Zhao, Yujie

e18031 Background: HPV+ OPSCC has better outcomes than HPV negative OPSCC but more distant metastatic potential. ICM in HPV+ OPSCC are rare. Data regarding risk factors, clinical presentation and outcomes after ICM diagnosis is limited. This study describes clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients (pts) with HPV+ OPSCC who develop ICM. Methods: Retrospective analysis of pts with HPV+ OPSCC and ICM between 2010 - 2024. Demographic, clinicopathologic, and survival data was collected. Skull base recurrences were excluded. Univariate and multivariate analyses used Cox proportional hazard models; continuous variables binarized by receiver operator curves. Survival assessed via Kaplan-Meier method; reported as median (95% CI). Calculations use BlueSky (v10.3.1). Results: Among 1,999 pts with HPV+ OPSCC, 16 (0.8%) had ICM. Pt characteristics and treatment are summarized in Table 1. Primary tumor sites were base of tongue (56%), tonsil (38%), and unknown (13%). Most pts (n=8, 50%) presented with stage IV disease (6 extracranial metastasis (ECM), 1 ICM only, 1 both). Frontal and parietal lobes were the most frequent ICM sites. Neurological symptoms were present in 10 (62%) pts; ICM was incidentally found in 6 (38%) pts. Median overall survival (mOS) from initial diagnosis was 34 months (21 – not reached) and median time from diagnosis to ICM was 24 months (range 1-112). mOS following ICM detection was 10.9 months (4 -18). On multivariate analysis, only surgical resection (hazard ratio [HR] 0.03, p<0.01) and radiotherapy (HR 0.01, p<0.02) were independently associated with post-ICM survival. With median follow up of 100 months, 14 pts (88%) had died; 2 (12%) were alive. Conclusions: ICM from HPV+ OPSCC are rare but devastating with a mOS <1 year from detection. Most pts were symptomatic, had de novo metastatic disease, and had other sites of metastases. Surgical resection and radiation were associated with improved OS. Multicenter efforts to investigate predictors, multiomic sequencing and identification of pt subsets who may benefit from ICM screening are warranted. Baseline characteristics of Pts with ICM in HPV+ OPSCC. Variable Summary statistics (n=16) Median age (range) 58 (34-71) Male 14 (88%) Smoking history 10 (60%) Clinical stage at diagnosis Stage I: 4 (25%) Stage II: 2 (12.5%) Stage III: 2 (12.5%) Stage IV: 8 (50%) Symptoms at ICM diagnosis Incidental: 6 (38%)Neurological: 10 (62%) Seizure (n=3) Motor/Sensory symptoms (n=3) Altered mental status (n=2) Cognitive symptoms (n=1) Dizziness (n=1) ICM site Frontal lobe: 7 (44%) Parietal lobe: 7 (44%) Occipital lobe: 4 (25%) Temporal lobe: 2 (13%) Cerebellum: 2 (13%) Concurrent ECM Bone: 11 (69%) Lung: 9 (56%) Lymph node: 6 (38%) Liver: 5 (31%) Kidney: 1 (6%) Cranial nerve: 1 (6%) Treatment after ICM Radiotherapy: 15 (94%) Chemotherapy: 10 (63%) Immunotherapy: 9 (56%) Surgery: 8 (50%)

e16610 Background: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy with an incidence of 1-2 per million per year. The optimal treatment remains unclear as does the benefit of chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with resectable ACC. Methods: The SEER database (2000–2021) was used to identify ACC pts > 18 years. Variables of interest included age, race, household income, rural-urban classification, stage, chemo, radiation therapy (RT), and surgery. Statistical analyses were conducted using ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and Kaplan-Meier methods to compare survival outcomes according to variables of interest. Results: Of the 2,598 pts identified, 1,564 (60%) were female. The majority of pts (85%) were white, followed by black (9%). Most pts (87%) resided in metropolitan areas. Pts with localized, regional, or distant metastatic disease comprised 25%, 17% and 36% of the group, respectively. 40% of pts underwent radical or total surgical removal of the primary site disease while 9%, 2%, and 1% underwent partial surgical removal, excision, or debulking surgery, respectively, and 30% did not undergo surgery. 34% of pts received chemo and 8% received RT. The median overall survival (mOS) for the entire cohort was 15 months (m) (95% CI: 14–17 m). No significant differences in OS were observed among pts of different races or household incomes. Distant metastatic disease was significantly associated with worse mortality when compared with regional or localized diseases (mOS: 5 m vs. 20 m vs 60.6 m, respectively, p < 0.001). Surgical intervention of any kind was associated with longer survival when compared to those who did not undergo surgery (18 m vs. 3 m, HR 0.33, p < 0.0001). Among the 971 pts with distant metastatic disease, pts who received chemo had a superior mOS compared to those who did not receive chemo or with unknown chemo status (8 m vs. 2 m, p < 0.0001). This OS advantage remained significant even after excluding pts who underwent surgery (5 m vs. 2 m, p < 0.0001). While chemo was also associated with longer mOS (29 m vs. 27 m, p < 0.0001) in localized disease, this survival advantage was not present in pts with localized disease managed with surgery (27 m vs. 27 m, p = 0.061). Although chemo was associated with numerically longer mOS in pts with regional disease, the difference was not significant. Conclusions: ACC with distant metastatic disease carries a poor prognosis yet demonstrates superior survival in pts who receive chemo. Surgery is associated with better survival outcomes, but there is no additive benefit from chemo in those with localized disease managed with surgical resection.

e20141 Background: TET are rare and challenging entities in clinical practice. Prospective trials in thymoma and thymic carcinoma (TC) are scarce. Limited number of small trials investigated the role of ICI in TET, and showed some clinical efficacy, but also with immune related adverse events (irAE). Guidelines list ICI as a treatment option in the 2 nd line, although no FDA approval was granted. Aside from the small trials, there is limited real world data about the efficacy and toxicity of ICI in TET. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of the medical records of all patients (pts) with TET who were treated with ICI between 3/25/2011 and 11/30/2024 at 5 Mayo Clinic sites. We collected data about baseline characteristics, diagnosis, irAE, and outcomes. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate median progression free survival (mPFS), and hazard ratio (HR) with Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: 30 pts were included, 28 diagnosed with TC, and 2 with malignant thymoma. 70% of pts were male. Median age at time of diagnosis was 61 years (range: 15 to 82), and median ECOG at the time of diagnosis was 0. 29 pts received Pembrolizumab, and one received Durvalumab. Prior to ICI, 86.67% of patients received chemotherapy. 70% of pts discontinued ICI use, 60% due to progression, and 10% due to irAE. Overall response rate (ORR) was 23.33%, with 3.33% complete response, and 20% partial response. Disease control rate (DCR) was 63.33%. The mPFS was 10.13 months. At the time of analysis 60% of pts were still alive. 40% of patients had irAE. While the two patients with thymoma experienced irAE, only 33.33% of those with TC had these events. 26.67% of pts had thyroiditis. Pancreatitis, pneumonitis, dermatitis, and encephalitis each occurred in 3.33% of pts. The median time to irAE onset was 75 days. 25% of irAE were grade 1, 66.67% grade 2, 0% grade 3, and 8.33% grade 4, represented by the case of encephalitis. Resolution of irAE occurred in 33.33% of cases. When stratified according to the occurrence of irAE, the mPFS was the same in both groups, with or without irAE, being 10.13 months, HR=0.99 (95% CI 0.39 – 2.54). Conclusions: In this real-world cohort of pts with TET, efficacy of ICI matched what has been previously reported, with similar ORR and DCR, but with longer mPFS. However, irAE incidence was higher, but with less grade 3/4 events. Differently than what has been suggested in other diseases, irAE occurrence did not correlate with better outcomes. These results validate the role of ICI in the treatment of TET, especially TC. Nonetheless, improving patient selection, and developing other therapeutic strategies, including combinations of ICI and other drugs, for these malignancies remain essential. Importantly, the high incidence of irAE indicates that future investigations must also focus on safety of interventions and supportive care in TET.

TPS2700 Background: Though immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has led to improvements in clinical outcomes in patients with cancer, when used as monotherapy in the advanced setting, only 18-25% of patients respond to ICI. Notably, ICI frequently lacks anti-tumor activity in immune-cold cancers where T cell priming is missing. Recent breakthroughs in identifying personal neoantigens via a comprehensive analysis of cancer sequencing data have brought increased attention to neoantigen cancer vaccines. Personalized cancer vaccines targeting neoantigens have shown early promise. While neoantigens have recently been investigated in some cancer types, the current neoantigen prediction algorithms have often focused on the MHC class-I subtype, single nucleotide mutations (SNM), small insertions and deletions (INDEL). We recently developed an informatics workflow, REAL-neo, for the identification, quality control (QC), and prioritization of both class-I and class-II human leukocyte antigen (HLA) bound neoantigens that arise from somatic SNM, INDEL, aberrant RNA splicing, and gene fusions, generating much more potent neoantigen candidates. Furthermore, we demonstrated robust T-cell response and prolonged survival by combining ICI and cancer vaccines in preclinical models. This single-arm phase I clinical trial is in progress to assess the safety, feasibility, and immunogenicity of personalized neoantigen vaccines in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid cancers. Methods: The vaccine consists of up to 20 peptides (15-30 mer) comprising patient-specific neoantigens identified from tumor DNA and mRNA sequencing data using REAL-neo and delivered with GM-CSF as an adjuvant. The first cohort of three patients will be treated at dose level 1 consisting of 4 or 5 peptides at 300 mcg/peptide and GM-CSF 125 mcg per injection site in each of four limbs. After Cohort 1 is deemed safe, the study will expand to cohort 2, when patients will be enrolled at the same dose level for vaccine plus Pembrolizumab 200 mg i.v. Neoantigen vaccine will be given via subcutaneous injection on days 1, 4, 8, 15, and 21 (cohorts 1 and 2) and weeks 5 and 8 (booster dose for cohort 2 only). Cohort 1 has been completed without dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Enrollment in Cohort 2 began in January 2024. AEs are assessed according to CTCAE v5. and safety findings are reviewed by data safety medical board (DSMB). Key eligibility criteria include 1) histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic solid malignancies and 2) cancer progression after at least one line of the standard-of-care (SOC) systemic treatment. For cohort 2, patients must be eligible to receive pembrolizumab per SOC or the treating physician’s judgment. Clinical trial information: NCT05269381 .

2598 Background: GI-102 (CD80-IL2v3) is a novel immunocytokine designed to direct IL-2v3 to immune cells and tumor cells. IL-2v3 of GI-102 abolished affinity to IL-2Rα minimizing the impact of IL-2 on Treg cells. Preferential targeting of immune cells and further inhibition of CTLA-4 and PD-L1 via CD80 synergize with potent activity of IL-2v3, resulting in robust proliferation and activation of CD8+ T and NK cells. Here we report preliminary safety and efficacy data of GI-102 from a phase 1/2a trial in patients with metastatic solid tumors. Methods: NCT05824975 is an ongoing, dose escalation (3+3 design) and expansion study to evaluate safety, tolerability, PK, PD and anti-tumor activity of GI-102. Each dose level allows to enroll additional 7 patients to fully inform the safety, PK and PD at that dose level. GI-102 was administered intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Disease was assessed every 6 weeks using RECIST v1.1. Results: As of 12 Jan 2024, 32 patients were treated in dose escalation: 8 at dose level 0.06 mg/kg, 10 at 0.12 mg/kg, 9 at 0.24 mg/kg and 5 at 0.45 mg/kg. Patients had received median of 3 [1-7] prior lines of therapy, including 25.0% (8/32) who had received ≥ 5 lines and 68.8% (22/32) had experienced immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed until the highest dose of 0.45 mg/kg Q3W. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs, ≥ 10%) were pyrexia [43.8%] and chills [34.4%]. 5 patients [15.6%] had ≥ Grade 3 TRAEs and no patient reported TRAEs leading to discontinuation of GI-102. In 23 patients (7 cutaneous melanoma, 4 non-small cell lung cancer, 3 ovarian cancer and others) who had at least 1 post-treatment tumor assessment, objective responses were observed in 17.4% (4/23). In patients with metastatic melanoma who previously experienced ICB, overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) was 42.9% (3/7) and 85.7% (6/7), respectively, including 3 confirmed partial responses (cPR). The median time to response (TTR) was 6 weeks and duration of response (DoR) was 6.0+, 2.4+ and 1.7+ month, respectively. In patients with metastatic ovarian cancer, ORR and DCR were 33.3% (1/3) and 66.7% (2/3), respectively, including 1 cPR [TTR of 6 weeks; DoR 1.9+ month]. Preliminary PK profile showed target-mediated drug disposition with a half-life of ~48 hours. 0.24 mg/kg of GI-102 resulted in a significant expansion of peripheral lymphocytes, CD8+ T cells (effector & memory) and NK cells, by 4.4 [2.1-9.6], 3.9 [2.0–5.7] and 20.4 [9.5–32.6]-fold change from baseline, respectively. There was no meaningful increase in Treg cells. Conclusions: GI-102 was well tolerated up to dose of 0.45 mg/kg Q3W with meaningful monotherapy activity, regardless of previous ICB experience, in patients who failed on standard of care. The dose-escalation is currently ongoing to identify RP2D. Clinical trial information: NCT05824975 .

e21157 Background: Atezolizumab is superior to docetaxel for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are pretreated with platinum-based chemotherapy based on the POPLAR and OAK trials. However, patients who received prior immunotherapy (IO) were excluded from these trials. The preferred subsequent therapy for these patients remains to be docetaxel +/- ramucirumab. The efficacy and safety of atezolizumab as a subsequent therapy in IO-pretreated patients are unknown. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of all patients with locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC who were pretreated with IO at Mayo Clinic Florida/Rochester in 2016 - 2022. Patients who received subsequent therapy of atezolizumab alone (Atezo), docetaxel (Doce), or docetaxel + ramucirumab (Doce+Ram) were included. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for survival analysis. Results: Among 169 patients included, 51.5% were female, 91.7% were Caucasian. The median age was 67 (35 – 92). The histology was predominantly adenocarcinoma (76.3%). The most common metastatic sites were bone (51.5%), followed by CNS (44.4%). The median number of prior therapies was 2 (1 – 8). Pembrolizumab was the most used prior IO (87%), followed by durvalumab (10.7%) and nivolumab (8.3%). 13.6% (n = 23), 49.1% (n = 83), and 37.2% (n = 63) patients received subsequent Atezo, Doce, and Doce+Ram, respectively. PFS was improved in the Atezo group compared with Doce group (median PFS 3.9 vs. 3.7 months, HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37 – 0.87, p = 0.015*). Notably, a prominent percentage of patients in the Atezo group appear to have long-term PFS benefits, demonstrated by 1-year PFS rates of 26.1%, 3.6%, and 4.8% (p = 0.003**), and 2-year PFS rates of 17.4%, 0%, and 0% (p = 0.002**), in the Atezo, Doce, and Doce+Ram groups, respectively. The median OS (months) in the Atezo, Doce, and Doce+Ram groups were 17.5, 7.6, and 11.5, respectively; and were 29.5, 7.2, and 6.9, respectively in the PD-L1 > 50% subgroups. The Atezo group showed significantly greater OS improvement compared with the Doce group (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26 – 0.66, p = 0.001**). This benefit appears greater and remains statistically significant in the PD-L1 > 1% (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.22 – 0.71, p = 0.005**) and PD-L1 > 50% (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.15 – 0.91, p = 0.022*) subgroups. 5 of 23 (21.7%) patients in the Atezo group developed immune-related adverse events. 3 patients were grade 3 or 4. No grade 5 event. Conclusions: We observed statistically significant and clinically meaningful PFS and OS benefits of atezolizumab monotherapy compared with docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC who were pretreated with IO. The OS benefits of atezolizumab over docetaxel +/- ramucirumab was greater in PD-L1 > 1% and PD-L1 > 50% subgroups. Atezolizumab appears to be tolerable in IO-pretreated patients. These findings need to be verified in a prospective study.

e21156 Background: Immunotherapy (IO) is one of the major treatments for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). IO may be discontinued in patients for many reasons, the most common being progression of disease (POD). For those patients who discontinued IO for reasons other than POD, such as immune-related adverse event (irAE), there is limited data that compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) when IO is continued vs. stopped. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of all patients with mNSCLC (stage IV) treated with IO at our institution from 2011 to 2022. Patients who discontinued IO due to POD were excluded from the analysis. The clinical outcomes, including PFS, OS, and irAE were investigated among patients with no POD who stopped IO prior to 6 or 12 months (m) vs. those that continued IO > 6 or 12m. Results: The analysis at the 6m timepoint included 92 patients, 82.6% were white, 50% were male, 67.4% had adenocarcinoma, and 82.6% used tobacco. The most common site of metastasis was bone (28.3%), followed by CNS (20.7%). 51.2% of patients had received IO as the first line systemic therapy and 32.6% received it as their second. Pembrolizumab was the most used IO (84.78%). Among these patients, 25 discontinued IO before 6m, and 67 patients continued IO beyond 6m. irAE, of any grade, occurred in 44.0% vs 37.3% when comparing IO discontinued with IO continued group at 6m. Patients who continued treatment beyond 6m had a longer duration of PFS (22.8m vs 11.8m, p = 1.14E-04) with a significant increase in OS (34.5m vs 14.0m, p = 1.34E-07). The analysis at the 12m timepoint included 71 patients, 87.3% were white, 46.5% were male, 78.9% had adenocarcinoma, and 80.3% used tobacco. The most common site of metastasis was bone (29.9%), followed by CNS (22.5%). 62.0% of patients had received IO as the first line systemic therapy and 28.7% received it as their second. Pembrolizumab was the most used IO (87.3%). Among these patients, 30 discontinued IO before 12m, and 41 patients continued IO beyond 12m. irAE, of any grade, occurred in 36.7% vs 41.5% when comparing IO discontinued with IO continued group at 12m. Similarly, patients who continued treatment beyond 12m had a longer duration of PFS (28.4m vs 14.2m, p = 1.91E-06) with a significant increase in OS (39.9m vs 17.6m, p = 3.45E-09). Conclusions: We observed that patients with mNSCLC and no POD, who continued IO beyond 6m and 12m, experienced a significant increase in PFS and OS than those who discontinued IO, with more significant increases in those who continued IO past 12m. These findings need to be verified in a larger cohort.

9093 Background: Pembrolizumab interrupts PD-1/-L1 interaction and is efficacious in many cancers. However, resistance invariably emerges in the majority of patients. Potential mechanisms include activation of compensatory pathways. The inhibition of sonic hedgehog signaling (sHH) was previously shown to induce intra-tumoral (IT) infiltration by CD4+, CD8+ and HLA-DR class II cells. Our preclinical data showed sHH inhibitor enhanced IT penetration by monoclonal antibodies and induced PD-L1 expression. We conducted a phase I study using a novel sequential pulse dosing of sonedegib followed by pembrolizumab in aST with an expansion cohort to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), tolerability and preliminary efficacy. Methods: The dose escalation utilized a 3+3 design to determine the MTD and proceeded to expansion cohort upon determination of the MTD. Patients enrolled to each dose level were observed for dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the 1st cycle. The expansion cohort consisted of NSCLC and head/neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) previously treated by anti-PD1/-L1. The recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was determined following the review of the toxicity profile of the combination from all cycles. The study treatment consisted of sonidegib oral daily from day 1 to 8 and pembrolizumab I.V. 200 mg on day 8 on an every 3-week cycle. The sonidegib dose levels explored were 400, 600 and 800 mg. Archival tumor and blood specimens were collected for correlative studies. Adverse events (AEs) were categorized and graded per CTCAE v5.0, and tumor response by RECIST v1.1. Results: The study enrolled a total of 33 patients and 29 received treatment (13 in escalation and 16 in expansion), including patients with NSCLC, HNSCC, skin cancer, gastric cancer and melanoma. The enrollment to the NSCLC cohort is complete and HNSCC continues. No DLT was encountered during dose escalation and the MTD was not reached. The highest planned dose level was selected to proceed to expansion (sonidegib 800mg days 1-8 in combination with pembrolizumab I.V. 200 mg on day 8 on an every 3-week cycle). The expansion cohort proceeded to enroll 15 patients evaluable for AEs (10 NSCLC and 5 HSNCC). Grade 3 and above treatment-related AEs across all patients were hyperglycemia, fatigue, dyspepsia, abdominal pain. The mature efficacy data will be reported at the meeting. Conclusions: The study successfully determined the RP2D of sonidegib when dosed sequentially with pembrolizumab in advanced solid tumors. The AE profile of the combination is similar to that for respective agents given individually. The efficacy data among anti-PD1/-PDL1-treated NSCLC will be reported at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT04007744 .

e18097 Background: Sorafenib and lenvatinib are FDA-approved MKIs for locally recurrent or metastatic, progressive, DTC refractory to radioactive iodine treatment. Cabozantinib showed a survival benefit in radioiodine-refractory DTC previously treated with sorafenib and/or lenvatinib and was granted FDA approval. Our study aims to investigate the benefit of other MKIs in DTC beyond the first-line setting. Methods: DTC patients (pts) treated with multiple lines of MKIs from August 2018 to July 2022 at Mayo Clinic across all sites were identified. Electronic medical records were reviewed. 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated for all lines of therapy using RECIST 1.1 criteria. Results: Among the 9 pts identified, 4 were male. The median age was 65 years (43-75). Most pts (60%) had papillary thyroid cancer. All pts received lenvatinib as first line treatment. The 6, 12 and 18-month PFS were 89%, 89%, and 55% respectively. 6 pts discontinued lenvatinib due to progression of disease (PD). 3 pts discontinued it due to adverse effects (AEs), which included hemoptysis (1 pt), severe rash (1 pt) and multiple psychiatric manifestations (1 pt). 8 pts received pazopanib, and 1 patient received cabozantinib with ipilimumab (1 dose) and nivolumab (6 months - discontinued due to myocarditis) as second-line therapy. Among them, 1 patient received pembrolizumab plus everolimus for 2 months before receiving pazopanib. The 6, 12 and 18-month PFS were 55%, 22%, and 11% respectively. All pts ceased treatment due to eventual PD, and there were no toxicity-related discontinuations. 5 pts subsequently received third-line MKIs, including cabozantinib (3 pts), pazopanib (1 pt), and lenvatinib (1 pt). The pt who received lenvatinib had discontinued it as first line therapy due to toxicity. The 2 pts treated with third-line cabozantinib and the pt rechallenged with lenvatinib showed no PD at 12-months and no toxicity related discontinuation. Conclusions: Pazopanib was associated with durable PFS and good tolerability when offered after PD or intolerance on lenvatinib in this retrospective analysis, warranting a randomized prospective study. [Table: see text]

e16621 Background: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is an exceedingly rare aggressive endocrine malignancy with about 1 new case per million people diagnosed annually in the US. Higher incidence of ACC has been reported in patients (pts) with inherited syndromes such as Lynch syndrome and Li-Fraumeni syndrome. However, the incidence rate of developing multiple primary cancers in this population is unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the frequency of additional malignancies in ACC patients. Methods: Using the Mayo Clinic Cancer Registry, we identified 63 pts who were treated for ACC from 2010- 2018 with updated follow up data until 01/31/2023. Electronic medical records were reviewed. Results: Among the patient cohort, 22 pts were male. 18/63 (29%) pts were found to have at least one additional malignancy, including basal cell carcinoma (3/18, 17%), melanoma (3/18, 17%), thyroid cancer (3/18, 17%), prostate cancer (3/18, 17%), squamous cell carcinoma of skin (2/18, 11%), renal cell carcinoma (2/18, 11%), breast cancer (2/18, 11%), leukemia (2/18, 11%), lung cancer (1/18, 6%), transitional cell malignant neoplasm of kidney (1/18, 6%), squamous cell carcinoma of tonsil (1/18, 6%), ovarian cancer (1/18, 6%), seminoma (1/18, 6%) and bladder cancer (1/18, 6%). 8/18 (45%) pts had more than one (2-3) non-ACC malignancies. The median age at diagnosis of ACC was 56 years (02-83). The median age at diagnosis of non-ACC malignancies was 54 years (25-72). Most of the patients (13/18) were diagnosed with non-ACC malignancy within 5 years of diagnosis of ACC. Most pts (13/18, 72%) were diagnosed with non-ACC malignancy first. Germline mutation information was not available except for 2 pts with known family history (FH) of Lynch syndrome and 2 pt with a known FH of Li-Fraumeni syndrome. FH was available in 38 pts, out of which 29 pts had FH of cancer identified in first-degree relatives. Among the 18 pts with additional malignancies, 12 pts had FH of cancer in first-degree relatives. All except 2 pts underwent curative treatment for their non-ACC malignancies, and 14 pts had no evidence of disease at death or the time of last follow-up. Conclusions: The rate of other multiple primary malignancies in pts with ACC is high, indicating possible genetic predisposition associated with this disease; Early genetic consultation and evaluation for known and novel germline mutations may need to be considered for these pts to improve long-term outcomes.