Gatti-Mays, Margaret Elena

Background: Premedications used to prevent paclitaxel-associated infusion hypersensitivity reactions (iHSRs) can cause undesirable toxicities, such as sleep disturbance and weight gain. Although phase II data suggest that discontinuing premedications after paclitaxel-associated iHSRs may be safe and feasible in select patients without prior iHSRs, no prospective randomized trials have evaluated this approach. Patients and Methods: This randomized clinical trial enrolled patients with breast cancer receiving paclitaxel chemotherapy. Those who experienced no iHSRs with the first 2 doses of paclitaxel were randomized to either continue standard premedications (control arm) or to discontinue all premedications (investigational arm). Both arms were followed longitudinally for any subsequent iHSRs requiring parenteral rescue medications. Additionally, changes in weight, drug-related side effects, and quality of life were assessed. Results: A total of 98 patients were randomized; 89 were evaluable (46 in the control arm and 43 in the investigational arm). Only 1 (2.3%) patient in the investigational arm experienced an iHSR, which resolved with rescue medications. No iHSRs occurred in the control arm. The estimated proportion of subjects who experienced a hypersensitivity reaction (exact binomial 95% CI) was 2.3% (95% CI, 0.1%–12.3%) in the investigational arm and 0.0% (95% CI, 0.0%–7.7%) in the control arm. Patients in the investigational arm reported significantly less sleep disruption (0.5 vs 1.7; P =.002) and unwanted appetite increases (1.0 vs 2.5; P =.0018). Conclusions: Discontinuation of premedications after 2 uneventful paclitaxel doses was not associated with a high rate of subsequent iHSRs and resulted in fewer steroid-related side effects. This strategy may reduce unnecessary medication exposure, improve patient experience, and streamline clinical workflows. For patients who do not experience iHSRs during the first 2 paclitaxel treatments, discontinuing premedications appears safe and may improve tolerability.

Abstract Background: Stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are associated with improved response to chemotherapy and better overall survival (OS) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Quantification of sTILs via hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) tumor slides offers a widely available method to define a simple, effective surrogate for host anti-tumor immunity. Digitization of H&E slides has rapidly gained acceptance for use in diagnostic pathology and research, opening the door for image-based computational approaches to enumerate sTILs, among other features. Methods: We describe QuTILs - a multilayer perceptron-based framework to detect/enumerate TILs trained on >700,000 cells via The Cancer Genome Atlas Program (TCGA) slide images, implemented in the widely used open-source QuPath digital pathology suite. QuTILs was applied to digital H&E images using standard computing in primary breast tumors from phase 3 breast cancer clinical trials - CALGB 40502 (testing), CALGB 40601 and 40603 (validation) - in total 1,729 total images from 962 unique patients. The aims of this investigation were: 1) to assess the relationship between TIL patterns with overall or event-free survival outcomes; 2) to benchmark diverse image-based characteristics of TIL abundance and spatial architecture; and 3) to evaluate the association between image-based TIL levels and RNA-seq-based immune deconvolution metrics (CIBERSORT, EPIC, quanTIseq). Results: QuTILs average processing time was 7.9 minutes for whole-slide total TIL count and area density on a standard laptop workstation. In CALGB 40502, there was positive but modest correlation between pathologist TILs and QuTILs total TILs %, higher in the TNBC subgroup of CALGB 40502 (Pearson r = 0.55). In Cox proportional hazards models, the CALGB 40502 TNBC cohort showed significant univariate association for total TILs % with increasing decile (higher total TIL%) associated with reduced hazard (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.712, 95% CI: 0.559-0.906; P = 0.006), which remained significant in multivariable model incorporating age, race, and treatment arm (HR: 0.713, 95% CI: 0.556-0.915; P = 0.008). In validation TNBC clinical trial CALGB 40603, marginal TILs % was significant in the univariable Cox model (HR: 0.786, 95% CI: 0.639-0.966). Evaluation of TILs % by QuTILs with RNAseq-based deconvolution metrics in cohort-stratified and deconvolution method-stratified multivariable models showed that decile total TILs % by QuTILs was shown to significantly predict outcome in the EPIC (HR: 0.668, 95% CI: 0.466-0.957) and quanTIseq (HR: 0.646, 95% CI: 0.446-0.936) sets, with a similar magnitude as in clinical Cox, suggesting that RNA-based deconvolution estimates may not supplement the prognostic power of image-based TIL estimates. Exploratory analyses of pre- versus post-neoadjuvant therapy H&E images in CALGB 40603 and CALGB 40601 revealed a significant decrease in QuTILs total TIL% in CALGB 40603 for all pairs (n = 118 pairs, pre-median=9.52%, post-median=6.33%; Wilcoxon signed rank P < 0.001) but no significant change in QuTILs total TIL% among all pairs in CALGB 40601 (n = 82 pairs, pre-median=15.92%, post-median=15.10%; P = 0.886). Conclusions: QuTILs provides a computationally efficient open-source workflow for sTIL identification from digital H&E images that can be deployed on a standard laptop. We present the first evaluation of digital sTIL enumeration in CALGB 40502, CALGB 40603, and CALGB 40601 phase III breast cancer clinical trials and demonstrate significant prognostic association with QuTIL total TIL % among TNBCs across studies. Citation Format: M. Vater, R. Salgado, E. Blige, H. Lefebvre, A. Strahan, M. Gatti-Mays, H. Rugo, K. Ballman, M. Watson, Y. Wen, R. Leon-Ferre, K. Niazi, W. Symmans, L. Carey, K. AbdulJabbar, Z. Li, D. Stover. Qutils: open-source image-based infiltrating immune cell detection and outcomes in calgb 40502, calgb 40603, and calgb 40601 phase iii breast cancer clinical trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-07-27.

ImportanceSystematic data on the association between anticancer therapies and thromboembolic events (TEEs) in patients with COVID-19 are lacking.ObjectiveTo assess the association between anticancer therapy exposure within 3 months prior to COVID-19 and TEEs following COVID-19 diagnosis in patients with cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis registry-based retrospective cohort study included patients who were hospitalized and had active cancer and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data were accrued from March 2020 to December 2021 and analyzed from December 2021 to October 2022.ExposureTreatments of interest (TOIs) (endocrine therapy, vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors/tyrosine kinase inhibitors [VEGFis/TKIs], immunomodulators [IMiDs], immune checkpoint inhibitors [ICIs], chemotherapy) vs reference (no systemic therapy) in 3 months prior to COVID-19.Main Outcomes and MeasuresMain outcomes were (1) venous thromboembolism (VTE) and (2) arterial thromboembolism (ATE). Secondary outcome was severity of COVID-19 (rates of intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, 30-day all-cause mortality following TEEs in TOI vs reference group) at 30-day follow-up.ResultsOf 4988 hospitalized patients with cancer (median [IQR] age, 69 [59-78] years; 2608 [52%] male), 1869 had received 1 or more TOIs. Incidence of VTE was higher in all TOI groups: endocrine therapy, 7%; VEGFis/TKIs, 10%; IMiDs, 8%; ICIs, 12%; and chemotherapy, 10%, compared with patients not receiving systemic therapies (6%). In multivariable log-binomial regression analyses, relative risk of VTE (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.04-1.69) but not ATE (aRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.56-1.16) was significantly higher in those exposed to all TOIs pooled together vs those with no exposure. Among individual drugs, ICIs were significantly associated with VTE (aRR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.01-2.07). Also noted were significant associations between VTE and active and progressing cancer (aRR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.03), history of VTE (aRR, 3.10; 95% CI, 2.38-4.04), and high-risk site of cancer (aRR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.14-1.75). Black patients had a higher risk of TEEs (aRR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.03-1.50) than White patients. Patients with TEEs had high intensive care unit admission (46%) and mechanical ventilation (31%) rates. Relative risk of death in patients with TEEs was higher in those exposed to TOIs vs not (aRR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.91-1.38) and was significantly associated with poor performance status (aRR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.30-2.40) and active/progressing cancer (aRR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.13-2.13).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study, relative risk of developing VTE was high among patients receiving TOIs and varied by the type of therapy, underlying risk factors, and demographics, such as race and ethnicity. These findings highlight the need for close monitoring and perhaps personalized thromboprophylaxis to prevent morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19–related thromboembolism in patients with cancer.

ImportanceCytokine storm due to COVID-19 can cause high morbidity and mortality and may be more common in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy (IO) due to immune system activation.ObjectiveTo determine the association of baseline immunosuppression and/or IO-based therapies with COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm in patients with cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis registry-based retrospective cohort study included 12 046 patients reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry from March 2020 to May 2022. The CCC19 registry is a centralized international multi-institutional registry of patients with COVID-19 with a current or past diagnosis of cancer. Records analyzed included patients with active or previous cancer who had a laboratory-confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction and/or serologic findings.ExposuresImmunosuppression due to therapy; systemic anticancer therapy (IO or non-IO).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was a 5-level ordinal scale of COVID-19 severity: no complications; hospitalized without requiring oxygen; hospitalized and required oxygen; intensive care unit admission and/or mechanical ventilation; death. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of cytokine storm.ResultsThe median age of the entire cohort was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 54-74) years and 6359 patients were female (52.8%) and 6598 (54.8%) were non-Hispanic White. A total of 599 (5.0%) patients received IO, whereas 4327 (35.9%) received non-IO systemic anticancer therapies, and 7120 (59.1%) did not receive any antineoplastic regimen within 3 months prior to COVID-19 diagnosis. Although no difference in COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm was found in the IO group compared with the untreated group in the total cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56-1.13, and aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.41-1.93, respectively), patients with baseline immunosuppression treated with IO (vs untreated) had worse COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm (aOR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.38-8.01, and aOR, 4.41; 95% CI, 1.71-11.38, respectively). Patients with immunosuppression receiving non-IO therapies (vs untreated) also had worse COVID-19 severity (aOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.36-2.35) and cytokine storm (aOR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.42-3.79).Conclusions and RelevanceThis cohort study found that in patients with cancer and COVID-19, administration of systemic anticancer therapies, especially IO, in the context of baseline immunosuppression was associated with severe clinical outcomes and the development of cytokine storm.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04354701

e18739 Background: Hair loss is a well-known side effect of chemotherapy. The Paxman Hair Loss Prevention System, a scalp cooling device, has been shown to be effective in reducing chemotherapy induced alopecia in patients receiving chemotherapy (Nangia, JAMA, 2017). The National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines have recommended scalp cooling as category 2A and 2B options, respectively. Methods: The real world use of scalp cooling using the Paxman device, as documented by orders through the Paxman Hub during the years of 2017-2020 was summarized. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographics and utilization. Results: Data from 6649 patients who used scalp cooling were reviewed. Patients with breast cancer were the most common users of scalp cooling (78%, n=5197) followed by gynecology (12%, n=775), gastrointestinal (3%, n=201), lung (1%, n=81) and genitourinary (1%, n=52). The majority of patients were between the ages of 45-65 (55%), followed by 65-74 (18%), older than 75 (5%), and 25-44 (2%). Average number (#) of cycles of cooling completed was 6.53 (range of average # of cycles 4.50-12). Scalp cooling with this device was commonly used in 39 out of 50 states. Conclusions: This is the largest report of scalp cooling usage in the real world setting in the USA, including scalp cooling usage in older adults. Uptake of scalp cooling across various cancers has not been uniform and this deserves further study.