Starr, Jason

Abstract Everolimus 10 mg daily is the standard dose for advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), but adverse events frequently necessitate dose reduction. As a result, oncologists often adopt a dose‐escalation strategy starting at 5 mg and increasing the dose as tolerated. In this multicenter study, we evaluated the effect of reduced dose (RD) and standard dose (SD) everolimus on survival, progression, and toxicity in patients with advanced NETs. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced NETs treated with everolimus at Mayo Clinic and University Hospitals (Cleveland, OH). Patients were grouped by starting dose (5 mg vs. 10 mg). Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), real‐world progression‐free survival (rwPFS), and adverse events. Multivariable Cox models, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), and time‐varying dose sensitivity analysis were used to account for confounding and dose crossover. Among 170 patients (48 started on 5 mg; 122 on 10 mg), the 5 mg cohort was older, had worse ECOG PS, and was more heavily pretreated. Median OS was 43.7 months (5 mg) versus 81.5 months (10 mg; log‐rank p = .02). However, after multivariable adjustment ( N = 124 G1–G2 patients; 51 events), the association was no longer statistically significant (adjusted HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.31–1.12; p = .11). Median rwPFS was 7.0 versus 12.4 months (log‐rank p = .05); the adjusted rwPFS difference was not statistically significant (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.56–1.61; p = .84). Nearly half (46.7%) of 10 mg starters required dose reduction. Any‐grade toxicity was more common with 10 mg (89% vs. 75%; p = .05). The apparent survival advantage of standard‐dose everolimus was substantially attenuated after adjustment. These findings do not establish dose equivalence and should be interpreted in the context of limited statistical power. Given its more favorable observed tolerability profile, RD everolimus warrants prospective evaluation as a starting strategy for patients at increased risk of treatment‐related toxicity who may not tolerate SD.

Liver transplantation has emerged as a curative treatment option for selected patients with unresectable hepatic malignancies beyond hepatocellular carcinoma, marking a paradigm shift in transplant oncology. For colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM), prospective trials have demonstrated that highly selected patients achieve 5-year OS rates of 60–83%, with the Oslo score identifying optimal candidates for transplantation. Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) has been successfully treated using strict patient selection criteria combined with neoadjuvant therapy, achieving 5-year OS rates of 50–68%, though emerging data suggests chemotherapy-based approaches may be preferable to radiation in selected cases. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), previously considered a contraindication to transplantation, can now achieve excellent long-term outcomes (79.5% 5-year OS) in patients demonstrating sustained response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radioembolization, with metabolic tumor volume < 70 cm3 serving as an objective prognostic marker. Across these three emerging indications, successful outcomes depend on strict patient selection based on tumor biology, intensive multimodal neoadjuvant therapy, multidisciplinary evaluation in high-volume centers, and careful observation during treatment to exclude patients with aggressive disease. This evolution in transplant practice offers curative intent therapy to patients that previously only had palliative therapeutic options, fundamentally transforming hepatobiliary and oncologic surgery.

Abstract Malignant insulinomas are rare pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors characterized by excessive insulin secretion and a high propensity for metastasis, leading to challenging management. This study retrospectively analyzed 57 patients treated for malignant insulinoma at Mayo Clinic sites between 1992 and 2024, focusing on the efficacy of systemic therapies in improving hypoglycemic control and survival outcomes. The most commonly used therapies included somatostatin analogs (SSA), everolimus, capecitabine-temozolomide (CAPTEM), and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). PRRT demonstrated the highest efficacy in controlling hypoglycemia (93%), followed by CAPTEM (68%) and everolimus (62%). SSA, chemotherapy, and streptozocin were less effective, with hypoglycemic improvement seen in 37.5, 33.3, and 28.6% of patients, respectively. Overall survival (OS) was longest with SSA at 84.67 months, followed by CAPTEM at 81.67 months and everolimus at 74.07 months. PRRT demonstrated a median OS of 49.73 months. In contrast, chemotherapy and streptozocin-based therapies had significantly shorter OS times of 15.23 and 8.35 months, respectively. These findings highlight significant variability in systemic therapy efficacy for malignant insulinoma, with PRRT emerging as a promising treatment for refractory hypoglycemia and long survival. Cox regression analysis identified primary tumor resection and a history of benign insulinoma as associated with longer OS. Optimal sequencing of therapies remains unclear, and individualized treatment plans based on hypoglycemic burden and tumor characteristics are critical for improving survival and quality of life in these patients.

Abstract Introduction Pathogenic mutations in POLE/POLD1 lead to decreased fidelity of DNA replication, resulting in a high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H), defined as TMB ≥ 10 mut/Mb, independent of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) and microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) status. Methods De-identified records of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) profiled with the Tempus xT assay (DNA-seq of 595-648 genes at 500×) were identified from the Tempus Database. Results Among 9136 CRC samples profiled, the frequency of POLE/POLD1 genomic alterations was 2.4% (n = 217). Copy number loss was the most common genomic alteration (64%, n = 138) of POLE/POLD1, followed by copy number amplifications (18%, n = 40) and short variant mutations (18%, n = 39). The POLE/POLD1 mutated group presented with a higher frequency of TMB-H phenotype relative to wild type (WT; 22% vs. 9%, P &lt; .001), with a median TMB of 127 mut/Mb in the TMB-H POLE/POLD1 subset. The TMB showed a dramatic contrast between POLE/POLD1 short variant mutations as compared to the group with copy number alterations, with a TMB of 159 mut/Mb vs 15 mut/Mb, respectively. Thus, the short variant mutations represented the so-called ultra-hypermutated phenotype. The POLE/POLD1 mutated group, as compared to WT, exhibited a higher rate of coexisting mutations, including APC, ALK, ATM, BRCA2, and RET mutations. Conclusion Patients with POLE/POLD1 mutations exhibited significant differences across immunological markers (ie, TMB, MMR, and MSI-H) and molecular co-alterations. Those with short variant mutations represented 18% of the POLE/POLD1 cohort and 0.4% of the total cohort examined. This group of patients had a median TMB of 159 mut/Mb (range 34-488), representing the ultra-hypermutated phenotype. This group of patients is important to identify given the potential for exceptional response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Abstract We present a 54-year-old White male with a diagnosis of stage IV pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma. Next-generation sequencing of the tumor/blood identified a complex tumor genome, which included a rearranged during transfection (RET) gene fusion. The patient initially received cytotoxic chemotherapy with a significant radiographic response. After 4 cycles of chemotherapy, the patient was transitioned to a clinical trial using selpercatinib, a RET inhibitor, as maintenance therapy. Unfortunately, our patient developed progression of disease at the first treatment monitoring scan. Our patient suffered primary resistance to RET-targeted therapy. Proposed mechanisms of resistance include intrinsic resistance of the nuclear receptor co-activator 4-RET fusion to RET inhibition, the RET fusion representing a passenger alteration to another tumorigenic driver pathway and/or decreased efficacy of RET inhibition after platinum-based chemotherapy. Our patient’s clinical course highlights the fact that “actionable” genomic alterations do not always equate to patient benefit.

The most common associated malignancies with BRCA mutations include breast and ovarian cancers. Less common malignancies associated with BRCA mutation include: pancreatic, prostate, colon, gastric, and biliary cancers. Esophageal cancer, particularly squamous cell carcinoma, has rarely been reported to harbor BRCA mutations. Here we report, to our knowledge, the first case of germline BRCA1 mutated associated esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.