Daviglus, Martha

ImportanceIdentifying factors associated with resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic can inform targeted interventions and resource allocation for groups disproportionately affected by systemic inequities.ObjectiveTo examine factors associated with self-reported resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic in racially and ethnically diverse, community-dwelling US adults.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study was conducted as part of the Collaborative Cohort of Cohorts for COVID-19 Research (C4R) study, which assessed the associations of the pandemic with self-reported resilience of participants from 14 established US prospective cohorts since January 2021. This report includes participants who responded to the self-reported resilience question on C4R questionnaires. Data was initially analyzed from October 2023 to May 2024, with updated analyses performed from August 2024 to April 2025.ExposureRace and ethnicity, behavior factors, health conditions, and social determinants of health measurements accessed before and during the COVID-19 pandemic through cohort visits and C4R questionnaires.Main Outcomes and MeasuresSelf-reported resilience was collected via 1 question (from the Brief Resilience Scale) in C4R questionnaires, “I tend to bounce back quickly after hard times.” Participants who answered agree or strongly agree were classified as resilient, and those who reported neutral, disagree, or strongly disagree were classified as not resilient. Modified Poisson regression was performed to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) and access multivariable-adjusted associations with resilience.ResultsOf 31 045 participants (18 672 [60%] women; 10 746 [34.6%] aged <65 years), 1185 (3.8%) identified as American Indian, 6728 (21.7%) as Black, 293 (0.9%) as East Asian, 6311 (20.3%) as Hispanic, 565 (1.8%) as South Asian, and 15 961 (51.3%) as White; a total of 23 103 participants (74.4%) self-identified as resilient. Compared with White participants, Black and Hispanic participants had higher prevalence of self-reported resilience (adjusted PR [aPR], 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06; aPR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06-1.11; respectively) and American Indian and East Asian participants had lower prevalence (aPR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.86-0.94; aPR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.84; respectively). Higher education, being married or living as married, higher income, and overweight were also associated with higher prevalence of resilience. Being female, having diabetes, and being unemployed were associated with lower prevalence of self-reported resilience. Compared with participants with public insurance only, participants with private insurance had higher prevalence of resilience (aPR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.10). COVID-19 vaccination and infection statuses were not significantly associated with resilience. Modification analyses showed important racial and ethnic differences in how factors such as hypertension, marital status, and insurance status were associated with resilience.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cross-sectional study of 31 045 adults, self-reported resilience varied by race, ethnicity, and sociodemographic factors. These findings highlight the complex interplay of individual and social factors in shaping the perception of resilience.

Background: High adherence to the Mediterranean Diet (MeDi) was associated with better cognitive performance and decreased memory decline among Hispanic or Latino adults. Objective: Investigate if higher adherence to the MeDi improves white matter (WM) integrity among Hispanic/Latino adults and if this effect is mediated by cardiovascular health (CVH). Methods: We included 2,774 participants from the Study of Latinos-Investigation of Neurocognitive Aging-MRI Ancillary Study. Participants completed 24-hour dietary recalls at baseline (2008-2011) which were used to calculate a MeDi score (MeDiS, range 0-9). Brain MRI and diffusion tensor images were collected between 2018 and 2022 on a 3T MRI scanner using a standardized protocol. WM integrity was ascertained using WM hyperintensity (WMH) volume and fractional anisotropy (FA). WMH volumes were residualized for total cranial volume and Ln-transformed prior to analysis. The association of MRI outcomes with MeDiS and its components was investigated using weighted linear regression analysis with complex survey design adjusting for age, sex, sociodemographic characteristics. Cardiovascular health was assessed using the Life’s Simple 7 (LS7, range 0-14) score. The mediating effect of LS7 on the primary outcome was reported as Average Causal Mediation Effects (ACME) and Average Direct Effects (ADE). Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: Mean age (95% CI) at MRI scan was 64.0 (63.4 to 65.2) and 44% were males. Mean MeDiS was 5.01 (4.89 to 5.12) and LS7 was 7.1 (7.0 to 7.3). In our fully adjusted model, increasing MeDi adherence was associated with decreased LnWMH volume (β=-0.07, 95% CI -0.10 to -0.03) and increased FA (β=0.002, 95% CI 0.001 to 0.003). Increasing LS7 scores partially mediated the relationship between MeDiS and WMHs (ACME=-0.01, ADE=-0.08, p<0.05, percent mediation=9%) and between MeDiS and FA (ACME=0.0001, ADE=0.002, p<0.01, percent mediated=8%). Among the different MeDi components, consumption of whole grains and fish above sex-specific energy adjusted energy median intake predicted lower WMH volume and increase FA (p<0.05 for both). Conclusions: Among diverse Hispanic/Latino adults, high MeDi adherence was associated with preserved WM integrity. This association was partially mediated by CVH. This suggests that the beneficial effect of MeDi on brain health is not fully explained by vascular risk factors. A culturally tailored MeDi may preserve brain health among Hispanic/Latino adults.

ImportancePersistent symptoms and disability following SARS-CoV-2 infection, known as post–COVID-19 condition or “long COVID,” are frequently reported and pose a substantial personal and societal burden.ObjectiveTo determine time to recovery following SARS-CoV-2 infection and identify factors associated with recovery by 90 days.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsFor this prospective cohort study, standardized ascertainment of SARS-CoV-2 infection was conducted starting in April 1, 2020, across 14 ongoing National Institutes of Health–funded cohorts that have enrolled and followed participants since 1971. This report includes data collected through February 28, 2023, on adults aged 18 years or older with self-reported SARS-CoV-2 infection.ExposurePreinfection health conditions and lifestyle factors assessed before and during the pandemic via prepandemic examinations and pandemic-era questionnaires.Main Outcomes and MeasuresProbability of nonrecovery by 90 days and restricted mean recovery times were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to assess multivariable-adjusted associations with recovery by 90 days.ResultsOf 4708 participants with self-reported SARS-CoV-2 infection (mean [SD] age, 61.3 [13.8] years; 2952 women [62.7%]), an estimated 22.5% (95% CI, 21.2%-23.7%) did not recover by 90 days post infection. Median (IQR) time to recovery was 20 (8-75) days. By 90 days post infection, there were significant differences in restricted mean recovery time according to sociodemographic, clinical, and lifestyle characteristics, particularly by acute infection severity (outpatient vs critical hospitalization, 32.9 days [95% CI, 31.9-33.9 days] vs 57.6 days [95% CI, 51.9-63.3 days]; log-rank P &amp;lt; .001). Recovery by 90 days post infection was associated with vaccination prior to infection (hazard ratio [HR], 1.30; 95% CI, 1.11-1.51) and infection during the sixth (Omicron variant) vs first wave (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06-1.49). These associations were mediated by reduced severity of acute infection (33.4% and 17.6%, respectively). Recovery was unfavorably associated with female sex (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79-0.92) and prepandemic clinical cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-0.99). No significant multivariable-adjusted associations were observed for age, educational attainment, smoking history, obesity, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or elevated depressive symptoms. Results were similar for reinfections.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study, more than 1 in 5 adults did not recover within 3 months of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Recovery within 3 months was less likely in women and those with preexisting cardiovascular disease and more likely in those with COVID-19 vaccination or infection during the Omicron variant wave.