Sica, Roberto Alejandro

Summary CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell (CAR‐T) therapy is a pivotal part of the treatment algorithm for large B‐cell lymphoma (LBCL) in the second‐ and third‐line settings based on numerous clinical trials. However, these studies included very few patients with a diagnosis of high‐grade B‐cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (HGBCL‐NOS) and it is unclear if outcomes are similar to those observed with more common LBCL histologies. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) registry, we identified 111 HGBCL‐NOS patients who received CAR‐T therapy. The cytokine release syndrome (CRS) rate was 74% (7.7% grade 3+), median onset was 4 days (1–17) and immune effector cell‐associated neurotoxicity syndrome rate was 45.2% (22.6% grade 3+), median onset was 7 days (1–17). At 2 years post‐CAR‐T infusion, the probability of overall survival and progression‐free survival were 41.6% and 28.7% respectively. The 2‐year non‐relapse mortality and relapse/progression were 3.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6–7.6) and 68.1% (95% CI: 57.9–77.6) respectively. Our analysis illustrates that patients with HGBCL‐NOS represent a particularly difficult group to treat, even with CAR‐T therapy. We observed that one third of patients achieved a durable response; however, the overall results were less favourable, with lower overall response rate, overall survival and progression‐free survival as compared to published reports on LBCL.

Background: Recent advancements in multiple myeloma (MM) diagnosis and treatment significantly improved patients' survival and quality of life. Severe Renal Impairment (RI) remains a significant challenge in newly diagnosed MM (NDMM), complicating treatment and affecting outcomes. Prior studies reported improved overall renal recovery in the era of novel therapies. However, there is a lack of evidence documenting the outcomes of patients presenting with severe RI. We present an updated analysis of the characteristics and outcomes of patients with NDMM presenting with severe RI in an ethnically diverse, low socio-economic population. Methods: A single-center retrospective review of patients with NDMM presenting to Montefiore Medical Center (Bronx, New York) was conducted from 2011-2023. Severe RI was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m². MM risk was assessed using the mSMART 3.0 tool. Results: Out of 284 patients with NDMM, 58 (20%) patients presented with severe RI. Black patients (p = 0.018) and older adults (64 years vs 60 years, p value 0.032) were more likely to present with severe RI. Severe RI at diagnosis correlated with high-risk myeloma (p = 0.002), high R-ISS stage (p < 0.001), and a lower likelihood of receiving stem cell transplants (p < 0.001). Among those with severe RI, 23/58 required dialysis of which 6/23 were taken off dialysis at last follow-up after renal recovery. Median eGFR at diagnosis, 6 months and 1 year after diagnosis was 11, 23 and 23.5 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively. 14 out of 58 patients (39%) achieved renal recovery to eGFR > 30 one year post-diagnosis, with no significant difference in race, sex, or ethnicity. The most common first-line treatment for patients with severe RI was CyBorD (62%). The median time from diagnosis to first treatment (including plasma exchange) was 10 days. By the last follow-up, 35/58 patients (60%) had a stem cell transplant, with a median time from diagnosis to transplant of 275 days. The median overall survival (OS) for patients with severe RI at diagnosis was 49 months, while it was not reached for those without severe RI (p < 0.001). Early death (≤ 2 months after diagnosis) occurred in 2 patients, both with severe RI. Among patients with severe RI, multivariate Cox regression survival analysis showed that achieving free light chain (FLC) below 500 mg/L (HR 0.212, p < 0.001) and receiving a stem cell transplant (HR 0.209, p 0.002) improved outcome. Conclusions: Despite improvements in the life expectancy of patients with MM, severe renal failure remains a challenge, particularly among minorities. Socioeconomic factors need to be explored as a contributor to outcomes in patients with severe RI. Achieving FLC clearance and undergoing stem cell transplant may play a role in survival in patients with NDMM and severe RI.

ImportanceSystematic data on the association between anticancer therapies and thromboembolic events (TEEs) in patients with COVID-19 are lacking.ObjectiveTo assess the association between anticancer therapy exposure within 3 months prior to COVID-19 and TEEs following COVID-19 diagnosis in patients with cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis registry-based retrospective cohort study included patients who were hospitalized and had active cancer and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data were accrued from March 2020 to December 2021 and analyzed from December 2021 to October 2022.ExposureTreatments of interest (TOIs) (endocrine therapy, vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors/tyrosine kinase inhibitors [VEGFis/TKIs], immunomodulators [IMiDs], immune checkpoint inhibitors [ICIs], chemotherapy) vs reference (no systemic therapy) in 3 months prior to COVID-19.Main Outcomes and MeasuresMain outcomes were (1) venous thromboembolism (VTE) and (2) arterial thromboembolism (ATE). Secondary outcome was severity of COVID-19 (rates of intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, 30-day all-cause mortality following TEEs in TOI vs reference group) at 30-day follow-up.ResultsOf 4988 hospitalized patients with cancer (median [IQR] age, 69 [59-78] years; 2608 [52%] male), 1869 had received 1 or more TOIs. Incidence of VTE was higher in all TOI groups: endocrine therapy, 7%; VEGFis/TKIs, 10%; IMiDs, 8%; ICIs, 12%; and chemotherapy, 10%, compared with patients not receiving systemic therapies (6%). In multivariable log-binomial regression analyses, relative risk of VTE (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.04-1.69) but not ATE (aRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.56-1.16) was significantly higher in those exposed to all TOIs pooled together vs those with no exposure. Among individual drugs, ICIs were significantly associated with VTE (aRR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.01-2.07). Also noted were significant associations between VTE and active and progressing cancer (aRR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.03), history of VTE (aRR, 3.10; 95% CI, 2.38-4.04), and high-risk site of cancer (aRR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.14-1.75). Black patients had a higher risk of TEEs (aRR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.03-1.50) than White patients. Patients with TEEs had high intensive care unit admission (46%) and mechanical ventilation (31%) rates. Relative risk of death in patients with TEEs was higher in those exposed to TOIs vs not (aRR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.91-1.38) and was significantly associated with poor performance status (aRR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.30-2.40) and active/progressing cancer (aRR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.13-2.13).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study, relative risk of developing VTE was high among patients receiving TOIs and varied by the type of therapy, underlying risk factors, and demographics, such as race and ethnicity. These findings highlight the need for close monitoring and perhaps personalized thromboprophylaxis to prevent morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19–related thromboembolism in patients with cancer.

ImportanceCytokine storm due to COVID-19 can cause high morbidity and mortality and may be more common in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy (IO) due to immune system activation.ObjectiveTo determine the association of baseline immunosuppression and/or IO-based therapies with COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm in patients with cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis registry-based retrospective cohort study included 12 046 patients reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry from March 2020 to May 2022. The CCC19 registry is a centralized international multi-institutional registry of patients with COVID-19 with a current or past diagnosis of cancer. Records analyzed included patients with active or previous cancer who had a laboratory-confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction and/or serologic findings.ExposuresImmunosuppression due to therapy; systemic anticancer therapy (IO or non-IO).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was a 5-level ordinal scale of COVID-19 severity: no complications; hospitalized without requiring oxygen; hospitalized and required oxygen; intensive care unit admission and/or mechanical ventilation; death. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of cytokine storm.ResultsThe median age of the entire cohort was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 54-74) years and 6359 patients were female (52.8%) and 6598 (54.8%) were non-Hispanic White. A total of 599 (5.0%) patients received IO, whereas 4327 (35.9%) received non-IO systemic anticancer therapies, and 7120 (59.1%) did not receive any antineoplastic regimen within 3 months prior to COVID-19 diagnosis. Although no difference in COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm was found in the IO group compared with the untreated group in the total cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56-1.13, and aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.41-1.93, respectively), patients with baseline immunosuppression treated with IO (vs untreated) had worse COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm (aOR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.38-8.01, and aOR, 4.41; 95% CI, 1.71-11.38, respectively). Patients with immunosuppression receiving non-IO therapies (vs untreated) also had worse COVID-19 severity (aOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.36-2.35) and cytokine storm (aOR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.42-3.79).Conclusions and RelevanceThis cohort study found that in patients with cancer and COVID-19, administration of systemic anticancer therapies, especially IO, in the context of baseline immunosuppression was associated with severe clinical outcomes and the development of cytokine storm.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04354701