Citations

Abstract Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative therapy for myelofibrosis (MF). In this large multicenter retrospective study, overall survival (OS) in MF patients treated with allogeneic HCT (551 patients) and without HCT (non-HCT) (1377 patients) was analyzed with Cox proportional hazards model. Survival analysis stratified by the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) revealed that the first year of treatment arm assignment, due to upfront risk of transplant-related mortality (TRM), HCT was associated with inferior OS compared with non-HCT (non-HCT vs HCT: DIPSS intermediate 1 [Int-1]: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.26, P < .0001; DIPSS-Int-2 and higher: HR, 0.39, P < .0001). Similarly, in the DIPSS low-risk MF group, due to upfront TRM risk, OS was superior with non-HCT therapies compared with HCT in the first-year post treatment arm assignment (HR, 0.16, P = .006). However, after 1 year, OS was not significantly different (HR, 1.38, P = .451). Beyond 1 year of treatment arm assignment, an OS advantage with HCT therapy in Int-1 and higher DIPSS score patients was observed (non-HCT vs HCT: DIPSS-Int-1: HR, 2.64, P < .0001; DIPSS-Int-2 and higher: HR, 2.55, P < .0001). In conclusion, long-term OS advantage with HCT was observed for patients with Int-1 or higher risk MF, but at the cost of early TRM. The magnitude of OS benefit with HCT increased as DIPSS risk score increased and became apparent with longer follow-up.

Abstract Introduction: In young men, sleep restriction decreases testosterone and increases afternoon cortisol, leading to anabolic-catabolic imbalance, insulin resistance and metabolic, neurocognitive, reproductive, and other adverse effects. Age-related differences in the hypothalamo-pituitary-testicular/adrenal response to sleep restriction could expose older individuals to greater or lesser risk, but this possibility has not been previously studied. Subjects and Methods: Thirty-five healthy young and older men aged 18-30y (n=17) and 60-80y (n=18), underwent blood sampling in the Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science every 10 minutes for 24 hours from 6PM-6PM under two conditions in random order spaced at least 3 weeks apart: awake (no sleep) or sleep (from 10PM to 6AM). Blood was assayed for LH, testosterone (T) and cortisol (F), and then analyzed by automated mathematical deconvolution and with cross approximate entropy statistics to determine hormone secretion and hormone synchrony, respectively. Statistical significance was construed by repeated measures ANOVA using a full factorial model that included age, sleep and the interaction. Results: Sleep deprivation had multiple effects on 24-hour (6PM-6PM) Te secretion with significant reductions in mean concentrations, basal, total and pulsatile secretion, and pulse frequency (each P<0.05), in the absence of detectable changes in LH. These effects were most apparent in older men and differed according to age for some parameters: pulsatile Te secretion (P=0.03) and T pulse frequency (P=0.02). Time-of-day analyses revealed that sleep restriction significantly reduced Te in the morning (6AM-9AM) and afternoon (3PM-6PM), reduced LH in the morning, and increased F in the afternoon, particularly in older men. Cross-approximate entropy statistics showed that sleep restriction enforced greater LH-Te and Te-LH joint synchrony in the morning (P<0.05 for each), but not in the afternoon. Conclusion: Sleep restriction decreases morning LH secretion, morning and afternoon Te secretion, and increases afternoon F secretion, especially in older men. This combination of findings could plausibly cause metabolic and reproductive ill-health when accumulated over decades of life, and may explain how chronic sleep loss contributes to metabolic and reproductive diseases that are more prevalent in older men. These preliminary data also suggest a time-of-day dependent uncoupling of the regulatory control of the testicular axis, and of cortisol secretion. Direct verification by interventions that manipulate hormones during the morning and late afternoon in appropriately matched cohorts of young and older men are now required.

Abstract Context. Interleukin-2 (IL2), a proinflammatory cytokine, is used for treatment of malignancies. Increased cortisol and ACTH were noted, but not investigated in detail. This is the first study in healthy men which uses moderate high IL2 doses as used in cancer treatment. Objective. The goal of this study was to quantify cortisol secretion after a single sc injection of IL2 at 1900 h in young and older healthy men in relation to dose, age and body composition. Design. This was a placebo-controlled, blinded, prospectively randomized cross-over study in 17 young subjects (mean age 24.1 yr, range 19–30 yr) and 18 older subjects (mean age 63.9 yr, range 60–75 yr). The subjects underwent 24 h of blood sampling at 10-min intervals, starting at 1800 h. At 2000 h IL2 (3 or 6 million units per m2 body surface) or saline was injected sc. Lights were off between 2300 and 0700 h. Setting. The study was performed in a Clinical Translational Research Unit. Outcome measures. Mean concentrations of cortisol, deconvolution analysis, and approximate entropy. Abdominal visceral fat (AVF) and total abdominal fat (TAF) were calculated from single slice CT. Results. Cortisol concentrations started to rise at 2300 h. The AUC’s during the lights-on periods were unchanged by IL2. Therefore, most analyses were restricted to the 8 h lights-off period. In young volunteers pulsatile cortisol secretion increased from 52.9±5.8 to 77.0±8.0 µg/L/8h and in older subjects from 60.6±3.8 to 70.6±4.6 µg/L/8h (GLM: treatment P <0.0001, treatment x age: P=0.02, mean ± SEM). Thus, the effect was smaller in older subjects. Increasing the IL2 dose increased cortisol secretion in young subjects (P= 0.001), but not in older subjects (P=0.90). In addition, the slopes (mean ± SE) of the linear part of the concentration curves after IL-2 were steeper than after placebo, pointing to accelerated release (young 1.40±0.13 to 3.76±0.11, P<0.0001, in older 1.27±0.04 to 3.28±0.15, P<0.0001).The incremental nocturnal pulsatile cortisol secretion after IL2 was negatively related to body composition (AVF: R= ̶ 0.41, P=0.019; TAF R= ̶ 0.41, P=0.043). Nocturnal ApEn-cortisol did not increase after low dose IL2 (0.981± 0.099 to 0.991±0.046, P=0.92). After high-dose, ApEn increased from 0.877±0.041 to 1.024±0.049, P=0.008, not correlated with body composition, nor with age. The ApEn increase points to decreased secretory regularity imposed by enhanced CRF signaling, rather than diminished cortisol feedback, which leads to greater secretory regularity. Conclusion. Il2, a paradigm for inflammation, increased pulsatile cortisol secretion, more in young than in older subjects. Higher IL2 doses in young subjects amplified cortisol secretion, but not in older subjects. Cortisol secretion exhibited an advance (earlier) time shift, accompanied by accelerated secretion. Incremental nocturnal cortisol secretion was negatively related to fat mass.

Abstract Context. Aging is associated with diminished testosterone (Te) secretion, which could be attributed to Leydig cell dysfunction, decreased pituitary stimulation and altered Te feedback. Objective. The goal was to quantify all three regulatory nodes of the GnRH-LH-Leydig cell- axis in the same cohort of healthy men, by measuring (1) indirectly the strength of the endogenous GnRH signal on the gonadotrope, (2) the strength of Te feedback on LH by ketoconazole (KTCZ), and (3) the effect of LH infusions on Te secretion, in relation to age and body composition. Design. This was a placebo-controlled, blinded, prospectively randomized cross-over study in 40 men, age 19–73 yr, BMI 20–34.3 kg/m2. A submaximal dose of ganirelix (GnRH antagonist) was used to assess outflow of GnRH, by calculating the difference between LH output during the control and ganirelix arm. Ketoconazole (steroidogenic inhibitor) was used to estimate feedback, by the difference in LH output during ketoconazole and control arm. High-dose ganirelix and repeated 6-min LH (18.75 IU) infusions were used to measure testicular responsivity. Blood sampling was at 10-min intervals. The 4 sessions were concluded with, a single submaximally GnRH stimulus to assess the responsiveness of the gonadotrope during ganirelix inhibition. Setting. The study was performed in a Clinical Translational Research Unit. Interventions. In 3 of the 4 experiments subjects underwent 5 h of blood sampling at 10-min intervals, starting at 0800 h. At 1100 h GnRH was injected and sampling was continued for another 2 h. Admission was at 1700 h the day before. At 2000 h they received KTCZ, dexamethasone or ganirelix and/or placebo. KTCZ and dexamethasone (or placebo) were administered again at 0700 when the IV catheter was placed. High-dose ganirelix was used to test the testicular responsiveness, and 7 LH pulses (90 min intervals) were given., with blood sampling from 1500 till 1300 h next day. Outcome measures. Mean concentrations of LH and (bio)Te, deconvolution analysis, endogenous dose-response LH-bioTe relation, and approximate entropy. Abdominal visceral fat (AVF) was calculated from single slice CT. Results. There were age-, but not body composition-related decreases in estimated endogenous GnRH secretion, Te’s feedback strength on LH, and Leydig cell responsivity to LH, accompanied by changes in approximate entropy. Bioavailable Te levels were negatively related to both age and AVF, without interaction between these variables. The LH response to a submaximal dose of GnRH was independent of age and AVF. Conclusion. Advancing age is associated with 1) attenuated bioavailable Te secretion caused by diminished GnRH outflow and not by decreased GnRH responsivity of the gonadotrope, 2) diminished testicular responsivity to infused LH pulses, and 3) partial compensation by diminished Te feedback on central gonadotropic regulation.

Abstract Aims To determine the extent of shared decision-making (SDM), during selection of oral anticoagulant (OAC) and rhythm control treatments, in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods and results We evaluated survey data from 1006 patients with new-onset AF enrolled at 56 US sites participating in the SATELLITE substudy of the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT II). Patients completed surveys at enrolment and at 6-month follow-up. Patients were asked about who made their AF treatment decisions. Shared decision-making was classified as one that the patient felt was an autonomous decision or a shared decision with their healthcare provider (HCP). Approximately half of patients reported that their OAC treatment decisions were made entirely by their HCP. Compared with those reporting no SDM, patients reporting SDM for OAC were more often female (47.2% vs. 38.4%), while patients reporting SDM for rhythm control were more often male (62.2% vs. 57.6%). The most important factors cited by patients during decision-making for OAC were reducing stroke and bleeding risk, and their HCP’s recommendations. After adjustment, patients with self-reported understanding of OAC, and rhythm control options, had higher odds of having participated in SDM [odds ratio (OR) 2.54, confidence interval (CI): 1.75–3.68 and OR 2.36, CI: 1.50–3.71, both P ≤ 0.001, respectively]. Conclusion Shared decision-making is not widely implemented in contemporary AF practice. Patient understanding about available therapeutic options is associated with a more than a two-fold higher likelihood of SDM, and may be a potential target for future interventions.

Background Past research in population health trends has shown that injuries form a substantial burden of population health loss. Regular updates to injury burden assessments are critical. We report Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2017 Study estimates on morbidity and mortality for all injuries. Methods We reviewed results for injuries from the GBD 2017 study. GBD 2017 measured injury-specific mortality and years of life lost (YLLs) using the Cause of Death Ensemble model. To measure non-fatal injuries, GBD 2017 modelled injury-specific incidence and converted this to prevalence and years lived with disability (YLDs). YLLs and YLDs were summed to calculate disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Findings In 1990, there were 4 260 493 (4 085 700 to 4 396 138) injury deaths, which increased to 4 484 722 (4 332 010 to 4 585 554) deaths in 2017, while age-standardised mortality decreased from 1079 (1073 to 1086) to 738 (730 to 745) per 100 000. In 1990, there were 354 064 302 (95% uncertainty interval: 338 174 876 to 371 610 802) new cases of injury globally, which increased to 520 710 288 (493 430 247 to 547 988 635) new cases in 2017. During this time, age-standardised incidence decreased non-significantly from 6824 (6534 to 7147) to 6763 (6412 to 7118) per 100 000. Between 1990 and 2017, age-standardised DALYs decreased from 4947 (4655 to 5233) per 100 000 to 3267 (3058 to 3505). Interpretation Injuries are an important cause of health loss globally, though mortality has declined between 1990 and 2017. Future research in injury burden should focus on prevention in high-burden populations, improving data collection and ensuring access to medical care.

Abstract Up to 85% of adult cancer survivors and 99% of adult survivors of childhood cancer live with an accumulation of chronic conditions, frailty, and/or cognitive impairments resulting from cancer and its treatment. Thus, survivors often show an accelerated development of multiple geriatric syndromes and need therapeutic interventions. To advance progress in this area, the National Cancer Institute convened the second of 2 think tanks under the auspices of the Cancer and Accelerated Aging: Advancing Research for Healthy Survivors initiative. Experts assembled to share evidence of promising strategies to prevent, slow, or reverse the aging consequences of cancer and its treatment. The meeting identified research and resource needs, including geroscience-guided clinical trials; comprehensive assessments of functional, cognitive, and psychosocial vulnerabilities to assess and predict age-related outcomes; preclinical and clinical research to determine the optimal dosing for behavioral (eg, diet, exercise) and pharmacologic (eg, senolytic) therapies; health-care delivery research to evaluate the efficacy of integrated cancer care delivery models; optimization of intervention implementation, delivery, and uptake; and patient and provider education on cancer and treatment-related late and long-term adverse effects. Addressing these needs will expand knowledge of aging-related consequences of cancer and cancer treatment and inform strategies to promote healthy aging of cancer survivors.

Abstract Background There are many pharmacologic therapies that are being used or considered for treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). There is a need for frequently updated practice guidelines on their use, based on critical evaluation of rapidly emerging literature. The objective was to develop evidence-based rapid guidelines intended to support patients, clinicians, and other healthcare professionals in their decisions about treatment and management of patients with COVID-19. Methods The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel of infectious disease clinicians, pharmacists, and methodologists with varied areas of expertise. Process followed a rapid recommendation checklist. The panel prioritized questions and outcomes. Then a systematic review of the peer-reviewed and gray literature was conducted. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence and make recommendations. Results The IDSA guideline panel agreed on 7 treatment recommendations and provided narrative summaries of other treatments undergoing evaluations. Conclusions The panel expressed the overarching goal that patients be recruited into ongoing trials, which would provide much-needed evidence on the efficacy and safety of various therapies for COVID-19, given that we could not make a determination whether the benefits outweigh harms for most treatments.