Li, Xiaoxian

Abstract Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) presents a significant clinical challenge due to its heterogeneity and lack of targeted treatment options, with chemotherapy and immunotherapy combinations currently serving as the main therapeutic strategy. Efforts to address TNBC heterogeneity have largely focused on classifying intrinsic cancer subtypes based on differential tumor mRNA expression, a strategy that has proven effective in hormone receptor-positive breast cancers but has yet to yield a clinically useful predictor of survival or treatment response in TNBC. We hypothesize that both the intrinsic characteristics of TNBC and the surrounding immune microenvironment influence treatment outcomes and that immune cell infiltration affects TNBC subtype classification and response variability. To explore this hypothesis, we compared the predictive and prognostic capabilities of cancer subtype-based (TNBC-type) gene signatures and immune cell deconvolution methods (CIBERSORT) within the same TNBC datasets. We found that immune cell abundance outperformed TNBC subtype-signatures and multicellular immune cell aggregates showed the highest performance of all. More specifically, aggregate immune cells associated with tertiary lymphoid structures and tumor associated macrophages/monocytes demonstrated statistically significant predictive value. These findings were confirmed in an independent cohort of 67 TNBC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Further, single-cell RNA sequencing analysis revealed that the predictive power of cancer-subtype could be partially explained by immune- and stromal features. Examination of single-cell resolution spatial transcriptomic data confirmed presence of TLS-like, TAM- and cancer-stromal niches within TNBC biopsy samples that were associated with treatment response. Overall, our results highlight that immune cell aggregates, which capture the spatial organization of the TME, outperform cell-type specific gene signatures in predicting TNBC outcomes. Our novel approach provides a robust framework for interpreting spatial relationships in bulk RNA-seq data, offering a pathway for reconciling past data with current advancements in spatial profiling technologies. This work paves the way for future studies to leverage the multi-cellular complexity of TNBC, enhancing diagnostic precision and facilitating the development of therapies that strategically modulate the tumor microenvironment for improved anti-cancer responses.

Abstract Recent advances in the field of immuno‐oncology have brought transformative changes in the management of cancer patients. The immune profile of tumours has been found to have key value in predicting disease prognosis and treatment response in various cancers. Multiplex immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence have emerged as potent tools for the simultaneous detection of multiple protein biomarkers in a single tissue section, thereby expanding opportunities for molecular and immune profiling while preserving tissue samples. By establishing the phenotype of individual tumour cells when distributed within a mixed cell population, the identification of clinically relevant biomarkers with high‐throughput multiplex immunophenotyping of tumour samples has great potential to guide appropriate treatment choices. Moreover, the emergence of novel multi‐marker imaging approaches can now provide unprecedented insights into the tumour microenvironment, including the potential interplay between various cell types. However, there are significant challenges to widespread integration of these technologies in daily research and clinical practice. This review addresses the challenges and potential solutions within a structured framework of action from a regulatory and clinical trial perspective. New developments within the field of immunophenotyping using multiplexed tissue imaging platforms and associated digital pathology are also described, with a specific focus on translational implications across different subtypes of cancer. © 2024 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

AbstractQuantifying tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer tumors is a challenging task for pathologists. With the advent of whole slide imaging that digitizes glass slides, it is possible to apply computational models to quantify TILs for pathologists. Development of computational models requires significant time, expertise, consensus, and investment. To reduce this burden, we are preparing a dataset for developers to validate their models and a proposal to the Medical Device Development Tool (MDDT) program in the Center for Devices and Radiological Health of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). If the FDA qualifies the dataset for its submitted context of use, model developers can use it in a regulatory submission within the qualified context of use without additional documentation. Our dataset aims at reducing the regulatory burden placed on developers of models that estimate the density of TILs and will allow head‐to‐head comparison of multiple computational models on the same data. In this paper, we discuss the MDDT preparation and submission process, including the feedback we received from our initial interactions with the FDA and propose how a qualified MDDT validation dataset could be a mechanism for open, fair, and consistent measures of computational model performance. Our experiences will help the community understand what the FDA considers relevant and appropriate (from the perspective of the submitter), at the early stages of the MDDT submission process, for validating stromal TIL density estimation models and other potential computational models. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

Abstract Modern histologic imaging platforms coupled with machine learning methods have provided new opportunities to map the spatial distribution of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. However, there exists no standardized method for describing or analyzing spatial immune cell data, and most reported spatial analyses are rudimentary. In this review, we provide an overview of two approaches for reporting and analyzing spatial data (raster versus vector‐based). We then provide a compendium of spatial immune cell metrics that have been reported in the literature, summarizing prognostic associations in the context of a variety of cancers. We conclude by discussing two well‐described clinical biomarkers, the breast cancer stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes score and the colon cancer Immunoscore, and describe investigative opportunities to improve clinical utility of these spatial biomarkers. © 2023 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

AbstractThe clinical significance of the tumor‐immune interaction in breast cancer is now established, and tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have emerged as predictive and prognostic biomarkers for patients with triple‐negative (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2‐negative) breast cancer and HER2‐positive breast cancer. How computational assessments of TILs might complement manual TIL assessment in trial and daily practices is currently debated. Recent efforts to use machine learning (ML) to automatically evaluate TILs have shown promising results. We review state‐of‐the‐art approaches and identify pitfalls and challenges of automated TIL evaluation by studying the root cause of ML discordances in comparison to manual TIL quantification. We categorize our findings into four main topics: (1) technical slide issues, (2) ML and image analysis aspects, (3) data challenges, and (4) validation issues. The main reason for discordant assessments is the inclusion of false‐positive areas or cells identified by performance on certain tissue patterns or design choices in the computational implementation. To aid the adoption of ML for TIL assessment, we provide an in‐depth discussion of ML and image analysis, including validation issues that need to be considered before reliable computational reporting of TILs can be incorporated into the trial and routine clinical management of patients with triple‐negative breast cancer. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

AimsDue to its rarity and non‐specific clinical and pathological features, low‐grade adenosquamous carcinoma (LGASC) of the breast continues to pose diagnostic challenges. Unlike other triple‐negative breast carcinomas, LGASC tends to have an indolent clinical behaviour. It is essential to recognise this lesion for accurate diagnosis and appropriate management.Methods and resultsTwenty‐five cases of LGASC were identified in our archives and collaborating institutes. Cases of LGASC with dominant coexisting other type carcinomas were excluded. We studied the clinical presentation, morphological features, patterns of the commonly used immunohistochemical stains and follow‐up. In our cohort, LGASC was commonly located at the outer aspect of the breast and associated with intraductal papilloma. The morphology of LGASC is characterised by infiltrating small glands and nests with variable squamous differentiation. We also found cuffing desmoplastic (fibrolamellar) stromal change in 75% of patients and peripheral lymphocytic aggregates in 87.5% of patients. P63 and smooth muscle myosin (SMM) were the most common myoepithelial markers used to assist in diagnosis. P63 often stained peripheral tumour cells surrounding invasive glands (circumferential staining in 80% of the cases), mimicking myoepithelial cells. It also stained the small nests with squamous differentiation. However, SMM was negative in 63% of the cases. The vast majority of our cases were triple‐negative; only a few had focal and weak expressions of ER and PR. One patient who did not have excision developed lymph node metastasis. Most patients underwent excision or mastectomy with negative margins as surgical treatment; there were no recurrences or metastases in these patients with clinical follow‐ups up to 108 months.ConclusionsLGASC has some unique, although not entirely specific, morphological features and immunohistochemical staining patterns. Fibrolamellar stromal change, peripheral lymphocytic aggregates and variable staining of p63 and SMM are valuable features to facilitate the diagnosis.