Citations

Background: Limited information is available for patients with breast cancer (BC) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially among underrepresented racial/ethnic populations. Methods: This is a COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry-based retrospective cohort study of females with active or history of BC and laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection diagnosed between March 2020 and June 2021 in the US. Primary outcome was COVID-19 severity measured on a five-level ordinal scale, including none of the following complications, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, and all-cause mortality. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression model identified characteristics associated with COVID-19 severity. Results: 1383 female patient records with BC and COVID-19 were included in the analysis, the median age was 61 years, and median follow-up was 90 days. Multivariable analysis revealed higher odds of COVID-19 severity for older age (aOR per decade, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.32–1.67]); Black patients (aOR 1.74; 95 CI 1.24–2.45), Asian Americans and Pacific Islander patients (aOR 3.40; 95 CI 1.70–6.79) and Other (aOR 2.97; 95 CI 1.71–5.17) racial/ethnic groups; worse ECOG performance status (ECOG PS ≥2: aOR, 7.78 [95% CI, 4.83–12.5]); pre-existing cardiovascular (aOR, 2.26 [95% CI, 1.63–3.15])/pulmonary comorbidities (aOR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.20–2.29]); diabetes mellitus (aOR, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.66–3.04]); and active and progressing cancer (aOR, 12.5 [95% CI, 6.89–22.6]). Hispanic ethnicity, timing, and type of anti-cancer therapy modalities were not significantly associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. The total all-cause mortality and hospitalization rate for the entire cohort was 9% and 37%, respectively however, it varied according to the BC disease status. Conclusions: Using one of the largest registries on cancer and COVID-19, we identified patient and BC-related factors associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, underrepresented racial/ethnic patients experienced worse outcomes compared to non-Hispanic White patients. Funding: This study was partly supported by National Cancer Institute grant number P30 CA068485 to Tianyi Sun, Sanjay Mishra, Benjamin French, Jeremy L Warner; P30-CA046592 to Christopher R Friese; P30 CA023100 for Rana R McKay; P30-CA054174 for Pankil K Shah and Dimpy P Shah; KL2 TR002646 for Pankil Shah and the American Cancer Society and Hope Foundation for Cancer Research (MRSG-16-152-01-CCE) and P30-CA054174 for Dimpy P Shah. REDCap is developed and supported by Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research grant support (UL1 TR000445 from NCATS/NIH). The funding sources had no role in the writing of the manuscript or the decision to submit it for publication. Clinical trial number: CCC19 registry is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04354701 .

ImportanceSystematic data on the association between anticancer therapies and thromboembolic events (TEEs) in patients with COVID-19 are lacking.ObjectiveTo assess the association between anticancer therapy exposure within 3 months prior to COVID-19 and TEEs following COVID-19 diagnosis in patients with cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis registry-based retrospective cohort study included patients who were hospitalized and had active cancer and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data were accrued from March 2020 to December 2021 and analyzed from December 2021 to October 2022.ExposureTreatments of interest (TOIs) (endocrine therapy, vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors/tyrosine kinase inhibitors [VEGFis/TKIs], immunomodulators [IMiDs], immune checkpoint inhibitors [ICIs], chemotherapy) vs reference (no systemic therapy) in 3 months prior to COVID-19.Main Outcomes and MeasuresMain outcomes were (1) venous thromboembolism (VTE) and (2) arterial thromboembolism (ATE). Secondary outcome was severity of COVID-19 (rates of intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, 30-day all-cause mortality following TEEs in TOI vs reference group) at 30-day follow-up.ResultsOf 4988 hospitalized patients with cancer (median [IQR] age, 69 [59-78] years; 2608 [52%] male), 1869 had received 1 or more TOIs. Incidence of VTE was higher in all TOI groups: endocrine therapy, 7%; VEGFis/TKIs, 10%; IMiDs, 8%; ICIs, 12%; and chemotherapy, 10%, compared with patients not receiving systemic therapies (6%). In multivariable log-binomial regression analyses, relative risk of VTE (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.04-1.69) but not ATE (aRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.56-1.16) was significantly higher in those exposed to all TOIs pooled together vs those with no exposure. Among individual drugs, ICIs were significantly associated with VTE (aRR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.01-2.07). Also noted were significant associations between VTE and active and progressing cancer (aRR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.03), history of VTE (aRR, 3.10; 95% CI, 2.38-4.04), and high-risk site of cancer (aRR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.14-1.75). Black patients had a higher risk of TEEs (aRR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.03-1.50) than White patients. Patients with TEEs had high intensive care unit admission (46%) and mechanical ventilation (31%) rates. Relative risk of death in patients with TEEs was higher in those exposed to TOIs vs not (aRR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.91-1.38) and was significantly associated with poor performance status (aRR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.30-2.40) and active/progressing cancer (aRR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.13-2.13).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study, relative risk of developing VTE was high among patients receiving TOIs and varied by the type of therapy, underlying risk factors, and demographics, such as race and ethnicity. These findings highlight the need for close monitoring and perhaps personalized thromboprophylaxis to prevent morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19–related thromboembolism in patients with cancer.

In response to the social inequities that exist in health care, the NIH-funded Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Researchers (CEGIR) recently formed a diversity committee to examine systemic racism and implicit bias in the care and research of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs). Herein, we describe our process, highlighting milestones and issues addressed since the committee’s inception, which we hope will inspire other researchers to enhance diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) in their fields. Our journey began by establishing mission and vision statements to define the purpose of the committee. Regular discussion of diversity-related topics was incorporated into existing meetings and web-based materials were shared. This was followed by educational initiatives, including establishing a library of relevant publications and a speaker series to address DEIA topics. We then established a research agenda focused on the following actionable items: (1) to define what is known about the demographics of EGIDs by systematic review of population-based studies; (2) to develop a practical tool for reporting participant demographics to reduce bias in EGID literature; (3) to examine health disparities in the care of individuals with eosinophilic esophagitis who present to the emergency department with an esophageal food impaction; (4) to examine how access to a gastroenterologist affects the conclusions of published research examining the prevalence of pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis; and (5) to develop a model for examining the dimensions of diversity, and provide a framework for CEGIR’s ongoing projects and data capture. In addition to promoting consciousness of DEIA, this initiative has fostered inclusivity among CEGIR members and will continue to inspire positive changes in EGID care and research.

Background The first commercialized single-use duodenoscope was cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration in December 2019. Data regarding endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) using a single-use duodenoscope are needed on a broader range of cases conducted by endoscopists with varying levels of experience in a wide range of geographic areas. Methods 61 endoscopists at 22 academic centers in 11 countries performed ERCP procedures in adult patients aged ≥ 18. Outcomes included ERCP completion for the intended indication, rate of crossover to a reusable endoscope, device performance ratings, and serious adverse events (SAEs). Results Among 551 patients, 236 (42.8 %) were aged > 65, 281 (51.0 %) were men, and 256 (46.5 %) had their procedure as an inpatient. ERCPs included 196 (35.6 %) with American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy complexity of grades 3–4. A total of 529 ERCPs (96.0 %) were completed: 503 (91.3 %) using only the single-use duodenoscope, and 26 (4.7 %) with crossover to a reusable endoscope. There were 22 ERCPs (4.0 %) that were not completed, of which 11 (2.0 %) included a crossover and 11 (2.0 %) were aborted cases (no crossover). Median ERCP completion time was 24.0 minutes. Median overall satisfaction with the single-use duodenoscope was 8.0 (scale of 1 to 10 [best]). SAEs were reported in 43 patients (7.8 %), including 17 (3.1 %) who developed post-ERCP pancreatitis. Conclusions In academic medical centers over a wide geographic distribution, endoscopists with varying levels of experience using the first marketed single-use duodenoscope had good ERCP procedural success and reported high performance ratings for this device.

Introduction: Cardiac arrhythmias are common in continuous flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients. The impact of axial vs. intrapericardial centrifugal LVAD pumps on arrhythmia incidence and associated clinical outcomes is unclear. Hypothesis: This multicenter study evaluated the impact of LVAD type (axial vs. centrifugal) on incidence of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, ICD shocks and mortality in LVAD patients. Methods: Analysis was done on 536 patients who underwent LVAD implantation at 5 US centers from 2008 to 2016. The groups were divided based on their LVAD type (axial - HeartMate II [HMII, n=433] vs. centrifugal - HeartWare (HW, n=103). Baseline characteristics as well as incidence of post-LVAD atrial arrhythmias (PL-AA), ventricular arrhythmias (PL-VA) and ICD shocks were analyzed in these groups. Multivariable Cox Regression analysis was used to identify predictors of survival. Results: Of 536 patients, 433 had HMII axial LVAD and 103 had HW centrifugal VAD implant. At baseline, HMII group had more males, higher proportion of CRT-D and higher prevalence of AA (Table 1A). Left ventricular dimensions were similar between groups. During a median follow-up of 537 days of LVAD support, incidence of PL-VA and ICD shocks were significantly higher in the HM2 group compared to HW group whereas incidence of PL-AA was not significantly different (Table 1A). In multivariable Cox Regression analysis, LVAD indication was the only variable that predicted survival (Table 1B). Type of LVAD (axial vs. centrifugal) was not associated with survival (HMII vs. HW - HR 1.04, P=0.48). Conclusions: In this multi-center continuous flow LVAD cohort, axial HM2 VAD patients had a higher incidence of PL-VA and ICD shocks. Type of LVAD (axial vs. centrifugal) was not associated with survival.

BACKGROUND: Differentiation of wide QRS complex tachycardias (WCTs) into ventricular tachycardia (VT) and supraventricular wide QRS tachycardia (SWCT) through 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation is one of the most critical yet challenging tasks in clinical practice. Recent research highlights novel automated methods that successfully diagnose WCTs. We sought to directly compare the diagnostic efficacy of these novel automated WCT differentiation methods (i.e., WCT Formula, VT Prediction Model, and WCT Formula II) to traditional ECG interpretation approaches (i.e., Brugada and Vereckei aVR algorithms). METHODS: A collection of paired WCT and baselined ECGs were retrospectively analyzed. Next, an electrophysiologist blindly and prospectively applied the Brugada and Vereckei aVR algorithms. Separately, computerized measurements were used to apply the three automated WCT differentiation methods. The diagnostic performance of each method was then evaluated. RESULTS: 213 WCTs (111 VT and 102 SWCT) from 105 patients were analyzed. The WCT Formula demonstrated superior overall accuracy (84.7% vs. 64.8%), specificity (86.2% vs. 35.3%), positive predictive value (PPV) (85.7% vs. 60.7%), and positive (+) likelihood ratio (LR) (6.06 vs. 1.42) compared to Vereckei aVR algorithm. Similarly, the WCT Formula attained higher specificity (86.2% vs. 61.8%), PPV (85.7% vs. 71.9%), and (+) LR (6.06 vs. 2.36) than the Brugada algorithm. The WCT Formula II demonstrated superior overall accuracy (89.2% vs. 64.8%), specificity (84.3 % vs. 35.3%), PPV (86.7% vs. 60.7%), and positive (+) LR (5.97 vs.1.42) compared to Vereckei aVR algorithm as well as higher specificity (84.3 % vs. 61.8 %), PPV (86.7% vs. 71.9%), and (+) LR (5.97 vs. 2.36) than the Brugada algorithm. The VT prediction model yielded superior specificity (79.4% vs. 35.3%), PPV (79.8 vs. 60.7%) and (+) LR (3.63 vs.1.42) compared to the Vereckei aVR algorithm but did not demonstrate superior diagnostic performance to the Brugada algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: Novel automated WCT differentiation methods achieved similar or superior diagnostic performance metrics compared to traditional ECG interpretation approaches.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background/Introduction Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) myocarditis is a life-threatening condition characterized by lymphocytic myocardial infiltration[1]. Complete heart block (CHB) occurs in 15% of cases and is often fatal[2-4]. The nature and optimal management of this often-malignant condition is poorly understood[5]. Purpose This case series assesses prognostic factors associated with survival at 90 days among people with ICI myocarditis and CHB. Methods The electronic patient record system was used to identify patients admitted with ICI myocarditis. A two-physician review was used to assess the presence of ICI-associated CHB. Wilcoxon rank sum and Spearman’s rank correlation were used for categorical and quantitative variables respectively. Data was analysed using STATA/IC 16.1. The primary outcome was person-day survival 90 days after presenting symptom onset. Results Six patients were included in the final analysis. Mean survival was 47 person days. All had metastatic disease and presented 15 to 32 days after the first ICI infusion. All had muscle weakness. Other common self-symptoms were shortness of breath (4), blurred vision (4), double vision (3), collapse (3), and leg swelling (1). Proximal myopathy (2), fatigable myopathy (1), ptosis (3), and peripheral oedema (1) were present on examination. Raised troponin T and white blood cell count (WBC) were associated with 90-day survival (see Table 1). Nt-pro BNP, AST, and CK levels were raised in all patients. Two patients were tested for anti-striated muscle antibody titres, and both were strongly positive. Increase in QRS duration compared to baseline ECG was associated with lower survival at 90 days. Only one patient had CHB on admission. Steroid dose, IVIG, and plasmapheresis weren’t associated with survival. One patient declined device therapy. One declined permanent pacemaker (PPM) after insertion of transvenous pacemaker (TVP). Both died within 2 weeks. Three people underwent insertion of a transvenous pacemaker (TVP) followed by PPM insertion (table 2). All three eventually died within 100 days. One person received isoproterenol and immunosuppression as a bridge to PPM and survived. One patient was managed initially with TVP but subsequently declined PPM insertion. TVP removal resulted in CHB recurrence, and they died shortly after discharge. One person declined device therapy and died while receiving comfort care. Lead malfunction was frequent. One patient experienced bradycardia arrest with failure of a TVP lead to capture, while another experienced lead dislodgement. Conclusion CHB secondary to ICI is often fatal. It should be considered in patients presenting with symptoms of myositis, raised troponin and increased QRS duration. Despite a small sample size, this study identifies several prognostic factors which can guide both patients and physicians with decision-making. Larger studies are needed to better understand the role of device therapy in this population.

PurposeThe need to detect and quantify brain lactate accurately by MRS has stimulated the development of editing sequences based on J coupling effects. In J‐difference editing of lactate, threonine can be co‐edited and it contaminates lactate estimates due to the spectral proximity of the coupling partners of their methyl protons. We therefore implemented narrow‐band editing 180° pulses (E180) in MEGA‐PRESS acquisitions to resolve separately the 1.3‐ppm resonances of lactate and threonine.MethodsTwo 45.3‐ms rectangular E180 pulses, which had negligible effects 0.15‐ppm away from the carrier frequency, were implemented in a MEGA‐PRESS sequence with TE 139 ms. Three acquisitions were designed to selectively edit lactate and threonine, in which the E180 pulses were tuned to 4.1 ppm, 4.25 ppm, and a frequency far off resonance. Editing performance was validated with numerical analyses and acquisitions from phantoms. The narrow‐band E180 MEGA and another MEGA‐PRESS sequence with broad‐band E180 pulses were evaluated in six healthy subjects.ResultsThe 45.3‐ms E180 MEGA offered a difference‐edited lactate signal with lower intensity and reduced contamination from threonine compared to the broad‐band E180 MEGA. The 45.3 ms E180 pulse had MEGA editing effects over a frequency range larger than seen in the singlet‐resonance inversion profile. Lactate and threonine in healthy brain were both estimated to be 0.4 ± 0.1 mM, with reference to N‐acetylaspartate at 12 mM.ConclusionNarrow‐band E180 MEGA editing minimizes threonine contamination of lactate spectra and may improve the ability to detect modest changes in lactate levels.

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) increases the risk of stroke and cardiovascular diseases. However, its impact on geriatric patients with a prior history of stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) has not been adequately studied. Methods: We utilized the 2019 National Inpatient Sample in the US to identify geriatric patients with OSA (G-OSA) who had a prior history of stroke/TIA. We then compared subsequent stroke (SS) rates among sex and race subgroups. We also compared the demographics and comorbidities of SS+ and SS− groups and utilized logistic regression models to assess outcomes. Results: Out of 133,545 G-OSA patients admitted with a prior history of stroke/TIA, 4.9% (6520) had SS. Males had a higher prevalence of SS, while Asian-Pacific Islanders and Native Americans had the highest prevalence of SS, followed by Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics. The SS+ group had higher all-cause in-hospital mortality rates, with Hispanics showing the highest rate compared to Whites and Blacks (10.6% vs. 4.9% vs. 4.4%, p < 0.001), respectively. Adjusted analysis for covariates showed that complicated and uncomplicated hypertension (aOR 2.17 [95% CI 1.78–2.64]; 3.18 [95% CI 2.58–3.92]), diabetes with chronic complications (aOR 1.28 [95% CI 1.08–1.51]), hyperlipidemia (aOR 1.24 [95% CI 1.08–1.43]), and thyroid disorders (aOR 1.69 [95% CI 1.14–2.49]) were independent predictors of SS. The SS+ group had fewer routine discharges and higher healthcare costs. Conclusions: Our study shows that about 5% of G-OSA patients with a prior history of stroke/TIA are at risk of hospitalization due to SS, which is associated with higher mortality and healthcare utilization. Complicated and uncomplicated hypertension, diabetes with chronic complications, hyperlipidemia, thyroid disorders, and admission to rural hospitals predict subsequent stroke.