Lamichhane, Ramesh

ABSTRACT Background Treatment options for medically‐refractory faecal incontinence ( FI )—including anorectal biofeedback, dextranomer injection, and sacral nerve stimulation—are limited and outcomes are often suboptimal. Anal or vaginal insert devices are infrequently used. Aims We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of a new anal insert device (StaySure) in patients with FI. Methods Patients with FI for ≥ 6 months and ≥ 4 moderate or large FI episodes during a 4‐week baseline entered a 2–4 week fitting/run‐in period to individualise device size (10 or 13 mm) followed by a 4‐week treatment period. Outcomes included effectiveness, safety, and quality of life (QoL). The primary outcome was the proportion achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in FI frequency. Results Of 124 enrolled patients, 98, 71, and 61 progressed through the baseline, fitting/run‐in, and treatment phases respectively, with few exclusions due to device intolerance. In the intent‐to‐treat cohort of 59 participants (93% women), mean ( SD ) number of days with FI declined from 13.2 (7.0) to 6.3 (6.9), and FI weekly episodes declined from 5.4 (6.9) to 2.1 (5.1) (69% reduction; p < 0.001) with similar results for both device sizes. The primary endpoint was achieved in 76.3% of participants; 54.2% achieved ≥ 75% reduction. The FIQoL overall score increased from a mean ( SD ) of 1.9 (0.6) to 2.3 (0.6) ( p < 0.001), indicating improved QoL . Improvements in FI frequency, FIQoL exceeded minimal clinically important difference thresholds, confirming clear clinical benefit. No treatment‐related serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions The StaySure anal insert device is safe, well tolerated, and effective in reducing FI in patients with moderate to severe symptoms refractory to conservative therapies. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03898778

ABSTRACT Background and Aim Determining the location of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is critical for guiding diagnostic and therapeutic strategies but often results in patients receiving pan‐endoscopy with upper endoscopy, colonoscopy, and small bowel capsule endoscopy, which can be unnecessary, costly, and waste limited healthcare resources. The blood urea nitrogen‐to‐creatinine ratio (BUN/Cr) may help discriminate between upper GI bleeding (UGIB) and lower GI bleeding (LGIB). This study aims to assess the diagnostic performance of the BUN/Cr in distinguishing UGIB from LGIB. Methods A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library to identify diagnostic test accuracy studies published from inception through January 31, 2025, which evaluated BUN/Cr in patients with UGIB versus LGIB. A linear mixed‐effects model meta‐analysis was conducted using the “diagmeta” package. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were estimated, and optimal threshold was determined using the Youden index. Results Seventeen studies were included in this meta‐analysis. The pooled mean difference in BUN/Cr between UGIB and LGIB patients was 11.44 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 8.35–14.52). At a threshold of > 30, pooled sensitivity was 38.8% (95% CI 28.1%–50.8%) and specificity was 89.3% (95% CI 81.0%–94.2%). At the optimal cut‐off of 22, sensitivity was 66.2% (95% CI 57.8%–73.7%), specificity was 71.0% (95% CI 58.5%–81.0%), and AUC was 0.740 (95% CI 0.683–0.794). Conclusion BUN/Cr demonstrates moderate diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing UGIB from LGIB, particularly at a threshold of ≥ 22. This readily accessible and inexpensive blood test may assist in early clinical triage and assessment of the location of GI bleeding, particularly in those patients where the clinical presentation is obscure.

e18031 Background: HPV+ OPSCC has better outcomes than HPV negative OPSCC but more distant metastatic potential. ICM in HPV+ OPSCC are rare. Data regarding risk factors, clinical presentation and outcomes after ICM diagnosis is limited. This study describes clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients (pts) with HPV+ OPSCC who develop ICM. Methods: Retrospective analysis of pts with HPV+ OPSCC and ICM between 2010 - 2024. Demographic, clinicopathologic, and survival data was collected. Skull base recurrences were excluded. Univariate and multivariate analyses used Cox proportional hazard models; continuous variables binarized by receiver operator curves. Survival assessed via Kaplan-Meier method; reported as median (95% CI). Calculations use BlueSky (v10.3.1). Results: Among 1,999 pts with HPV+ OPSCC, 16 (0.8%) had ICM. Pt characteristics and treatment are summarized in Table 1. Primary tumor sites were base of tongue (56%), tonsil (38%), and unknown (13%). Most pts (n=8, 50%) presented with stage IV disease (6 extracranial metastasis (ECM), 1 ICM only, 1 both). Frontal and parietal lobes were the most frequent ICM sites. Neurological symptoms were present in 10 (62%) pts; ICM was incidentally found in 6 (38%) pts. Median overall survival (mOS) from initial diagnosis was 34 months (21 – not reached) and median time from diagnosis to ICM was 24 months (range 1-112). mOS following ICM detection was 10.9 months (4 -18). On multivariate analysis, only surgical resection (hazard ratio [HR] 0.03, p<0.01) and radiotherapy (HR 0.01, p<0.02) were independently associated with post-ICM survival. With median follow up of 100 months, 14 pts (88%) had died; 2 (12%) were alive. Conclusions: ICM from HPV+ OPSCC are rare but devastating with a mOS <1 year from detection. Most pts were symptomatic, had de novo metastatic disease, and had other sites of metastases. Surgical resection and radiation were associated with improved OS. Multicenter efforts to investigate predictors, multiomic sequencing and identification of pt subsets who may benefit from ICM screening are warranted. Baseline characteristics of Pts with ICM in HPV+ OPSCC. Variable Summary statistics (n=16) Median age (range) 58 (34-71) Male 14 (88%) Smoking history 10 (60%) Clinical stage at diagnosis Stage I: 4 (25%) Stage II: 2 (12.5%) Stage III: 2 (12.5%) Stage IV: 8 (50%) Symptoms at ICM diagnosis Incidental: 6 (38%)Neurological: 10 (62%) Seizure (n=3) Motor/Sensory symptoms (n=3) Altered mental status (n=2) Cognitive symptoms (n=1) Dizziness (n=1) ICM site Frontal lobe: 7 (44%) Parietal lobe: 7 (44%) Occipital lobe: 4 (25%) Temporal lobe: 2 (13%) Cerebellum: 2 (13%) Concurrent ECM Bone: 11 (69%) Lung: 9 (56%) Lymph node: 6 (38%) Liver: 5 (31%) Kidney: 1 (6%) Cranial nerve: 1 (6%) Treatment after ICM Radiotherapy: 15 (94%) Chemotherapy: 10 (63%) Immunotherapy: 9 (56%) Surgery: 8 (50%)