Zhou, Alice Y.

Abstract Purpose: Standard care for high-grade gliomas (HGG) involves maximal surgical resection followed by radiation and temozolomide. Postoperative adjuvant therapy frequently causes lymphopenia, which is associated with poor prognosis. Interleukin 7 (IL7) is essential for lymphocyte development, homeostasis, and survival. NT-I7 (efineptakin alfa), a long-acting recombinant IL7, reverses lymphopenia and improves survival in murine glioma models. However, the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and impact of NT-I7 on immune cells in patients with HGG remain unknown. Patients and Methods: We conducted a phase I trial (NCT03687957) examining the MTD and effect of NT-I7 on lymphocytes in patients with newly diagnosed HGG. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity; secondary endpoints included absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) changes over time, overall response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints included immune profiling at different time points using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) in a subset of patients. Results: NT-I7 was well tolerated with a MTD of 720 µg/kg. Moreover, NT-I7 significantly increased ALCs for more than 12 weeks in duration. Early elevations in CD4+, CD8+ T cells and NK cells further coincided with increased TNF and CXCL9 cytokine levels. Comprehensive immune profiling of peripheral blood T cells revealed selective clonotype expansion within CD8+, but not CD4+, T cells following NT-I7 administration. Finally, a subset of our patients with MGMT promoter–unmethylated glioblastoma, which are typically associated with a poorer prognosis, demonstrated promising clinical responses. Conclusions: NT-I7 has the potential to maintain and increase lymphocyte counts in patients with HGG and warrants further investigation, particularly in combination with immune-based therapies.

Abstract Lymphopenia following chemoradiation for high grade gliomas (HGG) is common and is associated with decreased survival. NT-I7 (efineptakin alfa) is a long-acting analog of the lymphocyte pro-survival cytokine, interleukin-7. Our Phase I dose-escalation study of 19 patients with HGG demonstrated early elevations in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the first 4 weeks after administration of NT-I7. In this study, we explored the diversity and potential functionality of the NT-I7-expanded T cell population. A subset of 4 subjects with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) treated at 720 µg/kg of NT-I7 during adjuvant temozolomide in our study (NCT03687957) underwent Cellular Indexing of Transcriptomes and Epitopes by Sequencing (CITE-seq) of peripheral blood. CITE-seq with TCR clonotype sequencing (10x Genomics 5’) permitted simultaneous tracking of the T cell phenotype at the protein level, individual T cell clones, and gene expression dynamics between 4 timepoints: pre-treatment, and post-treatment weeks 1, 2, and 13. Here, we report the results of differential expression analyses between timepoints and patient-specific differences in T cell clonotype expansions. Both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in our study patients had increased expression of T cell activation markers LTB, CISH, and CD74. CD8+ T cell subsets demonstrated additional elevations in genes important in cytotoxic function (granzymes (GZMA, GZMB) and perforin (PRF1)), MHC Class II expression (HLA-DRA, HLA-DRB1), and AP-1 transcription factor subunits (JUND, JUN, JUNB, FOS, FOSB). After excluding known viral antigen clonotypes, 2 of 4 patients demonstrated TCR clonotype expansion. Notably, nearly all the expanded TCR clonotypes were found within CD8+ T cells, but not CD4+ T cells. NT-I7 promotes activation, cytotoxic function, and selective clonotype expansion of CD8+ T cells in patients with HGG. This, combined with its role in increased CD4+ T cell counts, suggests NT-I7 may be a powerful tool to restore immune function after treatment-associated lymphopenia in HGG.

ImportanceSystematic data on the association between anticancer therapies and thromboembolic events (TEEs) in patients with COVID-19 are lacking.ObjectiveTo assess the association between anticancer therapy exposure within 3 months prior to COVID-19 and TEEs following COVID-19 diagnosis in patients with cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis registry-based retrospective cohort study included patients who were hospitalized and had active cancer and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data were accrued from March 2020 to December 2021 and analyzed from December 2021 to October 2022.ExposureTreatments of interest (TOIs) (endocrine therapy, vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors/tyrosine kinase inhibitors [VEGFis/TKIs], immunomodulators [IMiDs], immune checkpoint inhibitors [ICIs], chemotherapy) vs reference (no systemic therapy) in 3 months prior to COVID-19.Main Outcomes and MeasuresMain outcomes were (1) venous thromboembolism (VTE) and (2) arterial thromboembolism (ATE). Secondary outcome was severity of COVID-19 (rates of intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, 30-day all-cause mortality following TEEs in TOI vs reference group) at 30-day follow-up.ResultsOf 4988 hospitalized patients with cancer (median [IQR] age, 69 [59-78] years; 2608 [52%] male), 1869 had received 1 or more TOIs. Incidence of VTE was higher in all TOI groups: endocrine therapy, 7%; VEGFis/TKIs, 10%; IMiDs, 8%; ICIs, 12%; and chemotherapy, 10%, compared with patients not receiving systemic therapies (6%). In multivariable log-binomial regression analyses, relative risk of VTE (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.04-1.69) but not ATE (aRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.56-1.16) was significantly higher in those exposed to all TOIs pooled together vs those with no exposure. Among individual drugs, ICIs were significantly associated with VTE (aRR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.01-2.07). Also noted were significant associations between VTE and active and progressing cancer (aRR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.03), history of VTE (aRR, 3.10; 95% CI, 2.38-4.04), and high-risk site of cancer (aRR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.14-1.75). Black patients had a higher risk of TEEs (aRR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.03-1.50) than White patients. Patients with TEEs had high intensive care unit admission (46%) and mechanical ventilation (31%) rates. Relative risk of death in patients with TEEs was higher in those exposed to TOIs vs not (aRR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.91-1.38) and was significantly associated with poor performance status (aRR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.30-2.40) and active/progressing cancer (aRR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.13-2.13).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study, relative risk of developing VTE was high among patients receiving TOIs and varied by the type of therapy, underlying risk factors, and demographics, such as race and ethnicity. These findings highlight the need for close monitoring and perhaps personalized thromboprophylaxis to prevent morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19–related thromboembolism in patients with cancer.

ImportanceCytokine storm due to COVID-19 can cause high morbidity and mortality and may be more common in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy (IO) due to immune system activation.ObjectiveTo determine the association of baseline immunosuppression and/or IO-based therapies with COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm in patients with cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis registry-based retrospective cohort study included 12 046 patients reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry from March 2020 to May 2022. The CCC19 registry is a centralized international multi-institutional registry of patients with COVID-19 with a current or past diagnosis of cancer. Records analyzed included patients with active or previous cancer who had a laboratory-confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction and/or serologic findings.ExposuresImmunosuppression due to therapy; systemic anticancer therapy (IO or non-IO).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was a 5-level ordinal scale of COVID-19 severity: no complications; hospitalized without requiring oxygen; hospitalized and required oxygen; intensive care unit admission and/or mechanical ventilation; death. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of cytokine storm.ResultsThe median age of the entire cohort was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 54-74) years and 6359 patients were female (52.8%) and 6598 (54.8%) were non-Hispanic White. A total of 599 (5.0%) patients received IO, whereas 4327 (35.9%) received non-IO systemic anticancer therapies, and 7120 (59.1%) did not receive any antineoplastic regimen within 3 months prior to COVID-19 diagnosis. Although no difference in COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm was found in the IO group compared with the untreated group in the total cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56-1.13, and aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.41-1.93, respectively), patients with baseline immunosuppression treated with IO (vs untreated) had worse COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm (aOR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.38-8.01, and aOR, 4.41; 95% CI, 1.71-11.38, respectively). Patients with immunosuppression receiving non-IO therapies (vs untreated) also had worse COVID-19 severity (aOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.36-2.35) and cytokine storm (aOR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.42-3.79).Conclusions and RelevanceThis cohort study found that in patients with cancer and COVID-19, administration of systemic anticancer therapies, especially IO, in the context of baseline immunosuppression was associated with severe clinical outcomes and the development of cytokine storm.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04354701