Atkins, Donita

Background: Bilateral cardiac sympathetic denervation (BCSD) has shown promise in treating patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) suffering from refractory multifocal premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) and ventricular tachycardia (VT). Despite its growing use, the effectiveness of BCSD across different NICM etiologies has not been extensively studied. Research Question: How effective is BCSD across a variety of NICM etiologies? Goals: To evaluate the effectiveness of BCSD on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and PVC burden in patients with NICM. Methods: We conducted a subset analysis on a previous retrospective, observational study of NICM patients who underwent BCSD. Eight NICM etiologies were assessed. Results: 43 NICM patients underwent BCSD (mean age 52.3±14.7 years; 30% females). Overall, LVEF significantly improved (38.7±7.9% to 46.2±9.6%, p <0.001), and PVC burden (PVCb) significantly decreased (23.7±9.9% to 1.3±1%, p <0.001). A similar phenomenon was seen in idiopathic/dilated cardiomyopathy (CM) (LVEF: +8.7%, p <0.001; PVCb: -20.6%, p <0.001), post-viral CM (LVEF: +4.8%, p =0.2; PVCb: -24.2%, p <0.001), familial CM (LVEF: +10%; PVCb: +23.3%), giant cell CM (LVEF: +10%; PVCb: + 30.5%), and arrhythmogenic right ventricular CM (LVEF: +12.5%, p=0.09; PVCb -30.6%, p =0.001). Catecholaminergic polymorphic VT had a non-significant increase in LVEF (+5%, p=0.5) but a significant decrease in PVCb (-21.8%, p=0.02), whereas sarcoidosis had the opposite effect with significant increase in LVEF (LVEF: +13.4%, p=0.3) but non-significant decrease in PVCb (-16.1%, p=0.02). Lastly, hypertrophic CM remained unchanged in LVEF (30%) but PVCb decreased (-8%). Conclusion: BCSD demonstrates efficacy in improving LVEF and reducing PVCb across almost all NICM with refractory VT. However, a case-by-case evaluation is still needed for its use.

Introduction: Cardiac arrhythmias are common in continuous flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients. The impact of axial vs. intrapericardial centrifugal LVAD pumps on arrhythmia incidence and associated clinical outcomes is unclear. Hypothesis: This multicenter study evaluated the impact of LVAD type (axial vs. centrifugal) on incidence of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, ICD shocks and mortality in LVAD patients. Methods: Analysis was done on 536 patients who underwent LVAD implantation at 5 US centers from 2008 to 2016. The groups were divided based on their LVAD type (axial - HeartMate II [HMII, n=433] vs. centrifugal - HeartWare (HW, n=103). Baseline characteristics as well as incidence of post-LVAD atrial arrhythmias (PL-AA), ventricular arrhythmias (PL-VA) and ICD shocks were analyzed in these groups. Multivariable Cox Regression analysis was used to identify predictors of survival. Results: Of 536 patients, 433 had HMII axial LVAD and 103 had HW centrifugal VAD implant. At baseline, HMII group had more males, higher proportion of CRT-D and higher prevalence of AA (Table 1A). Left ventricular dimensions were similar between groups. During a median follow-up of 537 days of LVAD support, incidence of PL-VA and ICD shocks were significantly higher in the HM2 group compared to HW group whereas incidence of PL-AA was not significantly different (Table 1A). In multivariable Cox Regression analysis, LVAD indication was the only variable that predicted survival (Table 1B). Type of LVAD (axial vs. centrifugal) was not associated with survival (HMII vs. HW - HR 1.04, P=0.48). Conclusions: In this multi-center continuous flow LVAD cohort, axial HM2 VAD patients had a higher incidence of PL-VA and ICD shocks. Type of LVAD (axial vs. centrifugal) was not associated with survival.