Halama, Niels

Abstract Recent advances in the field of immuno‐oncology have brought transformative changes in the management of cancer patients. The immune profile of tumours has been found to have key value in predicting disease prognosis and treatment response in various cancers. Multiplex immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence have emerged as potent tools for the simultaneous detection of multiple protein biomarkers in a single tissue section, thereby expanding opportunities for molecular and immune profiling while preserving tissue samples. By establishing the phenotype of individual tumour cells when distributed within a mixed cell population, the identification of clinically relevant biomarkers with high‐throughput multiplex immunophenotyping of tumour samples has great potential to guide appropriate treatment choices. Moreover, the emergence of novel multi‐marker imaging approaches can now provide unprecedented insights into the tumour microenvironment, including the potential interplay between various cell types. However, there are significant challenges to widespread integration of these technologies in daily research and clinical practice. This review addresses the challenges and potential solutions within a structured framework of action from a regulatory and clinical trial perspective. New developments within the field of immunophenotyping using multiplexed tissue imaging platforms and associated digital pathology are also described, with a specific focus on translational implications across different subtypes of cancer. © 2024 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Abstract Modern histologic imaging platforms coupled with machine learning methods have provided new opportunities to map the spatial distribution of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. However, there exists no standardized method for describing or analyzing spatial immune cell data, and most reported spatial analyses are rudimentary. In this review, we provide an overview of two approaches for reporting and analyzing spatial data (raster versus vector‐based). We then provide a compendium of spatial immune cell metrics that have been reported in the literature, summarizing prognostic associations in the context of a variety of cancers. We conclude by discussing two well‐described clinical biomarkers, the breast cancer stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes score and the colon cancer Immunoscore, and describe investigative opportunities to improve clinical utility of these spatial biomarkers. © 2023 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

AbstractThe clinical significance of the tumor‐immune interaction in breast cancer is now established, and tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have emerged as predictive and prognostic biomarkers for patients with triple‐negative (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2‐negative) breast cancer and HER2‐positive breast cancer. How computational assessments of TILs might complement manual TIL assessment in trial and daily practices is currently debated. Recent efforts to use machine learning (ML) to automatically evaluate TILs have shown promising results. We review state‐of‐the‐art approaches and identify pitfalls and challenges of automated TIL evaluation by studying the root cause of ML discordances in comparison to manual TIL quantification. We categorize our findings into four main topics: (1) technical slide issues, (2) ML and image analysis aspects, (3) data challenges, and (4) validation issues. The main reason for discordant assessments is the inclusion of false‐positive areas or cells identified by performance on certain tissue patterns or design choices in the computational implementation. To aid the adoption of ML for TIL assessment, we provide an in‐depth discussion of ML and image analysis, including validation issues that need to be considered before reliable computational reporting of TILs can be incorporated into the trial and routine clinical management of patients with triple‐negative breast cancer. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Aim Preclinical evidence suggests that oxidized macrophage migration inhibitory factor (oxMIF) may be involved in carcinogenesis. This phase 1 study (NCT01765790) assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and antitumour activity of imalumab, an oxMIF inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer using ‘3 + 3’ dose escalation. Methods In Schedule 1, patients with solid tumours received doses from 1 to 50 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks. In Schedule 2, patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, non‐small‐cell lung, or ovarian cancer received weekly doses of 10 or 25 mg/kg IV (1 cycle = 28 days). Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, dose‐limiting toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Results Fifty of 68 enrolled patients received imalumab. The most common treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs) included fatigue (10%) and vomiting (6%); four grade 3 serious TRAEs (two patients) occurred. The dose‐limiting toxicity was allergic alveolitis (one patient, 50 mg/kg every 2 weeks). The maximum tolerated and biologically active doses were 37.5 mg/kg every 2 weeks and 10 mg/kg weekly, respectively. Of 39 assessed patients, 13 had stable disease (≥4 months in 8 patients). Conclusions Imalumab had a maximum tolerated dose of 37.5 mg/kg every 2 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours, with a biologically active dose of 10 mg/kg weekly. Further investigation will help define the role of oxMIF as a cancer treatment target.

Abstract Background: MIF is a pleiotropic cytokine involved in tumor proliferation, invasiveness, angiogenesis, and the proinflammatory microenvironment. oxMIF is the pathogenic form mainly in tumor and its surrounding stroma. Imalumab (BAX69) is a novel recombinant, fully-human, monoclonal antibody that targets oxMIF, inhibiting tumorigenesis. Preclinical data demonstrated that imalumab has antitumor activities and acceptable toxicities. Methods: The primary endpoint of this dose-escalation study (3+3 design) was to assess maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The secondary endpoints were to assess antitumor activity, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD). Patients (pts) received intravenous (IV) imalumab [28-d cycles; 2 dose schedules (DS)]: biweekly in all solid tumors (DS1); weekly in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), metastatic ovarian cancer (OvCa) and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (DS2). Results: As of July 1 2015, 48 pts were treated in this study. DS1 = 19 pts in 6 cohorts (1, 3, 10, 25, 37.5, and 50 mg/kg), and DS2 = 29 pts in 2 cohorts (10 and 25 mg/kg) including expansion (10 mg/kg) into mCRC, OvCa and NSCLC. AUC and Cmax increased with dose. Dose escalation was stopped at 50 mg/kg (DS1) and 25mg/kg (DS2). An MTD was not reached for either DS. One pt reported dose-limiting toxicities: hypersensitivity pneumonitis (DS1; 50 mg/kg). There were no other grade 3 and 4 treatment related adverse events (trAEs). Grade 2 trAEs include: fatigue (n = 2), constipation (n = 1), peripheral edema (n = 1), infusion reaction (n = 1), and urticaria (n = 1). Stable disease (SD) ?4 mo was seen in 7 heavily pre-treated pts, including 1 pt with NSCLC who achieved SD for 13.4 mo. In DS2; Pre- and on-therapy tumor biopsies showed satisfactory tissue penetration of imalumab resulting in target saturation in all biopsy evaluable patients in all 3 tumor types. Biopsies revealed regulation of PI3K-AKT-mTOR downstream signaling, TNF-α signaling, anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1 and IL-10), and apoptosis. Based on clinical PK and PD study, 10mg/kg weekly was considered a biologically active dose and sufficient to reach ?95% target binding by the end of first cycle. Conclusions: Imalumab was well tolerated and showed single agent antitumor activity in heavily pretreated pts. An MTD was not reached. Recommended phase II dose (RP2D) is 10 mg/kg IV weekly. NCT01765790 Citation Format: Devalingam Mahalingam, Manish R. Patel, Jasgit C. Sachdev, Lowell L. Hart, Niels Halama, Ramesh K. Ramanathan, John Sarantopoulos, Xiaochun Liu, Salim Yazji, Dirk Jaeger, Deyaa Adib, Randolf Kerschbaumer, Apostolia Maria Tsimberidou. First-in-human phase 1 study assessing imalumab (BAX69), an anti-oxidized macrophage migration inhibitory factor (oxMIF) antibody in advanced solid tumors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr CT046.

Abstract The extent of T cell infiltrates in the primary tumor is one of the most important prognostic factors in colorectal cancer (CRC). Still, a putative causal role of T cell infiltrates for prolonged patient survival remains unclear. To answer this question, we studied the presence and functional activity of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) together with their specificity in CRC patients and correlated the obtained results to long term survival. We have utilized intracytoplasmic cytokine staining, conjointly with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)- multimers loaded with peptides derived from tumor antigen (TA), as well as antigen specific cytokine secretion assays, to demonstrate that tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) expression characterizes a population of TA specific, in situ active cytotoxic T cells. TNFα was increased in CRC tumors only when patients develop spontaneous systemic T cell responses, as elucidated by IFN-γ Elispot, and this increase correlated with the number of TNFα expressing tumor infiltrating T cells. Based on these observations we concluded that intratumoral TNFα can be a direct indicator of the in situ functionality of tumor specific effector T cells in CRC. In accordance, intratumoral TNFα concentration was an independent long term prognostic factor in a retrospective multivariate analysis of a cohort of 102 CRC patients involving various other immune parameters, such as CD4+, CD8+ T cell infiltration, presence of regulatory T cells or mast cells. In conclusion, our findings provide evidence for a causal relationship between T cell infiltrates and improved survival in CRC patients as the prognostic impact of T cell infiltrates depends on small subpopulations of in situ active TA specific T cells. Furthermore TNFα, as an indicator for the functionality of TIL, might be better and more accurate prognostic parameter in CRC than mere T cell infiltration. Citation Format: Slava Stamova, Christoph Reissfelder, Christina Gossmann, Marion Braun, Andreas Bonertz, Ute Walliczek, Moritz Koch, Axel Benner, Dirk Jäger, Niels Halama, Khashayarsha Khazaie, Jürgen Weitz, Philipp Beckhove. In situ activity of tumor specific CTL is a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 1283. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-1283