PURPOSE: Substantial and successful effort has been focused on decreasing the risk of local failure after rectal cancer surgery through the use of adjuvant therapies. Our study examined data from studies conducted by United States cooperative groups to investigate the impact of surgical and pathologic variables in rectal cancer outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Surgical and pathologic reports from 673 patients with stage II/III rectal cancer enrolled onto three adjuvant clinical trials were reviewed for tumor and surgical variables. Additional information on individual institutions and operating surgeon was collected. Variables were tested for association with 5-year local recurrence and survival after adjustment for adjuvant treatments and other important prognostic factors. RESULTS: Five-year local recurrence and survival rates were 16% and 59%, respectively. Surgeons treating more than 10 study cases had lower local recurrence rates than those treating ≤ 10 (11% v 17%, P = .02). Free radial margins also correlated with local recurrence (P = .01). Type of surgery, distal margins, and tumor radial spread were not significant. Tumor adherence to adjacent structures predicted local recurrence (35% v 14%, P < .001) and survival (30% v 63%, P < .001), regardless of en bloc resection. Although T and N classification predicted survival (P < .001), only N classification correlated with local recurrence. The number and percentage of positive nodes correlated with survival, but only the percentage independently predicted local recurrence. Several pathologic and surgical variables were reported suboptimally. CONCLUSION: Moderate variability in outcomes among surgeons was detected in this high-risk population. Efforts to improve surgical results will require changes in reporting practices to allow for more accurate assessment of the quality of surgery.
New Approaches to Assessing and Treating Early-Stage Colon and Rectal Cancer: Summary Statement from 2007 Santa Monica Conference
Abstract The 2007 Santa Monica Conference on Assessing and Treating Early-Stage Colon and Rectal Cancer, a multidisciplinary meeting of leaders in surgery, medical and radiation oncology, and pathology, was convened on January 12 to 13, 2007. The purpose of the meeting was to assess current data and issues in the field and to develop recommendations for advancing patient care and clinical research. Topics included pathologic assessment and staging, transanal versus laparoscopic versus open resection, adjuvant therapy, genetic testing and counseling, cooperative group strategies, and the use of biological therapies and novel agents. A review of the key issues discussed, as well as conclusions and recommendations considered significant to the field, is summarized below and presented at greater length in the individual manuscripts and accompanying discussion that comprise the full conference proceedings. Although the management of early-stage colon and rectal cancers remains a challenge for all of us, the development and use of new technologies and methods of assessment and treatment over the past several decades is yielding encouraging results. A variety of opportunities to further improve outcomes were addressed in this forum, including recommendations that specific protocols be adopted regarding surgical and pathologic dissection and reporting, particularly for stage II disease; the corollary need to increase active multidisciplinary collaboration; and the development of comprehensive consensus guidelines and recommendations to standardize care in early-stage colorectal cancer.
Changing epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of Clostridium difficile toxin-associated colitis
Abstract One hundred and ninety patients with Clostridium difficile toxin-associated colitis (CTAC) or pseudomembranous colitis (PMC) were identified, from microbiology records, disease index and proctoscopy service records, and studied retrospectively. CTAC was associated with cephalosporin antibiotic administration in 70 per cent of the patients. CTAC developed postoperatively in 108 patients after all types of surgery with no preponderance for abdominal surgery. Identification of cytotoxin in stool samples was the primary diagnostic test in 81 per cent of patients but cytotoxin was isolated in 98 per cent of all patients. Pseudomembranes visible on proctoscopy established the diagnosis in 19 per cent of patients and were more commonly seen in severe colitis (71 per cent) than in mild colitis (23 per cent). CTAC responded similarly to oral vancomycin and metronidazole with a relapse rate of 20–23 per cent, respectively. With its association with cephalosporin administration, CTAC is likely to occur with increasing frequency in surgical practice. Oral metronidazole is an effective, cheap, alternative to vancomycin therapy.
AbstractIncreased attention to surgical indications and technique can minimize the risks of recurrent rectal cancer. In addition, the use of adjuvant chemoradiation therapy has been shown to further decrease the risks of recurrent rectal cancer. In the event a recurrence develops, surgical therapy, combined with radiation therapy, can result in local control in as many as 75% of patients and long term survival in 25% to 40% of patients.
AbstractAn account is given of the evolution of proctocolectomy with construction of a pelvic ileal pouch and an ileoanal anastomosis, which has probably become the most popular elective operation at the present time for ulcerative colitis. The technique favored by the author for this procedure is described and the results obtained in 422 cases at the Mayo Clinic are analyzed, with 188 of them analyzed in detail. Outstanding issues regarding technical methods and outcome are discussed.
AbstractThe EEA stapler is a convenient, well‐designed, and reliable instrument. It will anastomose the bowel with reliability and speed at least equivalent to hand‐sewn techniques, and probably offers a technical advantage in performing very low rectal anastomoses. Unfortunately, intraoperative misadventures are greater with this device than with hand‐sewn techniques, and its use would seem best restricted to those situations in which it has its greatest advantage. Postoperative complications are not increased by its use, but the long‐term incidence of anastomotic stricture and possibly increased rate of local recurrence need to be clarified.