Hashmi, Shahrukh K.

Background Chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) is a complex post-transplant complication resulting in varying degrees of musculoskeletal (MSK) manifestations, including sclerosis-type skin conditions, fasciitis, and osteopenia, avascular necrosis affecting the shoulder, elbow and hands apart from other joints of the body. A large proportion of these can often miss out on the expertise of upper limb therapists. Study Objectives This paper aims to outline upper limb cGVHD manifestations to raise awareness among upper limb physiotherapists and rehabilitation specialists, so that patients can receive more focused, optimal care. Methods An electronic search was conducted across a wide database covering the period from 1990 to 2025. Further manual search used Google Scholar to help identify relevant articles. Boolean operators ‘AND’ and ‘OR’ combined keywords such as chronic graft versus host disease, acute graft versus host disease, allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, hematopoietic cell transplantation, stem cell transplant, bone marrow transplant, physiotherapy, upper limb specialist, musculoskeletal, fasciitis, and scleroderma. Results A total of 4,393 titles were screened against the pre-set inclusion and exclusion criteria, and only 3 articles were found to be suitable for this narrative review. All 3 articles were case studies of upper limb cGVHD and rehabilitation reporting positive outcomes on patients’ upper and lower limb range of motion, function, and quality of life (QoL). Conclusion cGVHD can cause various MSK issues, especially in the upper limbs. It is important to collaborate with upper limb physiotherapy and occupational therapy experts to improve awareness and patient outcomes.

Abstract Background: Until 2022, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) lacked in-country allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) services, forcing patients abroad for curative treatment while local hematologists managed pre- and post-transplant care. This fragmented model created unique challenges in graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) monitoring and survival tracking. We present the first analysis of outcomes in this underserved population. Aims: To evaluate overall survival (OS) and GVHD rates in adults receiving allo-HSCT abroad with UAE-based follow-up, establishing benchmarks for emerging local transplant programs. Methods: Retrospective multicenter study of adults undergoing allo-HSCT outside the UAE (2009–2023) with follow-up at three tertiary centers (SSMC, SKMC, Tawam). Of 454 screened patients, we excluded pediatric cases (n=245), autologous HSCT (n=76; excluded due to distinct indications/outcomes), and rare allo-HSCT indications (n=33), focusing on the most common diagnoses: acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n=54), B/T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B/T-ALL, n=38), and sickle cell disease (SCD, n=8). Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis estimated 1/3/5-year OS. Observed median survival was calculated for deceased patients. GVHD grading followed NIH consensus criteria. Log-rank tests compared subgroups (donor type). Results: Survival: AML 1/3/5-year OS: 96%/79.3%/55.5% (95% CI 48–63). KM-estimated median not reached; observed median in deceased patients: 20 months. Matched unrelated donor (MUD) recipients had inferior survival vs. matched related donor (MRD)/mismatched related donor (MMRD) (p=0.03). B-ALL: 1/3/5-year OS: 92%/76.4%/69.2% (95% CI 61–77). T-ALL (n=7): 1/3-year OS: 80%/50% (limited by small sample) SCD (n=8): 100% survival at all timepoints; no GVHD observed. GVHD: Any-grade GVHD: 68.5% (AML), 73.3% (B-ALL), 71.4% (T-ALL)—exceeding CIBMTR benchmarks (50–60%). Acute GVHD 35.2% (AML), 43.3% (B-ALL), 28.6% (T-ALL). Chronic GVHD 46.3% (AML), 40% (B-ALL), 57.1% (T-ALL). Conclusion: Despite high GVHD rates, survival outcomes support selective overseas referral for AML/B-ALL patients, particularly younger recipients. SCD results highlight the safety of HSCT in non-malignant disease. These findings underscore the need for local HSCT capacity to mitigate care fragmentation and establish a critical benchmark for UAE programs. Prospective studies should evaluate socioeconomic drivers of referral patterns and GVHD disparities.

Abstract Background: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains the leading cause of non-relapse morbidity and mortality in allogeneic hematopoietic-stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients. Clinical scoring systems (e.g., EBMT, HCT-CI, DRI, etc.) can stratify risk but show modest predictive performance (C-statistics 0.49–0.67) when it comes to GVHD. To address this gap, we developed GVHD-Intel 1.0, a real-time, scalable, and interpretable machine learning (ML) framework from an international study to predict both acute (aGVHD) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD), providing individual and bulk predictions using common input variables and HLA alleles. Methods: This retrospective global study, approved by respective institutional review boards, included electronic health records from three tertiary care centers in Abu Dhabi, UAE, and King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), Jordan, from 2009 to 2023. The model was developed in phases. The UAE399 cohort (399 HSCT recipients) served as the baseline dataset. To enhance model generalizability, 55 adult allo-HSCT recipients from KHCC were added to the training set. Two distinct test cohorts were used: UAE46 (46 allogeneic HSCT recipients from UAE) and KHCC150 (150 adult allogeneic HSCT recipients from KHCC), collected later and independently of training data. Variables included donor type, sex mismatch, disease status, time from diagnosis to transplant, and agents used in conditioning and GVHD prophylaxis (e.g., TBI, ATG, alemtuzumab use etc.). HLA alleles (A, B, C, DQ, DR) were symbolically encoded and transformed via one-hot encoding. GVHD events were classified as aGVHD (<100 days) or cGVHD (≥100 days). Missing values were excluded, and class imbalance was handled via class weighting. GVHD-Intel 1.0, co-developed with MBZ University of Artificial Intelligence, features modular ensemble architecture, drug-level feature engineering, novel HLA encoding for low-resolution compatibility scoring, and built-in interpretability using SHAP and LIME. The framework is cloud-deployable for both real-time and batch predictions. Results: The GVHD-Intel 1.0 was externally tested on two independent, temporally and institutionally distinct cohorts (UAE46 and KHCC150), demonstrating strong and consistent predictive performance for both acute and chronic GVHD. For cGVHD prediction, the model achieved an AUC (area under the curve or C-statistic for binary outcomes) of 0.832, F1 score of 0.896, accuracy of 82.7%, PPV of 0.930, sensitivity of 0.864, Brier score of 0.178, and log loss of 0.543. For aGVHD, performance metrics included an AUC of 0.802, F1 score of 0.860, accuracy of 77.6%, PPV of 0.930, sensitivity of 0.799, Brier score of 0.196, and log loss of 0.581. Model calibration remained strong across both tasks, with Brier scores <0.20. Conclusions: GVHD-Intel 1.0 is a robust, interpretable machine learning framework developed from real-world, multicenter data. By integrating widely available clinical variables and HLA allele data, it outperforms conventional clinical risk scores in predicting both acute and chronic GVHD in allo-HSCT recipients. Slightly reduced performance in aGVHD prediction is likely due to the lack of relevant variables. Next steps include prospective validation across multiple transplant centers globally and continued refinement through expanded data integration. GVHD-Intel 1.0 holds strong potential as a clinically valuable, scalable decision-support tool that can be enacted widely and easily by practicing transplant physicians worldwide in all types of settings.

Abstract Tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) is a CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL). We report infectious complications for 100 days (D100) following tisa-cel therapy in 471 pediatric and young adults (median age 13.8 years) with R/R B-ALL reported from September 2017 to June 2022. By D100, 137 (29%) patients had an infectious event, with an infection density of 0.542 per 100 person-days at risk. D100 cumulative incidences of bacterial, viral, and fungal infections were 14.1%, 11.6%, and 1.3%, corresponding to infection density scores of 0.296, 0.213, and 0.033 per 100 person-days at risk, respectively. In a multivariable analysis, receipt of ≥3 lines of therapy before tisa-cel (hazard ratio [HR], 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-3.08; P = .015), any-grade cytokine release syndrome (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.17-2.71; P = .007), and lack of neutrophil recovery (HR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.47-4.69; P = .001) were associated with an increased risk for any infection. Similar associations were observed for bacterial infections, with the addition of younger age as an adverse risk (<6 vs 6-15 years; HR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.23-4.61; P = .01). Risk factors for viral infections included increasing age (1-year increase; HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09; P = .016), prior history of any infection (HR, 2.76, 95% CI, 1.40-5.46; P = .004), and prior hematopoietic cell transplant (HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.18-3.71; P = .011). D100 infection-related mortality (IRM) rate was low at 0.2% (95% CI, 0.0-0.8). In this multicenter real-world study, we observed a high incidence of infectious complications but a low IRM following tisa-cel for R/R B-ALL.

Summary CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell (CAR‐T) therapy is a pivotal part of the treatment algorithm for large B‐cell lymphoma (LBCL) in the second‐ and third‐line settings based on numerous clinical trials. However, these studies included very few patients with a diagnosis of high‐grade B‐cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (HGBCL‐NOS) and it is unclear if outcomes are similar to those observed with more common LBCL histologies. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) registry, we identified 111 HGBCL‐NOS patients who received CAR‐T therapy. The cytokine release syndrome (CRS) rate was 74% (7.7% grade 3+), median onset was 4 days (1–17) and immune effector cell‐associated neurotoxicity syndrome rate was 45.2% (22.6% grade 3+), median onset was 7 days (1–17). At 2 years post‐CAR‐T infusion, the probability of overall survival and progression‐free survival were 41.6% and 28.7% respectively. The 2‐year non‐relapse mortality and relapse/progression were 3.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6–7.6) and 68.1% (95% CI: 57.9–77.6) respectively. Our analysis illustrates that patients with HGBCL‐NOS represent a particularly difficult group to treat, even with CAR‐T therapy. We observed that one third of patients achieved a durable response; however, the overall results were less favourable, with lower overall response rate, overall survival and progression‐free survival as compared to published reports on LBCL.

In REACH3 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03112603 ), ruxolitinib was investigated versus best available therapy (BAT) for 3 years in patients with steroid-refractory/dependent chronic graft-versus-host-disease (SR/D-cGVHD). Patients received ruxolitinib (10 mg twice daily) or BAT for 24 weeks; thereafter (weeks 24-156), patients continued randomized treatment, entered long-term survival follow-up, or crossed over from BAT to ruxolitinib. In 329 randomly assigned patients (ruxolitinib: 165; BAT: 164), the median failure-free survival (FFS) was 38.4 months for ruxolitinib versus 5.7 months for BAT (hazard ratio, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.27 to 0.49]). Median duration of response (DOR) was not reached for ruxolitinib versus 6.4 months for BAT. Ruxolitinib-treated patients had a higher probability of FFS (ruxolitinib: 56.5%; BAT: 18.2%) and maintaining a response (ruxolitinib: 59.6%; BAT: 26.7%) at 36 months. Median overall survival was not reached. Nonrelapse mortality and malignancy relapse/recurrence events were low. In 70 patients who crossed over to ruxolitinib, the overall response rate (50.0%) at week 24 and best overall response (81.4%) during the crossover period were consistent with the primary analysis of randomly assigned patients. No new safety signals were observed. Ruxolitinib provided longer FFS and DOR than BAT, demonstrating sustained efficacy and manageable safety over 3 years of follow-up in patients with SR/D-cGVHD.

PURPOSE Initial reports indicate that access to contemporary therapies currently used in North America for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) varies internationally. No studies have quantitatively reported the extent of disparities in the access to MM therapies worldwide, with a goal to investigate access to MM therapies and barriers globally. METHODS From June 18 to July 15, 2023, an electronic survey was distributed to 176 oncologists treating MM outside the United States. MM drugs were categorized by accessibility, with the cutoff for adequate access set at 60% of respondents affirming easy/moderate access. RESULTS Ninety-five (54%) respondents from 33 countries completed the survey. Fifty-one percent of the respondents were from university-based academic programs, and 17% of the responders treated only plasma cell disorders. Most respondents had adequate access to noncellular MM therapies, except for isatuximab, ixazomib, selinexor, and elotuzumab. Among the cellular therapies, 17% had access to Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell therapy, whereas 23% had access to approved T-cell engagers (TCEs). Financial stress on patients and health care systems has emerged as a primary barrier to global inaccessibility of treatment drugs. CONCLUSION Global access to novel MM therapies remains challenging, and we have identified barriers and suggested strategies to bridge this gap.

ABSTRACTBackgroundIn this study, we compared outcomes of intensified myeloablative conditioning regimens using large registry data from Japan (Japanese Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy) and the United States (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research).MethodsAdult patients who underwent their first myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for acute leukemia in remission between 2010 and 2018 using conditioning regimens of cyclophosphamide plus total‐body irradiation (CY/TBI), CY/TBI+cytarabine (AraC), or CY/TBI+etoposide (VP16) were included.ResultsThe acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cohort (N = 480, 38.8%) indicated that overall survival (OS) was poorer in CY/TBI+AraC (hazard ratio [HR] 1.46, p < 0.001) and CY/TBI+VP16 (HR 1.39, p = 0.059) compared to CY/TBI. Relapse was not suppressed, while treatment‐related mortality (TRM) was significantly higher (HR 1.78 and 1.74, p < 0.001 and 0.018, respectively). In the acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cohort (N = 3901, 61.2%), OS was comparable among these regimens. With intensified regimens, relapse was significantly suppressed in CY/TBI+VP16 (HR 0.74, p = 0.005), while TRM was higher (HR 1.21, p = 0.077). No interactions were observed regarding the country.ConclusionIn AML adding AraC and VP16 to CY/TBI had an adverse effect on OS. Conversely, in ALL, adding VP16 or AraC to CY/TBI did not affect survival, but the addition of VP16 reduced the risk of relapse.Clinical Trial RegistrationThe authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission.

1593 Background: “Financial toxicity” refers to the financial burden imposed by treatment costs on individuals with cancer, constituting a major barrier to achieving equitable cancer outcomes. Recent literature increasingly demonstrates the detrimental impacts of financial toxicity on quality of life (QOL) among individuals with cancer, including individuals who have undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This study evaluates associations among treatment cost burden and various aspects of QOL following HSCT. Methods: Seven hundred one HSCT recipients completed a survey examining their biopsychosocial health one year following transplant. The survey included the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Bone Marrow Transplantation (FACT-BMT), a multifactorial measure of QOL specific to this population. Treatment cost burden endorsement was measured on a 5-item Likert scale. Hierarchical regression models were developed to assess the incremental effects of demographic characteristics (i.e., Block 1), clinical predictors (Block 2), and cost burden (Block 3) on physical, emotional, social, functional, BMT-specific, general, and composite QOL outcomes. Results: Significant model improvement was observed with the addition of clinical factors ( ΔF(2,650) = 20.28, p < .001), and subsequently, treatment cost burden ( ΔF(1,649) = 110.29, p < .001). In the final model, higher cost burden was associated with poorer physical (β = -0.323, p < .001), emotional (β = -0.301, p < .001), social (β = -0.250, p < .001), functional (β = -0.317, p < .001), BMT-specific (β = -0.341, p < .001), general (β = -0.377, p < .001), and composite QOL (β = -0.381, p < .001). Poorer performance score was associated with each QOL indicator ( p < .001), with allogeneic transplant type associated with poorer functional (β = -0.001, p = .002), but higher emotional (β = 0.118, p = .002), wellbeing. Older age (β = 0.113, p = .003) and female sex predicted higher (β = 0.183, p < .001), while Hispanic ethnicity predicted poorer (β = -0.095, p = .010), social wellbeing. Female sex was associated with poorer QOL specific to BMT concerns (β = -0.118, p = .001). Conclusions: Higher treatment cost burden is associated with poorer overall QOL and its physical, emotional, social, functional, and BMT-specific components one year following HSCT, after controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics. This reflects a critical barrier to equitable cancer care, suggesting that financial toxicity may perpetuate preexisting inequities in QOL, treatment, disease, and survival outcomes that disproportionately impact the underserved. Future research should prioritize 1) better understanding relationships among complex indicators of financial toxicity, QOL, and their underpinning mechanisms and 2) developing solutions to mitigate financial toxicity of HSCT and overall cancer care.

The authors requested to update the acknowledgement, funding, and authors contribution section in their article titled “UAE Consensus on Patient Profiles for Pre-exposure Prophylaxis with Monoclonal Antibodies against COVID-19 in Hematological Malignancies and Immunocompromised States” published in “New Emirates Medical Journal,” 2024; 5: e02506882347591 [1]. We apologize for any inconvenience caused and appreciate the opportunity to rectify this matter. The original article can be found online at https://www. eurekaselect.com/article/147185 Original: AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS It is hereby acknowledged that all authors have accepted responsibility for the manuscript's content and consented to its submission. They have meticulously reviewed all results and unanimously approved the final version of the manuscript. FUNDING None. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Declared none. Corrected: AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS S.H., J.A., A.R.A., M.A., A.Al.M., B.G., A.L., H.Y.O., P.K.: All contributed to the delphie and discus-sion meetings; S.H., A.Al.M., A.R.A. and M.A.: Contributed to writing the main manuscript; S.H., B.G., A.L., H.Y.O., P.K.: Contributed to revising the main manuscript. FUNDING The consensus logistics and medical publication was funded by AstraZeneca FZ LLC, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors extend their sincere gratitude to Meeting Minds Medical Communications Agency for their unwavering support in medical content development, including invaluable editorial and formatting assis-tance, which significantly contributed to the successful completion of the manuscript. Additionally, we express our appreciation to the Emirates Society of Hematology (ESH) for their endorsement of this work, further enhancing its credibility and relevance within the field. A courtesy copy of the final manuscript was provided to AstraZeneca as a gesture of acknowledgment for their interest in this research endeavor.