McKinley, Blake

Background: Spinal epidural abscesses (SEA) are rare, occurring 2.5–3 times per 10,000 hospital admissions. While streptococcus species comprise 7% of reported SEAs, Group A Streptococcus (GAS) has been described only once in the medical literature to our knowledge. Case presentation: We present a case of GAS pharyngitis with subsequent paraplegia from a GAS SEA. A 33-year-old female presented to the emergency department (ED) and was initially diagnosed with GAS pharyngitis and a suspected strained lower back. Following treatment with amoxicillin, she returned with worsened back pain, radiculopathy, and leukocytosis, for which she was treated with cyclobenzaprine. On her third presentation, she had new bilateral lower extremity weakness with decreased sensation, bilateral ankle clonus, and hyperreflexia. MRI of the thoracic and lumbar spine revealed a multiloculated SEA at T5-T10 requiring laminectomy and abscess evacuation. Intraoperative cultures grew Streptococcus pyogenes. Despite surgery, medical management, and physical therapy, she remained paraplegic. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first report of SEA preceded by GAS pharyngitis. This case exposes the critical association between a recent infection, progression of back pain, eventual neurologic symptoms, and inflammatory markers that should trigger concern for SEA and early evaluation with MRI.

NGS used to diagnose and treat NSCLC patient with initial concern for metaplastic breast cancer

Abstract We present a 54-year-old White male with a diagnosis of stage IV pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma. Next-generation sequencing of the tumor/blood identified a complex tumor genome, which included a rearranged during transfection (RET) gene fusion. The patient initially received cytotoxic chemotherapy with a significant radiographic response. After 4 cycles of chemotherapy, the patient was transitioned to a clinical trial using selpercatinib, a RET inhibitor, as maintenance therapy. Unfortunately, our patient developed progression of disease at the first treatment monitoring scan. Our patient suffered primary resistance to RET-targeted therapy. Proposed mechanisms of resistance include intrinsic resistance of the nuclear receptor co-activator 4-RET fusion to RET inhibition, the RET fusion representing a passenger alteration to another tumorigenic driver pathway and/or decreased efficacy of RET inhibition after platinum-based chemotherapy. Our patient’s clinical course highlights the fact that “actionable” genomic alterations do not always equate to patient benefit.

e24104 Background: There is a high rate of anemia present in cancer patients and anemia is also a common referral to a hematologist. Symptomatic anemia can significantly impair an individual’s functional status so identifying its cause is essential for improving quality of life. Correction of nutritional deficiencies, like iron, B12, and folate deficiency can improve hemoglobin counts, prevent recurrent PRBC transfusions, and can often resolve the anemia. In a busy academic hematology oncology practice, we hypothesize that it is easy to overlook performing a basic nutritional evaluation especially in the setting of other causes for anemia such as chemotherapy, hemolysis, blood loss, chronic kidney disease, and other disorders. We aim to evaluate the frequency of anemia workup in the hematology and oncology division at our academic institution. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of all hematology oncology patients seen in our clinic who received a blood transfusion in 2021. All patients were 18 years old or order and received at least one-unit PRBC transfusion as an outpatient. One “transfusion event” was defined as any number of PRBC transfusions on a single day and any subsequent transfusions within a 90-day periods. A single patient, therefore, can have multiple distinct transfusion events. We analyzed whether patients received a “basic” anemia evaluation, defined as checking ferritin, iron saturation, B12, and folate levels within 3 months before or after the first transfusion, and whether a discrepancy in practice patterns exists between different hematology oncology subspecialties. Results: At the interim analysis, we identified 368 transfusion events for 275 patients. Those events were ordered by providers (physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant) in the following subspecialties: oncology (n = 20), malignant hematology (n = 18), classical hematology (n = 3), and fellow-in-training (n = 5). A basic anemia workup was missing in 58% (84 of 146), 27% (49 of 183), 23% (8 of 35), 40% (2 of 5) in the above groups respectively. For patients with macrocytic anemia defined as mean corpuscular volume (MCV) > 100 fL, 48% (38 of 79) did not have B12 or folate levels checked within 3 months before or after a transfusion event. For patients with MCV < 80 fL, 47% (14 of 30) did not have ferritin or iron saturation checked within 3 months before or after a transfusion event. Conclusions: We observed a high percentage of cancer and non-malignant hematology patients who did not receive a basic anemia evaluation within three months before or three months after a blood transfusion. A higher percentage of patients with solid tumors patients who required PRBC transfusions did not receive a basic anemia evaluation in a timely manner. Our study identified an area of quality improvement and need for intervention that can easily be overlooked in a busy academic hematology oncology practice.

e21156 Background: Immunotherapy (IO) is one of the major treatments for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). IO may be discontinued in patients for many reasons, the most common being progression of disease (POD). For those patients who discontinued IO for reasons other than POD, such as immune-related adverse event (irAE), there is limited data that compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) when IO is continued vs. stopped. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of all patients with mNSCLC (stage IV) treated with IO at our institution from 2011 to 2022. Patients who discontinued IO due to POD were excluded from the analysis. The clinical outcomes, including PFS, OS, and irAE were investigated among patients with no POD who stopped IO prior to 6 or 12 months (m) vs. those that continued IO > 6 or 12m. Results: The analysis at the 6m timepoint included 92 patients, 82.6% were white, 50% were male, 67.4% had adenocarcinoma, and 82.6% used tobacco. The most common site of metastasis was bone (28.3%), followed by CNS (20.7%). 51.2% of patients had received IO as the first line systemic therapy and 32.6% received it as their second. Pembrolizumab was the most used IO (84.78%). Among these patients, 25 discontinued IO before 6m, and 67 patients continued IO beyond 6m. irAE, of any grade, occurred in 44.0% vs 37.3% when comparing IO discontinued with IO continued group at 6m. Patients who continued treatment beyond 6m had a longer duration of PFS (22.8m vs 11.8m, p = 1.14E-04) with a significant increase in OS (34.5m vs 14.0m, p = 1.34E-07). The analysis at the 12m timepoint included 71 patients, 87.3% were white, 46.5% were male, 78.9% had adenocarcinoma, and 80.3% used tobacco. The most common site of metastasis was bone (29.9%), followed by CNS (22.5%). 62.0% of patients had received IO as the first line systemic therapy and 28.7% received it as their second. Pembrolizumab was the most used IO (87.3%). Among these patients, 30 discontinued IO before 12m, and 41 patients continued IO beyond 12m. irAE, of any grade, occurred in 36.7% vs 41.5% when comparing IO discontinued with IO continued group at 12m. Similarly, patients who continued treatment beyond 12m had a longer duration of PFS (28.4m vs 14.2m, p = 1.91E-06) with a significant increase in OS (39.9m vs 17.6m, p = 3.45E-09). Conclusions: We observed that patients with mNSCLC and no POD, who continued IO beyond 6m and 12m, experienced a significant increase in PFS and OS than those who discontinued IO, with more significant increases in those who continued IO past 12m. These findings need to be verified in a larger cohort.

Alpha-glucosidase inhibitor (αGIs)-induced pneumatosis intestinalis (PI) has been narrated in case reports but never systematically investigated. This study aimed to investigate the concurrency of PI and αGIs. A literature search was performed in PubMed, Google Scholar, WorldCat, and the Directory of Open-Access Journals (DOAJ) by using the keywords “pneumatosis intestinalis”, “alpha-glucosidase inhibitors”, and “diabetes”. In total, 29 cases of αGIs-induced PI in 28 articles were included. There were 11 men, 17 women, and one undefined sex, with a median age of 67. The most used αGI was voglibose (44.8%), followed by acarbose (41.4%) and miglitol (6.8%). Nine (31%) patients reported concomitant use of prednisone/prednisolone with or without immunosuppressants. The main symptoms were abdominal pain (54.5%) and distention (50%). The ascending colon (55.2%) and the ileum (34.5%) were the most affected. Nineteen (65.5%) patients had comorbidities. Patients with comorbidities had higher rates of air in body cavities, the portal vein, extraintestinal tissues, and the wall of the small intestine. Only one patient was found to have non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia. Twenty-five patients were treated with conservative therapy alone, and two patients received surgical intervention. All patients recovered. In conclusion, comorbidities, glucocorticoids, and immunosuppressants aggravate αGIs-induced PI. Conservative therapy is recommended when treating αGIs-induced PI.