Baumhoer, Daniel

Abstract Matrix-producing tumors of the sinonasal region are diagnostically challenging, with a large number of similar-appearing neoplasms having different prognoses, treatment strategies, and genetic syndrome associations. Osteochondromyxoma (OCM) is a very rare tumor known to be associated with Carney complex. Since its initial description in 2001, fewer than 20 cases have been reported, with the sinonasal tract being an apparently favored site. Herein we describe 6 new cases of sinonasal OCM.OCM cases with available slides were retrieved from the surgical pathology files of the authors’ practices. The tumors arose in 4 boys and 2 girls, ranging from 4 to 17 years (mean, 9.5 years). All presented with nasal obstruction and a mass. Radiologically the tumors presented as indolent-appearing, heterogeneous, calcified, expansile masses. Histologically the tumors all consisted of bland, normochromatic spindled to stellate cells in a myxoid to collagenized stroma, with variable amounts of cartilage and bone formation. Mitotic activity was very low and necrosis was absent. All demonstrated complete loss of PRKAR1A expression by immunohistochemistry. Of these 6 cases, 3 had been originally diagnosed as nasal chondromesenchymal hamartomas, and one as osteosarcoma. Treatment and follow up information were available for 5 patients: all were treated with surgery, with one also receiving chemotherapy after an initial osteosarcoma diagnosis. At the time of last clinical follow-up, all 5 patients were alive, one with residual disease. No patient was known to have other stigmata of Carney complex.Although rare, OCM preferentially occurs in the sinonasal tract, and therefore may be encountered by head and neck pathologists. Given their predilection for young patients and overlapping morphologic features, OCM are easily misdiagnosed as other matrix-forming sinonasal tumors, especially nasal chondromesenchymal hamartoma. Immunohistochemical demonstration of PRKAR1A loss is valuable for confirming an OCM diagnosis, which should prompt clinical investigation for the possibility of Carney complex.

ABSTRACTVarious cutaneous adnexal neoplasms have been associated with gene fusions as the main driver of their histogenesis, most of which showed poroid or hidradenomatous differentiation or represented other tumors of sweat glands. Recently, we encountered two cases of primitive basaloid neoplasms of predominantly folliculogenic/pilosebaceous origin, both surprisingly harboring recurrent EWSR1 rearrangements. Both tumors presented in young patients of either sex (1 F; 17 years; 1 M; 37 years) and involved the dermis and subcutaneous tissue of the abdominal wall (case 1) and the buttock (case 2). Histologically, the tumors were composed of primitive, basaloid cells with areas of keratinization (case 1) or foci of sebaceous differentiation (case 2) and stained strongly with keratins, p40 (case 1) or p63 (case 2), while lacking significant CD99 expression in both cases. Case 1 harbored an EWSR1::FLI1 fusion while case 2 harbored an EWSR1::PBX3 fusion. Clinical follow‐up was available for case 2 and showed no evidence of disease at 15 months of follow‐up. Methylation profiling showed case 1 to cluster with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, while case 2 was independent but positioned close to salivary gland epithelial‐myoepithelial carcinoma. These findings expand on the histopathologic and molecular genetic features of basaloid tumors with apparent adnexal differentiation and raise awareness to carefully interpret and correlate molecular findings with morphology and immunophenotype to avoid misinterpretation as a mesenchymal neoplasm.

AimsThe majority of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) harbour PDGFB or PDGFD rearrangements. We encountered ALK expression/rearrangement in a PDGFB/D‐negative CD34‐positive spindle cell neoplasm with features similar to DFSP, prompting evaluation of ALK‐rearrangements in DFSP and plaque‐like CD34‐positive dermal fibroma (P‐LDF).Methods and ResultsWe searched the archives of academic institutions for cases previously coded as DFSP and P‐LDF. NGS‐naïve or PDGFB‐negative DFSP were screened for ALK (clone D5F3) expression by immunohistochemistry. NGS or ALK FISH was performed on ALK‐positive cases. Methylome profiling studies were performed and compared with conventional DFSP. One case of “DFSP” and two “P‐LDF” with ALK expression were identified from the archives, while four cases were detected prospectively. These seven cases (6F:1M; 8 months to 76 years) arose in the dermis of the arm (two), scalp, eyelid, thigh, abdomen, and shoulder and ranged from 0.4 to 4.2 cm. Tumours were composed of spindled cells and displayed a storiform growth pattern. Cytologic atypia was absent, and mitotic figures were scarce (0–2/10 HPFs, high power fields). The lesional cells were diffusely positive for CD34 and ALK and negative for S100 protein. By NGS (n = 5), ALK fusion partners included DCTN1 (2), PLEKHH2, and CLIP2 in DFSP‐like cases and FLNA in P‐LDF‐like lesions. ALK FISH was positive in one (of two) cases previously labelled P‐LDF. Methylome profiling of two (of three) ALK‐rearranged DFSP‐like tumours showed clustering with conventional DFSP in the UMAP dimension reduction plot. To date, no tumour has recurred (n = 2; 26, 27 months).ConclusionWe describe a cohort of novel ALK‐rearranged tumours with morphologic features similar to DFSP.