Gautam, Sandeep

Introduction: Incident cardiac arrhythmias are common in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, but the impact of a second incident cardiac arrhythmia during hospitalization on clinical outcomes remain unclear. Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to assess the frequency and prognostic implications of a second incident arrhythmia in hospitalized COVID-19 patients over the pandemic course till vaccine availability. Methods: The multicenter COVID-RHYTHM Registry enrolled hospitalized COVID-19 patients from 3/8/2020 to 1/24/2021. Cardiac arrhythmia included documented atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter (AFL), ventricular tachycardia (VT), severe sinus bradycardia (<40 bpm) or AV block. Outcomes were compared between patients with single vs. more than one incident arrhythmias adjusting for baseline variables. Results: Of 6299 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, 4398 had an had an incident cardiac arrhythmia during hospitalization, of which 822 (19%) had a second incident arrhythmia. Those with >1 incident arrhythmia had a higher baseline prevalence of heart failure, chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease and sleep apnea (Table). Those with >1 incident arrhythmia had higher in-hospital mortality, need for ICU admission and need for rehab upon discharge. Length of stay was similar between the groups. Conclusions: In hospitalized COVID-19 patients with incident cardiac arrhythmias, a second incident arrhythmia during hospitalization was seen in 19%. Having >1 incident arrhythmia was associated with increased need for ICU admission and reduced survival.

Introduction: Cardiac arrhythmias are common in continuous flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients. The impact of axial vs. intrapericardial centrifugal LVAD pumps on arrhythmia incidence and associated clinical outcomes is unclear. Hypothesis: This multicenter study evaluated the impact of LVAD type (axial vs. centrifugal) on incidence of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, ICD shocks and mortality in LVAD patients. Methods: Analysis was done on 536 patients who underwent LVAD implantation at 5 US centers from 2008 to 2016. The groups were divided based on their LVAD type (axial - HeartMate II [HMII, n=433] vs. centrifugal - HeartWare (HW, n=103). Baseline characteristics as well as incidence of post-LVAD atrial arrhythmias (PL-AA), ventricular arrhythmias (PL-VA) and ICD shocks were analyzed in these groups. Multivariable Cox Regression analysis was used to identify predictors of survival. Results: Of 536 patients, 433 had HMII axial LVAD and 103 had HW centrifugal VAD implant. At baseline, HMII group had more males, higher proportion of CRT-D and higher prevalence of AA (Table 1A). Left ventricular dimensions were similar between groups. During a median follow-up of 537 days of LVAD support, incidence of PL-VA and ICD shocks were significantly higher in the HM2 group compared to HW group whereas incidence of PL-AA was not significantly different (Table 1A). In multivariable Cox Regression analysis, LVAD indication was the only variable that predicted survival (Table 1B). Type of LVAD (axial vs. centrifugal) was not associated with survival (HMII vs. HW - HR 1.04, P=0.48). Conclusions: In this multi-center continuous flow LVAD cohort, axial HM2 VAD patients had a higher incidence of PL-VA and ICD shocks. Type of LVAD (axial vs. centrifugal) was not associated with survival.