Ko, Clifford Y.

BACKGROUND: Older adults value the maintenance of function as an outcome of surgery, which can be evaluated by subjective perception and objective performance. The aims of this study were to explore whether these perceptions correlate with a decline in function, as measured by decreased ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs), and to identify risk factors associated with worsened 30-day postoperative perceived physical function (PPF) in patients aged 80 years and older. STUDY DESIGN: American College of Surgeons NSQIP Geriatric Surgery Verification Pilot Program data (2015 to 2017) were used for patients aged 80 years and older. Chi-square tests were used to examine the concordance between 30-day outcomes of PPF and the quantified performance of ADLs. Multivariable logistic regression models identified risks associated with worsened PPF 30 days postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 5,464 patients from 16 hospitals were included. The mean age was 85.7 years and 63% of participants were women. At 30 days postoperatively, 33% reported functional decline, whereas 28% had worsened quantified ADL performance (K = 0.25). Twenty-one percent of patients without quantified decline reported worsened PPF. Risk factors for worsened PPF were found for patient (eg American Society of Anesthesiologists class IV and V (odds ratio [OR] 2.2, 95% CI 1.5 to 3.2)), procedure (eg orthopaedic [OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.4]), and older adult-specific characteristics (eg preoperative fall [OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.9]). CONCLUSIONS: At 30 days postsurgery, there was discordance between quantified ADL performance and PPF in patients aged 80 years and older. Although assessing ADLs is a common approach to detect functional decline and loss of independence, directly asking patients about their PPF can serve as an additional important method for identifying functional decline, ensuring that the evaluation remains patient centered.

Abstract The 2007 Santa Monica Conference on Assessing and Treating Early-Stage Colon and Rectal Cancer, a multidisciplinary meeting of leaders in surgery, medical and radiation oncology, and pathology, was convened on January 12 to 13, 2007. The purpose of the meeting was to assess current data and issues in the field and to develop recommendations for advancing patient care and clinical research. Topics included pathologic assessment and staging, transanal versus laparoscopic versus open resection, adjuvant therapy, genetic testing and counseling, cooperative group strategies, and the use of biological therapies and novel agents. A review of the key issues discussed, as well as conclusions and recommendations considered significant to the field, is summarized below and presented at greater length in the individual manuscripts and accompanying discussion that comprise the full conference proceedings. Although the management of early-stage colon and rectal cancers remains a challenge for all of us, the development and use of new technologies and methods of assessment and treatment over the past several decades is yielding encouraging results. A variety of opportunities to further improve outcomes were addressed in this forum, including recommendations that specific protocols be adopted regarding surgical and pathologic dissection and reporting, particularly for stage II disease; the corollary need to increase active multidisciplinary collaboration; and the development of comprehensive consensus guidelines and recommendations to standardize care in early-stage colorectal cancer.