Wolff, B. G.

Abstract Anal canal length, anal canal resting and squeeze pressures, ileal pouch capacity and pouch compliance were measured in 104 patients after ileal pouch—anal anastomosis but before ileostomy closure. The intention was to determine if such parameters were associated with late functional outcome after re-establishment of intestinal continuity. Functional outcome in terms of stool frequency (day and night), incontinence (day and night), perianal pad use, perianal skin irritation, and the use of constipating agents was assessed for all 104 patients 1 year or more (median 438 days) after ileostomy closure. A low mean anal sphincter resting pressure before ileostomy closure was associated with subsequent nocturnal incontinence (P < 0·05) and, to a lesser extent, the need to use constipating agents (P = 0·08). Pouch compliance if low before ileostomy closure was associated with an increased frequency of nocturnal stool frequency after 1 year (P < 0·05). Anal canal length, anal sphincter squeeze pressure and pouch capacity before ileostomy closure were not related to subsequent functional outcome in these patients.

Abstract Electrocautery is widely used for dissection of tissues and cauterization of blood vessels. A visible plume of smoke is produced, which has an unpleasant odour and can induce acute and chronic inflammatory changes in the respiratory tract'. Airborne particles arc not effectively filtered or evacuated by operating room scavenging systems and facial masks only offer protection from large particles. Little is known about the chemical composition of this smoke and the health risks to the operating room staff have not been identified. The aim of this study was to determine the chemical composition of electrocautery smoke produced in the course of standard colorectal surgery.

AbstractThe EEA stapler is a convenient, well‐designed, and reliable instrument. It will anastomose the bowel with reliability and speed at least equivalent to hand‐sewn techniques, and probably offers a technical advantage in performing very low rectal anastomoses. Unfortunately, intraoperative misadventures are greater with this device than with hand‐sewn techniques, and its use would seem best restricted to those situations in which it has its greatest advantage. Postoperative complications are not increased by its use, but the long‐term incidence of anastomotic stricture and possibly increased rate of local recurrence need to be clarified.