Chheda, Milan G

Abstract Purpose: Standard care for high-grade gliomas (HGG) involves maximal surgical resection followed by radiation and temozolomide. Postoperative adjuvant therapy frequently causes lymphopenia, which is associated with poor prognosis. Interleukin 7 (IL7) is essential for lymphocyte development, homeostasis, and survival. NT-I7 (efineptakin alfa), a long-acting recombinant IL7, reverses lymphopenia and improves survival in murine glioma models. However, the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and impact of NT-I7 on immune cells in patients with HGG remain unknown. Patients and Methods: We conducted a phase I trial (NCT03687957) examining the MTD and effect of NT-I7 on lymphocytes in patients with newly diagnosed HGG. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity; secondary endpoints included absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) changes over time, overall response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints included immune profiling at different time points using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) in a subset of patients. Results: NT-I7 was well tolerated with a MTD of 720 µg/kg. Moreover, NT-I7 significantly increased ALCs for more than 12 weeks in duration. Early elevations in CD4+, CD8+ T cells and NK cells further coincided with increased TNF and CXCL9 cytokine levels. Comprehensive immune profiling of peripheral blood T cells revealed selective clonotype expansion within CD8+, but not CD4+, T cells following NT-I7 administration. Finally, a subset of our patients with MGMT promoter–unmethylated glioblastoma, which are typically associated with a poorer prognosis, demonstrated promising clinical responses. Conclusions: NT-I7 has the potential to maintain and increase lymphocyte counts in patients with HGG and warrants further investigation, particularly in combination with immune-based therapies.

AbstractBackgroundIt remains unknown how the COVID-19 pandemic has changed neuro-oncology clinical practice, training, and research efforts.MethodsWe performed an international survey of practitioners, scientists, and trainees from 21 neuro-oncology organizations across 6 continents, April 24–May 17, 2020. We assessed clinical practice and research environments, institutional preparedness and support, and perceived impact on patients.ResultsOf 582 respondents, 258 (45%) were US-based and 314 (55%) international. Ninety-four percent of participants reported changes in their clinical practice. Ninety-five percent of respondents converted at least some practice to telemedicine. Ten percent of practitioners felt the need to see patients in person, specifically because of billing concerns and pressure from their institutions. Sixty-seven percent of practitioners suspended enrollment for at least one clinical trial, including 62% suspending phase III trial enrollments. More than 50% believed neuro-oncology patients were at increased risk for COVID-19. Seventy-one percent of clinicians feared for their own personal safety or that of their families, specifically because of their clinical duties; 20% had inadequate personal protective equipment. While 69% reported increased stress, 44% received no psychosocial support from their institutions. Thirty-seven percent had salary reductions and 63% of researchers temporarily closed their laboratories. However, the pandemic created positive changes in perceived patient satisfaction, communication quality, and technology use to deliver care and mediate interactions with other practitioners.ConclusionsThe pandemic has changed treatment schedules and limited investigational treatment options. Institutional lack of support created clinician and researcher anxiety. Communication with patients was satisfactory. We make recommendations to guide clinical and scientific infrastructure moving forward and address the personal challenges of providers and researchers.