and β-catenin by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Our study aims to assess GS and β-catenin interpretation guidelines for applicability and reproducibility in predicting high-risk HCA and other relevant molecular alterations. Methods Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), β-catenin, GS, and CD34 stains from 75 HCAs were interpreted by three pathologists using Method A (GS interpretation: negative, perivenular patchy, map-like, diffuse, and indeterminate) and Method B criteria (similar GS interpretation scheme based on a recent publication, with and without CD34 expression patterns). Ease of application and interpretation confidence level were assessed. High-risk IHC was defined as nuclear β-catenin and/or diffuse homogeneous GS. Molecular testing was performed on a subset of HCAs and controls. Results There were 57 resections and 18 biopsy specimens examined. Methods A and B (GS only) were rated as easy to apply, with high interpretation confidence (≥90% using both methods). Consensus rate was comparable in biopsy specimens (100% for both methods) and resections (88% for Method A, 93% for Method B). While the same cases were stratified into high-risk GS categories using both systems, clinically significant genetic alterations (TERT promoter, EGFR, MTOR, and TP53) were identified in 25% of cases stratified as not high risk by IHC. Conclusions Both methods have a similar ease of application and level of interpretation confidence, and they also detected β-catenin mutations as expected. Other relevant molecular alterations associated with risk of neoplastic progression and/or bleeding were detected in 25% of HCAs with the non-high-risk IHC phenotype, suggesting the value of molecular testing in this subset.
Increased Exacerbations and Hospitalizations Among PI[asterisk]MZ Compared to PI[asterisk]MM Individuals: An Electronic Health Record Analysis
Abstract RATIONALE The best described endotype of COPD is alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency, which is due to a genetic abnormality in the SERPINA1 gene. Homozygotes for the Z allele (PI[asterisk]ZZ individuals) carry the genotype most commonly associated with severe AAT deficiency, but a highly prevalent endotype is the heterozygous state (PI[asterisk]MZ individuals). Here we test the hypothesis that individuals with PI[asterisk]MZ genotype are at higher risk for COPD exacerbation and healthcare utilization compared to those with no pathogenic variants in the SERPINA1 gene (PI[asterisk]MM individuals). METHODS Real-world data on 4,456 individuals with available AAT genotyping were extracted from the Cleveland Clinic Health System (CCHS) electronic health records (EHR) and analyzed to compare the risk of moderate COPD exacerbation (defined as a short-term steroid prescription), all-cause emergent care (defined as an express care visit, urgent care visit, or emergency department visit), and all-cause hospitalization between individuals with PI[asterisk]MZ vs. PI[asterisk]MM genotypes. Cox proportional hazards models were used to adjust for age, sex, race, BMI, smoking status, comorbidity count, liver disease diagnosis, and median income by zip code.To assess the effect of AAT levels on outcomes, we categorized participants into three groups based on AAT level and used 90 mg/dL as a threshold given it is the lower limit of the normal reference range and genotype: MM individuals with an AAT level >90 mg/dL, MZ >90 mg/dL and MZ <90 mg/dL. To assess the effect of PI[asterisk]MZ genotype among individuals with pre-existing lung disease, we performed a subgroup analysis of individuals with at least a six-month inhaler prescription. RESULTS In this cohort, 308 individuals had a PI[asterisk]MZ genotype. PI[asterisk]MZ was associated with increased risk for moderate COPD exacerbations (adjusted HR [95% CI]: 1.66 [1.27, 2.17]) and hospitalizations (adjusted HR [95% CI]: 1.44 [1.19, 1.75]) compared to PI[asterisk]MM. The risk of hospitalization was higher among PI[asterisk]MZ individuals with AAT levels <90 mg/dL (adjusted HR [95% CI]: 1.59 [1.14, 2.23]) but not in those with AAT levels >90 mg/dL, as compared to PI[asterisk]MM. Sensitivity analysis in those treated with inhaler therapy showed overall similar results. CONCLUSIONS Increased hospitalizations and moderate COPD exacerbations among PI[asterisk]MZ individuals compared to PI[asterisk]MM individuals merit future prospective studies to better characterize the longitudinal course and healthcare utilization among those with an PI[asterisk]MZ genotype. Given the high prevalence of these carriers globally, PI[asterisk]MZ represents a COPD phenotype that invites additional investigation to identify biomarkers of worse disease and treatable traits.
ALK‐rearranged, CD34‐positive spindle cell neoplasms resembling dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a study of seven cases
AimsThe majority of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) harbour PDGFB or PDGFD rearrangements. We encountered ALK expression/rearrangement in a PDGFB/D‐negative CD34‐positive spindle cell neoplasm with features similar to DFSP, prompting evaluation of ALK‐rearrangements in DFSP and plaque‐like CD34‐positive dermal fibroma (P‐LDF).Methods and ResultsWe searched the archives of academic institutions for cases previously coded as DFSP and P‐LDF. NGS‐naïve or PDGFB‐negative DFSP were screened for ALK (clone D5F3) expression by immunohistochemistry. NGS or ALK FISH was performed on ALK‐positive cases. Methylome profiling studies were performed and compared with conventional DFSP. One case of “DFSP” and two “P‐LDF” with ALK expression were identified from the archives, while four cases were detected prospectively. These seven cases (6F:1M; 8 months to 76 years) arose in the dermis of the arm (two), scalp, eyelid, thigh, abdomen, and shoulder and ranged from 0.4 to 4.2 cm. Tumours were composed of spindled cells and displayed a storiform growth pattern. Cytologic atypia was absent, and mitotic figures were scarce (0–2/10 HPFs, high power fields). The lesional cells were diffusely positive for CD34 and ALK and negative for S100 protein. By NGS (n = 5), ALK fusion partners included DCTN1 (2), PLEKHH2, and CLIP2 in DFSP‐like cases and FLNA in P‐LDF‐like lesions. ALK FISH was positive in one (of two) cases previously labelled P‐LDF. Methylome profiling of two (of three) ALK‐rearranged DFSP‐like tumours showed clustering with conventional DFSP in the UMAP dimension reduction plot. To date, no tumour has recurred (n = 2; 26, 27 months).ConclusionWe describe a cohort of novel ALK‐rearranged tumours with morphologic features similar to DFSP.
Solitary Fibrous Tumor of Breast and Axilla: Clinicopathological Profile of Five Tumors With Comparison of Risk Stratification Models
Introduction: Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a fibroblastic tumor with malignant potential that is underpinned by a recurrent inv12(q13q13)-derived NAB2::STAT6 fusion. Breast and axilla are uncommon locations for this entity. Methods: Records of two academic institutions were electronically searched for breast and axillary SFTs. Clinical and pathologic data were reviewed. Literature review for breast or axillary SFTs was performed. Present study and previously reported tumors were stratified using five SFT risk models: original and modified Demicco metastatic risk, Salas local recurrence risk, Salas metastatic risk, and Thompson local recurrence risk. Results: Five patients with breast or axillary SFT were identified. Median age was 49 years, and median follow-up (available for four patients) was 82 months. Three patients showed no evidence of disease, and one developed recurrence. Literature review identified 58 patients with breast or axillary SFT. Median age was 54 years, and median follow-up (available for 35 patients) was 24 months. Thirty-one patients showed no evidence of disease, three developed recurrence, and one developed metastasis. Original and modified Demicco models and Thompson model showed the highest sensitivity; original and modified Demicco models and Salas metastatic risk model demonstrated the highest specificity. Kaplan–Meier models were used to assess recurrence-free probability (RFP). Original and modified Demicco models predicted RFP when stratified by “low risk” and “moderate/intermediate and high risk” tumor, though sample size was small. Conclusions: While many SFTs of breast and axilla remain indolent, a subset may develop recurrence and rarely metastasize. The modified Demicco risk model demonstrated optimal performance characteristics.
Individuals With the PI[asterisk]MZ and PI[asterisk]MS Genotypes Have Similar Prevalence of Liver and Lung Disease in an EHR-based Cohort Study
PRRX1–NCOA1‐rearranged fibroblastic tumour: a clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and molecular genetic study of six cases of a potentially under‐recognised, distinctive mesenchymal tumour
AimsPRRX1–NCOA1‐rearranged fibroblastic tumour is a recently described, rare mesenchymal tumour. Only four cases have been previously reported. The aim of this article is to report six additional cases of this unusual mesenchymal neoplasm, with an emphasis on its differential diagnosis.Methods and resultsThe six cases were from three females and three males (age, 20–49 years; median, 42 years). Three tumours were located on the abdominal wall; two from the shoulder/axillary areas, and one on the lateral hip. All presented as slow‐growing subcutaneous nodules, ranging from 26 to 55 mm (median, 40 mm). The tumours consisted of circumscribed, variably cellular nodules composed of relatively bland plump spindled to epithelioid cells arranged singly, in cords, and occasionally in nests, embedded in hyalinised and collagenous stroma. Small hypocellular myxoid zones with ropey collagen fibres were present, as were irregularly dilated, gaping, crescent‐shaped or staghorn‐like thin‐walled vessels, best appreciated at the periphery. Immunohistochemistry for CD34, S100, MUC4 and STAT6 was consistently negative. RNA‐sequencing revealed PRRX1–NCOA1 fusions in all cases. Of the four cases with limited follow‐up (1.5–4 months), none recurred following local surgical excision.ConclusionsThe morphological features of PRRX1–NCOA1‐rearranged fibroblastic tumour overlap with those of RB1‐deficient soft‐tissue tumours, solitary fibrous tumour, and low‐grade fibromyxoid sarcoma/sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma. This differential diagnosis can be resolved with a combination of careful morphological study and the application of a panel of immunostains, although molecular genetic study is most definitive. The natural history of PRRX1–NCOA1‐rearranged fibroblastic tumour appears to be quite favourable, although longer‐term study of a larger number of cases is warranted.
Superficial sarcomas with CIC rearrangement are aggressive neoplasms: A series of eight cases
AbstractCIC rearranged sarcomas have significant overlap with Ewing sarcoma, are aggressive, and typically present in deep soft tissue. They most commonly have a t(4;19)(q35;q13) with CIC‐DUX4 fusion. Superficial presentation is rare. We report eight (6F, 2M; median 45‐years‐old, range 14‐65) superficial CIC‐rearranged sarcomas, involving the extremities (n = 4), vulva (n = 2), and trunk (n = 2). The tumors were composed of nodules/sheets of round cells with necrosis and hemorrhage separated by dense hyaline bands. Tumor cells had vesicular chromatin, prominent nucleoli and frequent mitotic figures. One showed pagetoid spread. Targeted next‐generation sequencing was positive for CIC‐DUX4 fusion (6/6); fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was positive for CIC rearrangement (2/3). Eight of eight had evidence of CIC‐DUX4 fusion/rearrangement by molecular techniques. Immunohistochemistry was positive for CD99+ (8/8) and DUX4+ (4/4). FISH for EWSR1 rearrangement was negative (5/5). Of five patients with at least 6 months follow‐up, three of five died of disease, all within 2 years of presentation. One is alive with disease at 48 months. One is disease free at 3 months. Superficial CIC‐rearranged sarcomas should be considered in cases exhibiting features reminiscent of Ewing sarcoma, but with increased pleomorphism and/or geographic necrosis. In contrast to superficial Ewing sarcomas, superficial CIC‐rearranged sarcomas are aggressive.