Lustberg, M.

Background: Premedications used to prevent paclitaxel-associated infusion hypersensitivity reactions (iHSRs) can cause undesirable toxicities, such as sleep disturbance and weight gain. Although phase II data suggest that discontinuing premedications after paclitaxel-associated iHSRs may be safe and feasible in select patients without prior iHSRs, no prospective randomized trials have evaluated this approach. Patients and Methods: This randomized clinical trial enrolled patients with breast cancer receiving paclitaxel chemotherapy. Those who experienced no iHSRs with the first 2 doses of paclitaxel were randomized to either continue standard premedications (control arm) or to discontinue all premedications (investigational arm). Both arms were followed longitudinally for any subsequent iHSRs requiring parenteral rescue medications. Additionally, changes in weight, drug-related side effects, and quality of life were assessed. Results: A total of 98 patients were randomized; 89 were evaluable (46 in the control arm and 43 in the investigational arm). Only 1 (2.3%) patient in the investigational arm experienced an iHSR, which resolved with rescue medications. No iHSRs occurred in the control arm. The estimated proportion of subjects who experienced a hypersensitivity reaction (exact binomial 95% CI) was 2.3% (95% CI, 0.1%–12.3%) in the investigational arm and 0.0% (95% CI, 0.0%–7.7%) in the control arm. Patients in the investigational arm reported significantly less sleep disruption (0.5 vs 1.7; P =.002) and unwanted appetite increases (1.0 vs 2.5; P =.0018). Conclusions: Discontinuation of premedications after 2 uneventful paclitaxel doses was not associated with a high rate of subsequent iHSRs and resulted in fewer steroid-related side effects. This strategy may reduce unnecessary medication exposure, improve patient experience, and streamline clinical workflows. For patients who do not experience iHSRs during the first 2 paclitaxel treatments, discontinuing premedications appears safe and may improve tolerability.

PURPOSE The primary objective of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase II study (Alliance A221805) was to screen two doses of duloxetine for preventing sensory oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN). METHODS Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive once daily 30 mg duloxetine, 60 mg duloxetine, or placebo. Eligible participants had stage II to III colorectal cancer and no baseline neuropathy, had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, were age 25 years and older, and received oxaliplatin via one of the following doses and schedules: 85 mg/m 2 every 2 weeks (6 or 12 doses) or 130 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks (4 doses). Duloxetine/placebo was taken once daily beginning day 1 of cycle 1 and continued for 17 weeks. The primary end point, a composite response reflecting sensory OIPN symptom severity and onset, was measured in weeks 19-21 using a validated participant-reported outcome survey assessing extremity numbness, tingling, and pain. Response was defined as a participant-reported highest score of ≤2 (ie, 1 = not at all; 2 = a little) on survey items. To be evaluable for the response end point, eligible participants must have initiated oxaliplatin and submitted ≥1 postbaseline OIPN survey. RESULTS Of the 199 participants (n = 66, 30 mg duloxetine; n = 66, 60 mg duloxetine; n = 67, placebo), 46, 47, and 50 (N = 143, 71.8%), respectively, were evaluable for primary end point analysis based on modified intention-to-treat criteria. Participant mean age was 55.1 years (standard deviation = 10.4). Most were White (n = 113, 80.7%) and male (n = 82, 58.6%). The proportion of responders among those receiving placebo (68.0%) was similar to those receiving duloxetine 30 mg (65.2%) or 60 mg (66.0%). Duloxetine adherence rates, measured via pill counts—30 mg (54%), 60 mg (57%), and placebo (59%) groups—were low (<75%). CONCLUSION Duloxetine is not more promising than placebo for preventing sensory OIPN.