Citations

Abstract Rationale Inflammation is central to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) pathogenesis but incompletely represented in COPD prognostic models. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a readily available inflammatory biomarker. Objectives To explore the associations of NLR with smoking status, clinical features of COPD, and future adverse outcomes. Methods We analyzed NLR calculated from the complete blood count of participants who currently or formerly smoked (n = 2,624) and tobacco-naive control subjects (n = 187) in the SPIROMICS multicenter observational cohort study. We assessed the stability of NLR at 6 weeks and 1 year, the association with select blood biomarkers, and the impact of smoking on NLR and cell counts. We stratified participants by NLR quartiles to compare cross-sectional clinical features at enrollment, prospectively observed exacerbations at 1 year, and mortality during longitudinal follow up. Results Higher NLR quartiles were broadly associated with more severe clinical features of COPD. NLR values were repeatable at 6 weeks (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.74) and 1 year (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.62). The impact of smoking on NLR varied with the severity of airflow limitation, mediated by an interaction between smoking, forced expiratory volume in 1 second percent predicted, and neutrophil counts but not lymphocyte counts. The highest NLR quartile (>3.11) was associated with an increased risk of exacerbation over 1 year (adjusted odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.18, 1.92) and increased risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.20, 1.66) compared with quartiles 1–3. Conclusions Elevated NLR in stable COPD is a widely available biomarker associated with increased risk for exacerbation and death. The impact of cigarette smoking on NLR varies with disease severity.

Importance In the literature, there is a lack of data reporting tumor control rates after radiotherapy in actively growing vestibular schwannomas (VS). Data for this rarely studied population are needed. Objective To estimate tumor control rates in radiologically growing VS treated with first-line radiotherapy. Design, Setting, and Participants This international, multicenter cohort study used prospectively collected data from patients with growing unilateral VS treated first-line with radiotherapy between January 2000 and December 2023 from 8 tertiary referral skull base units. The data were analyzed in June 2025. Exposures Radiotherapy as an initial treatment for VS. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was treatment failure, ie VS growth postradiotherapy, which was predefined as an increase in maximum intracranial tumor diameter (ICTD) of 3 mm or greater within the first 2 years after radiotherapy or 2 mm or greater thereafter. Secondary outcomes were treatment failure based on different definitions of VS growth: (1) an increase in ICTD of 2 mm or greater, (2) an increase in ICTD of 3 mm or greater, and (3) conversion to surgery. Results A total of 1883 patients (975 female individuals [51.8%]; median age at diagnosis, 63 years [IQR, 53-71 years]) were included in the study. Using the primary definition of treatment failure (an increase in ICTD of ≥3 mm within the first 2 years postradiotherapy or ≥2 mm thereafter), the Kaplan-Meier estimate yielded a 10-year tumor control rate of 76.1% (95% CI, 72.7%-79.2%). For secondary outcome definitions, 10-year tumor control rates were 60.1% (95% CI, 57.5%-64.3%) for an ICTD increase of 2 mm or greater, 78.3% (95% CI, 75.0%-81.2%) for an increase of 3 mm or greater, and 92.6% (95% CI, 90.4%-94.3%) for conversion to surgery. Neither pretreatment tumor size nor tumor location (intracanalicular vs extracanalicular) were significantly associated with treatment failure. Conclusions and Relevance The results of this cohort study provide tumor control outcomes for radiologically growing VS treated with radiotherapy using several clinically relevant definitions of growth. By focusing exclusively on this rarely isolated subgroup, the findings offer targeted data to potentially inform treatment expectations and future research.

Abstract Rationale High-attenuation area (HAA) is a computed tomography (CT) tool that correlates with lung inflammation and fibrosis. Systemic molecular correlates of HAA (e.g., plasma proteins) may inform biological processes involved in interstitial lung disease. Objectives To identify plasma proteins that associate with HAA and correlate with a higher probability of developing new-onset fibrotic or subpleural interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs). Methods Plasma protein levels were measured using a semiquantitative aptamer-based platform in MESA (the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis; N = 5,486) and SPIROMICS (Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD Study; N = 1,781). Linear regression models identified HAA-associated proteins after adjustment for demographic and socioeconomic factors, CT scanner parameters, study center, and batch. Associations of HAA-related proteins with new-onset fibrotic or subpleural ILAs were examined in MESA participants with ILA assessments on full-lung CT 10 years later. Immunohistochemical staining of select proteins was performed in lung tissue from pulmonary fibrosis cases. Measurements and Main Results There were 75 proteins detected that were significantly associated with HAA in MESA and SPIROMICS. Gene Ontology analysis of these proteins identified processes involved in immune cell chemotaxis and cellular growth and apoptosis. Seven proteins were associated with a higher probability of new-onset fibrotic or subpleural ILAs in MESA, and two of these, junctional adhesion molecule-like protein and GTP cyclohydrolase 1 feedback regulatory protein, stained in areas of fibrosis in lung tissue from patients with interstitial lung disease. Conclusions Plasma proteins associated with more HAA are involved in immune and cellular processes and associate with new-onset fibrotic-subpleural ILA.

Context.— Ensuring equitable laboratory patient care within diverse populations is a priority. The cytopathology laboratory has an important role in providing gender-inclusive care, particularly with regard to screening and prevention of human papillomavirus–related carcinoma, for individuals who are transgender, gender nonbinary, intersex, and with same-gender sexual orientation. Providing equitable care necessitates an understanding of gender-inclusive processes within the cytopathology laboratory. Many barriers to implementation exist and include sociocultural, legal, ethical, and financial hurdles. Objective.— To review the current literature regarding gender-inclusive care within a multi-institutional setting and identify challenges and opportunities for future growth in cytopathology. Specific areas of focus include appropriate terminology in laboratory information systems and requisitions, and variables affecting Papanicolaou test interpretation, human papillomavirus testing, and anal Papanicolaou test screening. Data Sources.— Primary literature was searched within the areas highlighted throughout the article. Multi-institutional experiences from the authors, in addition to editorials and expert opinion, were used. Conclusions.— The cytopathology laboratory has an important role in providing care that is inclusive and accurate for all patients. Gaps in care exist and further work is needed to address these disparities. This review attempts to increase awareness, educate, and share our own multi-institutional experiences, and calls for improvements in cytopathology to optimize quality in gender-inclusive patient care.

Objectives Cervical spine (c-spine) X-ray (XR) remains an important tool for pediatric trauma patients. XR is a low radiation alternative to multidetector CT (MDCT). Our primary aims were to analyze the sensitivity of a negative c-spine XR and to analyze what factors lead to additional imaging after a negative c-spine XR. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a level 1 pediatric trauma center from 2012 to 2021. We compared the group with negative c-spine XR and no additional imaging to the group with negative c-spine XR followed by additional c-spine MDCT and/or MRI. Results There were 2,081 negative XRs and 1,974 (95%) had their c-spines cleared without additional imaging. No patient required an operation for a clinically significant c-spine injury in this group, and we consider this no missed injuries. The remaining 108 patients had additional c-spine imaging after negative c-spine XR for c-spine clearance (24 MDCT, 76 MRI, 8 MDCT and MRI). Indications for additional c-spine imaging were pain (48.1%), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≤14 (43.5%), and paresthesia (8.3%). Patients who received additional imaging were more likely to have a GCS score ≤12 (25.4% vs 4.1%), Injury Severity Score >15 (21.9% vs 8.1%), Level 1 Trauma activation (21% vs 5%), Abbreviated Injury Scale head score of 4 or 5 (29% vs 5%), be intubated (30% vs 2%), and have non-accidental trauma as their mechanism of injury (20% vs 1%) (p value<0.0001, for all). Five patients who received additional imaging were treated with a cervical collar, but no operative intervention. Conclusions In this cohort, screening XR had a sensitivity of 100% for clinically significant c-spine injuries. GCS was the most significant predictor of obtaining additional imaging. A negative XR combined with a normal physical examination in an evaluable pediatric patient is a safe way of clearing the c-spine. Level of evidence Study contains level III evidence.

BACKGROUND: Older adults value the maintenance of function as an outcome of surgery, which can be evaluated by subjective perception and objective performance. The aims of this study were to explore whether these perceptions correlate with a decline in function, as measured by decreased ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs), and to identify risk factors associated with worsened 30-day postoperative perceived physical function (PPF) in patients aged 80 years and older. STUDY DESIGN: American College of Surgeons NSQIP Geriatric Surgery Verification Pilot Program data (2015 to 2017) were used for patients aged 80 years and older. Chi-square tests were used to examine the concordance between 30-day outcomes of PPF and the quantified performance of ADLs. Multivariable logistic regression models identified risks associated with worsened PPF 30 days postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 5,464 patients from 16 hospitals were included. The mean age was 85.7 years and 63% of participants were women. At 30 days postoperatively, 33% reported functional decline, whereas 28% had worsened quantified ADL performance (K = 0.25). Twenty-one percent of patients without quantified decline reported worsened PPF. Risk factors for worsened PPF were found for patient (eg American Society of Anesthesiologists class IV and V (odds ratio [OR] 2.2, 95% CI 1.5 to 3.2)), procedure (eg orthopaedic [OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.4]), and older adult-specific characteristics (eg preoperative fall [OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.9]). CONCLUSIONS: At 30 days postsurgery, there was discordance between quantified ADL performance and PPF in patients aged 80 years and older. Although assessing ADLs is a common approach to detect functional decline and loss of independence, directly asking patients about their PPF can serve as an additional important method for identifying functional decline, ensuring that the evaluation remains patient centered.

ImportanceIdentifying factors associated with resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic can inform targeted interventions and resource allocation for groups disproportionately affected by systemic inequities.ObjectiveTo examine factors associated with self-reported resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic in racially and ethnically diverse, community-dwelling US adults.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study was conducted as part of the Collaborative Cohort of Cohorts for COVID-19 Research (C4R) study, which assessed the associations of the pandemic with self-reported resilience of participants from 14 established US prospective cohorts since January 2021. This report includes participants who responded to the self-reported resilience question on C4R questionnaires. Data was initially analyzed from October 2023 to May 2024, with updated analyses performed from August 2024 to April 2025.ExposureRace and ethnicity, behavior factors, health conditions, and social determinants of health measurements accessed before and during the COVID-19 pandemic through cohort visits and C4R questionnaires.Main Outcomes and MeasuresSelf-reported resilience was collected via 1 question (from the Brief Resilience Scale) in C4R questionnaires, “I tend to bounce back quickly after hard times.” Participants who answered agree or strongly agree were classified as resilient, and those who reported neutral, disagree, or strongly disagree were classified as not resilient. Modified Poisson regression was performed to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) and access multivariable-adjusted associations with resilience.ResultsOf 31 045 participants (18 672 [60%] women; 10 746 [34.6%] aged &amp;lt;65 years), 1185 (3.8%) identified as American Indian, 6728 (21.7%) as Black, 293 (0.9%) as East Asian, 6311 (20.3%) as Hispanic, 565 (1.8%) as South Asian, and 15 961 (51.3%) as White; a total of 23 103 participants (74.4%) self-identified as resilient. Compared with White participants, Black and Hispanic participants had higher prevalence of self-reported resilience (adjusted PR [aPR], 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06; aPR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06-1.11; respectively) and American Indian and East Asian participants had lower prevalence (aPR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.86-0.94; aPR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.84; respectively). Higher education, being married or living as married, higher income, and overweight were also associated with higher prevalence of resilience. Being female, having diabetes, and being unemployed were associated with lower prevalence of self-reported resilience. Compared with participants with public insurance only, participants with private insurance had higher prevalence of resilience (aPR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.10). COVID-19 vaccination and infection statuses were not significantly associated with resilience. Modification analyses showed important racial and ethnic differences in how factors such as hypertension, marital status, and insurance status were associated with resilience.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cross-sectional study of 31 045 adults, self-reported resilience varied by race, ethnicity, and sociodemographic factors. These findings highlight the complex interplay of individual and social factors in shaping the perception of resilience.